On Love:

When in love, our soul ascends to imitation of Eros. To truly love someone is a wordless, thoughtless, instantiated experience. Love is without discursion and is free of justification. Love is simple and self-possessed; its only accident is the one we love.

It is "self-possessed" because our ego is dispensed by it. With everything, the ego is the foundation of our experience. But within Love, the self is suspended, and Love, without any accompaniment, subsumes the soul; that is, the soul becomes Love himself.

In the moment of Love's purity, Love is self-sufficient. Indeed, it is a god, perfect and needless. We oft associate love with longing, yet Love already possesses the loved within itself. If it didn't, what existence could it have? Love is not a potentiality, but an actuality.

Eros precedes the divison of love, for he is divine Love itself simplex; therefore, every later division of love shared between two is actually preceded by their union within Eros as one. As such, Love itself always possesses the other, their division as two coming after.

Thus, in true love, the wordless and thoughtless flush is the soul's possession of our loved via Eros. The self is forgotten and the soul takes flight, drawing itself into an instance of ecstatic communion and oneness, and we are overcome with the sentiment of ineffable goodness.

There are so many demoralising accounts that like to present various things as being representative of an irreversible death.

Remember: they are deliberately demoralising. It is a weapon asking you to embrace spiritual and sometimes actual suicide.

Nothing is irreversible. The means exist to rectify the very worst results of the modern age. Europa is not dead, far from it. True, she must awaken, but nothing has yet slain her. And when at last Europa awakens, Jove will carry her on his back.

Europe is doing great.

The shitskin invaders will leave not a single cultural or genetic trace here. They will be swiped away in a few months maximum once the road is free.

Millenial soys and fags will die old and alone and can't adopt or keep children in relevant numbers. Let those who are attracted by this crap die in misery. Europe is full already.

Boomers will soon be out of the game and make place for changes.

Kikes lost their power since media got decentralized with the internet.

The future belongs to us. There is no new left elite coming up. The only people who put effort in their lives are high IQ fancy white guys (and some asians maybe) who are gonna fuck the kikes and their zobot servants

A metaphysical consideration that helps intuit differences between the sexes: men are the divided heavenly and women are the unified earthly.

Notable is how men and women embody a paradox of natures, making the sexes complementary: unity is heavenly, and division is earthly.

Oppositional eschatologies is the foundation of Yahweh's labyrinth. It leads you deep into his maze, wherein you lose yourself and become incapable of conceiving the world without Yahwism.

Take a step back and observe yourself. Observe how your patterns of thought follow a dialectic of thesis and antithesis: that 'conveniently' for every positive there is a negative; and for every claim, a dissent; and for every good, an evil.

The labyrinth of Yahweh is wholly structured around entrapping people within a dualistic paradigm of oppositions. The labyrinth becomes difficult to escape because when you are in its midst, it is the whole known world. You become enraptured, and so as you experience its self-contained narrative unfold before you, this is taken as the whole of reality.

This is why on the divisive question of Jews, Christians are either total Zionist fanatics who giddily witness the Jewish people as a living miracle, or they are the complete opposite and believe them to be the very essence of evil. It is polarising in the extreme because when you are within the labyrinth, you are compelled to polarise.

Every Yahwist belief must polarise because it is only in the extremes that zealous, self-affirming dogmatism can be cultivated. It is here that narratives become all-encompassing and unquestionable, and wilful disinterest in the whole truth for the sake of retaining these all-encompassing narratives becomes the standard procedure.

Evidence of this can be seen beyond religion, as Yahweh's labyrinth holds the whole of our societies within itself, and so we see this exact dynamic within modern politics. Politics is incessantly reduced to polarising oppositions, each end enraptured by its own narrative, and are so conceited in their self-certainty that they passionately forego reason and embrace anything and everything that affirms them, and reject out of hand anything and everything that contradicts them.

The Jews are knowledgeable of Yahweh's labyrinth. It is endemic to their philosophy, whereby they believe the whole of creation came to be by way of the actualisation of all things and their corresponding opposite. Everything to them is a metaphysical polarity, and that it is only by intensifying these polar opposites to their greatest extreme that the world can properly become "complete," after which they believe the Messiah will at last come to reconcile all opposites into unity.

Consequently, it is of theological necessity for them to cultivate contraries and antagonise opposition. The seminal opposition of Yahweh's labyrinth began at the very beginning and is present plainly in the Bible: the Jews, the Chosen of God vs the Gentile, their God-forsaken opposite. From there unfolded every subsequent act and motion.

