Forwarded from TruthUnchained
The latest update on the Bishop on Sunday evening of 26th January.
The Bishop is unconscious but comfortable. His breathing is a little bit more laboured. He does not really react to anything.
He has had about two dozen visitors today, all of whom have been offering up prayers around his bed. Some good souls are spending another night with him so that he is not alone.
The Bishop is unconscious but comfortable. His breathing is a little bit more laboured. He does not really react to anything.
He has had about two dozen visitors today, all of whom have been offering up prayers around his bed. Some good souls are spending another night with him so that he is not alone.
Forwarded from TruthUnchained
The Bishop is in extremis. Please pray hard for him.
Forwarded from TruthUnchained
Bishop Richard Williamson died tonight at 11.23pm GMT. His final agony was only a matter of minutes.
This is Father Gilchrist.
Please support the YouTube channel. If we get to 50 subscribers, we will then be eligible to do livestreams. This means we can begin live-streaming the rosary.
I will try to upload a sermon as often as possible throughout this Lenten period for you all.
God bless you.
https://youtube.com/@thomisticteaching?si=WegYIAdAg-hcTp-3
Please support the YouTube channel. If we get to 50 subscribers, we will then be eligible to do livestreams. This means we can begin live-streaming the rosary.
I will try to upload a sermon as often as possible throughout this Lenten period for you all.
God bless you.
https://youtube.com/@thomisticteaching?si=WegYIAdAg-hcTp-3
YouTube
Thomistic Teaching
Share your videos with friends, family, and the world
Forwarded from The WM Review
We have never lost so many email subscribers from one article as this.
Not dozens—but noticeable.
And while we are sorry to see people go, we are not going to back down on this.
In fact, it's time to double down.
Because it is better to lose subscribers over telling the truth, than it is to keep them by silence.
Here are the facts:
- Vatican II's doctrine of religious liberty is a denial of the Catholic doctrine, and there are no coherent reasons why this liberty does not extend to the adherents of polytheistic religions, devil-worshippers and so on
- It is a tacit denial of Christ's Kingship over society and the duties that civil society owe to him
- It is rooted in agnosticism and naturalism, and is a chief doctrine of the religion of man
- As such, this enlightenment and revolutionary imposture is properly styled as promethean and even luciferian.
- All the "orthodox" phrases in Vatican II do not change this reality; in fact, they are there simply to make people swallow this false doctrine and others.
We are sorry if people are attached to ideas of religious liberty and are offended by this—but don't shoot the messenger.
This is why Vatican II is a robber council and must go.
These points have already been proven by others more ably than we can, but stay tuned for more on this important topic.
https://www.wmreview.org/p/religious-liberty-extent
Not dozens—but noticeable.
And while we are sorry to see people go, we are not going to back down on this.
In fact, it's time to double down.
Because it is better to lose subscribers over telling the truth, than it is to keep them by silence.
Here are the facts:
- Vatican II's doctrine of religious liberty is a denial of the Catholic doctrine, and there are no coherent reasons why this liberty does not extend to the adherents of polytheistic religions, devil-worshippers and so on
- It is a tacit denial of Christ's Kingship over society and the duties that civil society owe to him
- It is rooted in agnosticism and naturalism, and is a chief doctrine of the religion of man
- As such, this enlightenment and revolutionary imposture is properly styled as promethean and even luciferian.
- All the "orthodox" phrases in Vatican II do not change this reality; in fact, they are there simply to make people swallow this false doctrine and others.
We are sorry if people are attached to ideas of religious liberty and are offended by this—but don't shoot the messenger.
This is why Vatican II is a robber council and must go.
These points have already been proven by others more ably than we can, but stay tuned for more on this important topic.
https://www.wmreview.org/p/religious-liberty-extent
www.wmreview.org
Do Satanists have the right to religious freedom, according to Vatican II?
Those who defend Vatican II, and condemn those who object to it, need to own the implications.
Forwarded from The WM Review
The outrage at suggesting that Vatican II’s doctrine of religious liberty extends even to Satanists reveals something deeper.
Broadly speaking, there are two types of people among us.
The first recognises that we live in a world saturated with naturalism and liberalism—and that he himself is not exempt. When he uncovers yet another layer of these errors within his own thinking, actions, or assumptions, he is glad: for now the rot can be named and cut out. The work of restoration advances.
The second remains in denial about how deeply these errors have shaped him. He cannot bear to admit that any of his treasured views might spring from the poisoned wells of liberalism and naturalism. When this is pointed out, the persona he has constructed of the perfect, moderate conservative is threatened—so he rushes to defend it, either by justifying the error, denying its implications, or shooting the messenger.
