Giant Women in the 19th Century

This photo, "Giant Women on the Road to Raarsu," was taken in 1897 by Dr. Hughets.

There are at least three tall women in the picture. The central one is 22 years old and is 230 cm tall. The lady on the right is over six feet tall.

Judging by the unique exhibit from the National Museum of Natural History of France, not only traces of Patagonian giants are missing from history.

The mysterious ghostly walls of Tibet❕

The photos taken by the German expedition in 1938-1939 show the Gyantz Plain of Tibet, its ghostly walls and fortified entrance.

After the return of the expedition began a debate that lasted for decades - are these formations natural? I do not know what arguments geologists, historians and scientists make, but, in my opinion, if there is an even straight wall, of the same width, with the same "towers" of the same height, separated by equal gaps - it is quite a man-made structure. I suggest that critics show at least one such creation of nature on the globe (after all, if nature created these walls in the Gyantz Plain, then there must be others)🤔

Big secrets for the Bolshoi Theater🤔

To illuminate such a theater, one would have to try very hard. The famous chandelier in the auditorium, weighing 2.5 tons, was equipped with gas horns and it happened that glass plafonds broke from heat and splinters fell on the heads of spectators. It was installed in 1863. However, the Moscow gasworks for gas production was opened three years later, only in 1866.

If our history were true, there wouldn't be so many silly inconsistencies. Now, the history of any building that is more than two hundred years old gives us a lot of surprises📜

In 1886, a large expedition of scientists landed on Easter Island, who spent 3 years exploring the island, described everything they found, made maps and systematized objects

The results came out in 1891, but the most outstanding asset of the island - the statues of moai paid scant attention. Sketched one billet to the giant moai in the quarry, and now there are two of them. There are 5 ready-made icons, but there are 887 of them on the island. What is the meaning of this?

And even the photo of buried moai when compared with the sketch doesn't fit together - the head of the statue is turned either with the temple to the wall, or the back of the head. Like the falsifiers who drew the pyramids📜

The "Reptiloid" statues on Nuku-Hiva Island📜

Located at a place called Temechea-Tohua in the Marquesas Islands depicting strange creatures. They date from the beginning of the 2nd millennium. They are different: there are large, big-mouthed "reptiloids," and there are others: with small torsos and disproportionately large elongated helmeted heads with huge eyes.

One thing they have in common is a vicious expression. Who did our ancestors portray, representatives of another race or guests from other worlds? Maybe these were their spacesuits and they flew safely into space?🤔

Ranakpur Temple.

The whole temple and all the elements are made in marble. The material is not easy to work with, any movement can just destroy an entire column. There are 1,444 columns in this very temple, each one is unique. That is, the columns were not repeated, all were different. And some of the columns reach a height of 12 meters.

They say it was built by four people in 50 years. A plausible version, isn't it?

An ancient temple that is carved out of a single piece of rock.

400,000 tons of stone had to be processed and removed to create the unique cave temple of Kailas. This giant temple carved into the rock would have taken generations to build, but in fact, according to archaeologists, its construction lasted only eighteen years.

Kailasa is located in the state of Maharashtra in the village of Ellora near the city of Aurangabad in India. The entire temple is carved into one piece of rock. Kailasa is nearly one hundred meters high, 140 meters long and 130 meters wide. The temple was officially built between 756-773.

If someone thought of building such a structure these days, they would need ten ten-ton mining machines, which in 200 days of continuous work would only do the rough work on the rock. The smaller parts would require manual labor, and how much time it would take is hard to imagine. To this day, Kailasa is one of the places surrounded by many mysteries.

When faking history and deciding here and there to add a couple of hundred years for antiquity, the main thing - to clean up all the tails! There is such a science of numismatics and it too should not be neglected. You can, of course, buy all the numismatists, but it would be too expensive. What are dangerous collectors of ancient coins? At least because they ask uncomfortable questions.

Why is a Roman coin depicting the Arabic style of writing, which will appear only 600 years after the emperor depicted on it?📜

If to take official data on building of Cheops pyramid, it turns out that for one hour "ancient Egyptians" cut down, processed, moved, lifted and installed 9 blocks on 2.5 tons each, 220 a day. And this is without taking into account the fact that people were under the scorching sun for 12 hours, worked at night and they all had to be provided with water and food.

Japanese engineers 40 years ago tried to build a copy of the pyramid seven times smaller. They wanted to build it in a month, they built it in a year. A truck and a helicopter were involved in the construction because the construction methods described in the story surprisingly did not work📜

In the Hermitage there is a work by Heinrich Bucholz "Allegory of victory over the Turks" 1777.

We are interested in the image of the Bronze Horseman. The artist died in 1780-1781 and could not see the monument before it opened in 1782.

