Two amazing columns today - the first on election integrity by Wendi Mahoney:

https://uncoverdc.com/2022/03/25/jovan-pulitzer-hutton-requests-full-review-of-az-voter-rolls-eric-program/

This is a free article designed to highlight *YOUR* path forward to cleaning up elections WHERE YOU ARE.

I hope you share it, learn from the Ten Points, and do all you can to implement any of these steps.

Spread far and wide.

https://skeshel.substack.com/p/the-ten-points-to-true-election-integrity?s=w

Actor #KeanuReeves’s career prospects in #China might be in jeopardy after he performed at an online concert for #TibetHouse.

🔶Watch more👉https://ept.ms/BannedinChina

⭕ Try @EpochTV for free 👉https://ept.ms/FreeTrialTiffany

*Bombshell* Hunter Biden laptop text reveals Joe Biden got "half."🔻
tinyurl.com/mry83eur

Zuckerbucks via Executive Order: Biden Is Working to Turn Taxpayer Funded Election Offices Into Democrat Get Out the Vote Ops | Federalist

Biden is trying to turn government into a get-out-the-vote operation for his own political party. After failing to pass federal legislation to federalize control of the elections through Congress, and after states passed election integrity bills of their own, Obama’s puppet president is attempting a very quiet federal election takeover using an executive order to redirect federal tax dollars to identify new voting blocs that are expected to heavily support Democratic candidates.

One year ago, the Oval Office issued Executive Order 14019, which demanded more than a dozen federal agencies to register new voters and “promote voter participation.” The list of agencies ranged from the Department of Education to the Department of Homeland Security.

The average American does not think of federal agencies as responsible for voter registration and get out the vote efforts, and very few details have been released about the order’s implementation. This is by design — when politicians aren’t bragging, they are usually hiding.

In this case, the Biden administration is hiding an effort to require federal agencies to work with partisan private groups to strategically boost voter turnout in areas that would benefit Democrats. This order tips the scales to favor one party at every level of our representative democracy.

This is like the “Zuckerbucks” election privatization scam that funneled millions of private dollars into Democrat-favored districts during the 2020 election. But rather than Facebook’s founder funding it, taxpayers would.

Now, as state legislatures pass election integrity laws to make sure the Zuckerberg scandal will never happen again, Biden is taking action to ensure it will happen again and on an even bigger scale in Democrat strongholds.

If there was ever any doubt this executive order was politically driven, the text of the order aligns almost exactly with the policy recommendation from a December 2020 report produced by the far-left activist group Demos. According to the order, the heads of federal agencies will be tasked with promoting voter registration and voter participation. These activities reach far beyond their stated missions.

Soon after the White House issued the order, Demos published a document discussing how the Biden administration could best implement it. Even more concerning is that the two Demos officials who helped draft the group’s original recommendation are now working for the White House.

K. Sabeel Rahman, the former president of Demos, is now President Biden’s senior counselor for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and Chiraag Bains, who was Demos’ director of legal strategies, now reports directly to Biden’s director of the U.S. Domestic Policy Council, Susan Rice.

Even after a year, efforts to discover whether the administration is following Demos’ advice have so far hit dead ends. The Foundation for Government Accountability filed FOIA requests with multiple agencies about their compliance with the executive order but has yet to receive details about their plans.

Biden is weaponizing federal agencies to achieve partisan goals that he can’t accomplish through traditional legislative means. This behavior mocks our system of checks and balances and threatens the future of our democracy.

Read more🗞 Federalist

@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—

While we are peeling back the layers of this horrible propaganda that has been perpetrated on the American people, I am going to ask myself some questions and answer them with what I believe the answers are. I would love all of you to tell me what you think of my answers:

1) How could good ol' ballot stuffing be used to win a modern election? Hasn't there been a LOT of studies done to develop analysis tools to detect this?
1a) From what I have read/studied, the analysis tools that have been developed for this type of ballot-stuffing detection includes: a) Taking votes from the popular candidate, b) Adding to the unpopular candidate and c) Doing both, which amounts to vote flipping. The analytics developed to detect these activities rely on the idea that voting turnout follows normal distribution patterns. This is where Dr. Frank's finding becomes so important. If the #ElectionRacketeeringMachine has an arm that has access to the voter rolls and is able to add voters to the rolls of a specific age/race/party affiliation, then the precinct level turnout can be controlled to BE a normal distribution while INCLUDING the phantom/ghost/stuffed votes.

2) Why are the primaries for each party so important to put unexciting candidates (for the most part) on the ballots?
2a) The structure we are observing in the the #ElectionRacketerringMachine is originally planned based on 2 important things: a) The same number of people that care and come out to vote do so each and every time and the candidates can't be too exciting to cause the people who sit on the couch to actually come out and vote and b) the people that come out to vote must stay voting for their profiled party.

3) Why are there riots and social trauma events before each election?
3a) This allows politically divisive topics to be brought to the public forefront. This cast aspersion on the "other side" and re-enforces the idea that "Well, I might not like the candidate from my party, but I can't identify with "THOSE PEOPLE". This results in more people voting along the party lines that they have historically or staying home. Both options are preferable to the #ElectionRacketeerinMachine over a vote crossing D -> R.

4) If they have control of the elections, why do some good people still win?
4a) Still part of the psy-op. If they elected ALL unpopular candidates, it raises questions within the community (REF: 2021 Grand Junction, CO Municipal election). Therefore, there has to be enough people allowed through to make it look like the conservatives are putting up a good fight! This keeps the masses from rising up. If all of the elections were stolen at once, the populous would rise up and overthrow the system that is instituting the cheat (REF: US General election 2020).

5) Why is is a good thing to get people disillusioned in the voting system so that they will stay home?
5a) As soon as it is seen as a record trend that a voter has stopped voting, that voter can go into the pile as a phantom voter. This is optimal since these are real people with real addresses and are not dead...we just vote them by mail and - if they don't care about elections anymore, why would they check if they had voted to catch that the #ElectionRacketeeringMachine is stealing their vote? After all - they weren't using it...

Any other thoughtful questions for today?

Here is a report I have been looking forward to forwarding for a long time. Duane Doutel and Paul Layne have labored for months on this, and it is a pretty damning indictment of the 2020 election in West Virginia.

Highlights:

• WV’s percentage of registered voting age population is artificially high (88.9% for 2020 General Election).
• WV’s new registered voters significantly increased between 2012 and 2020 which does not follow the significant decrease in voting age population.
• The high voter registration rates for most age groups are an indication of potentially fraudulent registrations occurring in those age groups.
• Absentee and early voting methods accounted for 51% of the votes cast in the 2020 General Election.
• A high level of voter turnout (70% – 80%) in the majority of age groups who cast votes in the 2020 General Election is an indication that fraudulent votes are being cast in those age groups.