Universa Mysterium by Santiago Caruso

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3XtLsIoj3Sg&feature=share7

I do have a theory on the whole UFO thing, I'll write something up on it - this video is good background on the recent claims

I encourage all followers of this page to use the channel link and read the dozens of posts breaking down the most schizo esoteric theory on Aliens and time travel I've ever seen. It's amazing. 🍆

7 hours. Strap in.... STRAP ON! 🔥🔥🔥

Join the chat

https://news.1rj.ru/str/+xRVQXKvrIORiYTNl

Let's talk about Psychotronics...

If you entertain ideas about Psychic faculties around normies (I.e. Telepathy, Clairvoyance, precognition, psychokinesis. Etc.) They all say the same thing. "But anon this is mere crackpot fantasy, no experiment in any scientific laboratory has ever validated any psychic phenomenon".

This. Is incorrect.

However normies are retarded. And often need permission to think thoughts (though they would die before admitting this).

You can counter this argument the best by simply asking them a "question".

Say: "science has never validated psychic phenomena? How would it? IF, say telepathy was real and all Humans are more or less telepathic how would you falsify that without the observers unconsciously interfering? How would a (so called) double blind experiment be done?"

This line of questioning lays a trap for the normie. They see "scienece" as completely objective. Plot twist: it's not.

Thomas Kuhn proved there are different "era's" of science ruled by different Paradigms.

Ludwig Wittgenstein proved there is no such thing as a "fact".

Even Max Planck once said in exasperation: "Science does not progress from experiment to experiment, it progress from funeral to funeral!

"But what about proof?"

All proof found through the regular reductionist materialistic scientific parameters will forever be insufficient for sceptics.

However you can build case studies. And this is what parapsychological labs have been doing since the 70s.

Charles Tart, Dean Radin, Stephen Braude (specifically psychokinesis), and Ian Stevenson (specifically reincarnation and past life memory in children) to name just a few. There is a HUGE body of literature that is completely ignored and maligned by the mainstream. But why?

Sigmund Freud (Aka professor cocaine) towards the end of his life discovered through experimentation the reality of Psy abilities. He was going to make a presentation talking about how this will lead to a revolution in science (just like what Copernicus did for physics, and Darwin did for Biology). However Freud had a sort of "handler" a man named Ernst Jones dissuaded him saying that this would destroy the reputation of the budding field of Psychoanalysis. And just like that the hidden power within was occulted to the fringes once again.

When you look at the body of parapsychological research and the reality of the secret government program Project Stargate designed to cultivate Military-Grade Psychics to spy on enemies of the state. It then begs the question. What about ancient religions, secret societies, and initiatic schools?

This is where it gets interesting.

"States of Consciousness" by Charles T. Tart

"States of Consciousness, a classic by world authority Charles T. Tart, is a basic understanding of how the mind is a dynamic, culturally biased, semi-arbitrary construction and system. A systematic exploration of how and why altered states can come about and their possibilities. As a student of his remarked, "For the first weeks of class I didnt understand what those diagrams were about, but Ive realized the book is all about the way my own mind works!" Useful in understanding some of the important ways your mind works before you start altering it."