Dr. Henry Halley on the Racial Prophecies of Genesis 9.
Henry Hampton Halley was an American Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) minister who lived from 1874 to 1965. He is most known for authoring the publication Halley’s Bible Handbook¹, which started off as a 16 page booklet in 1924, eventually growing to an 800 page handbook by the 1960’s. Commenting on the Noahic prophecy in Genesis 9:18-28 Dr. Halley states:
“Descendants of Ham to be servant races; Shemites to preserve knowledge of the True God; Japhetic races to have largest portion of world, and to supplant Semitic races as teachers of God. It was fulfilled when Iraelites took Canaan, Greeks took Sidon, and Rome conquered Carthage; and ever since Japhetic races have dominated the world, and have been converted to the God of Shem, while Semitic races have occupied a place of comparative insignificance: and Hamitic races a place of servitude. An amazing forecast!”
-Page 74
¹https://tinyurl.com/43zutddf
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Henry Hampton Halley was an American Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) minister who lived from 1874 to 1965. He is most known for authoring the publication Halley’s Bible Handbook¹, which started off as a 16 page booklet in 1924, eventually growing to an 800 page handbook by the 1960’s. Commenting on the Noahic prophecy in Genesis 9:18-28 Dr. Halley states:
“Descendants of Ham to be servant races; Shemites to preserve knowledge of the True God; Japhetic races to have largest portion of world, and to supplant Semitic races as teachers of God. It was fulfilled when Iraelites took Canaan, Greeks took Sidon, and Rome conquered Carthage; and ever since Japhetic races have dominated the world, and have been converted to the God of Shem, while Semitic races have occupied a place of comparative insignificance: and Hamitic races a place of servitude. An amazing forecast!”
-Page 74
¹https://tinyurl.com/43zutddf
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
👍2
The Jesuit Pioneers of Anti-whiteism.
Richard W. Thompson, former secretary of the American Navy, records the following indictment in his 1894 work The Footprints of the Jesuits¹:
To justify itself, and to explain to the European nations the reasons which influenced it, the Portuguese Government caused to be prepared a statement of grievances, wherein the course of the Jesuits "in the Spanish and Portuguese dominions of the New World, and of the war which they had carried on against the armies of the two crowns," were set forth… It then embodies in a few expressive words… That they (the Jesuits) had produced under them thirty-one great populations, producing immense riches to the society, while the people themselves were kept in the most miserable slavery; that no Spaniard or Portuguese, were he even governor or bishop, was ever admitted into the Reductions; that, 'with strange deceit,' the Spanish language was absolutely forbidden; that the Indians were trained to an unlimited, blind obedience, kept in the most 'extraordinary ignorance,' and the most unsufferable slavery ever known, and under a complete despotism as to body and soul; that they did not know there was any other sovereign in the world than the fathers, and knew nothing of the king, or any other law than the will of the 'holy fathers;' that the Indians were taught that white laymen adored gold, had a devil in their bodies, were the enemies of the Indians, and of the images which they adored; that they would destroy their altars, and offer sacrifices of their women and infants; and they were consequently taught to kill white men wherever they could find them, and to be careful to cut off their heads, lest they should come to life again."
