This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1️⃣ This is video from the WEF website that has been taken down. It is also where the infamous "You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy" quote comes from as well.
More Info
…
More Info
2️⃣ World Economic Forum: Smartphones Will Be In Your Body By 2030
At the 2022 Davos meeting, Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark claimed that, by 2030, “smartphones will be implanted directly into the body.” This would coincide with the coming of 6G technology, which is expected to be launched by the end of the decade Video 1
For years, the WEF has been promoting a fervent push for transhumanism (the merging of humans with machines). They’re looking to accelerate this transition by making things people cannot live without (such as smartphones) available in a transhumanist format.
At the 2022 Davos meeting, Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark claimed that, by 2030, “smartphones will be implanted directly into the body.” This would coincide with the coming of 6G technology, which is expected to be launched by the end of the decade Video 1
For years, the WEF has been promoting a fervent push for transhumanism (the merging of humans with machines). They’re looking to accelerate this transition by making things people cannot live without (such as smartphones) available in a transhumanist format.
3️⃣ Chips in clothing is already well on its way, with luxury fashion brands leading the charge. They are used to authenticate products, allow a customer to locate a misplaced item, and to prove ownership of an item via blockchain.
As this technology becomes more and more ubiquitous, it is being used by companies such as H&M, Zara, and Old Navy to allow for taking inventory of an entire store instantly.
Eventually it will become standard for all clothing to have chips in them, and we will as a society quickly stop asking questions about whether they are “deactivated” or what have you once we leave the stores.
V I D E O
https://cutt.ly/WEFLIST3
…
As this technology becomes more and more ubiquitous, it is being used by companies such as H&M, Zara, and Old Navy to allow for taking inventory of an entire store instantly.
Eventually it will become standard for all clothing to have chips in them, and we will as a society quickly stop asking questions about whether they are “deactivated” or what have you once we leave the stores.
V I D E O
https://cutt.ly/WEFLIST3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
3️⃣ “digital IDs” for each individual piece of clothing “to help the planet” of course…
M o r e I n f o
M o r e I n f o
4️⃣ Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains Pfizer’s new technology to a crowd in Davos. “Microchips delivered in ingestible pills” that send wireless signals when the pharmaceutical has been digested.
"Imagine the… compliance" Bourla says - consumers are clearly not his customers, government bodies are. And Pfizer is fully aligned with "compliance" because it means more and more sales volume to their repeat buyer, government customers.
EXTERNAL VIDEO LINK
"Imagine the… compliance" Bourla says - consumers are clearly not his customers, government bodies are. And Pfizer is fully aligned with "compliance" because it means more and more sales volume to their repeat buyer, government customers.
EXTERNAL VIDEO LINK
5️⃣ The Need to “Recalibrate” Freedom of Speech
INFO: Internal Link
VIDEO: Internal Link
5 of 9 #WEFLIST
INFO: Internal Link
VIDEO: Internal Link
5 of 9 #WEFLIST
5️⃣ An easy way to identify world leaders who are groomed by the WEF is through their incessant rallying against free speech. They absolutely hate it and they’re constantly calling for the internet to be censored and highly regulated.
At the 2022 Davos meeting, Australian eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant tells the World Economic Forum we need a “recalibration" of freedom of speech.
Grant said: “We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be. So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online. You know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.”
Here, Grant calls for censorship, proposing that freedom of speech as a human right should be “recalibrated” using “online violence” as an excuse, as if there is such a thing as “violent speech” or “online violence”. And as always they throw in “child dignity” aka kiddie-pron as if these elites gave a shit about child sexual exploitation.
They love to equate speech with violence. It is an extremely manipulative way of justifying censorship. Free speech is, in fact, binary. Either it exists or it doesn’t, antithetical positions, and they clearly don’t want it to exist.
Note: The USA and 60 other nations signed a declaration for the ‘Future of the Internet’ that commits to bolstering “resilience to disinformation and misinformation”.
The European Union also has committed to the same declaration. “The ‘Declaration for the Future of the Internet’ is in line with the rights and principles strongly anchored in the EU & builds on the Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles”
V I D E O L I N K
…
At the 2022 Davos meeting, Australian eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant tells the World Economic Forum we need a “recalibration" of freedom of speech.
Grant said: “We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be. So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online. You know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.”
Here, Grant calls for censorship, proposing that freedom of speech as a human right should be “recalibrated” using “online violence” as an excuse, as if there is such a thing as “violent speech” or “online violence”. And as always they throw in “child dignity” aka kiddie-pron as if these elites gave a shit about child sexual exploitation.
They love to equate speech with violence. It is an extremely manipulative way of justifying censorship. Free speech is, in fact, binary. Either it exists or it doesn’t, antithetical positions, and they clearly don’t want it to exist.
Note: The USA and 60 other nations signed a declaration for the ‘Future of the Internet’ that commits to bolstering “resilience to disinformation and misinformation”.
The European Union also has committed to the same declaration. “The ‘Declaration for the Future of the Internet’ is in line with the rights and principles strongly anchored in the EU & builds on the Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles”
V I D E O L I N K
…
Twitter
Andrew Lawton
Australian eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant tells the World Economic Forum we need a "recalibration" of freedom of speech.
6️⃣ Mind Control Using Sound-Waves
INFO: Internal Link
Official WEF Website (Archived): External Link
6 of 9 #WEFLIST
INFO: Internal Link
Official WEF Website (Archived): External Link
6 of 9 #WEFLIST
👍1
6️⃣ At the WEF’s Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils in 2018, one of the topics discussed was “mind control using sound waves”. The WEF’s official website published an article ennoscriptd Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works where University of Oxford Professor Antoine Jérusalem describes the technology and the issues related to it.
The rest of this post proceeding this paragraph is entirely from weforum.org via https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/mind-control-ultrasound-neuroscience (the page has been scrubbed but is still available via the instant view at the bottom of this post somehow, despite the link being dead, telegram magic… or use the web archive). I urge you to take heed the final paragraph of this post.
Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?
Straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.
What are the biggest ethical challenges?
The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer number of applications, as well as the ethical use.
From a biological perspective, it’s similar to drugs. It can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It’s all about staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective, the world is changing so fast that it’s difficult to assess what will be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.
I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance 10 years from now, we need to start researching today.
How dystopian could it get?
I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.
This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.
What can we do to safeguard its potential?
“I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that’s human nature, and not unique to scientists.”
…
The rest of this post proceeding this paragraph is entirely from weforum.org via https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/mind-control-ultrasound-neuroscience (the page has been scrubbed but is still available via the instant view at the bottom of this post somehow, despite the link being dead, telegram magic… or use the web archive). I urge you to take heed the final paragraph of this post.
Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?
Straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.
What are the biggest ethical challenges?
The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer number of applications, as well as the ethical use.
From a biological perspective, it’s similar to drugs. It can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It’s all about staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective, the world is changing so fast that it’s difficult to assess what will be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.
I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance 10 years from now, we need to start researching today.
How dystopian could it get?
I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.
This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.
What can we do to safeguard its potential?
“I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that’s human nature, and not unique to scientists.”
World Economic Forum
Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works
The science of 'ultrasound neuromodulation' could change how we treat everything from Alzheimer's to migraines, says Professor Antoine Jerusalem of Oxford University.