Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Identity & Citizenship
When we refer to someone as British, we are referring to their ethnicity, i.e British heritage, shared British culture, and language. When we point out that someone is not British, such as the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Rishi Sunak, multiculturalists are quick to remind us that Sunak was born on British soil and is a British citizen. This often prompts nationalists to play the race card, playing directly into their hand, for the multiculturalists use this to shut down any debate with accusations of racism. However, the race card is unnecessary. We simply need to ask these individuals, "Is Britishness just a passport or a birth certificate, mere pieces of paper?" The likely answer, no, refutes their argument. By acknowledging that Britishness encompasses more than just citizenship or place of birth, they implicitly admit that it is something deeper. This moves the debate to what truly defines "Britishness", or any ethnicity for that matter.
@Kinism
When we refer to someone as British, we are referring to their ethnicity, i.e British heritage, shared British culture, and language. When we point out that someone is not British, such as the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Rishi Sunak, multiculturalists are quick to remind us that Sunak was born on British soil and is a British citizen. This often prompts nationalists to play the race card, playing directly into their hand, for the multiculturalists use this to shut down any debate with accusations of racism. However, the race card is unnecessary. We simply need to ask these individuals, "Is Britishness just a passport or a birth certificate, mere pieces of paper?" The likely answer, no, refutes their argument. By acknowledging that Britishness encompasses more than just citizenship or place of birth, they implicitly admit that it is something deeper. This moves the debate to what truly defines "Britishness", or any ethnicity for that matter.
@Kinism
👍3⚡1
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Ethnic Reality
In response to the notion that Britishness, or any national identity for that matter, can be reduced to a mere piece of paper such as a passport or birth certificate, some may argue that Britishness is not an ethnicity in the first place. This assertion is not only absurd but fundamentally flawed. Let's delve deeper into this matter for clarity.
Firstly, to deny Britishness, Englishness, Scottishness, and similar identities as ethnicities would require dismissing the established category of "white British," utilised by the UK government and numerous academic bodies for census data and sociological analysis. To claim otherwise would push this argument into the realm of conspiracy, as it contradicts widely accepted classifications and observations.
Moreover, it's essential to recognise the inherent nature of ethnicity itself. It's simply impossible for an individual to be without an ethnicity, as it's deeply ingrained in human identity. Multiculturalists readily acknowledge the ethnic identities of groups like Native Americans or African tribes, rooted in their unique cultural and ancestral backgrounds. Therefore, if not British, what ethnic group do white British people belong to? Ethnicity is not a matter of choice or perception; by its very definition it's largely a biological reality shaped by one's ancestry and genetic heritage.
Every person has a lineage that can be traced back to specific groups, making ethnicity an undeniable aspect of human experience. To suggest otherwise would be to deny fundamental truths about human diversity and heritage. So, if white British people aren't considered an ethnicity, then what alternative ethnic group do they supposedly belong to?
@Kinism
In response to the notion that Britishness, or any national identity for that matter, can be reduced to a mere piece of paper such as a passport or birth certificate, some may argue that Britishness is not an ethnicity in the first place. This assertion is not only absurd but fundamentally flawed. Let's delve deeper into this matter for clarity.
Firstly, to deny Britishness, Englishness, Scottishness, and similar identities as ethnicities would require dismissing the established category of "white British," utilised by the UK government and numerous academic bodies for census data and sociological analysis. To claim otherwise would push this argument into the realm of conspiracy, as it contradicts widely accepted classifications and observations.
Moreover, it's essential to recognise the inherent nature of ethnicity itself. It's simply impossible for an individual to be without an ethnicity, as it's deeply ingrained in human identity. Multiculturalists readily acknowledge the ethnic identities of groups like Native Americans or African tribes, rooted in their unique cultural and ancestral backgrounds. Therefore, if not British, what ethnic group do white British people belong to? Ethnicity is not a matter of choice or perception; by its very definition it's largely a biological reality shaped by one's ancestry and genetic heritage.
Every person has a lineage that can be traced back to specific groups, making ethnicity an undeniable aspect of human experience. To suggest otherwise would be to deny fundamental truths about human diversity and heritage. So, if white British people aren't considered an ethnicity, then what alternative ethnic group do they supposedly belong to?
@Kinism
💯1
Excerpt From A Defense of Jim Crow and the South: 2nd Edition by Joe Wasp (part one).