-Pages 184-186, parenthesis added for clarity
¹https://tinyurl.com/bdht5fa4
From thence onward the Jesuits have been fomenting racial agitation and anti-white sentiments in the minds of Shemites and Hamites in order to kindle hatred against the descendants of Japheth.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Richard W. Thompson, former secretary of the American Navy, records the following indictment in his 1894 work The Footprints of the Jesuits¹:
To justify itself, and to explain to the European nations the reasons which influenced it, the Portuguese Government caused to be prepared a statement of grievances, wherein the course of the Jesuits "in the Spanish and Portuguese dominions of the New World, and of the war which they had carried on against the armies of the two crowns," were set forth… It then embodies in a few expressive words… That they (the Jesuits) had produced under them thirty-one great populations, producing immense riches to the society, while the people themselves were kept in the most miserable slavery; that no Spaniard or Portuguese, were he even governor or bishop, was ever admitted into the Reductions; that, 'with strange deceit,' the Spanish language was absolutely forbidden; that the Indians were trained to an unlimited, blind obedience, kept in the most 'extraordinary ignorance,' and the most unsufferable slavery ever known, and under a complete despotism as to body and soul; that they did not know there was any other sovereign in the world than the fathers, and knew nothing of the king, or any other law than the will of the 'holy fathers;' that the Indians were taught that white laymen adored gold, had a devil in their bodies, were the enemies of the Indians, and of the images which they adored; that they would destroy their altars, and offer sacrifices of their women and infants; and they were consequently taught to kill white men wherever they could find them, and to be careful to cut off their heads, lest they should come to life again."
-Pages 184-186, parenthesis added for clarity
¹https://tinyurl.com/bdht5fa4
From thence onward the Jesuits have been fomenting racial agitation and anti-white sentiments in the minds of Shemites and Hamites in order to kindle hatred against the descendants of Japheth.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
🤣3🔥2❤1
Forwarded from Thuletide
If you want kids who are less healthy in basically every way, then procreate with someone of another race.
"Mixed-race Whites and Asians show significantly greater risk for considering suicide" (source)
"biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder" (source)
"Mixed-race Whites and Asians show significantly greater risk for considering suicide" (source)
"biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder" (source)
👍2
If you have not figured it out yet, racial distinctions go far beyond just skin color.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
❤2
Forwarded from NavigatingTheLies
The Truth has been right in front of us all along
After all, the Holy Bible is the most available book of all time, at 5-7 billion copies circulating worldwide
But we are brainwashed and indoctrinated from birth forward to reject its authenticity
Whether it’s through science, philosophy, film, etc.
All the answers and all the proof you need to successfully navigate this life are right here, preserved in the written Word of God
Read your Bible
Because the enemy is banking on you not reading it
“Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth” (John 17:17)
After all, the Holy Bible is the most available book of all time, at 5-7 billion copies circulating worldwide
But we are brainwashed and indoctrinated from birth forward to reject its authenticity
Whether it’s through science, philosophy, film, etc.
All the answers and all the proof you need to successfully navigate this life are right here, preserved in the written Word of God
Read your Bible
Because the enemy is banking on you not reading it
“Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth” (John 17:17)
👍4💯3
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Nation-State P1.
The concept of the nation-state may seem like abstract political theory to many, but its importance is profound and enduring. Foundational to the governance of numerous Western nations, it represents a fusion of political organisation and shared identity. In simpler terms, the nation-state is the blueprint for what we often refer to as an ethno-state. As succinctly put by Wikipedia:
In essence, the nation-state principle advocates for ethnic groups to self-govern within their own territories. This concept needs to be revitalised in the West, for it clearly shows that our roots were never meant to be multicultural; in fact, our countries were founded upon principles contrary to this.
@Kinism
The concept of the nation-state may seem like abstract political theory to many, but its importance is profound and enduring. Foundational to the governance of numerous Western nations, it represents a fusion of political organisation and shared identity. In simpler terms, the nation-state is the blueprint for what we often refer to as an ethno-state. As succinctly put by Wikipedia:
"A nation-state is a political entity where the government, a centralized authority overseeing a population within a defined territory, aligns with the nation, a community sharing a common identity. Unlike the broader term 'country,' a nation-state typically revolves around a predominant national or ethnic group."
In essence, the nation-state principle advocates for ethnic groups to self-govern within their own territories. This concept needs to be revitalised in the West, for it clearly shows that our roots were never meant to be multicultural; in fact, our countries were founded upon principles contrary to this.
@Kinism
💯1
The Three Principal Races of Man - an excerpt from The World Book Encyclopedia.
