Whistleblowers now confirm Ilhan Omar’s campaign funneled a massive amount of money to her husband’s firm while Somali-linked networks in Minneapolis ran one of the biggest COVID relief fraud schemes in history, hundreds of millions stolen.

She knew.
She benefited.
She covered for them.
This isn’t “community outreach.”
This is corruption on steroids

https://x.com/rickydoggin/status/2011840765618766184?s=46

BREAKING: Minneapolis Rank-and-File Cops Back ICE, Defy City Leadership

Border Commander Greg Bovino says Minneapolis police officers on the ground are thanking and fully supporting ICE and Border Patrol, directly contradicting Mayor Frey’s rhetoric, noting the same pattern seen in Los Angeles and Chicago, and inviting any Minneapolis officers who want to join ICE or U.S. Border Patrol to do so, pledging full support to make American cities safer.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Truth Social

This episode took a lot out of me --- and is extremely personal. If you don't know my story, it all started with standing up against the jab. And it's somewhat traumatic to revisit things I'd sooner forget. In any event, Ep. 19 is up: "Thy Will Be Done: A Case Presented on Earth and in Heaven." I hope it encourages you. https://rumble.com/v74ipr2-ep.-19-thy-will-be-done-a-case-presented-on-earth-and-in-heaven.html

Breaking:  complaint filed to the FEC against US Congresswoman Ilhan Omar for Smurfing $2,055,743 into her campaign committee.

See one way of how the bad actors are doing it:

Donors by Total FEC transactions
(and share going to Ilhan Omar – C00680934)

Donor              Total FEC      Omar #   Omar $                         ---------------------------------------------
Bandt, Paula            66,138      79     $204.00        Urba[xx], Wendy    55,701    163   $1,158.00      
Farr, Gerald              49,822     56     $855.00      
Fielder, Betty           43,532       5      $70.26         
Mason, Gwyneth    43,011      12      $83.26        
Bubenik, Patricia   42,286      10      $52.00       
Pilder, Stephen         41,791      98     $755.75      
Heaton, Kevin          41,554      54     $967.00     
Dearman, Melinda 35,524     45   $1,350.50   
Watson, James        34,201      15     $135.00   

Real example: Mr Watson supposedly made 34,201 contributions to political campaigns (spoiler alert: he did not). With 15 of those contributions going to corrupt Omar.

If you looked up her campaign donations you'd see the 15 and think nothing of it.

But Mr. Watson (ok, really computer bots did it and Mr Watson is a victim who had his identity stolen and doesn't know it - Chris Gleason discovered this)  made those 34, 201 to hundreds of federal campaigns.

Spoiler alert again: he actually didn't. It is Smurfing, which is structured money laundering happening in Minnesota and nationally in all states.

I expose the Smurfing of other Congressman, Senators  in my posts abovr. Use the spyglass and search my posts, or just scroll up.

Political Committee C00680934, ILHAN FOR CONGRESS has accepted 50,676 Smurfed
donor transactions totaling $2,055,743 from 3,359 unique Smurfing donors. That these transactions
encompass 64.1% of the 79,116 available committee transactions and also being 23.7% of the $8,669,428
full committee transaction valuation.

~ Peter Bernegger

BREAKING: DOJ to Charge Don Lemon Under the ‘KKK Act’ for Inciting Church Raid (VIDEO)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/breaking-doj-charge-don-lemon-under-kkk-act/

This should be very helpful to have this admission in a FACE Act prosecution. Arrest him.

HOLY SMOKES. Sec. Scott Bessent just EXPOSED Denmark's treatment of Greenland in front of millions!

"Denmark has a TERRIBLE history with Greenland. There was FORCED sterilization until the 80s and 90s! All of a sudden, now that the US expressed an interest, there's this new interest from them?!"

Europe does not care about Greenland or have the capability to defend it. Only America does.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Truth Social

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: TINA PETERS ASSAULTED

Last night, Tina Peters was assaulted at approximately 9PM MT in La Vista Correctional Facility.

Tina was inside a maintenance closet to fill up a water unit when an inmate approached her in the closet and began striking her in anger.