The author of the article writes:
“A cursory assessment of Jim Crow illuminates the fact numerous, if not most, segregationists utilized the Holy Bible to support their claims, a prime example being Mississippi Governor Ross Barnett’s status as a Baptist Sunday School teacher and who brazenly said, ‘The Good Lord was the original segregationist. He put the black man in Africa. He made us White because He wanted us White, and He intended that we should stay that way.’ Pastors, mostly Baptist, Methodist, and Presbyterian, frequently railed against integration. One of the more famous sermons delivered on racial integration was noscriptd ‘God: The Original Segregationist’ and was written and preached by Reverend Carey Danial of West Dallas, Texas in 1954. Bob Jones Sr., the founder of Bob Jones University in South Carolina, was a recalcitrant segregationist and famously delivered a radio broadcast sermon in 1960 noscriptd ‘Is Segregation Scriptural?’ in opposition to integration. Further inquiry proves their beliefs true. Utilizing multiple verses and passages, Jim Crowism patently fails to fit within the modern accusations of Southern sins. The Old Testament remains filled to the brim with verses and laws discussing the separation of the Hebrews from other peoples, the New Testament discusses in Acts 17:26 how the Lord separated human groups into different homelands, and Revelation 7:9 describes John’s vision of countless unique nations and languages standing before God’s throne. Revelation also details the antichrist’s goal to establish a one world government with a one world language, flying in the face of modern, open border, miscegenation pursuing globalism. Leviticus 19:19 uses cattle, seeds, and cloth metaphorical as a means of condemning race-mixing. Genesis 10:5, in a similar fashion to that of Acts 17:26, says, ‘By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.’ Ezra 9:1-7 displays an extreme grievance at the behest of the author towards intermarriage, and Zechariah 9:6 as well as Deuteronomy 28 both describe mixing as a curse. The Samaritans were a cursed people and were often viewed as such. They were the product of God’s punishment of the ancient Hebrews who were taken into bondage and slavery due to disobedience. Despite Christ’s parable of the Good Samaritan, at no point in the story does he refute this fact; they were the direct product of God’s judgement and wrath. Furthermore, is it wise to breed with cursed people’s, such as the modern Japhethites choosing to breed with the modern Hamites? Remember, 1 John 2:15-17 says, ‘15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.’ Also, John 15:19 reads, ‘If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.’ Mixing is a modern, worldly trend, and it is mentally bereft to accept that God approves of the systematic extermination of the Japhetic race at the behest of evil Western leadership. However, the most damning piece of evidence opposed to integration and amalgamation of the races exists in Genesis 11, in the very first book of the Holy Bible. This passage gravely chronicles the story of the Tower of Babel. In this bit of Biblical history, God deliberately separated the humans living within that ancient metropolitan city so as to prevent them from creating a singular language, culture, and nation, disobeying His command to spread throughout Earth and multiply within their own lands.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
The author of the article writes:
“A cursory assessment of Jim Crow illuminates the fact numerous, if not most, segregationists utilized the Holy Bible to support their claims, a prime example being Mississippi Governor Ross Barnett’s status as a Baptist Sunday School teacher and who brazenly said, ‘The Good Lord was the original segregationist. He put the black man in Africa. He made us White because He wanted us White, and He intended that we should stay that way.’ Pastors, mostly Baptist, Methodist, and Presbyterian, frequently railed against integration. One of the more famous sermons delivered on racial integration was noscriptd ‘God: The Original Segregationist’ and was written and preached by Reverend Carey Danial of West Dallas, Texas in 1954. Bob Jones Sr., the founder of Bob Jones University in South Carolina, was a recalcitrant segregationist and famously delivered a radio broadcast sermon in 1960 noscriptd ‘Is Segregation Scriptural?’ in opposition to integration. Further inquiry proves their beliefs true. Utilizing multiple verses and passages, Jim Crowism patently fails to fit within the modern accusations of Southern sins. The Old Testament remains filled to the brim with verses and laws discussing the separation of the Hebrews from other peoples, the New Testament discusses in Acts 17:26 how the Lord separated human groups into different homelands, and Revelation 7:9 describes John’s vision of countless unique nations and languages standing before God’s throne. Revelation also details the antichrist’s goal to establish a one world government with a one world language, flying in the face of modern, open border, miscegenation pursuing globalism. Leviticus 19:19 uses cattle, seeds, and cloth metaphorical as a means of condemning race-mixing. Genesis 10:5, in a similar fashion to that of Acts 17:26, says, ‘By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.’ Ezra 9:1-7 displays an extreme grievance at the behest of the author towards intermarriage, and Zechariah 9:6 as well as Deuteronomy 28 both describe mixing as a curse. The Samaritans were a cursed people and were often viewed as such. They were the product of God’s punishment of the ancient Hebrews who were taken into bondage and slavery due to disobedience. Despite Christ’s parable of the Good Samaritan, at no point in the story does he refute this fact; they were the direct product of God’s judgement and wrath. Furthermore, is it wise to breed with cursed people’s, such as the modern Japhethites choosing to breed with the modern Hamites? Remember, 1 John 2:15-17 says, ‘15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.’ Also, John 15:19 reads, ‘If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.’ Mixing is a modern, worldly trend, and it is mentally bereft to accept that God approves of the systematic extermination of the Japhetic race at the behest of evil Western leadership. However, the most damning piece of evidence opposed to integration and amalgamation of the races exists in Genesis 11, in the very first book of the Holy Bible. This passage gravely chronicles the story of the Tower of Babel. In this bit of Biblical history, God deliberately separated the humans living within that ancient metropolitan city so as to prevent them from creating a singular language, culture, and nation, disobeying His command to spread throughout Earth and multiply within their own lands.
