Forwarded from Matt Parrott
Answering the question posed recently by a hostile foreigner who asserted that my people have no valid culture, the American is distinct in inclination, mannerism, and outlook from his cousin identities in Europe and elsewhere on account of a unique origin and experience.
The American is generally distrustful of authority and suspicious of his government, a perfectly defensible disposition given the circumstances. The American needs his space, and resides as far from his neighbors as his occupational and logistical realities permit. The American is more earnest and risk-tolerant, far more likely to start an entrepreneurial venture or fall for a pyramid scheme.
The White American is comprised of any or all of the broad range of European nationalities who've been welcome here and remain welcome here (presuming they're here to join, instead of oppose, our nation). None of these ancestries is more or less "American" than the other, though it's the English colonists who informed our linguistic, legal, cultural, and social foundation upon which a unique civilization has grown.
Even White Americans whose direct ancestry is from elsewhere in Europe think and speak in the moral grammar derived from the English Civil Wars, the American Revolution, and our Civil War. Even those whose ancestors arrived from the Italian countryside less than a century ago have adopted and embraced a culture primarily derived from the Anglo-American pioneer experience, while participating in a healthy cultural exchange that has enriched this foundation.
Our approach to religion is broadly Christian, with an important emphasis on religious freedom and the need for every man to work out his spiritual issues without political interference. Our approach to class issues is to reject the explicit and implied nobilities of Europe and Latin America in favor of a meritocracy of individual effort and ability.
There certainly are problems with the American character. The meritocratic instinct has ultimately been hyperextended to facilitate intolerable wealth inequalities and permit nepotistic outsiders to prevail against us because they value ethnic and familial affinities above merit. Religious freedom is hyperextended to religious tribes that never agreed to the ecumenical ground rules. Individualism has been hyperextended into libertarian positions which preclude demanding our share from this regime.
I'm not arguing for all these cultural elements, especially as they currently manifest. We've got some changing to do, but we can do it ourselves.
The American is generally distrustful of authority and suspicious of his government, a perfectly defensible disposition given the circumstances. The American needs his space, and resides as far from his neighbors as his occupational and logistical realities permit. The American is more earnest and risk-tolerant, far more likely to start an entrepreneurial venture or fall for a pyramid scheme.
The White American is comprised of any or all of the broad range of European nationalities who've been welcome here and remain welcome here (presuming they're here to join, instead of oppose, our nation). None of these ancestries is more or less "American" than the other, though it's the English colonists who informed our linguistic, legal, cultural, and social foundation upon which a unique civilization has grown.
Even White Americans whose direct ancestry is from elsewhere in Europe think and speak in the moral grammar derived from the English Civil Wars, the American Revolution, and our Civil War. Even those whose ancestors arrived from the Italian countryside less than a century ago have adopted and embraced a culture primarily derived from the Anglo-American pioneer experience, while participating in a healthy cultural exchange that has enriched this foundation.
Our approach to religion is broadly Christian, with an important emphasis on religious freedom and the need for every man to work out his spiritual issues without political interference. Our approach to class issues is to reject the explicit and implied nobilities of Europe and Latin America in favor of a meritocracy of individual effort and ability.
There certainly are problems with the American character. The meritocratic instinct has ultimately been hyperextended to facilitate intolerable wealth inequalities and permit nepotistic outsiders to prevail against us because they value ethnic and familial affinities above merit. Religious freedom is hyperextended to religious tribes that never agreed to the ecumenical ground rules. Individualism has been hyperextended into libertarian positions which preclude demanding our share from this regime.
I'm not arguing for all these cultural elements, especially as they currently manifest. We've got some changing to do, but we can do it ourselves.
👍3
Building a Third Force
joeldavis – livestram
I didn’t really have many opportunities to pipe up in this one but Jeelvy picked up the slack 👌🏻
AWFL Conspiracy Theory
You think QAnon and Schizos are bad? Get a load of this conspiracy theory from libtard whamen.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-the-fight-to-ban-abortion-is-rooted-in-the-great-replacement-theory/amp/
@buildingathirdforce
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-the-fight-to-ban-abortion-is-rooted-in-the-great-replacement-theory/amp/
@buildingathirdforce
👍4
Ching Chong GRT take
A slightly less retarded conspiracy theory about the “roots” of The Great Replacement theory than yesterday’s. Still, the author had to do quite the bit of mental …. shall we say… kung fu, to come up with this.
https://religionandpolitics.org/2022/07/26/the-religious-and-anti-chinese-roots-of-replacement-theory/
@buildingathirdforce
https://religionandpolitics.org/2022/07/26/the-religious-and-anti-chinese-roots-of-replacement-theory/
@buildingathirdforce
Forwarded from Rich
Amazing it says this is a discredited theory… 3 lines later, Hispanics will be the majority in USA within 20 years lmao bruh wut
“Hatred of the other is more important than love of one’s own.”
