At the 2025 International Religious Freedom Summit, JD Vance endorsed the condemned idea of “the right [sic] to religious freedom”, happily observing that it is for everyone, “whether you’re a Christian, Muslim, Jew or no faith at all”

In a July 7, 2024 interview with Meet the Press, JD Vance said he openly supports the abortion [murder] drug, Mifepristone, being accessible to Americans

Pope Gregory XVI teaches against the idea of ‘liberty of conscience’, observing it leads to the ‘bottomless pit’ found in the book of Apocalypse.

If you have not read his magnificent encyclical, Mirari Vos (On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism), I would highly encourage you to do so—it is the accurate diagnosis of the system of modern evils which pervades every society.

The encyclical, in English, can be found (here).

An economic system which is not subjected to the laws of morality, and opposes, rather than welcomes, the influence of the Catholic religion on commercial life, is to be utterly rejected.

Morality, not money, is the ultimate arbiter of economic actions.

The Libertarian idea of the independence of economic activity from the laws of morality is repugnant to even mere reason. Conspicuously, this very important area of human life is to be neatly sectioned off from morality? Absurdity.

The State—observing prudence and careful to not overstep its bounds—must enforce these moral considerations and also foster a spirit of cooperation in its citizens as they work towards the common good, not merely the private good of any one man or interest.

Vivek Ganapathy Ramaswamay defensively reveals both of his Indian parents were non-citizens when he was born in this country, meaning his basis for citizenship is solely due to his being an “anchor baby”

🕵️‍♂️ Watchlist for Conservatives and Other Threats to America

Purpose
In a non-exhaustive way, to keep tabs on the biggest threats to true, American Reform.

Con Inc.
• Emerson comic

JD Vance
• Support for Abortion drug, Mifepristone
• Endorsement of ‘religious liberty’
• Unassuming, yet effective, instrument of Jewish money and power
• Hanukkah party

Vivek Ganapathy Ramaswamay — (link)

James Lindsay
• Promotion of antifascism
• Subversive individualism advanced by Lindsay
• “Judeo-Christianity”

Trent Horn
• Whining about antisemitism
• St. Paul vs. Trent
• Trent running interference for the Jews
• Trent is a liberal
• Liberal gatekeeping
• Trent “corrects” St. Thomas

Ron Paul
• Hero of America?

Dr. E Michael Jones
• Refutation of his many errors on race
• EMJ says Blacks can identify as group but Whites cannot
• Curse of Cham and heredity
• Can’t figure out why Catholics are philosemites
• His error in entirely divorcing the Jewish Question from race
• Are the Irish white?
• White identity is opposed to Catholic identity?
• Europeans are not white
• Bad history

Dr. Joseph Shaw
• Burning the Talmud is wrong
• Shaw doubles-down on his Talmud defense
• Index and the Talmud
• Clement VIII
• David Paul Drach

Eric Sammons
• Take that, racists!
• Pot calling the kettle black
• What kind of employees does he hire?
• More obfuscation on antisemitism
• Pro-lifeism

Ryan Grant
• Illegal immigrants are no big deal
• Allergy to authoritarianism
• Reagan was a libertarian?

Philos Project
• Orginal post
• Association of Hebrew Catholics
• Pius XI out of context
• Defending “Zionist Christians”
• Meeting with Netanyahu

Patrick Neve
• Condemning fascism

Corey Mahler
• Manufactured opposition between Scripture and the Papacy

Gideon Lazar
• Subversion
• Isn’t there somebody you forgot to ask?
• I am right about Gideon Lazar Pt. 1 | Pt. 2
• New podcast

Michael Knowles
• Hitler Pt. 1 | Pt. 2
• Antisemitism Pt. 1 | Pt. 2 | Pt. 3
• Who did they deport, Michael?
• Knowles caught in contradiction

Auron MacIntyre
• Tucker interview

Matt Fradd
• Wearing a kippah as a joke
• Israel limited hangout

Andrew Klavan
• Downplaying sinfulness of sodomy

Matt Walsh
• America is only ideas

Charles Coulombe
• Stauffenberg affair
• Bp. von Galen

Charlie Kirk
• Judaizer

Chris Rufo
• Racial intermarriage

Tucker Carlson
• Identity politics is “Nazism”

Melissa Streit
• Background

Ed Feser
• Bad philosophy
• Skin color error
• Error on culture
• Ed and MBS

Pope Pius XII explains how hereditary factors, including race, impose certain duties, are worthy of esteem and must not be injured

The second article from the Journal of American Reform will be released this coming Friday, likely in the evening.