In an age in which academia is so corrupted by cultural Marxism¹, it is a taxing feat to locate a modern dictionary or encyclopedia that is not greatly tainted with either false science (1 Timothy 6:20) or distorted history. Therefore, it is necessary to consult older works that have not been substantially contaminated by the ever so prevalent ideological and spiritual poison that dominates this “present evil world” (Galatians 1:4). This endeavor takes us to The World Book Encyclopedia, published in 1965, a year in which the racially agitating communists had not yet wholly succeeded in conquering the West with their egalitarian philosophy. In the 16th volume under the “Races of Man” section we read the following:
“The Races of Man are classified by anthropologists under three major racial stocks Caucasoid, or white; Mongoloid, or yellow; and Negroid, or black. Each of these racial stocks has basic physical characteristics by which it is distinguished. Careful study of this page and the pages that follow will make these physical differences readily apparent… As we view all mankind, we can see that racial groups differ in the color of their skin, in the color and form of their hair, in eye color, and in other external physical characteristics. On the basis of these differences, most anthropologists divide mankind into three major stocks, the Caucasoid (Caucasian), or white; the Negroid, or black; and the Mongoloid, or yellow… Caucasoids. Most of the peoples of Europe belong to the Caucasoid group. Some of the best known Caucasoid races are the Nordic, the East Baltic, the Alpine, the Dinaric, and the Mediterranean… Negroids. The Negroid races of Africa include the Ethiopians or Hamites, the Sudanese and Nilotes, the Bantu, and the Forest Negroes… Mongoloids. The Mongoloid peoples include the Sinitics, the Mongols, the American Indians, and the Eskimos.”
This was the general consensus and accepted teaching in the fields of anthropology and ethnology for centuries. The triracial taxonomy is in complete harmony with Biblical ethnology. For it was once a well established fact that Shem, Ham, and Japheth were the three progenitors of the major races of man. This is why even the secular scholars who composed the aforementioned encyclopedia made the connection between Ham and the negroid race. Such an occurrence would have an infinitesimal chance of transpiring today. At the present time, pseudo intellectuals (many of which having crept into Churches) wax eloquent with their unscientific, antichrist, and unbiblical race denialism which does nothing but set the stage for the world to accept the Antichrist, who will be a fully integrated mongrel, more on that at another time. This is precisely why the average Christian is completely ignorant of the Biblical origin of the races and the noscriptural principles for race relations. Pastors will seldom speak about race, and upon the chance that they do, they will utter nothing but integrationist propaganda which is designed to rid the Christian of his Biblically established and God given racial identity which will in return kindle the unbeknownst ethnic genocide of the Japhethic, Hamitic, and Shemetic races via miscegenation.
¹A neo-con term for communism weaponized in a culture war against historically Protestant and Baptist western civilization.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
In an age in which academia is so corrupted by cultural Marxism¹, it is a taxing feat to locate a modern dictionary or encyclopedia that is not greatly tainted with either false science (1 Timothy 6:20) or distorted history. Therefore, it is necessary to consult older works that have not been substantially contaminated by the ever so prevalent ideological and spiritual poison that dominates this “present evil world” (Galatians 1:4). This endeavor takes us to The World Book Encyclopedia, published in 1965, a year in which the racially agitating communists had not yet wholly succeeded in conquering the West with their egalitarian philosophy. In the 16th volume under the “Races of Man” section we read the following:
“The Races of Man are classified by anthropologists under three major racial stocks Caucasoid, or white; Mongoloid, or yellow; and Negroid, or black. Each of these racial stocks has basic physical characteristics by which it is distinguished. Careful study of this page and the pages that follow will make these physical differences readily apparent… As we view all mankind, we can see that racial groups differ in the color of their skin, in the color and form of their hair, in eye color, and in other external physical characteristics. On the basis of these differences, most anthropologists divide mankind into three major stocks, the Caucasoid (Caucasian), or white; the Negroid, or black; and the Mongoloid, or yellow… Caucasoids. Most of the peoples of Europe belong to the Caucasoid group. Some of the best known Caucasoid races are the Nordic, the East Baltic, the Alpine, the Dinaric, and the Mediterranean… Negroids. The Negroid races of Africa include the Ethiopians or Hamites, the Sudanese and Nilotes, the Bantu, and the Forest Negroes… Mongoloids. The Mongoloid peoples include the Sinitics, the Mongols, the American Indians, and the Eskimos.”