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡2
Excerpt From A Defense of Jim Crow and the South: 2nd Edition by Joe Wasp (part two).
At no point in Christ’s ministry or in the Great Commission does the Bible purport the idea of endless mixing and destruction of cultures but to spread the Gospel to all peoples, two very different ideas. While most verses quoted on this topic are usually pulled from the Old Testament, James 1:17, Hebrews 13:8, Numbers 23:19, Malachi 3:6, and other passages make it abundantly clear God does not change... It is indescribably foolish to ascribe and create sins that do not exist within the Bible. It is also quite asinine to believe a supermajority of Christians who lived prior to the Civil Rights Movement of the mid 20th Century were actually incorrect and not true Christians to begin with. This is an arrogant and prideful belief catalyzed among churches and church people more concerned with the comings and goings of the world than that of the noscriptures. The segregationists were more than biblically justified.”
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
At no point in Christ’s ministry or in the Great Commission does the Bible purport the idea of endless mixing and destruction of cultures but to spread the Gospel to all peoples, two very different ideas. While most verses quoted on this topic are usually pulled from the Old Testament, James 1:17, Hebrews 13:8, Numbers 23:19, Malachi 3:6, and other passages make it abundantly clear God does not change... It is indescribably foolish to ascribe and create sins that do not exist within the Bible. It is also quite asinine to believe a supermajority of Christians who lived prior to the Civil Rights Movement of the mid 20th Century were actually incorrect and not true Christians to begin with. This is an arrogant and prideful belief catalyzed among churches and church people more concerned with the comings and goings of the world than that of the noscriptures. The segregationists were more than biblically justified.”
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡2
Forwarded from Kinism
Kinism: Beautiful Simplicity
As Christians, we recognise that there are many realities common to all in human life that are ordained by God. For example, in Genesis 1:27, we read how God created mankind as male and female. Thus, we conclude that God ordained the common reality of sex/gender distinctions. It is upon this foundation that we ask, "Why? For what purpose do these distinctions exist?" This line of reasoning in Christianity leads us to our God-instituted and instructed 'gender roles'. This logic must be carefully noted, as Christians apply it to many other common realities in human life, such as age and health.
However, there is another God ordained reality common to all of mankind that many seemingly forget to apply this logic to: the reality of ethnicity. Every human has an ethnicity, an ancestry, so to remain consistent with how we discern how to walk in the Christian life, we should ask, "For what purpose has God instituted this ethnic reality?" For the noscriptures are hardly void of references to ethnicity (Genesis 10)—the entire Old Testament was literally about the ethnic tribe of Israel. Kinists simply ask this question about ethnicity and apply what we see in the Scriptures, namely that God instituted ethnic distinctions as a means for us to seek Him, and therefore, we should follow such a directive.
@Kinism
As Christians, we recognise that there are many realities common to all in human life that are ordained by God. For example, in Genesis 1:27, we read how God created mankind as male and female. Thus, we conclude that God ordained the common reality of sex/gender distinctions. It is upon this foundation that we ask, "Why? For what purpose do these distinctions exist?" This line of reasoning in Christianity leads us to our God-instituted and instructed 'gender roles'. This logic must be carefully noted, as Christians apply it to many other common realities in human life, such as age and health.
However, there is another God ordained reality common to all of mankind that many seemingly forget to apply this logic to: the reality of ethnicity. Every human has an ethnicity, an ancestry, so to remain consistent with how we discern how to walk in the Christian life, we should ask, "For what purpose has God instituted this ethnic reality?" For the noscriptures are hardly void of references to ethnicity (Genesis 10)—the entire Old Testament was literally about the ethnic tribe of Israel. Kinists simply ask this question about ethnicity and apply what we see in the Scriptures, namely that God instituted ethnic distinctions as a means for us to seek Him, and therefore, we should follow such a directive.
@Kinism
❤1
Forwarded from Kinism
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Kinism: Mutual Respect
Too often in the world, we are told that if you hold such views as Kinism — the belief that ethnic groups should live homogeneously — you are an evil psychopath who can't even look in the direction of someone from another ethnic group. This is a false assumption. There is no reason that just because you hold to Kinism, you can't form bonds with those of other ethnic groups and treat each other with mutual respect. Reject the false dichotomy imposed by the media; embrace Kinism.
