Algorithm of truth
https://carnicominstitute.substack.com/p/pandoras-polymer-synthetic-blood?publication_id=1921102&utm_campaign=email-post-noscript&r=1258g4&utm_medium=email
PANDORA'S BOX POLYMER MODIFIED BACTERIA - HIGH BIOLOGY INTERACTION
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Khan yunis is almost disappeared , 90% of the buildings are destroyed. Nobody can come back to live there. Depopolation and genocide still ongoing by evil-israel.
“We are ready to station troops in Ukraine under certain conditions” - Canadian Defense Minister Bill Blair.
Canada is open to sending troops to Ukraine, but not to participating in combat. At the same time, the Canadian military could help train Ukrainian military personnel and act in a non-combat role against Russia far from the front.
Canada is open to sending troops to Ukraine, but not to participating in combat. At the same time, the Canadian military could help train Ukrainian military personnel and act in a non-combat role against Russia far from the front.
"I don't want to deploy Canadian Forces personnel near the theater of operations, which could give the impression that we are taking on any component of a combat role" he added.
Forwarded from Algorithm of truth
Eschatus ___ Bruce Pennington (1976) _ John Guy Collick.pdf
5.5 MB
ESCHATUS - BRUCE PENNINGTON
Algorithm of truth
Video
Zeee Media - Share the truth at whatever cost.
Maria Zeee & Dr. Ana Mihalcea on Infowars: Why Are Injected People GLOWING? - Zeee Media
FEB 28, 2024 Dr. Ana Mihalcea joins Maria Zeee guest hosting The Alex Jones Show to discuss the new phenomenon of injected people glowing. If you would like to support Zeee Media to continue getting the truth out, you can donate here. Begin your journey to…
Algorithm of truth
ALGORITHM OF TRUTH - HUMANS ARE NOW HACKABLE ANIMALS
Harari's popular writings are considered to belong to the Big History genre, with Ian Parker writing in 2020 in the New Yorker that "Harari did not invent Big History, but updated it with hints of self-help and futurology, as well as a high-altitude, almost nihilistic composure about human suffering."[1]
His work has been more negatively received in academic circles, with Christopher Robert Hallpike stating 2020 in a review of Sapiens that: "one has often had to point out how surprisingly little he seems to have read on quite a number of essential topics. It would be fair to say that whenever his facts are broadly correct they are not new, and whenever he tries to strike out on his own he often gets things wrong, sometimes seriously." Hallpike further states that: "we should not judge Sapiens as a serious contribution to knowledge but as 'infotainment', a publishing event to titillate its readers by a wild intellectual ride across the landscape of history, dotted with sensational displays of speculation, and ending with blood-curdling predictions about human destiny. By these criteria, it is a most successful book."[62]
In 2020, philosopher Mike W. Martin, criticized Harari's view in a journal article, stating that "[Harari] misunderstands human rights, inflates the role of science in moral matters, and fails to reconcile his moral passion with his moral skepticism."[63]
In July 2022, American magazine Current Affairs published an article noscriptd "The Dangerous Populist Science of Yuval Noah Harari" by Darshana Narayanan, pointing to the lack of scientific rigor in his books. "The best-selling author is a gifted storyteller and popular speaker," she wrote. "But he sacrifices science for sensationalism, and his work is riddled with errors."[64]
In November 2022, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung called Harari a historian and a brand. They pointed out that the Yahav Harari Group, built by his partner Yahav, was a "booming product cosmos" selling comics and children's books, but soon films and documentaries. They observed an "icy deterministic touch" in his books which made them so popular in Silicon Valley. They stated that his listeners celebrated him like a pop star, although he only had the sad message that people are "bad algorithms", soon to be redundant, to be replaced because machines could do it better.[65]
His work has been more negatively received in academic circles, with Christopher Robert Hallpike stating 2020 in a review of Sapiens that: "one has often had to point out how surprisingly little he seems to have read on quite a number of essential topics. It would be fair to say that whenever his facts are broadly correct they are not new, and whenever he tries to strike out on his own he often gets things wrong, sometimes seriously." Hallpike further states that: "we should not judge Sapiens as a serious contribution to knowledge but as 'infotainment', a publishing event to titillate its readers by a wild intellectual ride across the landscape of history, dotted with sensational displays of speculation, and ending with blood-curdling predictions about human destiny. By these criteria, it is a most successful book."[62]
In 2020, philosopher Mike W. Martin, criticized Harari's view in a journal article, stating that "[Harari] misunderstands human rights, inflates the role of science in moral matters, and fails to reconcile his moral passion with his moral skepticism."[63]
In July 2022, American magazine Current Affairs published an article noscriptd "The Dangerous Populist Science of Yuval Noah Harari" by Darshana Narayanan, pointing to the lack of scientific rigor in his books. "The best-selling author is a gifted storyteller and popular speaker," she wrote. "But he sacrifices science for sensationalism, and his work is riddled with errors."[64]
In November 2022, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung called Harari a historian and a brand. They pointed out that the Yahav Harari Group, built by his partner Yahav, was a "booming product cosmos" selling comics and children's books, but soon films and documentaries. They observed an "icy deterministic touch" in his books which made them so popular in Silicon Valley. They stated that his listeners celebrated him like a pop star, although he only had the sad message that people are "bad algorithms", soon to be redundant, to be replaced because machines could do it better.[65]
Wikipedia
Big History
academic discipline which examines history from the Big Bang to the present