Either Bucholz could predict the future, or the officials screwed up the dates📜

Most of Australia is enclosed by a rabbit-proof fence, which closes the way to the interior of the continent. However, with the development of aerial photography and space imagery, it has become much easier to see what's going on inside the closed continent.

Rex Gilroy in 1975 discovered a structure suspiciously resembling a pyramid on the outskirts of the town of Gimpy (Gimpy). Officials quickly oriented themselves and issued a version that it was a farm structure that had been built by a Swiss florist in the late 1880s.

The mythical florist was fruitful - 3 similar pyramidal structures were found at a distance of 1'600 km from each other, next to which were found ancient artifacts.

Creatures "Swiss" are so uninteresting that access to them and research is prohibited. Something these bans reminded of Politics of China. Though probably the pyramids were built by the scientists themselves to distract attention from what can be really there. Why is this fence so high? And why is there no video of the fence

Unusual hieroglyphs found in an Egyptian tomb are constantly causing controversy in the scientific community🤔

Modern cargo helicopters have a similar cutout at the bottom of the hull. The coincidence of the technique is very interesting.

These are the ruins of the Temple of Artemis. The bases of the columns were once underground. Large amounts of soil have been removed and moved. From the photograph you can judge approximately how deep the structure was. At least 10 meters deep. Cultural layers, archaeologists say. Accumulated over the centuries.

And the temple, as usual, according to all canons of history, was destroyed in wars by conquerors. Ah, no! Here historians cannot lead us astray. The bases of the columns are at least 10 meters deep from the surface. According to the laws of accumulation of layers these structures should be tens of millions of years old!

Su Nuraxi or "ancient fortress" is a central tower of megaliths, 20 meters high. There were also four smaller towers built on each side of the world

On the outer side of the construction of about a dozen small towers of megaliths, and all of them on the island about 7-8 thousand. But who built all this about 3,000 years ago, and for what purpose, is still unknown🤔

Giants on the streets of European cities in the 18th century👁

A painting by the artist Nicolas Jean Baptiste Ragnet. A competition of boatmen on the river between the bridge of change and the bridge of Notre Dame (view of the bridge of change) 1756.

Looking at the figures of the standing boatmen, we see that they are at least twice the size of those sitting in the boats! A critical reader will say that it is an allegory, so saw the author himself, far from realities, but the seventeenth century, and especially the eighteenth century is the kingdom of vedutists!

Veduta (Italian veduta, "kind") - a genre of European painting, especially popular in Venice in the XVIII century. It is a painting, drawing or print with a detailed depiction of an everyday cityscape📜

Parkas' elongated skulls were finally sent for DNA analysis. Let me tell you right away that they turned out to be human. Although no alien DNA was found in the skulls, the analysis results were able to baffle scientific traditionalists.

All the skulls belonged to the Native Americans, but in the DNA found traces of haplogroups that lived in the Black and Caspian Seas, and in the foothills of the Caucasus. How ancestors of Indians 3,000 years ago crossed the Bering Strait and reached the Pacific coast of South America scientists are not specified📜

As, indeed, it is not specified why the volume of the skull of the Indians is 1.5 times larger than usual, there is no sagittal suture and traces of artificial deformation.

WILLIAMS' FORK🤔

An artifact found by a man named John Williams, hence its name. It looks like an ordinary cobblestone, but it has what looks like a modern electric plug embedded in it. Three pins protrude above the rock. The cobble itself is feldspar granite. It was found in the countryside, far from industrial sites. It is estimated that the stone is about 100 thousand years old. How this piece was set into the granite is a mystery....

The ancient city of Sardis, Turkey

One of the hundreds of cities covered with soil, excavated in 1910-1914. These are the ruins of the temple of Artemis. This is probably the name given to it by archaeologists. From the photo you can see how deep the structure was, at least 10 meters deep. Cultural layers - say archaeologists (sand and clay) have accumulated over the centuries. And the temple, as usual, according to all the canons of history, was destroyed in the wars of the conquerors.

A 5,000 year old image found in Altai and signed "Manaka" is a deity of the Turks.
In Hinduism there is the fertility goddess Manasa, a woman with seven snakes around her head.
A similar "hydra" Chicomecatl is painted in temples throughout Mexico, as a legacy from the Aztecs.


But allow me, where are the Altai and India and where are the Aztecs? Assuming that nomads from Eurasia were involved in the settlement of the Americas, the journey must have been 5,000-13,000 years ago.

One of the most important ancient cultures that existed in Europe, developing around 9'000-7'700 BC in what is now known as the Balkans, was called the Danube Valley Civilization. Its borders stretched from Greece to Slovakia and from Croatia to Romania.

One of the first civilizations to create copper tools, architecture (e.g. houses with two stories), furniture production, and most importantly, writing. And all this at a time when most of Europe was in the Stone Age.

What did not please the authors of the textbooks with such a developed civilization? Apparently, the ancestors of the Slavs were not supposed to be developed🥲