This was the general consensus and accepted teaching in the fields of anthropology and ethnology for centuries. The triracial taxonomy is in complete harmony with Biblical ethnology. For it was once a well established fact that Shem, Ham, and Japheth were the three progenitors of the major races of man. This is why even the secular scholars who composed the aforementioned encyclopedia made the connection between Ham and the negroid race. Such an occurrence would have an infinitesimal chance of transpiring today. At the present time, pseudo intellectuals (many of which having crept into Churches) wax eloquent with their unscientific, antichrist, and unbiblical race denialism which does nothing but set the stage for the world to accept the Antichrist, who will be a fully integrated mongrel, more on that at another time. This is precisely why the average Christian is completely ignorant of the Biblical origin of the races and the noscriptural principles for race relations. Pastors will seldom speak about race, and upon the chance that they do, they will utter nothing but integrationist propaganda which is designed to rid the Christian of his Biblically established and God given racial identity which will in return kindle the unbeknownst ethnic genocide of the Japhethic, Hamitic, and Shemetic races via miscegenation.
¹A neo-con term for communism weaponized in a culture war against historically Protestant and Baptist western civilization.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
🔥3
Gen 9:27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
Forwarded from Young Dixie Media
Picture that should underscore the insanity of integration. It was quite literally forced at gun point on the South. Blacks had their own schools, stores, buses, and pools. The movement was based on envy because Southerners kept better care of their own institutions and the blacks in the South wanted them. The real violation of the constitution was taking away the South's right to have their own institutions (which their forefathers made).
🔥2👍1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Identity & Citizenship
When we refer to someone as British, we are referring to their ethnicity, i.e British heritage, shared British culture, and language. When we point out that someone is not British, such as the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Rishi Sunak, multiculturalists are quick to remind us that Sunak was born on British soil and is a British citizen. This often prompts nationalists to play the race card, playing directly into their hand, for the multiculturalists use this to shut down any debate with accusations of racism. However, the race card is unnecessary. We simply need to ask these individuals, "Is Britishness just a passport or a birth certificate, mere pieces of paper?" The likely answer, no, refutes their argument. By acknowledging that Britishness encompasses more than just citizenship or place of birth, they implicitly admit that it is something deeper. This moves the debate to what truly defines "Britishness", or any ethnicity for that matter.
@Kinism
When we refer to someone as British, we are referring to their ethnicity, i.e British heritage, shared British culture, and language. When we point out that someone is not British, such as the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Rishi Sunak, multiculturalists are quick to remind us that Sunak was born on British soil and is a British citizen. This often prompts nationalists to play the race card, playing directly into their hand, for the multiculturalists use this to shut down any debate with accusations of racism. However, the race card is unnecessary. We simply need to ask these individuals, "Is Britishness just a passport or a birth certificate, mere pieces of paper?" The likely answer, no, refutes their argument. By acknowledging that Britishness encompasses more than just citizenship or place of birth, they implicitly admit that it is something deeper. This moves the debate to what truly defines "Britishness", or any ethnicity for that matter.
@Kinism
👍3⚡1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Ethnic Reality
In response to the notion that Britishness, or any national identity for that matter, can be reduced to a mere piece of paper such as a passport or birth certificate, some may argue that Britishness is not an ethnicity in the first place. This assertion is not only absurd but fundamentally flawed. Let's delve deeper into this matter for clarity.
Firstly, to deny Britishness, Englishness, Scottishness, and similar identities as ethnicities would require dismissing the established category of "white British," utilised by the UK government and numerous academic bodies for census data and sociological analysis. To claim otherwise would push this argument into the realm of conspiracy, as it contradicts widely accepted classifications and observations.
