Forwarded from Germanic Faith (Kyle Davis)
"This work addresses the issue of magical communication found in the Elder Futhark runic innoscriptions. It examines the Kragehul Spear Shaft (DR 196), Björketorp runestone (DR 360), the Horn(s) of Gallehus (DR 12), Gummarp runestone (DR 358), Lindholm amulet (DR 261), Straum whetstone (KJ 50), Ribe skull fragment (DR EM85; 151B), the Noleby runestone (KJ 67), and the Eggja runestone (N KJ 101). It seeks magical communication which may putatively be encompassed by the law of magical semiosis.
By setting objective parameters for measuring this law of magical communication, it can be determined whether or not a particular innoscription should be understood as magical or non-magical specific to the Umwelt and Weltanschauung of the Runemaster. Essentially, this work is meant to challenge runologists in postulating falsifiable criteria so that magical communication in the world of the Runemaster can be discussed in an academic setting.
The work begins by discussing how Charles Sanders Peirce can help provide a basic framework regarding the sign. His phenomenological framework is applied to the world of the Runemaster. The next section then addresses the problem with the word "magic," which goes far beyond the concept of "if it does not make sense, it must be magical." It then leads to a discussion of runes and numinous qualities and finally to a corpus chapter which applies the theories and methods the author has adopted."
https://a.co/d/doYHJPT
Dr. Shell 's work on runes and magical practices come off as both approachable, practical and well educated. Support a heathen author in his journey while he offers a respectable approach from academia.
People talk about Dr. Crawford, but we need to show more support for one of our own.
Subscribe to his YouTube channel here:
https://youtube.com/@scottt.shellcontinentalger2464?si=nsKZ4DgjD463rPWl
By setting objective parameters for measuring this law of magical communication, it can be determined whether or not a particular innoscription should be understood as magical or non-magical specific to the Umwelt and Weltanschauung of the Runemaster. Essentially, this work is meant to challenge runologists in postulating falsifiable criteria so that magical communication in the world of the Runemaster can be discussed in an academic setting.
The work begins by discussing how Charles Sanders Peirce can help provide a basic framework regarding the sign. His phenomenological framework is applied to the world of the Runemaster. The next section then addresses the problem with the word "magic," which goes far beyond the concept of "if it does not make sense, it must be magical." It then leads to a discussion of runes and numinous qualities and finally to a corpus chapter which applies the theories and methods the author has adopted."
https://a.co/d/doYHJPT
Dr. Shell 's work on runes and magical practices come off as both approachable, practical and well educated. Support a heathen author in his journey while he offers a respectable approach from academia.
People talk about Dr. Crawford, but we need to show more support for one of our own.
Subscribe to his YouTube channel here:
https://youtube.com/@scottt.shellcontinentalger2464?si=nsKZ4DgjD463rPWl
🔥7❤1⚡1❤🔥1🤔1
Forwarded from Esoteric Dixie Dharma
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"I saw that in a movie" 😈
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣19🤯3😈3🥰1💋1