There are some who have long defended Vatican II and its teaching on religious liberty—and who have or seek a place at the table of the establishment—and who are heavily invested in making sure that everything appears coherent.
Not all such men fall into the second camp. There are honest men who really believe that these far-fetched solutions are the truth. You can tell who these honest men are, because they do not get worked up or aggressive/defensive about the suggestion that they might be wrong: they just disagree, state their reasons, and maintain charity and respect with those who disagree.
But the danger of ideological thinking is very real. May we be preserved from it.
Broadly speaking, there are two types of people among us.
The first recognises that we live in a world saturated with naturalism and liberalism—and that he himself is not exempt. When he uncovers yet another layer of these errors within his own thinking, actions, or assumptions, he is glad: for now the rot can be named and cut out. The work of restoration advances.
The second remains in denial about how deeply these errors have shaped him. He cannot bear to admit that any of his treasured views might spring from the poisoned wells of liberalism and naturalism. When this is pointed out, the persona he has constructed of the perfect, moderate conservative is threatened—so he rushes to defend it, either by justifying the error, denying its implications, or shooting the messenger.
There are some who have long defended Vatican II and its teaching on religious liberty—and who have or seek a place at the table of the establishment—and who are heavily invested in making sure that everything appears coherent.
Not all such men fall into the second camp. There are honest men who really believe that these far-fetched solutions are the truth. You can tell who these honest men are, because they do not get worked up or aggressive/defensive about the suggestion that they might be wrong: they just disagree, state their reasons, and maintain charity and respect with those who disagree.
But the danger of ideological thinking is very real. May we be preserved from it.
Forwarded from The WM Review
Linking Satanism with religious liberty triggered outrage—here's why
Follow-up to the drama over this issue. Here's the thing: we either accept that liberalism pervades the very air we breathe, or we live in denial.
https://www.wmreview.org/p/trigger-warning
Follow-up to the drama over this issue. Here's the thing: we either accept that liberalism pervades the very air we breathe, or we live in denial.
https://www.wmreview.org/p/trigger-warning
www.wmreview.org
Linking Satanism with religious liberty triggered some outrage—here's why
We either accept that liberalism pervades the very air we breathe, or we live in denial.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio has died.
He showed the Catholic world the poisonous fruits of Vatican II in an obvious fashion leading to a surge of Catholics to seek out more traditional groups and forms of worship to reject the Modernist's concoctions. So much so, that towards the latter years of his papacy, he attempted to suppress various indult groups and TLM associations. However, his attempts merely managed to foster a spirit of rebellion.
Bergolio was known to cause confusion with every official statement and especially informal interviews. First, by the ambiguous text or wording, then by the strange responses, or lack of, when questioned on such teachings and thirdly by the actions that he allowed to go unchallenged by his bishops. Examples include, Amoris Laetitia, which allowed open adulterers to receive communion. The Document on Human Fraternity For World Peace and Living Together which states that God wills a diversity of religions and the more recent "gay blessing" scandal, with many, many more examples. It is immeasurable the loss of faith, confusion and division that he has caused.
We should hope that he has made peace with God before his final moments and that He has mercy on him.
Eternal rest grant onto him, O Lord, and perpetual light shine upon him. May his soul and the souls of all the faithful departed, rest in peace. Amen.
He showed the Catholic world the poisonous fruits of Vatican II in an obvious fashion leading to a surge of Catholics to seek out more traditional groups and forms of worship to reject the Modernist's concoctions. So much so, that towards the latter years of his papacy, he attempted to suppress various indult groups and TLM associations. However, his attempts merely managed to foster a spirit of rebellion.
Bergolio was known to cause confusion with every official statement and especially informal interviews. First, by the ambiguous text or wording, then by the strange responses, or lack of, when questioned on such teachings and thirdly by the actions that he allowed to go unchallenged by his bishops. Examples include, Amoris Laetitia, which allowed open adulterers to receive communion. The Document on Human Fraternity For World Peace and Living Together which states that God wills a diversity of religions and the more recent "gay blessing" scandal, with many, many more examples. It is immeasurable the loss of faith, confusion and division that he has caused.
We should hope that he has made peace with God before his final moments and that He has mercy on him.
Eternal rest grant onto him, O Lord, and perpetual light shine upon him. May his soul and the souls of all the faithful departed, rest in peace. Amen.
Forwarded from The WM Review
Francis is dead, RIP
Jorge Mario Bergoglio, whom many know as 'Pope Francis,' has gone to his reward.
