Forwarded from Europa Last Battle
Breaking News Alert:
Trump Administration Overhauls Military Recruitment: DEI Out, Focus on 'Real Men' to Combat Deep State
In a dramatic shift in policy, President Donald Trump has officially dismantled Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs within the U.S. military. With these changes now in place, the administration aims to recruit what it describes as "real men" to fortify the nation's defenses against what they term "the Deep State."
This move, part of a broader initiative to refocus military priorities, signals a major pivot from previous policies which emphasized diversity and inclusion. Sources close to the administration claim this is a step towards strengthening national security by ensuring that recruitment is based solely on merit and capability.
Stay tuned for further developments as this story unfolds.
Trump Administration Overhauls Military Recruitment: DEI Out, Focus on 'Real Men' to Combat Deep State
In a dramatic shift in policy, President Donald Trump has officially dismantled Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs within the U.S. military. With these changes now in place, the administration aims to recruit what it describes as "real men" to fortify the nation's defenses against what they term "the Deep State."
This move, part of a broader initiative to refocus military priorities, signals a major pivot from previous policies which emphasized diversity and inclusion. Sources close to the administration claim this is a step towards strengthening national security by ensuring that recruitment is based solely on merit and capability.
Stay tuned for further developments as this story unfolds.
👍1
Forwarded from Libs of TikTok
A source on a military base sent me this. Defense Health Agency Lieutenant General Telita Crosland recently sent a memorandum detailing guidance on providing trans treatments to service members.
I’m told they’re still pushing this out and promoting it despite Trump’s order banning trans people from the military.
Someone needs to check what’s going on at DHA
I’m told they’re still pushing this out and promoting it despite Trump’s order banning trans people from the military.
Someone needs to check what’s going on at DHA
👎1
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
🤬Breaking News Alert: 🔥🚒
Clinton's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Policy: The Catalyst for Military Decline, Critics Claim
In a controversial historical assessment, President Bill Clinton's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) policy is being labeled as the catalyst that began the degradation of military readiness and discipline. Introduced in 1993, DADT was intended as a middle ground, allowing gay service members to serve without the military inquiring about their sexual orientation, but it has now come under fire for allegedly undermining the military's traditional values and operational effectiveness.
Critics argue that this policy marked the beginning of a series of changes that fundamentally altered the culture and focus of the U.S. military. The policy, which was repealed in 2011, is seen by some as the first step in a long line of diversity initiatives that they believe have diluted the military's core mission.
For more details on this historical policy and its long-term impact, you can visit http://History.com's article on the DADT repeal.
Stay tuned as we delve deeper into this contentious debate.
Clinton's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Policy: The Catalyst for Military Decline, Critics Claim
In a controversial historical assessment, President Bill Clinton's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) policy is being labeled as the catalyst that began the degradation of military readiness and discipline. Introduced in 1993, DADT was intended as a middle ground, allowing gay service members to serve without the military inquiring about their sexual orientation, but it has now come under fire for allegedly undermining the military's traditional values and operational effectiveness.
Critics argue that this policy marked the beginning of a series of changes that fundamentally altered the culture and focus of the U.S. military. The policy, which was repealed in 2011, is seen by some as the first step in a long line of diversity initiatives that they believe have diluted the military's core mission.
For more details on this historical policy and its long-term impact, you can visit http://History.com's article on the DADT repeal.
Stay tuned as we delve deeper into this contentious debate.
👍1
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
The Times of Israel
Painting of Clinton in blue dress hung in Jeffrey Epstein’s home
Macabre decor of financier's Manhattan residence included prosthetic eyeballs, a human chessboard, stuffed poodle, and doll swinging from a chandelier
Breaking News Alert:
Controversial Painting of Bill Clinton in Women's Attire Sparks Speculation
A painting depicting former President Bill Clinton dressed in a blue dress and red heels, reminiscent of his infamous affair with Monica Lewinsky, was prominently displayed in the late Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home. This artwork, which has reignited discussions around Clinton's personal life, portrays him in a manner that has led some to speculate about his sexual orientation and cross-dressing tendencies.
