Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The Jewish Patsy
“The Jews have been the perpetual and particular scapegoat (an Old Testament term) for Jesuit crimes, and a great host of Catholic and ‘non-Catholic’ co-adjutors have produced a massive repository of ‘scholarly works’ blaming the Jews for virtually every major successful Jesuit program of the past. In the Dark Ages the Jews were accused of drinking the blood Catholic infants and being the source of the Black Death; in the new Dark Age they are accused of being the hidden rulers of the world, manipulating everyone through usury and banking. ‘Of course, you attribute to others what you're doing yourself, and since what you're doing yourself is hateful, the others become hateful. But since the others, as a rule, would like to do the same hateful thing that you're doing, they collaborate with you, hinting that-yes-what you attribute to them is actually what they have always desired. God blinds those he wishes to destroy; you just have to lend Him a helping hand.’¹ The Jesuits precipitate and anticipate future mass acts of violence against nations and ‘ethnic groups.’ They or their mouthpieces seem to have advance knowledge of the design of coming aggressions. Sometimes they appear prophetic, but it is no prophecy to blurt out planned events which are being orchestrated by those with whom you are in association… The Society is careful to involve a number of Jews that are prominent and very visible in all of the swindles, revolutions, wars, and mass murders they have fomented since their inception. The future Jesuit, co-adjutor writers then have material to work with in maintaining the Romish fiction that the Jews run the monetary and political apparatus of the world's governments and are responsible for the horrendous crimes which the Jesuits themselves have perpetrated through loyal third parties that only with difficulty can be shown to have affiliation with the Society. This most clever stratagem allows the Society to kill two birds with one stone. They are able both to cover their own tracks, and to whip the Gentiles into frenzy over supposed Jewish supremacy and criminality. The Jesuits have well noted the latent, Satanic Anti-Jewish feeling that is present in most Gentle populations, and have used it to great advantage for their cause… Each Jesuit author stands on the shoulders of the previous authors and appeals to the large body of evidence (some factual and some fantasy) created by his predecessors. This sly operation allows fiction to become fact by a gradual ‘evolution’ and for the continuance of the Catholic Dark Age conception of Jewry to be foisted on each succeeding generation of readers. Individual Jews who serve the ends of the Jesuits are always surrounded, aided and even directed by co-adjutor Knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Opus Dei members or others who are indirectly in the pay and employ of the Catholic superstructure maintained and policed by Jesuit temporal power. Some powerful Jews are even known to be Knights of Malta or other royal orders, notably certain members of the Rothschild family, both past and present. The presidents and prime ministers who have a few Jews with high visibility as their advisors and department heads do so at the instruction and behest of the Catholic Church and its right arm, the Jesuit Order. Prior planning provides plausible denial through a Jewish presence in many of the financial and political moves of the Society, but if one looks hard he will not see hordes of Jewish rabbis banqueting and counseling with potentates, prime ministers, presidents and oligarchs. Instead he will find Catholic cardinals, bishops, and Jesuit priests standing next to every seat of power and luxuriantly ensconced in every national capital. The Jew is a side kick, an appendage to conspiracy, but he is not the master mind.”
-The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner pages 34-35, 38-39.
