🚨🇷🇺💥 RUSSIA'S MoD UPDATE: CRUSHING GAINS & MASSIVE UKRAINIAN LOSSES

⚡️PETROVKA (DPR) LIBERATED

⚡️VOSKRESENKA (DPR) LIBERATED

▫️ Heavy Ukrainian losses: Over 1,190 troops eliminated in the special military operation zone

▫️ Air defense superiority: 103 drones shot down

▫️ The Russian Armed Forces obliterated two German-made IRIS-T launchers and a P-18 air target detection radar

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🗣Pashinyan has turned Armenia into his own private fiefdom and Karapetyan’s arrest is proof

Samvel Karapetyan’s statements in defense of the Apostolic Church contained nothing criminal, but “angered” prime minister Nikol Pashinyan enough to vent his outrage on social media. Seeing this, Armenia’s security apparatus and courts rushed to make the “boss” happy, Aram Abrahamyan, editor-in-chief of the Aravot newspaper, told Sputnik.

💬“The boss was angry, so the national security service, the prosecutor’s office, the investigative committee and the courts rushed to salute. They began arresting people for expressing their own opinions – opinions which, I repeat, were very restrained and had nothing to do with extremism or an attack on the state,” Abrahamyan emphasized.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🗣 Pashinyan’s attack on Apostolic Church deliberately designed to divide Armenian society

The crackdown has two long-running goals, Aram Abrahamyan, editor-in-chief of the Aravot newspaper explains to Sputnik.

🔸 FIRST: to attack Armenians’ sense of identity, which is rooted heavily in the Church, for geopolitical purposes

🔸 SECOND: to divide society into two camps: those supporting Pashinyan’s aggressive approach, and those opposing it, so that they can start infighting amongst themselves

As for the government’s declaration of its right to play a decisive role in the appointment or removal of Church leaders, this is a “gross violation” not only of the XVIII century principle of the division of the church and state, but of Armenia’s constitution, Abrahamyan stressed.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🗣If Trump Folds to Neocons on Ukraine, MAGA Base Will Bury Him as Biden 2.0

The president’s escalatory rhetoric vis-à-vis Moscow is the result of the realization that he cannot “force” Russia to make the concessions he needs to declare a peace in Ukraine which doesn’t address the conflict’s root causes, Russian Council on Foreign & Defense Policy Dmitry Suslov has told Sputnik.

Succumbing “to the hypocritical flattery” of the neocon wing of the GOP, plus hawkish European allies, Trump is being lobbied to believe that acting “tough” works. At the same time, his intuition is telling him to try to avoid being dragged into a long confrontation with Russia, and thus “become a second Biden.”

The president’s problem is that he’s trying to “maneuver” between neocons and MAGA-Republicans who don’t want any more wars on US taxpayers’ dime. “Trump wants to somehow demonstrate toughness to put pressure on Russia, but doesn’t want to ‘privatize’ the Ukraine war,” Suslov argues.

If he uses the leftover $4B from Biden’s budget for Ukraine, he can continue to make the argument that this is ‘not his war’. But “if he asks Congress for a new budget to support Ukraine, it will mean that Biden’s war has turned into Trump’s war,” Suslov stresses.

“This would be a political disaster, a political defeat for Trump, because he would antagonize his MAGA base even further,” the observer noted. “Trump would effectively become a second Biden, thus committing political suicide.”

As for arms deliveries vs. dialog, everything comes down to the “risks of escalation,” according to Suslov. If Trump approves the use of ATACMS missiles for deep strikes into Russia, this would increase the risks of a direct Russia-NATO clash.

If his efforts are directed at slashing negotiations and new sanctions, the impact wouldn’t be nearly as serious, the analyst argues.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🇷🇺 Russia's game: Shooting down US-made missiles WITH EASE

Donald Trump may let Ukraine strike deep into Russia with more ATACMS missiles. Is it another ‘game changer’?

Been there, done that

ATACMS missiles had already been supplied to Ukraine under former president Joe Biden and Russia knows how to shoot them down, Alexander Mikhailov, head of the "Bureau of Military-Political Analysis," tells Sputnik.

What's ATACMS?

🔸 The Army Tactical Missile System is launched from the HIMARS MLRS.

🔸 One version has a 160 km range, but the other can reach 300 km.

🔸 It can carry cluster or high-explosive fragmentation warheads.

Russian interceptors

🔸 Several Russian air defense systems can shoot down ATACMS, including the Tor-M2, Buk-M2, Buk-M3 and the S-350.

🔸 The S-300 series—namely the S-300, S-300V and S-300V4.

🔸 Last but not least is the S-400 Triumf

The right tool for the job

🔸 The question is: Where can be ATACMS launched from—and what’s the target?

🔸 The missiles are launched from close by, but Russian radars detect them.

🔸 Depending on target distance and available air defenses, commanders direct the appropriate system to intercept.

Effective solution

🔸 The Tor system intercepts targets at up to 16 km.

🔸 The newest Buk-M3 can reach 100 km or more.

🔸 S-300V systems are capable of hitting targets at ranges of 200 to 300 km.