“We must adopt the mentality of an ADL caricature of WN’s in order to win.”
“Jews might try to act sneaky in the future, so if our politics go mainstream then you’ll know we’re actually losing.”
“Affirming your own national identity is weak sauce.”
—
This guy can give a great speech, no doubt.
But the mentality he’s promoting is one of a total fucking loser. No thanks 🙅🏻♂️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/warrenbalogh88/2137
“We must adopt the mentality of an ADL caricature of WN’s in order to win.”
“Jews might try to act sneaky in the future, so if our politics go mainstream then you’ll know we’re actually losing.”
“Affirming your own national identity is weak sauce.”
—
This guy can give a great speech, no doubt.
But the mentality he’s promoting is one of a total fucking loser. No thanks 🙅🏻♂️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/warrenbalogh88/2137
Telegram
Warren Balogh
In the past I took the controversial opinion that it's more important to be anti-semitic than pro-White.
I stand by this opinion, and I further predict that in the next five years we will see the rise of an explicitly "pro-White" Jew-controlled form of politics.…
I stand by this opinion, and I further predict that in the next five years we will see the rise of an explicitly "pro-White" Jew-controlled form of politics.…
👍1
In the past I took the controversial position that being a weirdo is more important than being normal. I stand by this opinion.
I heard/read somewhere that Saul Alinsky and Hillary Clinton corresponded when Clinton was a lass.
Allegedly Alinsky gave her shit for deciding to go into government from Yale rather than become a full time rabble rouser. Hillary correctly judged that she’d be far more effective for the cause from inside the system rather than without.
She was 🤏🏻 that close to being President.
Infiltrationism isn’t “Buckleyite loyal opposition”. It’s common sense.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/birdmanchan/741
Allegedly Alinsky gave her shit for deciding to go into government from Yale rather than become a full time rabble rouser. Hillary correctly judged that she’d be far more effective for the cause from inside the system rather than without.
She was 🤏🏻 that close to being President.
Infiltrationism isn’t “Buckleyite loyal opposition”. It’s common sense.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/birdmanchan/741
Telegram
Matt Parrott
The ultimate rejection of our stated beliefs and goals is to invest the future of your children in the maintenance, support, and perpetuation of a system and a way of life you purport to oppose because you believe it will be more materially advantageous for…
👍2
Forwarded from Thuletide
https://news.1rj.ru/str/thuletide/3388
Hiding out on a homestead or being a redpilled electrician and waiting for the NWO to blow over isn't going to stop White people from going extinct or change the course of Globalism. You have to be in the political game to win it or even alter it.
Tradesmen and other working-class people are already based enough. The majority of the population in every White country has always opposed the Globalist agenda. Has that ever stopped it from advancing?
Right-Wingers need to be rich, successful, and influential. If not, we will lose. Even creating parallel institutions or NGOs (e.g. Rich Houck's idea of a White SPLC) is impossible to achieve without money and influence.
Disagree? Here's a list of peasant revolutions to check your chance of overthrowing the government without elite backing or influence (spoiler: It's 0%): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_peasant_revolts
Hiding out on a homestead or being a redpilled electrician and waiting for the NWO to blow over isn't going to stop White people from going extinct or change the course of Globalism. You have to be in the political game to win it or even alter it.
Tradesmen and other working-class people are already based enough. The majority of the population in every White country has always opposed the Globalist agenda. Has that ever stopped it from advancing?
Right-Wingers need to be rich, successful, and influential. If not, we will lose. Even creating parallel institutions or NGOs (e.g. Rich Houck's idea of a White SPLC) is impossible to achieve without money and influence.
Disagree? Here's a list of peasant revolutions to check your chance of overthrowing the government without elite backing or influence (spoiler: It's 0%): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_peasant_revolts
Telegram
Thuletide
The Left wins because 1) they have huge financial backing, 2) they have smart people in high places, and 3) they control the institutions that smart people have to pass through to get to the high places.
Nothing will change if Right-Wingers voluntarily embrace…
Nothing will change if Right-Wingers voluntarily embrace…
Excellence > Equality
“In a cosmic joke, it’s those with power who order us to value equality, even though they appeal to no divine authority to impose their moral order.”
https://www.amren.com/features/2022/07/excellence-over-equality/
https://www.amren.com/features/2022/07/excellence-over-equality/
You either use power or you lose power. It’s really that simple.
👍6
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The question every Republican, conservative, MAGAtard, Patriot etc. should be asking themselves and their leaders this morning.
👍3
Bookmark this, retard.
It’s literally the first thing you see when you google “Net Zero carbon US”.