¹(Foucault's Pendulum, Page 518, Umberto Eco, Ballantine Books, 1989)
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
“The Jews have been the perpetual and particular scapegoat (an Old Testament term) for Jesuit crimes, and a great host of Catholic and ‘non-Catholic’ co-adjutors have produced a massive repository of ‘scholarly works’ blaming the Jews for virtually every major successful Jesuit program of the past. In the Dark Ages the Jews were accused of drinking the blood Catholic infants and being the source of the Black Death; in the new Dark Age they are accused of being the hidden rulers of the world, manipulating everyone through usury and banking. ‘Of course, you attribute to others what you're doing yourself, and since what you're doing yourself is hateful, the others become hateful. But since the others, as a rule, would like to do the same hateful thing that you're doing, they collaborate with you, hinting that-yes-what you attribute to them is actually what they have always desired. God blinds those he wishes to destroy; you just have to lend Him a helping hand.’¹ The Jesuits precipitate and anticipate future mass acts of violence against nations and ‘ethnic groups.’ They or their mouthpieces seem to have advance knowledge of the design of coming aggressions. Sometimes they appear prophetic, but it is no prophecy to blurt out planned events which are being orchestrated by those with whom you are in association… The Society is careful to involve a number of Jews that are prominent and very visible in all of the swindles, revolutions, wars, and mass murders they have fomented since their inception. The future Jesuit, co-adjutor writers then have material to work with in maintaining the Romish fiction that the Jews run the monetary and political apparatus of the world's governments and are responsible for the horrendous crimes which the Jesuits themselves have perpetrated through loyal third parties that only with difficulty can be shown to have affiliation with the Society. This most clever stratagem allows the Society to kill two birds with one stone. They are able both to cover their own tracks, and to whip the Gentiles into frenzy over supposed Jewish supremacy and criminality. The Jesuits have well noted the latent, Satanic Anti-Jewish feeling that is present in most Gentle populations, and have used it to great advantage for their cause… Each Jesuit author stands on the shoulders of the previous authors and appeals to the large body of evidence (some factual and some fantasy) created by his predecessors. This sly operation allows fiction to become fact by a gradual ‘evolution’ and for the continuance of the Catholic Dark Age conception of Jewry to be foisted on each succeeding generation of readers. Individual Jews who serve the ends of the Jesuits are always surrounded, aided and even directed by co-adjutor Knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Opus Dei members or others who are indirectly in the pay and employ of the Catholic superstructure maintained and policed by Jesuit temporal power. Some powerful Jews are even known to be Knights of Malta or other royal orders, notably certain members of the Rothschild family, both past and present. The presidents and prime ministers who have a few Jews with high visibility as their advisors and department heads do so at the instruction and behest of the Catholic Church and its right arm, the Jesuit Order. Prior planning provides plausible denial through a Jewish presence in many of the financial and political moves of the Society, but if one looks hard he will not see hordes of Jewish rabbis banqueting and counseling with potentates, prime ministers, presidents and oligarchs. Instead he will find Catholic cardinals, bishops, and Jesuit priests standing next to every seat of power and luxuriantly ensconced in every national capital. The Jew is a side kick, an appendage to conspiracy, but he is not the master mind.”
-The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner pages 34-35, 38-39.
¹(Foucault's Pendulum, Page 518, Umberto Eco, Ballantine Books, 1989)
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
👍1
Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The Jesuit Hive Mind
"’What is the nature of the Jesuit? None; he is fit for everything; a machine, a simple instrument of action, has no personal nature.’¹ Whatever he may be, the Jesuit can be anything, and yet is nothing. He is whatever he is told to be and if he is a ‘good Jesuit,’ that is all he ever will be. By his own rule, he should possess no thoughts or desires of his own; all his thoughts, desires, being but those of the Jesuit Universal Mind. He is a man who has foresworn allegiance to his country and attachment to family, and the life of his order is his life. His existence is submerged into the soul and life of the Order, and his personality is both a reflection and extension of his ghostly father, the Jesuit General, who is responsible for the perpetuation and preeminence of the Pope and The Papacy. ‘In the army of the Jesuits, each individual is a picked and chosen man; himself fit, in his own appointed sphere, to become a leader, a captain, a general, yes, a chieftain among leaders...In point of oneness of mind, singleness of purpose, simultaneousness of action, and terribleness of execution, what army, in ancient or modern times, is fit to be compared with that of the Jesuits?’² ‘The collective church is a body inanimate when alone and without the Pope, but informed by the Pope with a soul.’³ The Jesuit's obedience to orders must be inward as well as outward, in the heart as well as the flesh. In perfect obedience to his superior, he has willingly and with great effort surrendered not only his will, but his understanding. ‘But he who wishes to make an absolutely complete offering of himself must in addition to his will include his understanding, which is the highest degree of obedience.’⁴ ‘Perfection in Jesuitism cannot be reached otherwise than by lose of manhood. Will, judgment, conscience, liberty, all the Jesuit lays down at the feet of his general. It is a tremendous sacrifice, but to him the General is God...’⁵ ‘The destructive process of scooping out the will of the Jesuit novice, to replace it with that of his superior (as a watchmaker might fit a new movement into a case) and thereby, in most cases, to annihilate those subtle qualities of individuality and originality which are essential to genius,’⁶ so that ‘he not only identifies his will with that of the superior, but even his thoughts, and submits his own judgment to the superior's judgment, to the extent that a devout will can bend the understanding.’⁴”
-The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner pages 10-12.
