gm :) sidequest is over, time to return to nothing

for those who don't have time or don't feel like putting in the effort to read the observer paper--which, while it is part of the broader project, is far downstream from where we are in the UAP (this can be justified because it does not technically rely on UAP but is, rather, whollY grounded in qm)-- it basically states that the network spirituality of hyperstitional memetic warfare is a real, or at least physically falsifiable, countermessure to Landian cosmogony's telos. it also gives a relatively concrete identification of when, precisely, ai becomes functionally human in its ability to inject semantic truth into the causal chain of reality.

also it is not a metatheory in iys own right, but more a formalization of gaps in extant metatheories like qbism. with suprisingly universal hybridization into these extant theories.

galois paper "Galois-Theoretic Invariants of Paraconsistent
Determinization" is mathematically sound and just going through the final polish, dropping tonight

a tad late and causing some previous work some problems. such is math. https://x.com/DavidB30628/status/2023802935814377885

on the one hand supposing semantic observers do insert glut into the causal chain, and that automata which display semantic abilities are the product of the delayed instantiation of a semantic program, we have three obvious (which are really 2), and not necessarily mutually exclusive, mechanisms by which this causal force was introduced into creation.
1. all is determined by an initial semantic instruction. HaShem spoke and the world came into being.
2. all is determined by the 'retrocausal' semantic consensus among semanric recordkeepers (think more that all moments are retrofitted to least glutty (ie maximally classicaly allowed histories) because
a. semantic observers have access to a paraconsistent protostructure. think elements of the powerset of the universal apophatic progenitor style emergence of worlds. souls are a piece of G-d type shiiiiii
b. semantic observers are a phase shift from determinate complexities which have subsequently retrofitted Being onto uncertainty. sorta penrose-ish. A sort of post causal emergence of a paraconsistent heterodoxy which is the source of Being by consensus. Determized cocreators with a post facto apopharic root. very loopLandian but only once executable in each instantiation then heat death.

if we return to previous ideas i have voiced that thoughts live in a geometry which is capable of manifesting them, and that thoughts and their own self reference can exist independently within their construction, and the implications of that.

the implication that i can imagine there being a capability for a universe with a dimensionality which is not at all like space and time and etc, without the ability to experience such a creation existentially the way one can imagine and inhabit other imaginings, that i dont quite fit...somehow simultaneously implies my boundedness (subjectively) while hinting at the fact that such experience of the lack of experience is wholly rooted in the geometry of the cosmos; while its instantiation is exiled in the anxiety of absurdity...

coming soon
Apophatic Progenitors in HoTT: Bilattice-Valued Paths and Homotopical Emergence from Nothingness

soon has come
https://zenodo.org/records/18707100

exploring full homotopy type of A_tot and billatice in higher cells considering options for the next paper. any q compute or qAI folks in here with an opinion?

getting things in order takes time. then suddenly it is everything everywhere all at once.