In 2015, Brown University reported that 200,000 civilians lost their precious lives in Iraq. Last year, 1,500 children lost their lives within six months alone in Afghanistan.[6] Imagine the uproar among the Neoconservative establishment if Muslims ended up killing just 50 American children in one year.
You see, New World Order agents aspire to turn the Middle East into ashes for Israel. But every step they take inexorably leads them to their own destruction. If Donald Trump again wants to be a successful president, he needs to put a stop to perpetual killings in the Middle East. Mothers and fathers are exhausted about seeing their precious sons and daughters’ dreams shattered by an essentially diabolical enterprise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJEodk1sj6A
[1] Ann Coulter, Never Trust a Liberal Over 3-Especially a Republican (Washington: Regnery, 2013), 3.
[2] Ann Coulter, If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans (New York: Random House, 2007), 2.
[3] Quoted in George Gurley, “Tea With Miss Coulter,” New York Observer, October 2, 2007.
[4] Andrew Bacevich, Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed their Soldiers and Their Country (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2013), 94, 105.
[5] Evan Perez and Shimon Prokupecz, “New Year’s holiday threats prompt more security,” CNN, December 30, 2016.
[6] Jack Moore, “Afghanistan: Civilian Casualties and Child Deaths Hit Record High in 2016,” Newsweek, July 25, 2016.
You see, New World Order agents aspire to turn the Middle East into ashes for Israel. But every step they take inexorably leads them to their own destruction. If Donald Trump again wants to be a successful president, he needs to put a stop to perpetual killings in the Middle East. Mothers and fathers are exhausted about seeing their precious sons and daughters’ dreams shattered by an essentially diabolical enterprise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJEodk1sj6A
[1] Ann Coulter, Never Trust a Liberal Over 3-Especially a Republican (Washington: Regnery, 2013), 3.
[2] Ann Coulter, If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans (New York: Random House, 2007), 2.
[3] Quoted in George Gurley, “Tea With Miss Coulter,” New York Observer, October 2, 2007.
[4] Andrew Bacevich, Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed their Soldiers and Their Country (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2013), 94, 105.
[5] Evan Perez and Shimon Prokupecz, “New Year’s holiday threats prompt more security,” CNN, December 30, 2016.
[6] Jack Moore, “Afghanistan: Civilian Casualties and Child Deaths Hit Record High in 2016,” Newsweek, July 25, 2016.
costsofwar.watson.brown.edu
Costs of War | Brown University
Promoting research and public awareness of the human, economic, social, and environmental costs of U.S. war
Forwarded from Algorithm of truth
Electromagnetic Radiation & Wireless
Health Impacts
Illustration of people in lab-coats researching a cell
Link copied
Health Impacts
Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation
Children
Pregnant Women
Electromagnetic Sensitivity (EMS)
Cell Phones
Wi-Fi
Cell Towers
Fifth Generation Wireless Networks (5G)
Lower Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation
Mechanisms of Harm
Precautionary Approach Recommendations
The Inadequacy of Federal Exposure Guidelines
Over the past several decades, numerous scientific publications have demonstrated the harmful effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure from wireless sources – such as smartphones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, smart meters and other Internet of Things (IoT) devices – at levels well below maximum federal exposure limits.
Despite this body of evidence, federal exposure guidelines have remained unchanged since first implemented in 1996 and an unprecedented proliferation of wireless sources has been imposed upon an uninformed public.
It is essential to educate yourself and those around you about the adverse health effects of wireless exposure, the inadequacy of current federal exposure guidelines and the regulatory capture that has enabled the unchecked expansion of wireless technology and infrastructure throughout the country.
Health Impacts of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
EMF are physical regions of electromagnetic energy produced by electrically charged particles and electromagnetic radiation (EMR).
EMF Scientist – International Appeal (2022)
“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”
PowerWatch: 1,670 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers on Electromagnetic Fields and Biology or Health (2018)
“Powerwatch has been researching the links between EMF and health risks for more than 25 years. The organization, which is completely independent of government and industry, gathers information to help the lay person (sic) understand this issue.”
Kivrak et al. (2017)
“The results of the recent studies not only clearly demonstrate that EMF exposure triggers oxidative stress in various tissues, but also that it causes significant changes in levels of blood antioxidant markers. Fatigue, headache, decreased learning ability, and cognitive impairment are among the symptoms caused by EMF.”
