“Death threats” seem to be the standard PR tactic to manage activist backlash, so this is probably not true. If these threats were real they would amount to a confirmed terrorist threat from transgender activists, and transgender activism would, by the same token, risk being classified as a terrorist movement. Based on these considerations, plus the support for Deves’ views being expressed by Jacinta Price (in front of “uncomfortable looking” Scott Morrison) I infer that this is an intentional electoral strategy, developing association with anti-radical views without taking a direct stance on the issue. In short, playing conservative without openly denouncing the radicals.

It is reasonable to conclude, all things considered, that Ukraine was set up for de-nazification by the western powers and globalists. They armed them, feigned ideological support for the Ukrainian ultranationalists who were waving the Blood and Soil flag (a symbol of “racial purity” used historically by Banderites and SS alike to motivate ethnic cleansing of Belarusians, Latvians, Poles and Jews). In short, other nations gave enough rope to Ukrainian Nazis to suicide by Putin, and it seems few if any of them will be allowed to survive, prohibited by Zelensky from surrendering. This is the only plausible explanation I can see for Israel arming and ostensibly supporting actual Nazis.

Elon Musk has released his Hyperloop “white paper” (a few rough drawings of a pneumatically suspended vehicle in a vacuum tunnel, with no calculations to speak of to back up the design, with an aerodynamically nonsensical compressor/fan on the nose:)) about one year after I published my HSTV design. Another US consortium has subsequently scooped up my IP for the ‘through-vaccum’ air supply valve, under the guise of collaboration, then ghosted me. I wonder… https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1275

What is the difference between Fascism and Communism?

Communists kill the most competent people first, then work their way down.

Fascists kill the least competent people first, then work their way up.

Next on TEDx: “Necrophilia is a natural sexual orientation, you bigots!”

There is no redemption possible for NSA Twitter.

Twitter is a virtual space where humans can share their thoughts with one another. At USD 44 Billion price tag, what else does it do?

Based on the recent valuation of Twitter at USD44 Billion, and considering there are 200 million active users, the price is roughy $220 per user. Elon Musk has effectively paid enough to have sex with each and every one of Twitter users (street price), but those users (despite being used) will not see this money; Twitter shareholders (the pimps: Vanguard, Blackrock etc) will. Or did he just buy your soul? 🔥

Inflation is not an organic, unavoidable consequence of “the market”; it is a policy decision. It is always intentional because inflation is a transfer of wealth from the entire economy to the banks… but first some basics. There are only two parameters that control inflation: a) the total volume of trade in a given period of time b) the total supply of money in the economy that is available to consumers. A third theoretical parameter is the velocity of money, but the changes in velocity are negligible in any relatively stable economy. In simple terms, the entire supply of money “chases” all the goods and services in the economy. If the same volume of money chases fewer good, prices go up. If more money chases the same supply of goods, prices go up. Assuming that the rate of consumption remains constant or growing, and there is significant price inflation, this unequivocally proves that banks are issuing more credit, therefore charging more interest. All the money in circulation with the exception of cash is just someone’s debt to the banking system, which attracts interest. It follows that all inflation under zero or positive growth is the gross profit of the banks. Banks decide how much and under what conditions they will issue credit, and bank credit is the M3 money supply (the money you “keep” in your bank account, which is 98% of all money in use, is made by the banks, at interest).

Causes of Inflation

CPI/Inflation is an aggregate measure for the entire economy, with only some “volatile” goods excluded. Let us assume a fixed amount of money in circulation. If, for example, the price of fertiliser goes up because of military conflict in Ukraine, this means that more money is directed towards buying fertiliser, leaving less money for other goods and services, and thus lowering the prices of those other goods and services. The net effect is still zero overall inflation. For inflation to rise due to supply chain issues there must be a disruption to all core supply chains, not just one. Covid restrictions have achieved that, but there is also an inexplicable policy shift among international shipping companies or seaport authorities to slow down supply chains. Even local supply chains are still inexplicably restricted. In addition, the glowing real estate prices force buyers to borrow ever more money to own a home, which has a direct effect of inflating the money supply: 98% of money in circulation is bank credit that someone took out and spent, but no matter where in the economy this money is, it attracts interest payable to the banks. This second factor is definitely a bank lending policy decision, with the loan guarantee scheme by the Government adding fuel to the fire. Everything is set up to justify a rapid increase of interest rates; again, this is a policy decision to decimate debtors, and the government, RBA or the banks are not telling the truth about the real reasons inflation is high. They are doing it, and they will raise interest rates, and anyone with debt will suffer like in the Great Depression. It will be slaughter… Unless there is another agenda, monetary substitution with a new sovereign currency, but we wont know until the day this happens.