¹(“The Jesuits,”MM. Jules Michelet, and Quinet; of the College of France, translated from the 7th edition by C. Cooks, B.I., Fourth Edition, London, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1848)
²(Ibid, Duff, Page 7.)
³(Roman Catholicism, Old and New. John Schulte, page 277, quoting Jesuit, Cardinal Pallavinci.)
⁴LOYOLA, IGNATAIUS (From ST. IGNATIUS' OWN STORY AS TOLD TO LUIS GONZALEZ WITH A SAMPLING OF HIS LETTERS, translated by William J. Young, SJ.; published 1956, Henry Regenery Company, Pages 114-115, The Letter on Obedience, March 26, 1553.)
⁵(History of the Reformation, J. A. Wylie, Volume Il, page 392.)
⁶(Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Handy Volume Issue, 1910, page 342.)
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
"’What is the nature of the Jesuit? None; he is fit for everything; a machine, a simple instrument of action, has no personal nature.’¹ Whatever he may be, the Jesuit can be anything, and yet is nothing. He is whatever he is told to be and if he is a ‘good Jesuit,’ that is all he ever will be. By his own rule, he should possess no thoughts or desires of his own; all his thoughts, desires, being but those of the Jesuit Universal Mind. He is a man who has foresworn allegiance to his country and attachment to family, and the life of his order is his life. His existence is submerged into the soul and life of the Order, and his personality is both a reflection and extension of his ghostly father, the Jesuit General, who is responsible for the perpetuation and preeminence of the Pope and The Papacy. ‘In the army of the Jesuits, each individual is a picked and chosen man; himself fit, in his own appointed sphere, to become a leader, a captain, a general, yes, a chieftain among leaders...In point of oneness of mind, singleness of purpose, simultaneousness of action, and terribleness of execution, what army, in ancient or modern times, is fit to be compared with that of the Jesuits?’² ‘The collective church is a body inanimate when alone and without the Pope, but informed by the Pope with a soul.’³ The Jesuit's obedience to orders must be inward as well as outward, in the heart as well as the flesh. In perfect obedience to his superior, he has willingly and with great effort surrendered not only his will, but his understanding. ‘But he who wishes to make an absolutely complete offering of himself must in addition to his will include his understanding, which is the highest degree of obedience.’⁴ ‘Perfection in Jesuitism cannot be reached otherwise than by lose of manhood. Will, judgment, conscience, liberty, all the Jesuit lays down at the feet of his general. It is a tremendous sacrifice, but to him the General is God...’⁵ ‘The destructive process of scooping out the will of the Jesuit novice, to replace it with that of his superior (as a watchmaker might fit a new movement into a case) and thereby, in most cases, to annihilate those subtle qualities of individuality and originality which are essential to genius,’⁶ so that ‘he not only identifies his will with that of the superior, but even his thoughts, and submits his own judgment to the superior's judgment, to the extent that a devout will can bend the understanding.’⁴”
-The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner pages 10-12.
¹(“The Jesuits,”MM. Jules Michelet, and Quinet; of the College of France, translated from the 7th edition by C. Cooks, B.I., Fourth Edition, London, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1848)
²(Ibid, Duff, Page 7.)
³(Roman Catholicism, Old and New. John Schulte, page 277, quoting Jesuit, Cardinal Pallavinci.)