Tina raised her hands and pushed the inmate away.
Per Tina, the camera showed her pushing the inmate away from her out of the closet.

She was subsequently handcuffed, shackled, and brought to solitary.

Tina was told she is being charged with Felony Assault for defending herself against an unprovoked attack.

She will be locked down completely for 24-72 hours and held in IDO (the hole) for an unknown period of time.

As far as Tina is aware, the inmate who assaulted her has not been charged, slept in their cell last night, and will face no consequences.
This incident is clearly a targeted attack against Peters.
In all likelihood, it is being used as an opportunity to isolate and harass Tina Peters.

Tina has been warning officials that something like this would happen eventually. She was advised to apply for the Incentive Pod. Tina has applied repeatedly and been denied despite nothing disqualifying her.

Something is not right at LVCF.

Tina has minor injuries but is not seriously injured as of this morning.

Can you imagine 70 year old Tina Peters being charged ANOTHER felony charge for defending herself?

Please support Tina! Support her Legal Defense at http://Tinapeters.us and continue to pray for her safety and swift release!

https://tinapeters.us/2026/01/19/for-immediate-release-tina-peters-assaulted/

Question for LVCF re:
@realtinapeters
latest incident:

70 year old high profile non-violent inmate is doing routine work in a closet.

Another inmate goes into the closet.

70 year old non-violent inmate just had an appeal hearing that raised issues regarding:
- improper SENTENCING
- inability to mount a defense speaking to INTENT (namely that she intended to receive a benefit from her "scheme of deception")
- convictions differing from charges that the jury was instructed on (related)
- 1st amendment violations (related)
- whether 3 charges should have been 1
- general idea that her prosecution and sentencing were the result of targeted weaponization

*70 year old non-violent inmate has been the subject of repeated threats from within and outside the prison.

70 year old non-violent inmate, awaiting a ruling on appeal, decides to assault much younger inmate in the closet.

70 year old non-violent inmate thrown in solitary.
Assault charges.

Other inmate is cool. Obviously the 70 year old non-violent inmate is the problem here.

Is that the story going forward CDOC?

https://x.com/ApolloPappas/status/2013357208814448765

THE AMERICAN WAR ON ELECTION CORRUPTION

*Manunoscript Accepted*

Expected release March 5

Democrats have been in power in Virginia for ~48 hours and they’ve already introduced a bill to ban the hand-counting of election ballots…

"Prohibits such ballots from being counted by hand for any reason…"

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2013403860656939227?s=20

"Tarrant County proves that a voting system can be programmed to manipulate ballot images to match a false result, making it impossible for fraud to be uncovered."

https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/bombshell-tarrant-county-hart-intercivic

Virginia, was just trying to catch up with the other so-called "Red States" that have made hand counting illegal for decades.

FUN FACT: Florida led the nation by making digital and mechanical tabulation of ballots THE ONLY LEGAL VOTE TALLY.

When asked in a FL Legislative Committee back in Dec 2023, our premier Secretary of State, Cord Byrd, made it clear that the SOEs in FL have NO DISCRETION TO HAND COUNT...

even when it is just spot checks the machine counts.

You may vote on paper...but they ONLY CARE WHAT THE 3rd PARTY. PRIVATE VENDORS SAY ARE THE RESULTS.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElectionFraud20_org/6417

This clip of FL SOS Cord Byrd from Dec 2023's House Ethics Committee sums it all up for Floridians.

Byrd states, we use paper ballots to vote because that is the "BEST EVIDENCE OF THE VOTERS INTENT"

The chairman asks, well can the local SOEs count the paper ballot to check them against the machines? Even if they still use the machines to transmit the totals?

Byrd replies that the local SOE are FORBIDDEN to count the paper ballots UNLESS there is a close race where the results are 0.25% apart from each other.

The changes Senator Ingoglia is now asking for with SB1414 will make sure that results is always controlled by the private election vendors.

So basically no one will be allowed to observe your paper ballot to even simply check if the machines are tabulating them correctly.

It is a legal slight of hand.

You still believe you vote by paper ballot.

But the government never checks to see if the digital tabulatin matches what happened on the paper.

YOU HAVE TO TRUST THE MACHINES!

Do you?