Why would anyone invest hundreds of hours of their time to create content and grow a community on a platform that can lock you out at a drop of a hat if they dont like you. Twitter cannot be trusted.

EpiPen will not fix the public acquiescence to the removal of the right to free medical contents from their own children and from future generations. There must be consequences. They must atone.

Compliance with vaccine mandates is a blood bond, a collective crime of acquiescence to the removal of the right to free medical consent from our children and future generations, and if this moral wrong is to be normalised for the future generations then those who teach children must be themselves guilty but in denial, must be complicit but believe that what they did was right, so that they themselves will want to normalise their crime to evade the realisation of guilt and the associated liability.

This alleged plan neatly fits the hypothesis that both EU and Russia want to exterminate ultra-nationalists in Ukraine (incite them to suicide by Putin), because the ultimate agenda is to split Ukraine in half: the western part to be reunited with Poland (and so automatically becomes a part of EU), while the eastern side becomes Russia. Sounds like EU and Russia made a secret deal, because Ukrainian nationalists stood in the way of creating the ultimate economic union, combining the technology and management of the EU with Russia’s resources. And the key to the puzzle is again supplied by Henry Kissinger: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/henry-kissinger-to-settle-the-ukraine-crisis-start-at-the-end/2014/03/05/46dad868-a496-11e3-8466-d34c451760b9_story.html

Persuasive Action (Vaccine Mandates)

Consider formally asking your Employer/Institution/University/MP what steps have they taken to eliminate the risk of harm posed by their acquiescence to the removal of the right to free medical consent from their employees/members/students/constituents.

If the relevant institution has mandated vaccines on their own initiative, you could reword accordingly, for example: ‘I understand that the University requires that all employees and students must be vaccinated against Covid-19 to access the University facilities/sites. What steps have you taken to eliminate the risk of harm posed by your removal of the right to free medical consent from your students and employees?’

Hypothesis: Voter Fraud is a persuasive tool designed to facilitate popular acceptance of Digital ID. They will make sure that the biggest perverts, traitors and scoundrels (who are carefully selected for their aberrant tendencies to humiliate you) will keep winning by voter fraud, until you submit. After that, votes will no longer matter; their sole legal function will be is to document your consent to delegate your speck of sovereignty to the rulers, and thus justify their authority over you (‘for the greater good’).

In times of great change humans tend to impulsively react rather than act consciously towards a rational aim. We fear losing our bearing, our conceptually fixed points of reference that gave us the stability of value and meaning. Our propensity to be traumatised by radical change and to react impulsively to this perceived existential threat (it is an existential threat to our self-image constructed in terms of the normalised past) makes us susceptible to manipulation, because it motivates us to act now, to fight or to run, to respond as if we were drowning, rather than calmly observe and understand the unfolding change. A robust response to radical change must also involve observing and trying to understand the aspects of ourselves that are threatened by the change. Why are they threatened? Why should things that happen externally threaten what we are to ourselves, the integrity of our Self. Are those aspects perhaps deficient, defective, aliens to us; imaginary appendages that did not belong to us in the first place but we took them for our own, because we were conceited, deluded, mistaken, lazy, therefore already lacking self-integration. A Sage one said: that which endures though change is real, that which is subject change is not. Without a permanent part of the Self there would be no continuity of our being, and without continuity of being there would be no being, because being is conceivable only in time, as something that lasts over a duration. We must therefore be clear, discover which aspect of ourselves is permanent, the thread on which all the changing aspects of being are still attributed to the same Self. In times of stability and order only a handful of Sages were motivated to pursue this challenge, but times of great change force all of us to see ourselves for what we are, if we are anything at all. On the other side of a painful process of transformation we might just be grateful for that opportunity. That which is permanent need neither fight nor run.