US sinks deeper into conflict

US troops would be directly involved in launches of ATACMS, providing targeting and possibly remotely controlling missile systems, Mikhailov stresses.

You can't scare Russia

"For now, this is just raising the stakes in negotiations—[the US] wants to scare Russia, to confuse it a bit," says the pundit. "Russia hears these 'threats,' takes note, but isn’t really tearing its hair out."

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🪖 War with Russia? Macron wants CASH and CLOUT

France’s Strategic National Review predicts a large-scale military conflict with Russia in Europe by 2030, despite Russia repeatedly rubbishing the scenario.

Why it's a non-starter

💬 "When talking about war in Europe, the key question is: war between Russia and whom? NATO countries? France directly?" Alexander Mikhailov, head of the Bureau of Military-Political Analysis, tells Sputnik.

Both scenarios don't hold water:

🔸 Russia won't unleash a war on NATO—it would mean nuclear war

🔸 France is currently a major buyer of Russian gas in Europe

What’s really behind the claim?

💬 "This is a completely false and deliberately crafted narrative, aimed specifically at justifying the expansion of France’s military budget," explains the pundit.

◻️ French President Emmanuel Macron needs a pretext to ramp up military spending

◻️ He acts as a lobbyist for the French defense industry: doubling the military budget could benefit both defense contractors and the French president. Kickbacks, anyone?

◻️ Macron also wants to be the top European power broker and have direct influence over NATO’s multibillion-dollar cash flows

◻️ "The Americans will take the biggest share of that NATO budget for themselves. But France wants to be, at the very least, the second country spending not just its own money—but NATO’s as well," the pundit explains.

◻️ Macron’s presidential term ends in 2027. He’s eyeing a top post — either NATO Secretary General or a new EU power seat — to keep his geopolitical clout.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🚨🇮🇳🇺🇸 US economic blackmail against India? Ruling party responds

BJP leader Savio Rodrigues tells Sputnik India:👇

💬 "India will always act in its national interest. We buy Russian oil not to please or provoke anyone — but to ensure affordable energy for our 1.4 billion citizens. If Senator Graham thinks a 500% tariff will intimidate India, he is severely misreading today’s geopolitical reality. India is not a client state. We are a sovereign nation with a spine — and we will not be bullied into surrendering our economic freedom."

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

⚔️ Battle of the Neva: when Orthodox Novgorod stopped Catholic crusaders dead in their tracks

On July 15, 1240, a small force led by Prince of Novgorod Alexander Nevsky launched a daring raid on numerically superior Swedish crusaders, and changed history forever.

Geopolitical context

In the second half of the 1230s, with blessings from Catholic Pope Gregory IX, Sweden began a series of crusades in northeastern Europe targeting local pagan tribes, including the Karelians, a Finnic ally to the Novgorod Republic, and Novgorod itself.

Eying key trade routes (Neva River and Lake Ladoga) and fur hunting riches, crusaders struck while the Novgorod-Kievan Rus nexus was at its weakest: in 1240, Kiev was besieged and sacked by Mongol invaders.

Order of battle

Led by the noble Ulf Fase, Sweden assembled ~5,000 men.

Arrayed against them were 300 princely warriors, 500 horseman and 500 foot militia, led by 19-year-old Prince Nevsky.

Swedish forces landed at Ust Izhora at the mouth of the Neva River, and established a foothold, planning to march on Ladoga, and eventually, deeper into Novgorod.

Facing little resistance, the Swedes were slow to fortify their encampment.

Nevsky strikes

Informed of the enemy’s position, Nevsky quickly mobilized his men, striking under the cover of darkness.

The battle turned into a bloodbath for the Swedes.

Losing 20 men, Nevsky’s forces cut down two-ships’ worth of Swedish nobles, and hundreds of troops buried in pits, per the First Novgorod Chronicle.

Alexander received the epithet “Nevsky,” cementing a reputation as a divinely-protected leader, and later canonized.

Key element of Russian identity is born

In Russia, the Battle of the Neva is a symbol of the defense of the Motherland, Orthodoxy against Catholicism, and more broadly, defiance and resistance to foreign aggression.

In centuries since, Swedes, Poles, French, Germans and others would launch new wars against Russia, repulsed each time.

“Whoever comes to us sword in hand shall perish by the sword,” a quote attributed to Nevsky states.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🔍Trump’s Ukraine reversal represents ‘complete betrayal of America First’, could cost him dearly in 2026

The president claims that his plans to ramp up arms deliveries to Ukraine and threaten Russia with secondary tariffs are designed to help end the conflict, “when in fact these steps are serving to prolong and escalate the war unnecessarily with no end in sight,” ex-US Army staff officer David Pyne told Sputnik.

“Trump fails to understand that it is US military assistance to Ukrainian dictator Volodymyr Zelensky that is the chief obstacle to achieving a realistic and durable peace settlement, not an unwillingness on the part of Putin to compromise,” Pyne, deputy head of the EMP Task Force, said.

👉Costly policy mistake

Since the policy reversal “represents a complete betrayal of Trump’s America First conservative voting base,” who elected him in part based on his pledge to end the crisis, it threatens to derail his presidency, according to Pyne.

