Pt 1-

Had a bit of an epiphany during the night.

We were one of the first to sense the "civil war" narrative being pushed by certain echelons of the establishment as well as certain 'groups' of people.

The one thing we weren't so sure about was why.

The initial thinking was to make the UK and Europe a Lebanon style country so as real Nationlists would be unable to do much if they ever took power but this was always a bit flimsy.

However, I have been thinking about why would Elon Musk be as prominent as he is with Robinson etc. Funding Ben Habib as well.

Why is Trump saying Sadiq Khan wants to bring in Sharia Law?

Why would Vance have said the UK will be the first euro-Islamic country with Nuclear weapons?

Then it hit me.

The 'civil war' they are so desperate to kick off is to turn the UK into a distressed asset.

People are so naive to think that Trump, Musk, Peter Thiel etc actually care about them.

These guys and the US in general is built on disaster capitalism and scooping up resources on the cheap.

Now the US is a dying empire with horrific demographics, massive debt issues, societal problems.

However, they still have easily the largest and most powerful weapons at their disposal.

These weapons are not just military ones but also Hollywood, the TV, social media companies etc.

Pt 2-

The UK clearly has problems but we are still in the top 10 of economic, military and resource powers.

London trades trillions upon trillions in currency and derivatives.

It is essential for the free flow of international capital which is the only reason Trump’s handlers care about it and his antipathy towards Khan and the left.

The same people despise Zohran Mamdani in New York, not because they fear 'Islamisation' but they fear they cannot control these puppets as much as they can with others, especially over the Gaza issue.

The protests in the US were a real wake up call which is the only reason they are rolling back DEI and why lifelong liberal Democrats like Bill Ackman became Republican.

Like Canada, which the US is also angling for, they share a commonality of heritage and language with the USA.

So what I see is that Musk etc and his tech buddies in Palantir, Larry Ellison etc are the ones stirring the pot.

Not to save the UK but rather to take control of it.

Now here is where the difficulties and nuances of it all come in.

Pt 3-

They already have a solid 20-25% support of the public who like Trump/MAGA etc.

You saw it last week with his state visit.

Numerous zio shill accounts like Calvin Robinson, Lozza Fox, Hopkins, GB News etc. saying please come and "liberate" us President Trump with many in agreement.

So what circumstances would lead to a situation where the US could potentially invade the UK.

Well they already have a substantial military presence here for a start.

Secondly this wouldn't be the first time a foreign power was "invited" to take over the UK.

The Glorious Revolution of 1688 was a Dutch invasion accompanied by an interesting cohort of 'merchants and central bankers'.

It was supported and facilitated by vast swathes of the British ruling class and many could argue it was beneficial to the country in the long term as we then entered the golden era of Empire and Pax Britannica.

So my analysis would be the potential for them to kick off a "civil war" in the UK between the natives and primarily Muslims but in all these situations it would get more complicated with internal factional disputes and other fights starting.

Farage would then come in as PM c 2029 or perhaps even earlier if the situation spiralled out of control or it would kick off due to Farage coming in with Trade Unions and leftists crippling the country through strikes as well.

Pt 4-

The country by the early 2030's will be in a state of chaos and paralysis.

Farage may not even see that due to his 'lifestyle' which is very unhealthy so you may then get a wet lettuce like Tice and things get even worse.

The likes of Robinson, Hopkins etc will be ready to pounce at this point demanding US intervention as Reform are incapable of being tough enough (they already have sown these seeds).

By this point in the early 2030's Europe will also likely be up in flames as well but the US empire won't be that concerned because just off the coast lies Airstrip 1 that they can use as a strategic base.

Trillions and trillions to be made as well with selling the NHS to US Health Companies as well as North Sea Oil and Gas.

Here is the interesting aspect of it as well.

By this point many Nationalists and right of centre people will be so angry and disillusioned that the thought of US involvement won't be that bad.

You will be promised 'free speech' you will be given the constitutional right to bear arms.

The left will be purged.

Britain wouldn't become an Islamic country.

Rupert Lowe would be installed as Governor or someone like that.

However, you would be a vassal state of Washington, an open borders policy would still exist and multi culturalism pushed as long as they subscribe to the correct 'values'.

And of course ultimately the strings won't be pulled in Washington DC but the International Finance houses of New York and the Tech hub of Tel Aviv.

Likewise you will have all the 'free speech' in the world except against a certain group.

So would people on our side grudgingly accept this or be in opposition to it?

The problem they would face is that most of the opposition would be from Corbyn, Sultana, Owen Jones and then Liberals like Ed Davey and remainer types.

Would be a lonely place to oppose this from a right wing perspective.

Musk said 'civil war' is inevitable.

They obviously have plans and this is now my analysis of why.

There will be other elements and vested interests pushing for destabilisation as well such as Neo Con war hawks who see conflict with Russia/China/Iran as more important but this way of thinking isn't as strong as it was in the early 2000's.