⁴LOYOLA, IGNATAIUS (From ST. IGNATIUS' OWN STORY AS TOLD TO LUIS GONZALEZ WITH A SAMPLING OF HIS LETTERS, translated by William J. Young, SJ.; published 1956, Henry Regenery Company, Pages 114-115, The Letter on Obedience, March 26, 1553.)
⁵(History of the Reformation, J. A. Wylie, Volume Il, page 392.)
⁶(Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Handy Volume Issue, 1910, page 342.)
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
❤2
I will remind you, the migrants are being imported to die, they are being brought to lands to provoke civil wars, they are cannon fodder. Pray for their eyes to awake and for safe travels back home before the hammer drops
@BeastWatch
@BeastWatch
👍8🔥2
Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Another Jesuit Connection to Nikola Tesla? | Tesla and his Death Ray
College professor Joseph P. Farrell notes the following in his book The Giza Death Star Deployed:
“The resemblance of published diagrams of Tesla's ‘death ray’ does indeed bear a striking resemblance to those of famous Jesuit scientist Athanasius Kircher's pictures of Archimedes' mirror, discussed previously.” -The Giza Death Star Deployed: The Physical and Engineering of the Great Pyramid by Joseph P. Farrell page 195.
Is it a mere “coincidence” that Tesla’s death ray diagrams bear a “striking resemblance” to Jesuit priest Athanasius Kircher's Archimedes' mirror or did Tesla deliberately model his death ray after his Jesuit forefather? Taking into consideration the fact that Tesla was Jesuit trained¹, that he received an honorary degree from a degree from a Jesuit controlled university¹, that he had his own version of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises², and that he read after a Jesuit priest³. It does not seem far fetched to conclude that Tesla consciously patterned his death ray off Kircher’s work from centuries earlier.
¹https://news.1rj.ru/str/Jesuitocracy/30
²https://news.1rj.ru/str/Jesuitocracy/33
³https://news.1rj.ru/str/Jesuitocracy/28
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
College professor Joseph P. Farrell notes the following in his book The Giza Death Star Deployed:
“The resemblance of published diagrams of Tesla's ‘death ray’ does indeed bear a striking resemblance to those of famous Jesuit scientist Athanasius Kircher's pictures of Archimedes' mirror, discussed previously.” -The Giza Death Star Deployed: The Physical and Engineering of the Great Pyramid by Joseph P. Farrell page 195.
Is it a mere “coincidence” that Tesla’s death ray diagrams bear a “striking resemblance” to Jesuit priest Athanasius Kircher's Archimedes' mirror or did Tesla deliberately model his death ray after his Jesuit forefather? Taking into consideration the fact that Tesla was Jesuit trained¹, that he received an honorary degree from a degree from a Jesuit controlled university¹, that he had his own version of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises², and that he read after a Jesuit priest³. It does not seem far fetched to conclude that Tesla consciously patterned his death ray off Kircher’s work from centuries earlier.
¹https://news.1rj.ru/str/Jesuitocracy/30
²https://news.1rj.ru/str/Jesuitocracy/33
³https://news.1rj.ru/str/Jesuitocracy/28
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
👍1
Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Hitler’s Use of Propaganda was Analogous to that of the Jesuits
The American writer and librarian Robert B. Downs pens the following in his work Books that Changed the World,
“To attain the objectives set by his soaring ambition, Hitler proposed to use three methods: propaganda¹, diplomacy, and force. Nowhere in Mein Kampf² is the author more revealing of himself and his tactics than in his discussion of propaganda techniques, correctly believed by him to be one of the Nazis' most effective and formidable weapons. Max Lerner called Hitler ‘probably the greatest master of propaganda and organization in modern history³,’ adding that, ‘to find his equal one must go back to Loyola and the Jesuits⁴.’ To perfect his own understanding of the propaganda art, Hitler studied the propaganda techniques of the Marxists⁵, the organization and methods of the Catholic Church, British propaganda of World War I, American advertising, and Freudian psychology⁶.”
-Books that Changed the World by Robert B. Downs page 124.
¹Created by the Jesuits for their use in the counter-reformation.
