On August 19, 2005, Benedict XVI visited the Cologne Synagogue to participate in a Jewish prayer service. After being directed to his chair, the service began, with the Chief Rabbi leading the congregation in songful prayer. Benedict XVI then gave a short speech, followed by his receiving the Shofar, a ceremonial gift whose purpose is to call the Jews to prayer. After the prayers and ceremonies concluded, he navigated his way out of the synagogue to a standing ovation from the congregation.

The video footage of the event is linked (below) on my Telegram channel, while the original on YouTube can be found (here).

The Philos Project, one of the many organs of Jewish subversion, just released a video questioning if there is a “radical agenda” behind Christ is King. Insinuating that not only that there is, presently, but that there could be. Importantly, using “radical” as a pejorative.

Two of my friends and mutuals made good replies to the original tweet.

Check out Catholic Colin’s response (here), along with the response of Catholic State (here).

I also replied with my own thoughts (here).

How to respond when a fellow Catholic calls you an antisemite—in short, clarify, rather than deny:

https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1903853648376996187?s=46

It’s Mussolini Monday ⚡️


“The present attitude of the Roman Catholic Church toward the Jew, as well as that of Mussolini, is of much interest for the latter has revived the age-old disabilities of the Church against the Jews. All Jewish literature is forbidden and no book by a foreign Jew can be translated into Italian. No play by a foreign Jew can be produced. No Jew is allowed to broadcast over the radio. Jewish professors are barred from Italian universities and textbooks of 114 Jewish writers have been withdrawn from the schools. Jews have been expelled from all administrative posts. Marriage is again illegal between Jews and Christians.”

- Eugene Nelson Sanctuary

The latest Substack post from The Journal of American Reform is live.

Opposing the Synagogue of Satan and its influence, a short program — Meurin, 1893

Apologies for the delay on this post, as it was scheduled to come out three days ago, on Saturday.

To make up for that, and as a thank you to my growing subscriber base, I have created an additional edit from his 1893 text on the interplay between freemasonry and the synagogue. Below you will see the psychology, both tragic and treacherous, of the Jew as explained by Msgr. Meurin.

If you have not already, consider subscribing! And, if you have benefited from my work in any way, big or small, consider making a donation to the journal (here).

Either way, the totally free educational materials will continue to be produced, hopefully with ever-increasingly quality. Thank you, again, for all the support up until this point.

Msgr. Meurin analyzes the psychology, both tragic and treacherous, of the Jew noting that, “What a strange figure in humanity is this people of Israel! How great and majestic it is in its history, as long as it walks with the Lord! How great it is also and above all terrible in its hatred against its Messiah, whom it misunderstood and killed on the cross!”

Help me ratio EMJ

https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1904675264329560105?s=46

Church Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, St. Basil the Great, explains why women who procure abortions are murderers who must be punished

American Catholics must rethink their options.

There is a recent phenomenon among Catholic so-called influencers who, having clandestinely pivoted away from their earlier support of Zionism, are now retreating to the more tenable (superficially) position of philosemitism. This position is characterized by special treatment, concern, privileges and concessions to Jews, catering to their taboos and paranoia, often over and against Catholic sensibilities and attitudes—sometimes even teachings. In a dispute between a Jew and Catholic, before weighing any evidence, they reflexively side with the former.

Notice, importantly, that these influencers did not publicly acknowledge reasons for their having abandoned Zionism—since it is both a theological and political error—rather that goes unmentioned. A good mind, upon receiving sufficient evidence that it is mistaken, should change its position, humbly admitting (which goes for everyone, including the present author of this post) it got something wrong. There is no shame in that. However, their glaring omission has the effect of leaving their audience in the dark as to whether it was humbly realizing they were mistaken or, perhaps more cynically, it is now expedient (money) to be anti-Zionist. Another element, coupled with the aforementioned, is that rejecting Zionism, especially the more outrageous forms, shores up their credibility with those who rightly see that the conservative movement is presently (though, this could change) in a perilous position, hemorrhaging interest, money and credibility.

All of this to say that the pressure and probing questions must continue. Philosemitism is, in some ways, more dangerous, given how it camouflages itself, being hard to pin down. Organized Jewry still remains in control, albeit weakened, if we are still playing with Jewish rules.

Catholics tainted with philosemitism, who have managed to capture power, still truly hold back a political order governed—exclusively—by Catholic moral principles and attitudes. They must be challenged, firmly, without compromising the truth. Credulity is no virtue, though what is to be avoided is irrational skepticism, or worse, poisoned cynicism.

Original X post (here)

Pope Leo XIII dissects the religiously indifferent State, along with the idea of freedom of worship, linking it to the ‘legal apostasy of society'

In the X post linked (here), James Lindsay is actually entirely correct to identify the burgeoning illiberal, nationalistic and authoritarian shift on the right as something which fundamentally threatens the underlying American principles, attitudes and culture. He is also correct to say that, if this movement prevails, the “Judeo-Christian” order will topple, ignominiously.

