JOIN CHAT LINK

https://news.1rj.ru/str/+gKxmgTL11Ro3Mzc1

This chat is a safe space for schizos. The rules are:

1. Anything goes, as long as it's esoteric.

2. Users should be instantly banned if they post:

>Thvg Shakers (or any gay porn)
>Gore
>Crypto/NFT spam
>Pregnant SpongeBob memes

3. De-railing actual esoteric conversations is counted as spamming which is a ban-able offense.

4. No promoting the O9A (Order of Nine Angles) or else you'll be banned for Cringe.

Just read through this book, the Atlantis Blueprint by Colin Wilson and Rand Flem-Ath.

They are (similar to Graham Hancock at the same time) building on the work of Charles Hapgood, who devised an earth crust displacement theory which would have the geographic north pole located at different places prior to the various earth crust displacements that have occured.

Flem-Ath and Wilson build on this, as well as Hapgood's work on advanced ancient seafaring knowledge, with a thesis that Plato's Atlantis' capital city was in none other than Antarctica, which prior to the last crust shift, according to Hapgood circa 12kya, was up to 2,000 miles further north than its current location and thus ice free

Meanwhile they also believe ancient sites they claim to have been built by the global Atlantean civillization are aligned to previous positions of the geographic north pole, or located at whole number fractional latitudes or phi-ratio latitudes away from the previous pole, which drawing on Hapgood, they claim lay in the Hudson bay at the time of Atlantis

Its certainly a fascinating theory but I personally dont see quite enough evidence to find the Antarctica argument compelling, however, i do find compelling the evidence of cataclysmic crustal displacement in general, and it doesnt seem a stretch that one such crustal displacement event may have occured around either the beginning, end, or both, of the cataclysmic younger dryas period

Most people think it works this way

My point is you are only THIS individual you once. There is no isekai. What you do this life does not determine the next. All things already exist simultaneously. Cultivation 'only' allows you to live better NOW and connect to better 'yous' in different historic times. You never 'were st. germain', you're the gigachad that is giga enough to look through his eyes a bit.

Admin pic

Sir, you dropped this...

Real

Just doing a bit of Reynard-maxxing

Bruh.....

A E S T H E T I C

Question: Why did God make the Mysteries so convoluted?

Answer: My take is this is not to do with God but to do with us.

God is a gardener and we are plants. You don't just sprinkle water on a seed and a full grown/fully formed plant pops out. There is a process, there are conditions that need to be in place (proper soil, appropriate sunlight etc.)

So, why are things convoluted?

I think there is a "game" at play. Nothing sinister. But a game between God and Man. Like a father playing with his son.

I believe the game is: God has hidden pieces of Truth within "the World" and we must find them.

Some people say: "The Truth can only be found Within". I think this statement is a blind, and incorrect.

There are Truths that can only be obtained by engaging with and studying the Macrocosm. AND there are Truths that can only be gained through the Microcosm too. It's only through a mixture of both that we can get anywhere.

And here we come to the point. It's not the "truths" we find that matter, but the activity of the search develops qualities in us that God wishes to see arise.

Perhaps these qualities that arise include a type of extension of consciousness that allows to connect and dialogue with something higher. If we draw from Steiner we can sum up these qualities as 3: Imagination, Inspiration, Intuition.