This is the archetypal opposite upon which every Yahwist creed and belief is modelled. Every single one designates a "Chosen People" against a "Forsaken People." Just consider for a moment how Europe's whole history since its adoption of Christianity has been completely dominated by this dialectic, from religious sectarianism to revolutionary politics. The spectre of Yahwism is identifiably there, even sometimes in the absence of Jewish involvement.

If we are to ever be liberated from this death spiral, we must reject it in its TOTALITY, and we must be intensely vigilant to identify it wherever it may linger, wheresoever thought might incline to it. And as difficult as it will be for many, the first step is abandoning Christianity, which stands as the root of its introduction to us in the first place and will ever refresh our submission until it is totally discarded.

Response I made on X to someone who had just converted to Orthodoxy on account of its criticism of Jews.

Metaphysically speaking, there is no such thing as "Yahweh." Yahweh is an identity that is used by many daemons to fulfil their act of leveraging ignorance to drive Saturnian procession.

When proactively pursued, such is rightly called Typhonic. Typhon is multiplicity without limitation (i.e. without order). This is what demarcates Typhon from Saturn; Saturn may be a processional drive to multiplicity, but he does so via limitation. Typhon breaks down order and strives to alienate the many from the all by alienating it from itself. Chaos without potency or actuality. Nil.

Achievement of this is, praise the gods, impossible. True self-alienation and true oblivion have been ordained by the gods to be beyond reach, guaranteed by the divine Necessitas, who safeguards the order of all things in accordance with themselves.

However, this does not withhold us from being subject to illusions. By exploitation of our ignorance, we are made to impose upon ourselves false matrices of illusory truths that, from our solipsistic vision, appear to be unwavering reality. It is in this false reality that Yahweh becomes a real god with real power, and he appears to us a fixed reality.

The power of Yahweh is in the name alone, and this is actually identified many times in the Bible. His name is sacred, worshipped, and isn't to be taken in vain, precisely because it is the name that is the vehicle of power, no actual being that lives in reality. It is occupied and used by many beings, each refusing an identity of its own but whose entire nature is to be transitive and shifting, and so Yahweh only "lives" so long he is believed.

Thus, in this sense, he can be destroyed. But the eternal victory, the one concerning reality, remains forever unspoiled. Jove's conquest of Typhon is immortal; forever, Typhon is nothing. All that's needed of us is to wake up.

One must assume Hades and the retributive deities relish in the punishment of evil, lest to wish evil persons dead would be an offence to the gods who receive them upon their passing.

Ergo, the killing of evil persons is to cultivate what the gods love.

We have to KILL evil. Retribution has to be desired on an untold scale. Laughter-loving Venus humours herself among the corpses of our enemies strewn across the fields of justice. To high heavens cheer is echoed when evil is committed to genocide.

For the few of my followers who have asked about my site, I have updated the domain. The apotheism(dot)com domain is more or less lost due to the cyber brigands that snap up newly released domains so that they can sell it back to their original owners at an absurd premium, so going forward I will be using apotheism.org. The main consequence of this is that any existing links using the .com domain won't work anymore, but if for whatever reason you are storing URLs to my site, replacing .com with .org will restore it.

"Who can be calm when he is called upon to prove the existence of the Gods? Who can avoid hating and abhorring the men who are and have been the cause of this argument; I speak of those who will not believe the tales which they have heard as babes and sucklings from their mothers and nurses, repeated by them both in jest and earnest, like charms, who have also heard them in the sacrificial prayers, and seen sights accompanying them―sights and sounds delightful to children―and their parents during the sacrifices showing an intense earnestness on behalf of their children and of themselves, and with eager interest talking to the Gods, and beseeching them, as though they were firmly convinced of their existence; who likewise see and hear the prostrations and invocations which are made by Hellenes and barbarians at the rising and setting of the sun and moon, in all the vicissitudes of life, not as if they thought that there were no Gods, but as if there could be no doubt of their existence, and no suspicion of their non-existence; when men, knowing all these things, despise them on no real grounds, as would be admitted by all who have any particle of intelligence, and when they force us to say what we are now saying, how can any one in gentle terms remonstrate with the like of them, when he has to begin by proving to them the very existence of the Gods?"
- The Athenian Stranger in Plato's Laws, Book X

The nitpick over whether or not the "biblical" Judeans are comparable/related to modern Jews is resolved the moment anyone actually reads the Bible and any other texts contemporary to the time written about the Judeans.

Instead of taking their righteousness for granted, which many do because they read the Bible uncritically and accept its justifications on its face, consider the behaviour of the Jewish nation throughout the Bible. Imagine you were the target, and that you don't believe in their prophetic self-justifications but instead are simply their victim.