²Which was ghostwritten by Jesuit Priest Bernhard Stempfle according to Otto Strasser in his book Hitler and I, page 57.
³Who would have amounted to nothing had not it been for Hitler’s master propagator Joseph Goebbels, the Jesuit seminarian trained in the Order’s ancient methods of propaganda.
⁴Of course, for they were the ones who created and mastered propaganda in the first place.
⁵Karl Marx was Jesuit educated and was tutored by Jesuit General Peter Beckx according to Otto Von Bismarck.
⁶Which was practiced by the Jesuits before Freud was even born, see The Scientific Outlook by Bertrand Russel page 142.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The American writer and librarian Robert B. Downs pens the following in his work Books that Changed the World,
“To attain the objectives set by his soaring ambition, Hitler proposed to use three methods: propaganda¹, diplomacy, and force. Nowhere in Mein Kampf² is the author more revealing of himself and his tactics than in his discussion of propaganda techniques, correctly believed by him to be one of the Nazis' most effective and formidable weapons. Max Lerner called Hitler ‘probably the greatest master of propaganda and organization in modern history³,’ adding that, ‘to find his equal one must go back to Loyola and the Jesuits⁴.’ To perfect his own understanding of the propaganda art, Hitler studied the propaganda techniques of the Marxists⁵, the organization and methods of the Catholic Church, British propaganda of World War I, American advertising, and Freudian psychology⁶.”
-Books that Changed the World by Robert B. Downs page 124.
¹Created by the Jesuits for their use in the counter-reformation.
²Which was ghostwritten by Jesuit Priest Bernhard Stempfle according to Otto Strasser in his book Hitler and I, page 57.
³Who would have amounted to nothing had not it been for Hitler’s master propagator Joseph Goebbels, the Jesuit seminarian trained in the Order’s ancient methods of propaganda.
⁴Of course, for they were the ones who created and mastered propaganda in the first place.
⁵Karl Marx was Jesuit educated and was tutored by Jesuit General Peter Beckx according to Otto Von Bismarck.
⁶Which was practiced by the Jesuits before Freud was even born, see The Scientific Outlook by Bertrand Russel page 142.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In case you forgot, the Jesuits were very involved in the creation of Freemasonry.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Excerpts from Freemasonry: A Poem in Three Cantos (Part One)
In 1830 Samuel Whittemore published a book by a Massachusetts citizen ennoscriptd Freemasonry: A Poem in Three Cantos. Accompanied with Notes Illustrative of the History, Policy, Principles, &c. Of the Masonic Institution; Shewing the Coincidence of its Spirit and Design with Ancient Jesuitism…
The author writes:
“‘Twas then the mantle on the Masons fell Which long had mask'd the Jesuit arts so well. ‘The organization of Freemasonry, like that of Jesuitism, is complicated and mysterious. To maintain and propagate the gospel was on the front of Jesuitism, as benevolence is on the front of Freemasonry; while the real aim of both has been self-aggrandizement. In the accomplishment of their object, they have been equally and astonishingly successful…’¹ The foregoing sketch is principally taken… from an article relating to the Jesuits, contained in the Edinburgh Encyclopedia, (Am. Ed.) vol. XI…It has not been my purpose to give a full and connected history of the order, but rather such parts of it only as would bring to the view of the reader the many points of resemblance subsisting between the history, the policy, and the principles of Jesuitism, and the bistory, policy and principles of the Masonic Institution. These points of resemblance are so numerous and so striking, that whoever reads the foregoing sketch with attention, cannot well avoid recognizing them. Indeed we shall discover in almost every line, analogies so strong and decided, as to rivet our attention to them at once. It is therefore the less necessary for me to undertake particularly to point them out to the reader. Freemasonry runs parallel with Jesuitism in almost every particular; insomuch so, that to give the history of the one, is almost equivalent to reciting that of the other… The constitutions and laws of the Jesuits were pretended ‘to have been suggested by the immediate inspiration of Heaven:’ so also Freemasonry claims divine origin. The primary object of the [Jesuit] society was, to establish a spiritual dominion over the ‘minds of men;’ and ‘to accomplish this object, the whole constitution and policy of the order were singularly adapted. The design of the Jesuits was, to make them masters of the world.’ It is abundantly evident that a primary object of the Masonic society has been, to establish ‘a dominion over the minds of men:’ that their design has been to ‘make themselves masters of the world.’ To accomplish these objects, ‘the whole constitution and policy of their order are admirably adapted.’ The Jesuits were pretendedly zealous for the interests of religion; while to promote their own selish interests,and those of their order, was all they cared for. The Masons feign an equal zeal for the promotion of charity and benevolence; while nothing can be clearer than that their great object, as an order, has ever been, to promote their own aggrandizement, and selfish interests… ‘The principles and practices [of the Jesuits] were uniformly accommodated to the circumstances in which they were placed.’ The same remark is emphatically true, in regard to the Free Masons, as the history of their scisms, and of their conduct in different countries and at different periods, will prove. The Christianity² of the Jesuits, ‘camelion-like, readily assumed the color of every region where it happened to be introduced,’ So Masonry, ‘camelion-like, assumes’ any religion which happens to be predominant; or infidelity, if that have greater popularity. The Jesuits ‘devised the most absurd falsehoods, to be used for attracting disciples, or even to be taught as parts of Christianity².’ How true is all this of Freemasonry! What absurd fables, what monstrous falsehoods it has devised, in order to attract disciples! It also proclaims itself as an appendage of Christianity; as an bandmaid to religion; and even sometimes arrogantly and impiously pretends that ITSELF is superior to divine revelation!”
-pages 122, 129-131
¹Ward’s Review, Vol. 1. p. 316
²Catholic “baptized” paganism
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In 1830 Samuel Whittemore published a book by a Massachusetts citizen ennoscriptd Freemasonry: A Poem in Three Cantos. Accompanied with Notes Illustrative of the History, Policy, Principles, &c. Of the Masonic Institution; Shewing the Coincidence of its Spirit and Design with Ancient Jesuitism…
The author writes:
“‘Twas then the mantle on the Masons fell Which long had mask'd the Jesuit arts so well. ‘The organization of Freemasonry, like that of Jesuitism, is complicated and mysterious. To maintain and propagate the gospel was on the front of Jesuitism, as benevolence is on the front of Freemasonry; while the real aim of both has been self-aggrandizement. In the accomplishment of their object, they have been equally and astonishingly successful…’¹ The foregoing sketch is principally taken… from an article relating to the Jesuits, contained in the Edinburgh Encyclopedia, (Am. Ed.) vol. XI…It has not been my purpose to give a full and connected history of the order, but rather such parts of it only as would bring to the view of the reader the many points of resemblance subsisting between the history, the policy, and the principles of Jesuitism, and the bistory, policy and principles of the Masonic Institution. These points of resemblance are so numerous and so striking, that whoever reads the foregoing sketch with attention, cannot well avoid recognizing them. Indeed we shall discover in almost every line, analogies so strong and decided, as to rivet our attention to them at once. It is therefore the less necessary for me to undertake particularly to point them out to the reader. Freemasonry runs parallel with Jesuitism in almost every particular; insomuch so, that to give the history of the one, is almost equivalent to reciting that of the other… The constitutions and laws of the Jesuits were pretended ‘to have been suggested by the immediate inspiration of Heaven:’ so also Freemasonry claims divine origin. The primary object of the [Jesuit] society was, to establish a spiritual dominion over the ‘minds of men;’ and ‘to accomplish this object, the whole constitution and policy of the order were singularly adapted. The design of the Jesuits was, to make them masters of the world.’ It is abundantly evident that a primary object of the Masonic society has been, to establish ‘a dominion over the minds of men:’ that their design has been to ‘make themselves masters of the world.’ To accomplish these objects, ‘the whole constitution and policy of their order are admirably adapted.’ The Jesuits were pretendedly zealous for the interests of religion; while to promote their own selish interests,and those of their order, was all they cared for. The Masons feign an equal zeal for the promotion of charity and benevolence; while nothing can be clearer than that their great object, as an order, has ever been, to promote their own aggrandizement, and selfish interests… ‘The principles and practices [of the Jesuits] were uniformly accommodated to the circumstances in which they were placed.’ The same remark is emphatically true, in regard to the Free Masons, as the history of their scisms, and of their conduct in different countries and at different periods, will prove. The Christianity² of the Jesuits, ‘camelion-like, readily assumed the color of every region where it happened to be introduced,’ So Masonry, ‘camelion-like, assumes’ any religion which happens to be predominant; or infidelity, if that have greater popularity. The Jesuits ‘devised the most absurd falsehoods, to be used for attracting disciples, or even to be taught as parts of Christianity².’ How true is all this of Freemasonry! What absurd fables, what monstrous falsehoods it has devised, in order to attract disciples! It also proclaims itself as an appendage of Christianity; as an bandmaid to religion; and even sometimes arrogantly and impiously pretends that ITSELF is superior to divine revelation!”
