Anonymous Conservative News Brief – Telegram
Given that, I am thinking the linkage of China and Russia and Serbia to this is increasing in its probability as a bullshit diversion in my probability matrix, though in truth there is still not enough data to make a conclusion. It is convenient if it were China and Russia, it feeds a perception there is not really much we are going to be able to do to get vengeance when everything is revealed, since we do not want global nuclear war. So will just have to eat what happened and drop it. Whereas, if there were a smaller cadre of non-state associated elites, who formed a sort of private, non-state, intelligence organization/syndicate, we could deploy wetwork teams, probably highly technologically sophisticated wetwork teams of a sort we would not presently even think of as classical wetwork teams, and kill them all. If that were the case, the seeding of this narrative now might imply they are seeing some way to mold future events to force Trump to align with that conclusion, since in the end, what will happen to them is determined by what Trump/White-Hat-Intel decides to do, and presently I would assume that is, in the end, kill them. I do not think such a potent, and capable enemy can be left about, just waiting to put the band back together at the time and place of their choosing.
🔥1
There is always the urge to pump your fist, and say, “Finally, we got the cocksuckers!” with each story like that. But first, you have to expect somebody will be trying to muddy the waters with disinformation in this case, given what is at stake. And two, I take them all with a grain of salt because there are so many. The rigging was done by a professional intel organization, so it was mapped and wargamed before anybody pulled the trigger on it, and one aspect produced by that is it must leave behind an auditable record which supports the rigged outcome, in case there is an audit.

I am unclear how you can have trucks of ballots shipped in by one entity, people like Ruby Freeman scanning the same ballots hundreds of times on the fly, Ballot Harvesters dumping made up ballots into the system, poll workers discarding Trump votes on the fly, Machines programmed to not accept Trump votes at all, algorithms in the machines which are reducing the Trump vote by the exact same set percentage on the fly as the night goes on in all jurisdictions, Chinese election workers leaving Mike Lindell’s “PCAP” data records as they access the voting machines over the internet to change totals as the night goes on according to their whim, CIA hacking in through Serbian Servers, Italian Satellites being used to access the machines by MI-6/Five Eyes, USB data drives being plugged in to change totals again, and then additional fraud on the Absentee ballots counted afterward, and even more fraud if there is a recount, and have it all integrated into one auditable record, supported by boxes of millions of physical paper ballots, which if broken open and counted by hand, will show the exact same total.

It feels like pros would follow the KISS principle, and find one “Magic Trick” which made everyone think their vote was counted, and yielded the desired result believably in a predictable fashion. And this trick would not require adjustment based on how the actual voting went, and it would produce an auditable record in the form of millions of paper ballots after all was said and done, which would support the pre-ordained result exactly.

All these different moving parts happening on the fly, and then actual voting can make them have to go back in on the fly and change things again, and at the end of it they have millions of ballots in boxes which support the numbers – which seem to be relatively unknown until it is over. I do not see how that works. You would have to get the final numbers, and then take a few days to print the millions of hard copies in the right relative numbers, and then box them up and swap them with the real ballots if it worked like that. And for a few days, you would have no hard copies supporting the result, I would think, and you would always run the risk the swap got detected.

And then on top of it, they even get thwarted and have no plan B, so Trump wins – it just does not feel like how a professional intel operation works. Some of these stories have to be BS, IMO, and they are being produced to muddy the waters.
One advantage you have, if you were a life-long target, is the realization of how many people who surrounded you were lying to you and trying to manipulate you will leave you incredibly hardened against that type of thing. Maybe that is legit, but the only way you will know is if it unwinds, and the ground surveillance, the American Stasi, is either revealed or not. If they reveal it, and destroy it, it will have been legit. But if you do not see it revealed, then everything was bullshit, and the band plays on. https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/2007961528079986692
Whether noscripted Kayfabe or a genuine war being fought, that was clearly the message they wanted to send. On the one hand, I would think if a war, you would focus on winning, and not look for points on style, but on the other hand they did not actually launch on Christmas, so maybe it is a war. I will believe it all when I see assholes being executed by firing squads and hung on TV, and then I no longer have to listen to their bullshit or deal with the surveillance, or even do these briefs.https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/2007981628648206368
This is how I would expect a Secretary of State to look after a mission was a complete failure, not after watching a first-person-view video of a Delta Operator on point, fast roping to a roof and plying his trade in real time speed. I do not really have insight into what, if anything it means, but Rubio smacks me in the face every time I see these shots of him. And others are seeing it too, which is why you are getting these memes:https://x.com/C_3C_3/status/2007936984539713664
So if Venezuela was a denied area for Cabal to operate in, and CIA was operating in it, as it appears, Cuba, home of the Havana Syndrome, was the nation used to create it. So Cuba was a denied area for CIA to operate in? Or was Cuba owned by the same entity which owned CIA, and they were kept compartmentalized?https://x.com/AFpost/status/2007899154086019543
I hate to beat a dead horse, but if r/K Theory were taught in political science, people would know, migrants are r-strategists. https://x.com/AFpost/status/2007913588443525182
This is a consequence of the pervasiveness of surveillance, and the intelligence operation it serves being in control of politics. Everything everyone does covertly, I would assume goes in their file. Before, everyone in each sector was just familiarizing themselves with patterns, and looking for pattern breaks. Someone breaks off after work and stops by a motel, it would be surveillance’s job to figure out what was going on, who was being met with, when the next rendezvous would be, and get cameras in the room so next time, whatever was going on with whoever they were meeting up with would get recorded and documented. I would be surprised if less than 97% of all affairs were documented in the affair-haver’s files. Now today, with AI scraping phone geolocation, and emails, and text messages, and probably listening in people’s cars, I would assume any pattern break produces a flag, and all flags are run down by the locals to create a record of everything you are up to. And people would think this bad, but the reality is, if you dream of power and money, I now think the fastest way there is to have a thing for underaged gay hookers. The worse what you do is, the more control the machine will have over you, and the higher it will promote you. Biden was a complete loser, but I think the members of that family are all banging each other, and because of that, he ended up President with like three multi-million dollar homes.
🔥1
Elon Musk – “We have entered the Singularity” -The technological singularity is a hypothetical future point where AI surpasses human intelligence, leading to runaway technological growth and unpredictable, transformative changes, often envisioned as an “intelligence explosion” where superintelligent AI rapidly self-improves beyond human comprehension, akin to an astrophysics event horizon. While debated, proponents like Ray Kurzweil suggest this could merge humans with machines or create advanced solutions to global problems, whereas critics warn of existential risks and the potential for AI dominance, emphasizing the need for ethical development.” If there is a highly advanced, non-human intelligence here, this might be the point where they would intervene somehow.