Only a handful of the many, many stories of deceitfulness, all taken from just the first book:

In Genesis 12, Abram (Abraham prior to being renamed) and his wife Sarai went to Egypt due to famine. Sarai is said to be very beautiful, and so Abram introduces her as his sister supposedly to avoid being killed by men wishing to claim her. Pharaoh desired her, and so for her sake he profited Abram generously as he believed he was her brother, but when Pharaoh took Sarai into his home, Yahweh struck him and his household with plague to defend Sarai's fidelity, and so Pharaoh learned Sarai was married to Abram and banish them with their wealth.

In Genesis 25, we are told the barren wife of Isaac, Rebekah, gave birth to two sons, Jacob (whose name literally means "supplanter" or "he cheats") and Esau. Esau grew up to be a capable hunter, while Jacob "was a quiet man dwelling in tents." When Esau came in from the field, he was exhausted and pleaded Jacob give him some of the stew that he was cooking. Jacob leveraged Esau's desperation and compelled him to swear an oath surrendering his birthright to Jacob in exchange for food and drink.

In Genesis 27, Isaac is said to be ailing and of poor eyesight. He asks Esau to go out and hunt game for him and to prepare for him a meal and that when he returns, he will give Esau his blessing. Hearing this, Rebekah schemes against her own son with Jacob to rob him of his firstborn blessing, and so Jacob deceived Isaac by disguising himself as Esau and giving him food prepared by Rebekah.

In Genesis 30 and 31, Jacob deceives his father-in-law Laban by offering to take as his wage the speckled, spotted, and striped of his herd. Since Jacob was shepherding the flock for Laban, he selectively bred the flock (using a superstitious method of placing striped sticks before the flock when they bred) so that they would all be born speckled, spotted, or striped. Jacob thus claimed from the herd all the young cattle, swindling from Laban significant wealth for himself. He then fled from Laban in secret, taking with him Laban's daughters who were his wives, the wealth he had accrued under Laban, and Rachel, one of Jacob's wives and Laban's daughters, stole her father's household gods when they left.

These are all persons revered by Jews as their ancestral patriarchs from whom the Jewish nation descends, and from just this handful of stories alone, the Jewish character as we know it today is manifestly present.

Those who try to distance the Bible from the Jews, or, far worse, claim that Europeans are in fact the "true Israelites" and that the Hebrew patriarchs are actually OUR ancestral patriarchs, have either never read the Bible where these stories are aplenty, or are simply incapable of disengaging their subjective biases.

I'm not sure what sort of demographic I have on Telegram in terms of my following. It's likely very different to my following on X. It is certainly much smaller, but I think also it is more targeted.

Before I had criticised Sewell, and I had done erroneously. I forget what in particular I shared, but I do recall that it was libel defaming him and that it was wrong. I corrected that after he raised with me my error, but it was regrettable nonetheless.

Yet, I remain cynical. It's this cynicism that likely had me believe on its face whatever lie I endorsed when criticising Sewell. I didn't believe Europe's Oceania had much hope of racial awareness, that it would be left behind Europe and likely suffer a sad death at the hands of our either complicit or idiotic rulers, and at the hands of the miniscule Jewish population who, despite their absurd minority in Australia, have exercised and continue to exercise obscene influence over our politics.

The March For Australia protest bared little more character to me than the entirely empty Australian copy-cat Yellow Jacket protests and the ineffectual protests against Covid regulations. The right-wing of Australia is broadly speaking deeply pathetic. It bears the same limp-wristed weaknesses of the Weimar conservatives, except by tenfold. I subjected the prime of my youth to the politics of this nation, involving myself for a decade, and it was for nil but my own learning.

But it is evident that something is stirring globally. In England, an unprecedented level of unrest is erupting against England's disintegration via migration. And in Australia, although the march numbers were nothing in comparison to that of England, there is evidently an underlying feeling.

Sewell spoke to this crowd as a leader. He acknowledged their reluctance, but explained precisely why him and his men were needed. He presented his indispensability, that only him and those behind him were ready to fight belligerence with belligerence. Across social media, I saw many positive responses to the rhetoric Sewell presented, where even those who premise their opinion with a clarification that they 'hate Nazis,' they admit that only NSN is fighting for white Australians.

Take from this what you will. Credit was deserved, so with my meagre audience I will provide credit.

White Australia leader Thomas Sewell makes a speech at the March for Australia rally in Melbourne.

Follow: @NoticerNews