The painting, identified as "Parsing Bill" by artist Petrina Ryan-Kleid, was hung in a place where visitors to Epstein's residence would immediately see it, suggesting a provocative statement or jest. Critics and observers have noted the peculiarity of such a depiction, especially given the context of Clinton's public life and political legacy.
For more on this startling revelation, see the detailed article on The Times of Israel.
This discovery adds another layer to the complex narrative surrounding both Clinton's presidency and his association with Epstein. Stay tuned for further analysis and reactions.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/painting-of-clinton-in-blue-dress-hung-in-jeffrey-epsteins-home/
Controversial Painting of Bill Clinton in Women's Attire Sparks Speculation
A painting depicting former President Bill Clinton dressed in a blue dress and red heels, reminiscent of his infamous affair with Monica Lewinsky, was prominently displayed in the late Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home. This artwork, which has reignited discussions around Clinton's personal life, portrays him in a manner that has led some to speculate about his sexual orientation and cross-dressing tendencies.
The painting, identified as "Parsing Bill" by artist Petrina Ryan-Kleid, was hung in a place where visitors to Epstein's residence would immediately see it, suggesting a provocative statement or jest. Critics and observers have noted the peculiarity of such a depiction, especially given the context of Clinton's public life and political legacy.
For more on this startling revelation, see the detailed article on The Times of Israel.
This discovery adds another layer to the complex narrative surrounding both Clinton's presidency and his association with Epstein. Stay tuned for further analysis and reactions.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/painting-of-clinton-in-blue-dress-hung-in-jeffrey-epsteins-home/
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Breaking Unheard News:
Exclusive Revelation: Focus on Racial and Religious Divides Serves Those in Power
In an eye-opening expose, it has been uncovered that individuals and groups who obsess over comparisons between races and religions are unwittingly aiding those who benefit from a 'divide and conquer' strategy. This age-old tactic, used by those holding power, keeps populations at odds with one another, preventing unity and the promotion of true humanity.
Humanity Forgotten?: An alarming question has surfaced - when was the last time society truly focused on celebrating human unity rather than the differences that segregate us? This revelation comes at a time when acts of genuine human connection and empathy seem to be fading into obscurity, overshadowed by narratives that emphasize division.
This unheard news calls for a societal introspection: Are we, as a collective, neglecting the essence of what makes us human in favor of focusing on what keeps us apart? Stay tuned as we delve into this critical issue, exploring the potential for a shift towards a more unified, compassionate world.
Exclusive Revelation: Focus on Racial and Religious Divides Serves Those in Power
In an eye-opening expose, it has been uncovered that individuals and groups who obsess over comparisons between races and religions are unwittingly aiding those who benefit from a 'divide and conquer' strategy. This age-old tactic, used by those holding power, keeps populations at odds with one another, preventing unity and the promotion of true humanity.
Humanity Forgotten?: An alarming question has surfaced - when was the last time society truly focused on celebrating human unity rather than the differences that segregate us? This revelation comes at a time when acts of genuine human connection and empathy seem to be fading into obscurity, overshadowed by narratives that emphasize division.
This unheard news calls for a societal introspection: Are we, as a collective, neglecting the essence of what makes us human in favor of focusing on what keeps us apart? Stay tuned as we delve into this critical issue, exploring the potential for a shift towards a more unified, compassionate world.
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Mexico has reportedly blocked a U.S. deportation flight from landing, escalating tensions with the United States under President Donald Trump's administration. This incident comes amidst Trump's aggressive immigration policies, aiming for what has been described as the largest mass deportation effort in U.S. history. The flight, which was carrying illegal immigrants back to Mexico, was denied landing rights, highlighting a significant diplomatic friction between the two nations.
The move by Mexico could be seen as a direct challenge to Trump's policies, especially given that deporting migrants to foreign countries requires the consent of the receiving nation. This action by Mexico might provoke retaliatory measures from the U.S., considering Trump's history of using economic and diplomatic leverage against nations that do not comply with his administration's directives.