Moreover, it's essential to recognise the inherent nature of ethnicity itself. It's simply impossible for an individual to be without an ethnicity, as it's deeply ingrained in human identity. Multiculturalists readily acknowledge the ethnic identities of groups like Native Americans or African tribes, rooted in their unique cultural and ancestral backgrounds. Therefore, if not British, what ethnic group do white British people belong to? Ethnicity is not a matter of choice or perception; by its very definition it's largely a biological reality shaped by one's ancestry and genetic heritage.
Every person has a lineage that can be traced back to specific groups, making ethnicity an undeniable aspect of human experience. To suggest otherwise would be to deny fundamental truths about human diversity and heritage. So, if white British people aren't considered an ethnicity, then what alternative ethnic group do they supposedly belong to?
@Kinism
In response to the notion that Britishness, or any national identity for that matter, can be reduced to a mere piece of paper such as a passport or birth certificate, some may argue that Britishness is not an ethnicity in the first place. This assertion is not only absurd but fundamentally flawed. Let's delve deeper into this matter for clarity.
Firstly, to deny Britishness, Englishness, Scottishness, and similar identities as ethnicities would require dismissing the established category of "white British," utilised by the UK government and numerous academic bodies for census data and sociological analysis. To claim otherwise would push this argument into the realm of conspiracy, as it contradicts widely accepted classifications and observations.
Moreover, it's essential to recognise the inherent nature of ethnicity itself. It's simply impossible for an individual to be without an ethnicity, as it's deeply ingrained in human identity. Multiculturalists readily acknowledge the ethnic identities of groups like Native Americans or African tribes, rooted in their unique cultural and ancestral backgrounds. Therefore, if not British, what ethnic group do white British people belong to? Ethnicity is not a matter of choice or perception; by its very definition it's largely a biological reality shaped by one's ancestry and genetic heritage.
Every person has a lineage that can be traced back to specific groups, making ethnicity an undeniable aspect of human experience. To suggest otherwise would be to deny fundamental truths about human diversity and heritage. So, if white British people aren't considered an ethnicity, then what alternative ethnic group do they supposedly belong to?
@Kinism
💯1
Excerpt From A Defense of Jim Crow and the South: 2nd Edition by Joe Wasp (part one).
The author of the article writes:
“A cursory assessment of Jim Crow illuminates the fact numerous, if not most, segregationists utilized the Holy Bible to support their claims, a prime example being Mississippi Governor Ross Barnett’s status as a Baptist Sunday School teacher and who brazenly said, ‘The Good Lord was the original segregationist. He put the black man in Africa. He made us White because He wanted us White, and He intended that we should stay that way.’ Pastors, mostly Baptist, Methodist, and Presbyterian, frequently railed against integration. One of the more famous sermons delivered on racial integration was noscriptd ‘God: The Original Segregationist’ and was written and preached by Reverend Carey Danial of West Dallas, Texas in 1954. Bob Jones Sr., the founder of Bob Jones University in South Carolina, was a recalcitrant segregationist and famously delivered a radio broadcast sermon in 1960 noscriptd ‘Is Segregation Scriptural?’ in opposition to integration. Further inquiry proves their beliefs true. Utilizing multiple verses and passages, Jim Crowism patently fails to fit within the modern accusations of Southern sins. The Old Testament remains filled to the brim with verses and laws discussing the separation of the Hebrews from other peoples, the New Testament discusses in Acts 17:26 how the Lord separated human groups into different homelands, and Revelation 7:9 describes John’s vision of countless unique nations and languages standing before God’s throne. Revelation also details the antichrist’s goal to establish a one world government with a one world language, flying in the face of modern, open border, miscegenation pursuing globalism. Leviticus 19:19 uses cattle, seeds, and cloth metaphorical as a means of condemning race-mixing. Genesis 10:5, in a similar fashion to that of Acts 17:26, says, ‘By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.’ Ezra 9:1-7 displays an extreme grievance at the behest of the author towards intermarriage, and Zechariah 9:6 as well as Deuteronomy 28 both describe mixing as a curse. The Samaritans were a cursed people and were often viewed as such. They were the product of God’s punishment of the ancient Hebrews who were taken into bondage and slavery due to disobedience. Despite Christ’s parable of the Good Samaritan, at no point in the story does he refute this fact; they were the direct product of God’s judgement and wrath. Furthermore, is it wise to breed with cursed people’s, such as the modern Japhethites choosing to breed with the modern Hamites? Remember, 1 John 2:15-17 says, ‘15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.’ Also, John 15:19 reads, ‘If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.’ Mixing is a modern, worldly trend, and it is mentally bereft to accept that God approves of the systematic extermination of the Japhetic race at the behest of evil Western leadership. However, the most damning piece of evidence opposed to integration and amalgamation of the races exists in Genesis 11, in the very first book of the Holy Bible. This passage gravely chronicles the story of the Tower of Babel. In this bit of Biblical history, God deliberately separated the humans living within that ancient metropolitan city so as to prevent them from creating a singular language, culture, and nation, disobeying His command to spread throughout Earth and multiply within their own lands.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The author of the article writes:
“A cursory assessment of Jim Crow illuminates the fact numerous, if not most, segregationists utilized the Holy Bible to support their claims, a prime example being Mississippi Governor Ross Barnett’s status as a Baptist Sunday School teacher and who brazenly said, ‘The Good Lord was the original segregationist. He put the black man in Africa. He made us White because He wanted us White, and He intended that we should stay that way.’ Pastors, mostly Baptist, Methodist, and Presbyterian, frequently railed against integration. One of the more famous sermons delivered on racial integration was noscriptd ‘God: The Original Segregationist’ and was written and preached by Reverend Carey Danial of West Dallas, Texas in 1954. Bob Jones Sr., the founder of Bob Jones University in South Carolina, was a recalcitrant segregationist and famously delivered a radio broadcast sermon in 1960 noscriptd ‘Is Segregation Scriptural?’ in opposition to integration. Further inquiry proves their beliefs true. Utilizing multiple verses and passages, Jim Crowism patently fails to fit within the modern accusations of Southern sins. The Old Testament remains filled to the brim with verses and laws discussing the separation of the Hebrews from other peoples, the New Testament discusses in Acts 17:26 how the Lord separated human groups into different homelands, and Revelation 7:9 describes John’s vision of countless unique nations and languages standing before God’s throne. Revelation also details the antichrist’s goal to establish a one world government with a one world language, flying in the face of modern, open border, miscegenation pursuing globalism. Leviticus 19:19 uses cattle, seeds, and cloth metaphorical as a means of condemning race-mixing. Genesis 10:5, in a similar fashion to that of Acts 17:26, says, ‘By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.’ Ezra 9:1-7 displays an extreme grievance at the behest of the author towards intermarriage, and Zechariah 9:6 as well as Deuteronomy 28 both describe mixing as a curse. The Samaritans were a cursed people and were often viewed as such. They were the product of God’s punishment of the ancient Hebrews who were taken into bondage and slavery due to disobedience. Despite Christ’s parable of the Good Samaritan, at no point in the story does he refute this fact; they were the direct product of God’s judgement and wrath. Furthermore, is it wise to breed with cursed people’s, such as the modern Japhethites choosing to breed with the modern Hamites? Remember, 1 John 2:15-17 says, ‘15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.’ Also, John 15:19 reads, ‘If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.’ Mixing is a modern, worldly trend, and it is mentally bereft to accept that God approves of the systematic extermination of the Japhetic race at the behest of evil Western leadership. However, the most damning piece of evidence opposed to integration and amalgamation of the races exists in Genesis 11, in the very first book of the Holy Bible. This passage gravely chronicles the story of the Tower of Babel. In this bit of Biblical history, God deliberately separated the humans living within that ancient metropolitan city so as to prevent them from creating a singular language, culture, and nation, disobeying His command to spread throughout Earth and multiply within their own lands.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡2
Excerpt From A Defense of Jim Crow and the South: 2nd Edition by Joe Wasp (part two).
