One way to discover those things within ourselves to which we are attached, which we like and of which we are proud (although perhaps quite unconsciously), is the frequency of their repetition in outward manifestations―in dealings with other people. Such recurrent manifestations could be the first clue to our "vanities", which in turn should be interpreted in relation to the characteristics of our astrological sign.

In an attempt to give an easily comprehensible, hypothetical example, and a very obvious one, he said that if a given individual should observe that in his dealings with other people he manifested a certain, persistent, recurring insistence on "having his own way", and that such a person turned out to be someone who was born under the sign of Aries, the implication is fairly obvious.

Learn how, consciously, not to insist. If a Piscean was also "insisting" in this sense, the insistence might be interpreted as a "onesided" insistence; and it might be necessary to learn, consciously, to "insist" with the other half of one's nature.

If a person born under the sign of Aries can learn not to insist in his dealings with other people (assuming that he has found he does so), he will at least have learned the possibility of not being insistent in his own self-struggles towards growth or development.

Any recurring manifestation (any unconscious habit) is, of necessity, a form of blindness in that the repetitive manifestations, by its very operation, prevents conscious activity.

In relating this rather general conversation to Gurdjieff's "work" or his "method" I could only conclude, personally, that it is a fairly clear example of his teaching ― fundamentally, the discussion seemed to me to emphasize the need to produce constant struggle within oneself which, generally, was the basis of his method―anything to keep the pot boiling. Anything, including astrology.

The simplest guidepost that he gave in this discussion of astrology and the signs of the Zodiac was to watch for those things in oneself which one "loves"―whether they were physical, emotional, or mental manifestations, compulsions, habits, or characteristics (he gave a choice of terms). If you "loved" your hands as a physical feature―this was a clue of a kind; something to do with the use or function of the hands. If you "loved" or "cherished" your propensity for eloquence, this was another clue. If you loved or were proud of the fact that you were always "honest" . . . another clue. And so on.

Not much in the way of answers, but as he admonished repeatedly, there are no answers except the ones that one finds for oneself.

~ Fritz Peters 'My Journey With A Mystic'

Jorjani's Thanosis, Significance of the Subtle Body, Shunyata, Gnostic Psychotronics, Oppression as Evolutionary Catalyst, Veritas vs. Alethea, Bardo Trickery, and Archetype of the Future

Remote View below
👇🏻
https://open.substack.com/pub/esotericdixiedharma/p/promethean-voidwalker?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=5y14ud

Why does the Sciencel Seethe so much?

MAKE ATLANTIS GREAT AGAIN

https://www.youtube.com/live/zzaPejFg6jM?si=OVOVKH9GCEzW_1n4

After my Livestream finishes we'll all hop onto Jord's for some Atlantean Deep Lore

https://www.youtube.com/live/K4_IkKOwZFs?si=fGXqierwtGuyOXHH

Mentioned in YT chat - For posterity

I found my birth mother's youtube channel and its filled with hundreds if not thousands of saved videos of how to curse an enemy

MAKE ATLANTIS GREAT AGAIN

https://www.youtube.com/live/zzaPejFg6jM?si=OVOVKH9GCEzW_1n4

HAPPENING

Hey guys, If you could ask American Esoteric and Abbas the Alchemist anything? what would you ask?

Oh, and in regards to "Hyperborea". If people want a non-Blavatsky source. You can find a book called "Beyond the North Wind" by Christopher McIntosh.

That book is hands down the best aggregate of data on Hyperborea I have ever read.