Rest assured that whomever the global banking cartel has nominated to win the war, will win the war.

Joe Hildebrand implies that his acquiescence to the taking away of the right to free medical consent from our children and future generations is not only legitimate but a moral obligation, if you (like him) disapprove of the admittedly unreasonable lockdowns. Another way, if you refuse to sacrifice the freedom of your children to the government, and if you are not willing to sacrifice the lives of the few for the temporary benefit of the many, then you are “recalcitrant”, selfish “hypocrites”. There are three possibilities that I can see here: a) Joe has not learned from history what happens when people lose the right to free medical consent, or b) he knows, but wants to cause harm, c) he is playing a villain to teach you something and to help you discover the right reasons for disagreeing with him. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/proof-covid-antivaxxers-have-totally-missed-the-point/news-story/1a80b32bf49d22fe0cdb7638f2b98b0a

If you think that my efforts documented here are objectively valuable or directly beneficial to your interests, if I am doing something for you that you cannot do as effectively, then please consider making a donation. What you see on this channel is not whipped up at the spur of the moment but is backed by 30 years of hard study. Moreover, maintaining the quality and relevance of the arguments takes a lot of research, a lot of time that could be invested in leisure or paid work. Thank You if you have already contributed. https://ko-fi.com/michaelkowalik

People are more likely to oppose the oppression and injustice in distant countries than to defend the freedom of their own children. There are three possible causes of this bias: a) the effectiveness of local public diplomacy (propaganda) convinces the oppressed that they are free and the local oppressive measures are justifiable; b) it takes less courage to confront unjust situations where one does not have skin in the game, than those where the state apparatus can inflict immediate punishment for insubordination; c) the state propaganda may intentionally divert public outrage from local oppression towards the oppression of distant others.

Science and bio-engineering do not transcend natural selection but are still subject to it. Defective scientific assumptions or conclusions, defective evaluations of bio-engineering objectives, are also evolutionary end points. The idea that humans are biologically deterministic is one of such assumptions. Self-reflexive consciousness breaks determinism, because it can infinitely amplify finite content akin to two mirrors facing one another, which in turn permits randomness to enter and for lucid selection from these non-deterministic possibilities. Our biological structure imposes bias on this selection, acting as a chaotic attractor, which can indeed be near-deterministic for low depth of conscious reflexivity. The greater the depth of reflexion the less deterministic we become. In essence, the more we act as animals, the more we embrace our animality, driven by impulse, feelings, urges or emotions, the more we are determined by extrinsic stimuli, therefore more controllable. The more we act as conscious rational beings, the more we work to transcend our animality, the less we are bound by biology. Humanity, in this sense, transcends both biology and determinism, but this transcendent quality is a matter of degree that depends on our individual development as conscious rational beings. https://twitter.com/TGA2024/status/1495805626836201473

New Study: Pfizer Covid vaccine may damage human DNA.

“Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects. At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity, including whole genome sequencing of cells exposed to BNT162b2, as well as tissues from human subjects who received BNT162b2 vaccination.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73

On the Legitimacy of Authority

No political system or process has the capacity to legitimise authority. Democracy is just a recent pretence at legitimising the rule of the majority over the minority, whereas the divine right of kings purported to legitimise the rule of minority over the majority. The only consistent, irrefutable source of authority is objective morality, that which is right according to the conditions of rational consciousness. Real authority cannot be owned or delegated by anyone to anyone; it is the logical structure of being that everyone is subject to. Anyone can embody it by consistently acting according to it. Those who embody authority may appear as if they themselves are the authority, but they are merely faithful servants of it. There are no legitimate rulers and never could be.

I stand with Dostoevsky. I stand with Mussorgsky. I stand with Prokofiev. I stand with Stravinsky. I stand with Borodin. I stand with Yevgeny Ivanovich Zamyatin. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/76171.We

The advocates of immunisation believe that it is necessary to challenge the immune system by injecting a tolerable dosage of dangerous pathogens in order to acquire immunity. They also typically advocate the frequent use of hand sanitiser, which eliminates countless tolerable germs that we naturally rely on to continuously challenge our immune system and thus maintain strong adaptive immunity. The use of hand-sanitiser is anti-immunisation.

Propaganda

Under the influence of propaganda one does not feel manipulated; it endows certainly of moral conscience, emotional clarity, unquestionable correctness of thought. The more emotional clarity we have and the stronger is our sense of moral right, the more rigorously we must question ourselves, we must learn to doubt ourselves, because we make errors of judgments, especially when confronted with shocking events. This is precisely why propaganda aims to stir primal emotions, provoke terror and anxiety, because the primal, animal brain does not think rationally but reacts to existentially challenging stimulus in a predictable fashion. Be more more rational, less emotional, if you want to be free.

Two Kinds of Love

In one sense, Love is not an emotion but a state of consciousness, a state of special awareness of another, whereas any emotion that is interpreted as love, you know, the kind of ‘love’ that makes you crave, miss, yearn, that makes you jealous or, simply, one that moves you to action, is something else, something less than Love, something that makes you dependent, that binds you, is more primal and less conscious, less human, more animal. Beware of those who equivocate between these two kinds of love.