At no point in Christ’s ministry or in the Great Commission does the Bible purport the idea of endless mixing and destruction of cultures but to spread the Gospel to all peoples, two very different ideas. While most verses quoted on this topic are usually pulled from the Old Testament, James 1:17, Hebrews 13:8, Numbers 23:19, Malachi 3:6, and other passages make it abundantly clear God does not change... It is indescribably foolish to ascribe and create sins that do not exist within the Bible. It is also quite asinine to believe a supermajority of Christians who lived prior to the Civil Rights Movement of the mid 20th Century were actually incorrect and not true Christians to begin with. This is an arrogant and prideful belief catalyzed among churches and church people more concerned with the comings and goings of the world than that of the noscriptures. The segregationists were more than biblically justified.”
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
At no point in Christ’s ministry or in the Great Commission does the Bible purport the idea of endless mixing and destruction of cultures but to spread the Gospel to all peoples, two very different ideas. While most verses quoted on this topic are usually pulled from the Old Testament, James 1:17, Hebrews 13:8, Numbers 23:19, Malachi 3:6, and other passages make it abundantly clear God does not change... It is indescribably foolish to ascribe and create sins that do not exist within the Bible. It is also quite asinine to believe a supermajority of Christians who lived prior to the Civil Rights Movement of the mid 20th Century were actually incorrect and not true Christians to begin with. This is an arrogant and prideful belief catalyzed among churches and church people more concerned with the comings and goings of the world than that of the noscriptures. The segregationists were more than biblically justified.”
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡2
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Beautiful Simplicity
As Christians, we recognise that there are many realities common to all in human life that are ordained by God. For example, in Genesis 1:27, we read how God created mankind as male and female. Thus, we conclude that God ordained the common reality of sex/gender distinctions. It is upon this foundation that we ask, "Why? For what purpose do these distinctions exist?" This line of reasoning in Christianity leads us to our God-instituted and instructed 'gender roles'. This logic must be carefully noted, as Christians apply it to many other common realities in human life, such as age and health.
However, there is another God ordained reality common to all of mankind that many seemingly forget to apply this logic to: the reality of ethnicity. Every human has an ethnicity, an ancestry, so to remain consistent with how we discern how to walk in the Christian life, we should ask, "For what purpose has God instituted this ethnic reality?" For the noscriptures are hardly void of references to ethnicity (Genesis 10)—the entire Old Testament was literally about the ethnic tribe of Israel. Kinists simply ask this question about ethnicity and apply what we see in the Scriptures, namely that God instituted ethnic distinctions as a means for us to seek Him, and therefore, we should follow such a directive.
@Kinism
As Christians, we recognise that there are many realities common to all in human life that are ordained by God. For example, in Genesis 1:27, we read how God created mankind as male and female. Thus, we conclude that God ordained the common reality of sex/gender distinctions. It is upon this foundation that we ask, "Why? For what purpose do these distinctions exist?" This line of reasoning in Christianity leads us to our God-instituted and instructed 'gender roles'. This logic must be carefully noted, as Christians apply it to many other common realities in human life, such as age and health.
However, there is another God ordained reality common to all of mankind that many seemingly forget to apply this logic to: the reality of ethnicity. Every human has an ethnicity, an ancestry, so to remain consistent with how we discern how to walk in the Christian life, we should ask, "For what purpose has God instituted this ethnic reality?" For the noscriptures are hardly void of references to ethnicity (Genesis 10)—the entire Old Testament was literally about the ethnic tribe of Israel. Kinists simply ask this question about ethnicity and apply what we see in the Scriptures, namely that God instituted ethnic distinctions as a means for us to seek Him, and therefore, we should follow such a directive.
@Kinism
❤1