— 1 Peter 2:17
@Kinism
Too often in the world, we are told that if you hold such views as Kinism — the belief that ethnic groups should live homogeneously — you are an evil psychopath who can't even look in the direction of someone from another ethnic group. This is a false assumption. There is no reason that just because you hold to Kinism, you can't form bonds with those of other ethnic groups and treat each other with mutual respect. Reject the false dichotomy imposed by the media; embrace Kinism.
17 Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king.
— 1 Peter 2:17
@Kinism
🔥3
Forwarded from IFB Independent Fundamental Baptists
Happy Wednesday. Here’s some comedy to get you through the day
🤣2
Forwarded from 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕱𝖆𝖑𝖘𝖊 𝕿𝖊𝖆𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖗𝖘
Martin Luther King Jr/MLKJ denied the bodily resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ and called the Bible as "legends and myths". Martin Luther King Jr. is a false teacher and a wicked heretick, and he never ever recanted his words or repented:
"At the age of 13 I shocked my Sunday School class by denying the bodily resurrection of Jesus. From the age of thirteen on doubts began to spring forth unrelentingly. At the age of fifteen I entered college and more and more could I see a gap between what I had learned in Sunday School and what I was learning in college. This conflict continued until I studied a course in Bible in which I came to see that behind the legends and myths of the Book were many profound truths..." (An Autobiography of Religious Development, Martin Luther King Jr).
As an adult, MLKJ admitted he never got saved: "I have never had an abrupt conversion experience," https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/autobiography-religious-development#ftnref8
Anti False Teachers
"At the age of 13 I shocked my Sunday School class by denying the bodily resurrection of Jesus. From the age of thirteen on doubts began to spring forth unrelentingly. At the age of fifteen I entered college and more and more could I see a gap between what I had learned in Sunday School and what I was learning in college. This conflict continued until I studied a course in Bible in which I came to see that behind the legends and myths of the Book were many profound truths..." (An Autobiography of Religious Development, Martin Luther King Jr).
As an adult, MLKJ admitted he never got saved: "I have never had an abrupt conversion experience," https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/autobiography-religious-development#ftnref8
Anti False Teachers
⚡3
This fact is puzzling to modern egalitarian “scholars.” In an attempt to cope with this reality they manufacture outrageous claims based on nothing other than their imagination. Conjuring up fables that “racism” or “white supremacy” apparently led to this result. If these dumbbells picked up a Bible for once in their life they could locate the reason for this “mystery” in the plain Original English of 1611. As a preacher once said, “there’s nothing like a Bible to clear up a college education.” Read Genesis 9:25-27
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
⚡8
It is rather convenient that the integrationist who made this image just so happened to omit the half of the verse that completely debunks their position!
You should realize you have a faulty belief if, out of necessity, you have to handle the word of God deceitfully to arrive at such a conclusion (2 Corinthians 4:2).
Let us not forget that a text without a context is a pretext for error.
Here is the whole verse, including the part of it that the egalitarians always leave out:
Act 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
Act 17:27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
You should realize you have a faulty belief if, out of necessity, you have to handle the word of God deceitfully to arrive at such a conclusion (2 Corinthians 4:2).
Let us not forget that a text without a context is a pretext for error.
Here is the whole verse, including the part of it that the egalitarians always leave out:
Act 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
Act 17:27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:
𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
🔥8
Forwarded from Ελευθερία (Γεωργιος)
If you were starving and disease ridden in Africa (1800’s) and you were offered America on the condition of slavery for you and your children, what do you do?
Share for larger sample.
Share for larger sample.
Anonymous Poll
52%
Accept, bring my family
14%
Accept, but sell self to leave family money
22%
Reject, but sell hutmate
22%
Reject
Forwarded from The Conspiracy Hole (Brody Hyde)
“Invasive species can lead to the extinction of native species by displacing them for resources, preying on them, introducing diseases, altering habitats, and causing genetic dilution through hybridization.”
💯5
Forwarded from 𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚 𝕆𝕣𝕥𝕙𝕠-𝔻𝕆𝕏𝕏
Ezra 9:2-7 (KJV)
For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass.
And when I heard this thing, I rent my garment and my mantle, and plucked off the hair of my head and of my beard, and sat down astonied.
Then were assembled unto me every one that trembled at the words of the God of Israel, because of the transgression of those that had been carried away; and I sat astonied until the evening sacrifice.
𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚 𝕆𝕣𝕥𝕙𝕠-𝔻𝕆𝕏𝕏
For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass.
And when I heard this thing, I rent my garment and my mantle, and plucked off the hair of my head and of my beard, and sat down astonied.
Then were assembled unto me every one that trembled at the words of the God of Israel, because of the transgression of those that had been carried away; and I sat astonied until the evening sacrifice.
𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚 𝕆𝕣𝕥𝕙𝕠-𝔻𝕆𝕏𝕏
💯3