Of course to quote a good Scots poet:

"The best-laid plans o' mice and men gang aft agley"

But I do see this as a very possible path moving forward and one that doesn't seem ridiculously outlandish.

Will publish this on the website and post ad article within the next few weeks and appreciate any feedback.

Some really outstanding analysis in the comments to make things a bit more succinct about the future choices the UK will have under ever growing US Hegemony:

Option 1 - Left wing, open borders, multicultural ZOG.

Option 2- Hungary/Orban style, reasonably closed borders, reasonably autonomous ZOG.

Of course the only real solution is Option 3 which is not what is being offered.

Option 2 simply slows the process of decay down which is why we came to our conclusions around Farage and Reform.

It became obvious that the establishment was comfortable with him as PM, his appearance on I'm a Celebrity, massive MSM coverage etc.

It will see a mild pushback against Cultural Marxism and a smattering of deportations but nothing really substantive.

If we can get a few candidates in under the radar and destroy the Tories and Labour then it is a small victory.

However it is also the anti-accelerationist move which could lead to people becoming even more dumber and docile.

You see this with the likes of Sargoy/Robinson etc. saying 'we are winning' etc when we clearly aren't.

Also this theory is based on the likes of JD Vance being the next President giving Palantir full control.

Part 1-

Perhaps you have noticed but today is the first day in a while I have had a chance to think about a few things!

Still no PC access yet but all being well within the next couple of weeks.

One of the most pressing issues we face, not only now but in the longterm, is the collapsing White Birth Rate.

Yes Remigration can help with that but it doesn't solve the overall problem which quite simply is that the majority of women born around the year 2000 have no wish to start a family.

Now clearly there are a number of higher factors at play but on a simplistic level the main driver behind this is Late Stage Capitalism.

It requires constant consumption to keep itself sustained.

It keeps creating debt bubbles.

What it also does is takes the role of the female and turns her from her natural position as a Mother to a consumer.

Young women are then sold a lie about what their lives should look like.

I was walking around a shopping centre earlier and the vast majority of staff were the females I am talking about.

You can observe this wherever you go or if you ever meet any their story will be very similar.

Many will have moved to a city from a rural area.

They will spend c 50% of their income on rent and travel.

What income they have left is then spent purely on personal consumption much of which perpetuates their childhood memories.

Bubble teas, sugary muffins, sugary coffees.

They will meet friends at night to sample the latest Eritrean restaurant that's opened.

They will associate mass immigration with a positive, they have friends from abroad, their UBER driver is a Somali etc. etc.

Their dating scene will present them with thousands of men at any one time with many older men offering them some 'sugar' to buy the finer things in life or perhaps a luxury holiday she can then post about on Instagram.

Or they can do OnlyFans which doesn't appear to have any shame around it anymore.

Why are their not more Father's disgusted and ashamed about this?

Are they scared to speak out lest they be seen as 'anti-feminist'?

Being blunt 50 years ago this 23 year old metropolitan girl you can find in all developed cities around the world would have worked in the fields or in a factory. She would have been married young and had kids young.

The modern women will look back on the life her Grandmother lived and think how terrible it was despite her being the one in a constant state of anxiety, depression and emptiness due to the soullesness of modern life.

Yet life was better then because there was a simplicity to it.

Now some of these young women recognise the system is knackered so choose to rebel against it.

Their understanding of the problems are correct but the solution presented to them is wrong.

They do this by embracing 'Marxist Socialism' and believe that we have these problems because of 'racism, the patriarchy, structural, inequality etc.'

These young women do require Socialism to protect them but a completely different understanding of it.

One that recognises the needs of the nation above the self and one that doesn't see the women as merely a unit engaging in consumption.

Unless the current economic system is destroyed and replaced with one that acts in the national interest then young women will continue to live hedonistic, unfulfilled lives.

Part 2-

The very same system of 'Capitalism' is why we have mass immigration from 3rd world countries.

The pool of poor younger people they can oppress and move to the cities to do the lower paid jobs is dwindling.

So instead they bring over Indians en masse who will work 90 hour works while smiling and saying 'yaas saar' and let them play with the shiney toys and post on Instagram so people can see how well Sajid from the village has done.

People ask why I get so angry and frustrated at the pantomimes we regularly witness going on.

The problems we face are systemic, however they are not chronic.

This can all be fixed over time.

But standing in London listening to Rikki Doolan strumming a guitar isn't really going to achieve much now is it?

Might make people feel a bit better and they will pay for the privilege but if that is the case then it is just a glorified political 'Happy Ending'.

The problem, as the lads reading will know, is that you then constantly require them and nothing actually ends. 🤦‍♂

Both frauds...

This must be a line in the sand for people.

Hate to be a doom piller but just like during the convid scam the sheep masses will go along with the idea of Digital ID.

Some may shrug their shoulders but when confronted with any signs of trouble in not having one they will soon sign up.

They will agree with the media narrative that it's needed to fight 'illegal immigration'.