-pages 122, 129-131
¹Ward’s Review, Vol. 1. p. 316
²Catholic “baptized” paganism
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Scientology School Headquartered on the Site of a Former Jesuit Novitiate.
The Delphian School, in Yamhill County, Oregon, near Sheridan operates as a K-12 private school which utilizes the study methods developed by L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of the Church of Scientology. In 1974 the Jesuit Order sold their novitiate near Sheridan, Oregon to the Delphian organization for it to be converted into the first Scientology boarding school which first opened in 1976. Since opening the site of the Delphian School near Sheridan has served as the headquarters of the office of Delphi schools which oversees all of the schools ran by the organization within the United States.
References:
Old Catholic Buildings Still Serving - The Catholic Sentinel
The Delphian School - Wikipedia
Delphi School, Inc. - Wikipedia
Inside the Secretive Scientology School - The Daily Mail
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The Delphian School, in Yamhill County, Oregon, near Sheridan operates as a K-12 private school which utilizes the study methods developed by L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of the Church of Scientology. In 1974 the Jesuit Order sold their novitiate near Sheridan, Oregon to the Delphian organization for it to be converted into the first Scientology boarding school which first opened in 1976. Since opening the site of the Delphian School near Sheridan has served as the headquarters of the office of Delphi schools which oversees all of the schools ran by the organization within the United States.
References:
Old Catholic Buildings Still Serving - The Catholic Sentinel
The Delphian School - Wikipedia
Delphi School, Inc. - Wikipedia
Inside the Secretive Scientology School - The Daily Mail
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The Church of Scientology Modeled After the Roman Catholic Church
In a 1988 petition filed by lawyers working for the Church of Scientology we observe the following:
“Counsel asserts the hierarchical structure of the Church of Scientology is similar to, if not identical to, that of other longer established hierarchical religions… Specifically, counsel asserts ‘the parallels between the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of Scientology are particularly strong…’ the Mother Church of Scientology controls the doctrine and theology of local Scientology churches… The Church of Scientology does exhibit some of the same characteristics as the Roman Catholic Church. Both religions have similar structures in that both have separately incorporated individual units.”
-Matter of Church Scientology International In Visa Petition Proceedings Page 599.
Source: Matter of Church Scientology International - United States Department of Justice
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In a 1988 petition filed by lawyers working for the Church of Scientology we observe the following:
“Counsel asserts the hierarchical structure of the Church of Scientology is similar to, if not identical to, that of other longer established hierarchical religions… Specifically, counsel asserts ‘the parallels between the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of Scientology are particularly strong…’ the Mother Church of Scientology controls the doctrine and theology of local Scientology churches… The Church of Scientology does exhibit some of the same characteristics as the Roman Catholic Church. Both religions have similar structures in that both have separately incorporated individual units.”
-Matter of Church Scientology International In Visa Petition Proceedings Page 599.
Source: Matter of Church Scientology International - United States Department of Justice
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Papacy is and will always be the beast, man of sin, antichrist, one who causes all to take a mark or die.