What next?
https://www.wmreview.org/p/francis-is-dead-rip
Jorge Mario Bergoglio, whom many know as 'Pope Francis,' has gone to his reward.
What next?
https://www.wmreview.org/p/francis-is-dead-rip
www.wmreview.org
Francis is dead, RIP
Jorge Mario Bergoglio, whom many knew as 'Pope Francis,' has gone to his reward. What next?
Forwarded from The WM Review
Cue jokes: "We're all sedevacantists now."
How funny. But no, "we're" not. Sedevacantism is predicated not just on a vacant see, but the Church's teaching on the papacy and her own constitution.
Many who are chortling about how "we're sedevacantists now" will accept whoever's elected—even Pope Susan:
https://www.wmreview.org/p/susanvacantism
How funny. But no, "we're" not. Sedevacantism is predicated not just on a vacant see, but the Church's teaching on the papacy and her own constitution.
Many who are chortling about how "we're sedevacantists now" will accept whoever's elected—even Pope Susan:
https://www.wmreview.org/p/susanvacantism
www.wmreview.org
SUSANVACANTISM: The Spiritual Dangers
It is the year 2051 CE. Rad-Trads have declared, based on their own private judgment, that Pope Susan is in fact a woman, and therefore not the pope. Fredrik Tunaphisch reports on SUSANVACANTISM.
Not one man currently in the Sistine Chapel is a real cardinal. This is, therefore, an illegitimate election.
It is possible, however, that by a miracle of God's infinite mercy, a real Catholic could somehow receive the requisite two thirds of votes and be elected, and his subsequent recognition by the virtual unanimity of the Church would legitimize his elevation to the Papacy. (That's without thinking of the Cassiciacum Thesis.)
Let us pray that such a miracle occur.
Kyrie eleison.
It is possible, however, that by a miracle of God's infinite mercy, a real Catholic could somehow receive the requisite two thirds of votes and be elected, and his subsequent recognition by the virtual unanimity of the Church would legitimize his elevation to the Papacy. (That's without thinking of the Cassiciacum Thesis.)
Let us pray that such a miracle occur.
Kyrie eleison.
What name will the next papal claimant take?
Final Results
16%
Francis II
3%
Benedict XVII
15%
John Paul III
2%
Paul VII
1%
John XXIV
19%
Pius XIII
8%
Leo XIV
8%
Gregory XVII
2%
Clement XV
25%
Other
Forwarded from Frankie Logue
https://collegeofcardinalsreport.com/cardinals/robert-francis-prevost/ —> pro-Amoris Laetitia but apparently a little less pro-LGBT than Francis. Cards close to his chest regarding the traditional Mass and blessing sodomitical unions
https://www.thetablet.co.uk/features/next-pope-papabile/ —> directed removal of Bp Strickland
Also head of Augustianians and prefect of dicastery for bishops
General profile: https://web.archive.org/web/20250502030654/https://cruxnow.com/papal-transition/2025/05/papabile-of-the-day-cardinal-robert-francis-prevost
https://angelusnews.com/news/vatican/cardinals-prevost/ —> Some issues re. sexual abuse
Overall picture: seen as continuity Francis but not in style. Maybe less off the cuff
https://www.thetablet.co.uk/features/next-pope-papabile/ —> directed removal of Bp Strickland
Also head of Augustianians and prefect of dicastery for bishops
General profile: https://web.archive.org/web/20250502030654/https://cruxnow.com/papal-transition/2025/05/papabile-of-the-day-cardinal-robert-francis-prevost
https://angelusnews.com/news/vatican/cardinals-prevost/ —> Some issues re. sexual abuse
Overall picture: seen as continuity Francis but not in style. Maybe less off the cuff
The College of Cardinals Report
Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, O.S.A.
Forwarded from SERVIAM- I Will Serve
He's a "moderate" now, since Francis destroyed so much. He would have been a heretic in the 50s, and burnt at the stake in the Middle Ages.
Forwarded from The WM Review
Card. Prevost elected by conclave as Leo XIV—Who is he?
Leo XIV, Cardinal Prevost, has been elected by the Conclave. He is thus a true successor of Paul VI: but is he a successor of St Peter?
https://www.wmreview.org/p/leo-xiv-prevost
Leo XIV, Cardinal Prevost, has been elected by the Conclave. He is thus a true successor of Paul VI: but is he a successor of St Peter?
https://www.wmreview.org/p/leo-xiv-prevost
www.wmreview.org
Card. Prevost elected by conclave as Leo XIV—Is he Catholic?
Leo XIV, Cardinal Prevost, has been elected by the Conclave. He is thus a true successor of Paul VI: but is he a successor of St Peter?