Somehow I PREDICTED it would be easy to find… you know, since they tell us day in day out.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/birdmanchan/775
It’s literally the first thing you see when you google “Net Zero carbon US”.
Somehow I PREDICTED it would be easy to find… you know, since they tell us day in day out.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/birdmanchan/775
👍12👎1
1. The Great Replacement is happening and it’s bad.
2. Race is real and it’s important.
3. The solution to The Great Replacement is ethnonationalism.
4. The JQ is valid.
——
There’s a fifth core principle out there somewhere. Something along the lines of “Return to Normalcy”. Which is the crux of the disagreement between Roasties and Schizos.
Sorry but what exactly is the point of having an Ethnostate if we’re going to be subject to a type of technocratic paternalism that’s functionally indistinguishable from slavery?
The same goes for the cultural realm. Some people act like the tranny bullshit is also a distraction in the same way the Roasties do with technocracy/globalism etc.
Sorry but I want the whole hog, anything less isn’t worth fighting for. The Great Replacement could halt and reverse and race realism could become hegemonic tomorrow, but if we still had malevolent heebs in power pushing cultural pozz and technocratic slavery, the future would still be bleak.
Also, the if j’s “went away” and the pozz/technocracy disappeared tomorrow but we still had to deal with being replaced in our own homelands it wouldn’t be a future worth fighting for.
Sorry, but like the late great Adolph said “I Want It All”. (Not that Adolph, the other one 😏. Yeah yeah jogger music, I get it, sue me.😀)
2. Race is real and it’s important.
3. The solution to The Great Replacement is ethnonationalism.
4. The JQ is valid.
——
There’s a fifth core principle out there somewhere. Something along the lines of “Return to Normalcy”. Which is the crux of the disagreement between Roasties and Schizos.
Sorry but what exactly is the point of having an Ethnostate if we’re going to be subject to a type of technocratic paternalism that’s functionally indistinguishable from slavery?
The same goes for the cultural realm. Some people act like the tranny bullshit is also a distraction in the same way the Roasties do with technocracy/globalism etc.
Sorry but I want the whole hog, anything less isn’t worth fighting for. The Great Replacement could halt and reverse and race realism could become hegemonic tomorrow, but if we still had malevolent heebs in power pushing cultural pozz and technocratic slavery, the future would still be bleak.
Also, the if j’s “went away” and the pozz/technocracy disappeared tomorrow but we still had to deal with being replaced in our own homelands it wouldn’t be a future worth fighting for.
Sorry, but like the late great Adolph said “I Want It All”. (Not that Adolph, the other one 😏. Yeah yeah jogger music, I get it, sue me.😀)
👍4
Hapa on point as usual.
One thing I’d like to point out though is that this whole idea of “capitalism bad” is just the result of centuries of conditioning. It’s one of the left’s (see: jews) oldest memes.
They take the normal state of affairs, deem it “bad” so they can subvert it, create a pejorative for it and then repeat it until everyone, even their enemies accept the framing.
So now we have:
The roughly normal state of affairs between people who buy/sell/trade goods, services, and labor = CAPITALISM 😱 = Bad according to jews like Kerl Merks.
The normal and healthy state of affairs when it comes to individual in-group preference and out-group suspicion/hostility = RACISM 😱 = Bad according to jews like Trotsky.
The normal state of affairs between the sexes = SEXISM or CIS 😱 = Bad according to heebs, pedos and freaks like John Money, Betty Friedan and Volkmar Sigush.
I don’t feel obligated to ever use or defend “capitalism” because it’s just the boogeyman term created by our enemies for what happens naturally.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7461
One thing I’d like to point out though is that this whole idea of “capitalism bad” is just the result of centuries of conditioning. It’s one of the left’s (see: jews) oldest memes.
They take the normal state of affairs, deem it “bad” so they can subvert it, create a pejorative for it and then repeat it until everyone, even their enemies accept the framing.
So now we have:
The roughly normal state of affairs between people who buy/sell/trade goods, services, and labor = CAPITALISM 😱 = Bad according to jews like Kerl Merks.
The normal and healthy state of affairs when it comes to individual in-group preference and out-group suspicion/hostility = RACISM 😱 = Bad according to jews like Trotsky.
The normal state of affairs between the sexes = SEXISM or CIS 😱 = Bad according to heebs, pedos and freaks like John Money, Betty Friedan and Volkmar Sigush.
I don’t feel obligated to ever use or defend “capitalism” because it’s just the boogeyman term created by our enemies for what happens naturally.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/7461
Telegram
HapaPerspective
The roasties that repeatedly call us “schizos” from within the Dissident Right, their whole movement really just boils down to supporting the further centralization of power — that means moving power further and further away from us, because we aren’t the…
🔥4