Health Impacts of Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation
Frequencies ranging from 3 kilohertz to 300 gigahertz on the electromagnetic radiation (EMR) spectrum are defined as RF radiation.
Bioinitiative Report – Updated Research Summaries (2022)
“Clearly the trend continues that the great majority of studies report effects of low-intensity exposures to both ELF-EMF and RFR, and a small percentage of published studies report that no effects are seen.”
Hardell et al. (2021)
“These results give support to the increased cancer risk in humans and laboratory tested animals for RF radiation. In fact, RF-EMF may now be classified as a human carcinogen, Group 1. However, such classification can only be made by IARC.”
Yadav et al. (2021)
“This review with the help of in vitro and in vivo studies shows that RF could change the morphology and physiology of germ cells with affected spermatogenesis, motility and reduced concentration of male gametes. RF also results in genetic and hormonal changes. In addition, the contribution of oxidative stress and protein kinase complex after RFR exposure is also summarized which could also be the possible mechanism for reduction in sperm parameters.”
Health Impacts
Illustration of people in lab-coats researching a cell
Link copied
Health Impacts
Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation
Children
Pregnant Women
Electromagnetic Sensitivity (EMS)
Cell Phones
Wi-Fi
Cell Towers
Fifth Generation Wireless Networks (5G)
Lower Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation
Mechanisms of Harm
Precautionary Approach Recommendations
The Inadequacy of Federal Exposure Guidelines
Over the past several decades, numerous scientific publications have demonstrated the harmful effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure from wireless sources – such as smartphones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, smart meters and other Internet of Things (IoT) devices – at levels well below maximum federal exposure limits.
Despite this body of evidence, federal exposure guidelines have remained unchanged since first implemented in 1996 and an unprecedented proliferation of wireless sources has been imposed upon an uninformed public.
It is essential to educate yourself and those around you about the adverse health effects of wireless exposure, the inadequacy of current federal exposure guidelines and the regulatory capture that has enabled the unchecked expansion of wireless technology and infrastructure throughout the country.
Health Impacts of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
EMF are physical regions of electromagnetic energy produced by electrically charged particles and electromagnetic radiation (EMR).
EMF Scientist – International Appeal (2022)
“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”
PowerWatch: 1,670 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers on Electromagnetic Fields and Biology or Health (2018)
“Powerwatch has been researching the links between EMF and health risks for more than 25 years. The organization, which is completely independent of government and industry, gathers information to help the lay person (sic) understand this issue.”
Kivrak et al. (2017)
“The results of the recent studies not only clearly demonstrate that EMF exposure triggers oxidative stress in various tissues, but also that it causes significant changes in levels of blood antioxidant markers. Fatigue, headache, decreased learning ability, and cognitive impairment are among the symptoms caused by EMF.”
Health Impacts of Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation
Frequencies ranging from 3 kilohertz to 300 gigahertz on the electromagnetic radiation (EMR) spectrum are defined as RF radiation.
Bioinitiative Report – Updated Research Summaries (2022)
“Clearly the trend continues that the great majority of studies report effects of low-intensity exposures to both ELF-EMF and RFR, and a small percentage of published studies report that no effects are seen.”
Hardell et al. (2021)
“These results give support to the increased cancer risk in humans and laboratory tested animals for RF radiation. In fact, RF-EMF may now be classified as a human carcinogen, Group 1. However, such classification can only be made by IARC.”
Yadav et al. (2021)
“This review with the help of in vitro and in vivo studies shows that RF could change the morphology and physiology of germ cells with affected spermatogenesis, motility and reduced concentration of male gametes. RF also results in genetic and hormonal changes. In addition, the contribution of oxidative stress and protein kinase complex after RFR exposure is also summarized which could also be the possible mechanism for reduction in sperm parameters.”
Forwarded from Algorithm of truth
Google
US10012594B2 - Coliphage biosensor
- Google Patents
- Google Patents
Disclosed are methods, apparatuses, and genetically modified bacteria that may be used to detect bacteriophages in a sample. In some embodiments, a rapid detection test is disclosed to test for the presence of coliphages which may indicate the presence of…
Forwarded from Algorithm of truth