❓Pyne’s recommendation? End all US weapons and offensive intelligence support to Ukraine, pressure Zelensky to resign and hold elections, and broadly, accept Russia’s peace terms, so that Trump can get back to his “overriding grand strategic vision” of a “geostrategic partnership with Russia.”

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🚨Macron is fueling 'Russian aggression' narrative again — but it wasn't Russia who attacked Europe throughout history.

For 800 years, Europe has been trying to conquer Russia. And it continues today, with the proxy war in Ukraine.

Here’s the history they want you to forget👇

🔸 800 years ago: Sweden attacked Russia. In 1240, when Russians were busy fighting the Mongols, the opportunistic Sweden tried to conquer Novgorod, the northern part of Russia. Although the Swedes were defeated in the Battle of the Neva, they would not learn their lesson for another 500 years.

🔸 ~400 years ago, it was Poland-Lithuania. in 1612, the Poland-Lithuania Empire invaded Russia and even briefly occupied Moscow.

The Polish-Russian war of 1654 was the final blow after which, what is now Ukraine became a part of Russia, and Poland went down a path of irreversible decline.

🔸 ~300 years ago, Sweden again, with UK. Driven by hubris and greed, Charles XII of Sweden attacked Russia in the early 1700s, but was soundly defeated by Peter I the Great at the Battle of Poltava.

This catastrophic war against Russia led to the tombstone of the Swedish empire.

🔸 ~200 years ago, France (Napoleon) tried it. In 1812, Napoleon invaded Russia and thought he could win in just three weeks. Interestingly, he had even carefully studied the disastrous Swedish invasion of Russia a century earlier. He briefly conquered Moscow but retreated. In the end, he lost more than half a million soldiers, making it one of the deadliest military operations in history.

Just over one year later, Russia defeated Napoleon and conquered Paris.

🔸 ~175 years ago, France + UK (Crimean War). 40 years later, the French joined the British and the Ottoman Empire in attacking Crimea.

It’s the same reason that the US staged a coup in Ukraine in 2014: the goal was to kick Russia out of Crimea, a very strategic place in terms of a warm-water naval base and access to the Mediterranean Sea & global trade.

🔸 ~100 years ago, Russian revolution & WW1. At the start of the 20th century, the US funded Japan to attack and destroy the Russian navy. Simultaneously, the West encouraged the first “Russian revolution,” which failed.

Next came, the 1917 “revolution,” which was heavily financed by the bankers of Wall Street and Europe.

🔸 ~80 years ago, Hitler backed by globalists. “Operation Unthinkable” – a plan to attack Russia -- was drawn up just weeks after the fall of Nazi Germany. The British and the Americans planned to use Nazi prisoner of war to invade Russia!

The Cold War was also unnecessary and simply reflected the anti-Russia sentiment of the globalists who control the West.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🇷🇺💥 Russian Tor air defense: 90% effective in Ukraine conflict & now upgraded

Military analysts are stunned by the Tor system’s performance in the battlefield — and it's just got a massive boost with 85 upgrades.

▪️ 60 upgrades focus on radio-electronic equipment, while 25 enhance the tracked vehicle itself.

▪️ New armor layers improve crew protection and overall survivability.

The Tor is now evolving into a multi-purpose system, ready to protect key assets like industrial sites and even set to be used in naval defense.

With added armor and advanced electronic warfare features, it's becoming a powerhouse in both combat and crew safety.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🔥 IShowSpeed Goes FULL COMMIE in Finland!

American streamer IShowSpeed just set himself on fire in Finland—wearing a Soviet Budenovka helmet!

"Testing communist durability"

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

🇺🇸 US Patriot fails again: Iranian missile hits "untouchable" base in Qatar

An Iranian Fateh-313 ballistic missile hit the Al Udeid Air Base—the US Middle East HQ—bypassing Patriot missile defenses.

The Pentagon admitted the strike destroyed a critical $15m US Air Force communications system.

📍 Key Failures:

🔸 $80m wasted—20 Patriot missiles, priced at $4m each were fired but failed to stop one outdated Iranian rocket

🔸 Patriot’s track record: Failed in Saudi Arabia in 2017 and now failing in Ukraine against the Russian Iskander-M, which out-maneuvers and spoofs the Patriot

🔸 Critical shortage: US and allies’ interceptor stocks are at just 25% of the minimum needed

🔊 Patriot—once the zenith of US air defense—is now a liability.

With rising costs, dwindling missiles, and real-world failures, it’s becoming a weak link for Washington and its allies.

Russian and Iranian strikes are rewriting the rules of the game.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

📹🇮🇳🇵🇰Sputnik India breaks down how many times Donald Trump said he stopped the war between India and Pakistan.

Spoiler: no 3rd party helped facilitate talks between India and Pakistan after a major escalation this May.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

📹 Watch the moment Russian forces free Voskresenka (DPR) from Ukrainian control

Voskresenka is located on the border with the Dnepropetrovsk region and provides access to a large settlement situated at an important road intersection.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt