👀

Exploding the myth that to be a good Catholic one must be “anti-Nazi”.

Dropping this weekend at The Journal of American Reform.

What is terrifying is the massive audience and the prestige men like Mr. Coulombe have.

The brazenness is staggering.

X 🔗

Conservatives love to complain, attack and fear-monger when it comes to communism but they never want to examine the bases of the socialist system and see how it applies to our country, America.

In the 1936 constitution of the USSR we find, among other things:

Art. 122 — The overturning of patriarchal order and the establishment of feminism, in law, granting women absolute equality in economic, State, political and cultural life.

Art. 123 — Dogmatic racial leveling, criminalizing expressions of racial solidarity or feeling, along with ensuring that equality extends to the political and social sphere, not merely a matter of equality under the law.

Art. 125 — The establishment of the revolutionary principles of freedom of speech, press and assembly.

X 🔗

Answering a good objection from Pinesap, who draws from Cd. Dulles, on the conciliar opposition to deportation, mass or otherwise: https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1990273783890948565?s=46

European races have the benefit of enjoying natural, i.e. dispositional, racial superiority (in an incidental as opposed to essential way) along with being Christianized for much longer than non-European races. Grace builds on nature as we all know, and a complicating factor is that the effects of religion on intelligence and morals can take longer to appear for different races.

— This racial inequality is philosophically expected and, a posteriori, empirically proven.

The relative inferiority of Africans—again, understood properly—has its foundation in both racial and religious bases, each contributing to a greater or lesser extent. Other factors, like culture and climate play a role.

— Men are only equal in a metaphysical sense, considered in the abstract, and are not born equal in the modern, colloquial understanding.

Inequality for individuals and groups is natural and to be embraced, not lamented. To those who have more, more will be expected. There is a greater duty in charity to help others, most importantly towards their supernatural end, and the judgment of those enjoying superiority will be more severe.

In conclusion, the law of grace does not destroy the law of particularity, rather it perfects it, further unifying all men in what is proper: common ancestry, the Church and Her sacraments, a particular judgement and, ultimately, destiny.

X 🔗

I wonder how many modern pagans and unchristian nationalists have been turned away from Catholicism by not hearing this message, who otherwise would be amenable to conversion. Ultimately, the blame rests with them but a goal should be to remove obstacles, reducing the scandal of the weak.

I suspect it is not insignificant.

Response to Trent Horn’s video on female suffrage: https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1991562100913656062?s=46

Adrien Arcand's commentary on Pope Pius XI condemning National Socialism in the encyclical 'Mit Brennender Sorge'

Nov. 27th, 1961
I have read, perhaps one hundred times, in his German, Latin, English and French texts, their encyclical letter, and I have never seen anything that condemns National Socialism. Certainly, there are allusions made against Alfred Rosenberg and his 90,000 Wotanists (against eighty million Germans), but not one [allusion] against Hitler. In better times, I have written to a very high authority to ask—as a Catholic and for the eternal salvation of my soul—that they instruct me on what may be [worthy of condemnation] in Mein Kampf and in the speeches of Hitler. They could not indicate anything that was [worthy of condemnation]. Hitler had lawfully banned “communism, socialism, atheistic and free-thinking clubs, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexual clubs, and Freemasonry.” These are all things that the Church has always condemned. As the only true leader of the Western world, he had the immense honor of throwing his armed forces against the USSR. He implemented the Port de Brassard upon the Jews, copying the popes of the Middle Ages who imposed the wearing of badges upon the Jews of that time.

Pope Pius XI explains in what sense a State and Regime can be legitimately totalitarian, i.e. signifying totality, and cohere with Christian principles.

Source: AAS (1931), pgs. 147-8

X 🔗

Kennedy Hall has, yet again, missed the mark in his analysis.

My response and earlier critique of his line of thinking: https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1991952742688977277?s=46

🧵 A short thread commemorating a sordid anniversary.

— On this day, exactly two years ago, Dr. Eugene Michael Jones encouraged his audience to read Noel Ignatiev’s 1995 book, “How the Irish Became White”.

Noel Ignative, for those unfamiliar with the man, was a Jewish revolutionary, intellectual and influential author who is famous for founding “Race Traitor”, a journal whose tagline declared “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity”.

X 🔗

At the greatest heights of ‘Western Civilization’, which is a curious way of labeling Christendom, here is what Christian princes and the Catholic Church had to impose on the once chosen race, i.e. to mitigate the Jewish danger and protect our society. Keep this in mind any time a Jew tells you he only wants a return of “Western values”:

• Segregated in ghettos
• Forced to wear yellow badges and hats
• Compulsory hearing of sermons
• Blasphemous rabbinical books, including the Talmud, were censored and burned
• Barred from holding political office
• Denied citizenship and equal civil rights

Bear in mind this was the period of history with the most saints, highest level of public morals, necessary union between Church and State and, not to be forgotten, the flowering of philosophy, theology, art, music and architecture.

Modernity, then, is the liberation of the Jew and the imposition of the Synagogue on Europe and her peoples, where the Church once stood.

X 🔗

I just started analyzing this document, which proceeds from the [apparent] magisterium of Leo XIV. If he was invested with pontifical authority, we should *not* see doctrinal error and rupture with Tradition, which is a consequence of the assistance of the Holy Ghost. As Catholics know, in the Roman See, the true religion will always be preserved, inviolate.

However, in incredible fashion, it affirms nearly word-for-word the doctrines and spirit embodied by the ecumenical movement that Pope Pius XI condemned in 1932, who called it the “abandoning [of] divinely revealed religion”.

Here is one easy example, which I challenge anyone to dispute:

— In Mortalium Animos Pope Pius XI condemned the following (no. 7) ideas and spirit: “Controversies therefore, they [ecumenists] say, and longstanding differences of opinion which keep asunder till the present day the members of the Christian family, must be entirely put aside, and from the remaining doctrines a common form of faith drawn up and proposed for belief, and in the profession of which all may not only know but feel that they are brothers.”
 
— In Unitate Fidei, Leo XIV maintains (no. 12) the opposite, urging his followers thusly: “We must therefore leave behind theological controversies that have lost their raison d’être in order to develop a common understanding and even more, a common prayer to the Holy Spirit, so that he may gather us all together in one faith and one love.”

X 🔗