What is wrong, however, is his conclusion, thinking these trends are a bad thing. When, in reality, they are something very healthy, giving real hope to a make our country good—to say nothing of supernatural goodness—for the first time.

They are something very Catholic, indeed.

Imagine having to explain to your great grandparents that in 2026 the [likely] governor of Ohio is going to be a man by the name of Vivek Ganapathy Ramaswamy, whose campaign consists primarily in lecturing Ohioans on what it truly means to be an American. Not only is the governor going to be Indian, but he is going to be a self-professed Hindu, too. Additionally, both of his Indian parents were non-citizens when they gave birth to him, so his tenuous claim to citizenship is based entirely on a perverse interpretation of the 14th amendment.

Oh, and the majority White population of the state, who nearly all believe in Jesus Christ, are going to enthusiastically support him, denouncing anyone who would dare oppose him and his program as un-American.

Under the direction of Pope Pius IX, the Holy Office gave the following ruling in 1866 on the moral legitimacy of slavery.

https://x.com/smichaellibrary/status/1905500918386225203?s=46

Michael Knowles’ wife is Jewish

Full credit to Leon DeGroyper for finding the proof

Friday ratio on Trent Horn whining about antisemitism?


https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1905792877063483466?s=46

🪡 A Thread on the Talmud and its defenders🧵

As the outrageous blasphemies and perverse teachings of the Jewish Talmud are increasingly coming to light, many Protestant heretics, and even some Catholics, have been attempting to downplay, sometimes outright denying, the aforementioned. This running of interference for the Jews is not new; as the Church and Christian rulers have always combatted the efforts of those who give support and favor to the Jews against the Faith of Christ.

It is not uncommon to hear one or many of the following defenses being marshaled against those who expose what Pope Leo XIII condemned as the “impious Talmudic, Cabalistic and other nefarious books of the Jews.”

I. The Talmud is merely the musings of various rabbis through the centuries and is not an esteemed Jewish text or particularly authoritative for that matter.

-> Response

II. Most of what Christians think about the Talmud is based on lazy, fabricated memes amounting to no more than “conspiracy theorizing” about the Jews and their teachings.

-> Response

III. So what? The Jews do not recognize the divinity of Christ and therefore their denouncing Him [blasphemy] and sentencing him to a punishment in “boiling excrement” [unspeakable blasphemy] is not only defensible, but even understandable.

If someone approves of any of the following they are a Feminist, to a greater or lesser degree, despite any lip-service to the contrary:
 
• Women doing political commentary, wielding civil power or holding elected office

• Female crossdressing (i.e. wearing shorts or pants)

• Opposed, in principle, to corporal punishment being administered by a husband to his wife

• Sports for women and girls

• Women being independent and opinionated

• Co-ed schooling after primary education

• De-stigmatizing women in higher education

• Denying, even minimizing, male intellectual superiority

• Working wives outside the home, barring some proportionate reason

• Getting permission from your wife, distinct from counsel

• Defending or shielding women from public shame for dressing immodestly

• Women using foul, crass or obscene language, including cussing and swear words

X 🔗

Pope Pius XI outlines why Christians deplore the public exhibition of women and girls in sports

“Suppose, for example, we ask our adversaries [the Protestants] on what ground they have concocted that novel and sectarian opinion which banishes Christ from the Mystical Supper. If they name the Gospel, we meet them promptly. On our side are the words, this is my body, this is my blood. This language seemed to Luther himself so forcible, that for all his strong desire to turn Zwinglian, thinking by that means to make it most awkward for the Pope, nevertheless he was caught and fast bound by this most open context, and gave in to it, and confessed Christ truly present in the Most Holy Sacrament no less unwillingly that the demons of old, overcome by His miracles, cried aloud that He was Christ, the Son of God.

Well then, the written text gives us the advantage: the dispute now turns on the text of what is written. Let us examine this from the words in the context, my body which is given for you, my blood which shall be shed for many. Still the expression on Calvin’s side is most hard, on ours easy and quite plain.

What further? Compare the Scriptures, they say, one with another. By all means. The Gospels agree, Paul concurs. The words, the clauses, the whole sentence reverently repeat living bread, signal miracle, heavenly food, flesh, body, blood. There is nothing enigmatical, nothing befogged with a mist of words. Still our adversaries hold on and make no end of altercation.

What are we to do? I presume, Antiquity should be heard; and what we, two parties suspect of one another, cannot settle, let it be decided by the decision of venerable ancient men of all past ages, as being nearer Christ and further removed from this contention. They cannot stand that, they protest that they are being betrayed, they appeal to the word of God plain and simple, they turn away from the comments of men. Treacherous and fatuous excuse. We urge the word of God, they darken it. We appeal to the witness of the Saints as interpreted, they withstand them. In short their position is that there shall be no trial, unless you stand by the judgment of the accursed party.”

- St. Edmund Campion, SECOND REASON, the sense of Holy Writ