Ukraine Far Right Extremism and Terrorism Threat Assessment (West Point Academy)

Abstract: Neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups in the United States and Europe have become more active and dangerous in the last decade and have developed a much deeper online presence. This has helped them establish closer transnational contacts. One common preoccupation for both individuals and groups has been the conflict in Ukraine, where a well-established far-right extremist movement and its associated militia have consistently engaged with and welcomed far-right ideologues and fighters from other parts of Europe and North America. https://ctc.usma.edu/the-nexus-between-far-right-extremists-in-the-united-states-and-ukraine/

It appears that the trade sanctions imposed on Russia will take out the top global exporter of fertilisers (about 17% of the global fertiliser supply): https://www.statista.com/statistics/1278057/export-value-fertilizers-worldwide-by-country/

Almost forgot, the trade sanctions against Russia will also shut out about 25% of global wheat, flour and wheat products: https://www.statista.com/statistics/190429/principal-exporting-countries-of-wheat-flour-and-products/

Did I mention that Russia is currently the biggest producer of Crude Oil in the world? Yes, that part will be off the market too. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/oil-producing-countries

Critique of Nativism

Your heritage consists of the intergenerationally developed structures and principles we carry in our minds. You can ignore them, you can reject them, you can instead choose the fleeting popular culture or ideology that will subvert and erase your heritage, but even without the countless diversions it takes a great effort to preserve your heritage, to understand and cultivate it, to claim it, because without cultivation it will become polluted by error, and will be forgotten, and your Self will dis-integrate and turn against itself, lost for meaning. So do not be distracted by nationalistic ideals, by the nativist pride or by tribal “identity”. You are nothing, you belong nowhere, and you are owed nothing apart from what is inside of you, and only that which is inside of you, the human heritage you were able to assimilate and cultivate, is a testimony of your value to others. This heritage is a product of humanity, of rational consciousness, and no nation or tribe can claim monopoly on meaning. On the flipside, land ownership and nationahood are primarily economic constructs, places of collaboration and effort, and the main reason for restricting access to national territory is to prevent free-for-all expropriation of value generated by others. On another level, nation-states are socio-cultural experiments, trying out different approaches to managing human needs and disagreements, and of meaningful co-existence in relatively autonomous areas, so that comparison, mutual evaluation and learning are possible.

Junk Science from Nature

A new research paper (in the News today) submitted to Nature suggests that even mild Covid infection causes brain and cognitive degeneration. The most glaring problems with this study:

1) “Information on the vaccination status (except for those identified through lateral flow test), and how both vaccination dates might interact with the date of infection, is also currently unavailable.” Strangely, the authors do not report or analyse the effect of vaccination status even where known. It is therefore possible that only infections following vaccination were associated with the degenerative effect.

2) Another confounder is the possible presence of degenerative brain disease before infection in those who showed the degenerative effect after infection. The authors reported a pattern of lower brain volumes and cognitive abilities in those who subsequently become infected with Covid. They assert without evidence that this could not explain their findings. “While the two groups were not significantly different across major demographic and risk factor variables, we identified a subtle pattern of lower cognitive abilities in the participants who went on to be infected, but this could not explain away our longitudinal findings. The future positive cases also showed lower subcortical volume, and higher diffusion abnormalities at baseline compared with the controls, in brain regions not overlapping with our longitudinal results.“

3) Only positive cases who were unvaccinated were re-tested to confirm the positive result, therefore those who were vaccinated had a greater likelihood of being false positives. This obvious bias allows for the possibility that it was not Covid infection that produced the degenerative effect, but the vaccine, irrespective of infection.”Participants were also invited to take a home-based lateral flow (Fortress Fast COVID-19 Home test, Fortress Diagnostics and ABC-19TM Rapid Test, Abingdon Health) to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. A second kit was sent to all participants who recorded an initial positive result and who had indicated they had not yet been vaccinated, in order to reduce the number of false positives.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04569-5

I do not understand what is happening in Ukraine. It doesn’t make sense how Russia is playing this and all the commentary in the news media is nonsense. Something else is going on, but I do not know what. I have presented some hypotheses above, but here is another one. Since Russia is not using their state of the art equipment or much of their standing force in this invasion, but more or less match the equipment and capacity of the Ukrainian defenders, it is possible that they are trying to draw out the fighting and bleed Ukraine slowly, in an even fight (while using only a small fraction of its fighting capacity), while indirectly causing maximum economic disruption to the rest of the world. At the same time they can expect to draw all the nationalistic fanatics into combat and little by little kill them off, thereby securing a more peaceful, less aggressive social mix when they will finally have to leave Ukraine. In this way Russia could mitigate the future risk of any renewed fighting, revenge terrorism, or massacres in the autonomous, Russian speaking regions. On the other side of the fence, Zelensky is enthusiastically assisting Russia to accomplish this hypothetical objective, inciting Ukrainian males and boys to fight despite zero chances of success. I would not be hugely surprised if Zelensky were a Russian agent.

The world has an inequality problem - intelligence-inequality problem. When differences in intelligence are high, the smarter people cannot be understood by the least intelligent people, they cannot come to agreement about critical issues because the conceptual resolution at which they view reality is too different. This in turn compels the smarter minority to lie to the less intelligent majority, creating a sharply demarcated, two class society. I suspect that somewhere in the logic of the Reset, this point carries great weight. They don’t know how to deal with the threat posed by the stupidity of the masses apart from a) continuous manipulation (which is unreliable and exhausting), b) mandatory, targeted medication or bio-hacking (which is unethical), or c) extermination (which is grotesque and would be psychologically damaging to the elites themselves). I suspect they agreed on b).