It comes from the analysis of Bp. Alois Hudal on the racial doctrines, both true and false, that were proliferating in Germany during the 1930s. His 1937 book, Foundations of National Socialism, still remains untranslated from the German original. I hope to be the first in this important effort, at least on this section.

It is very relevant to the encyclical released in 1937 by Pope Pius XI, Mit Brennender Sorge, on the Church and the German Reich, and the reader will surely see how the good bishop’s thinking was very much in line with the mind of the Church on the race issue.

If you have not already, please subscribe and check out my publication below: 👇🏼

https://open.substack.com/pub/americanreform

In his senior thesis at Harvard, Vivek Ramaswamay floated his support for human-animal hybrids, saying “Unbeknownst to most Americans, today the creation of human-animal chimeras represents a valuable experimental tool that could revolutionize science and medicine.”

In response to Zionist demands, Pope Benedict XV outlines the official position of the Catholic Church on the Jewish takeover of Palestine, saying “For surely it would be a terrible grief for Us and for all the Christians faithful if infidels [the Jews] were placed in a privileged and prominent position; much more if those most holy sanctuaries of the Christian religion were given into the charge of non-Christians.”

Very few Catholics are aware of the above papal position, outlined in 1919, but the much more widely known remarks of Pope St. Pius X can be found here (link), which are also illustrative on this issue.

There is a striking similarity, in both theological and political opposition, to Jewish domination and statehood in the Holy Land, which properly belongs exclusively to Christians.

It seems tedious, but it bears repeating: Donald Trump and the GOP are allergic—if not overtly hostile—to explicit, White identity, which means securing the rights of the majority group in America, lawfully preserving the racial and national makeup of the country and ending mass [legal] immigration.

This kind of display is merely a tool to shore up support with his base, teasing rhetoric with racial overtones, while trying to bolster his credibility with the radical right, which is increasingly tenuous. Until he names the “White man” and his plight, criticism is warranted and, indeed, necessary.

Despite all of these overtures, Trump is and will remain a committed individualist, which is importantly mirrored by his policy program, unless, of course, the racial group in question is non-White. Finally, he will never talk about reality, plainly, admitting to the ongoing White racial suicide, present in nearly every European country, since it would implicate America.

Do not be fooled.

Austrian bishop, Alois Hudal, in a thoughtful and convincing way, offers a solution to the racial questions plaguing pre-war Germany.

In his book, whose intention was to create a bridge between the Catholic Church and German Reich, he clarifies, “The Church has not yet taken a dogmatic position on the racial question. In the sight of God, that is, in the realm of the supernatural, all races and people are equal, have equal rights and have equal obligations when it comes to the ultimate goal of life. This certainly does not mean that all races are also equal in their natural, intellectual, moral and physiological dispositions. Racial protection can therefore be regarded as self-defense for a people in certain living conditions, as far as it is concerned with preventing mixing for the purpose of producing children.”

Additionally, my second post for The Journal of American Reform is live! If you enjoy my work, whether visual (graphics) or writing (commentary, translations and a forthcoming book), consider subscribing to the journal—totally free.

This release is from Austrian bishop, Alois Hudal, whose never before translated work “The Foundations of National Socialism”, delves into the German thinking, both good and bad, on the racial question. Written in 1937 and bearing an imprimatur from Cardinal Innitzer, this important work was delivered with a personal note, by Bishop Hudal, to the German leader, Adolf Hitler, in an effort to create a bridge between the Catholic Church and the Reich.

“German Racialism in the 1930s, separating the wheat form the chaff — Hudal, 1937”

Instead of making some appeal to a nebulous set of “true” or “real” conservative values, in an attempt to correct obvious degeneracy and sin, we can realize the problem is conservatism—in any of its forms—itself.

Christian morality is fundamentally immutable, whereas conservatism is fundamentally mutable, ever-changing, a constant dialectic of conservative liberals attempting to justify and maintain the sinful order of progressive liberals.

As such, it should be anathematized, not championed.

Liberalism is the real, underlying problem. Its twin children of progressivism and conservatism are merely two different symptoms of the same disease, one presenting evil openly and honestly, not caring to camouflage it for polite society, the other attempting to rationalize and justify it.

The former may be the engine of moral decay and godlessness, but it is the latter, conservatism, which is responsible for the installation and maintenance of these nightmarishly wicked systems.

The devil uses both, playing each off of the other, all in an attempt to overthrow true order, sublime Catholic order, what was once called Christendom.