This incident also reflects the broader context of U.S.-Mexico relations under Trump's presidency, where immigration has been a contentious issue. Trump has previously used tariffs and other economic threats as tools to push for compliance on immigration policies. The refusal of the flight could lead to increased border security measures, trade negotiations, or other forms of diplomatic or economic pressure from the U.S. side.
From the Mexican perspective, this decision might be motivated by internal political pressures, humanitarian concerns, or a strategic stance against what they perceive as unilateral U.S. actions. Mexico has shown readiness to deal with possible mass deportations through initiatives like "Mexico Embraces You," aimed at supporting returning citizens, but this direct action against a deportation flight indicates a new level of resistance or negotiation strategy.
The situation underscores the complexities of international relations, especially concerning immigration and border control, where national policies often clash with international diplomacy. The outcome of this standoff could have implications not only for U.S.-Mexico relations but also for how the U.S. navigates its immigration enforcement with other countries under Trump's administration.
For further details, the source of this news can be referenced at https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14323583/Mexico-deportation-flight-block-Trump.html
The move by Mexico could be seen as a direct challenge to Trump's policies, especially given that deporting migrants to foreign countries requires the consent of the receiving nation. This action by Mexico might provoke retaliatory measures from the U.S., considering Trump's history of using economic and diplomatic leverage against nations that do not comply with his administration's directives.
This incident also reflects the broader context of U.S.-Mexico relations under Trump's presidency, where immigration has been a contentious issue. Trump has previously used tariffs and other economic threats as tools to push for compliance on immigration policies. The refusal of the flight could lead to increased border security measures, trade negotiations, or other forms of diplomatic or economic pressure from the U.S. side.
From the Mexican perspective, this decision might be motivated by internal political pressures, humanitarian concerns, or a strategic stance against what they perceive as unilateral U.S. actions. Mexico has shown readiness to deal with possible mass deportations through initiatives like "Mexico Embraces You," aimed at supporting returning citizens, but this direct action against a deportation flight indicates a new level of resistance or negotiation strategy.
The situation underscores the complexities of international relations, especially concerning immigration and border control, where national policies often clash with international diplomacy. The outcome of this standoff could have implications not only for U.S.-Mexico relations but also for how the U.S. navigates its immigration enforcement with other countries under Trump's administration.
For further details, the source of this news can be referenced at https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14323583/Mexico-deportation-flight-block-Trump.html
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
CalMatters
Trump and Newsom embrace in fire-ravaged LA, but now the president wants to tie federal aid to voter ID
The president and California's governor promised to work together for fire victims, but Trump keeps suggesting aid is tied to state changes.
Trump and Newsom embrace in fire-ravaged LA, but now the president wants to tie federal aid to Voter ID
President Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom were seen embracing in Los Angeles amidst the aftermath of devastating wildfires, showcasing a moment of unity on the surface. However, this apparent camaraderie has been overshadowed by Trump's condition for federal disaster aid. Trump has publicly stated that he wants California to implement Voter ID laws before the state can receive full federal assistance for recovery efforts from the wildfires.
This demand has sparked controversy, as tying federal aid to changes in state voting laws could be seen as an attempt to leverage disaster relief for political gain. Critics argue that disaster aid should be apolitical, focusing solely on helping citizens recover from natural disasters. The move by Trump echoes his long-standing push for stricter voter identification laws, which he claims are necessary to combat voter fraud, though evidence supporting widespread voter fraud is scarce.
From the perspective of Newsom and other state officials, this condition could be viewed as an inappropriate use of federal power, potentially delaying much-needed support for fire victims. California already has voter identification requirements for registration but not necessarily for voting itself, which has been a point of contention in the broader national debate on voting rights.
The situation also highlights the tension between federal and state governance, especially when political ideologies differ. Newsom has responded by focusing on the immediate needs of Californians affected by the fires, while also hinting at potential legal challenges or alternative funding strategies if federal aid is withheld or conditioned inappropriately.
The political implications of tying disaster aid to voting policy reforms could set a precedent for future federal-state interactions, potentially affecting how disaster relief is negotiated and distributed across the U.S. This case could also influence public perception of both leaders, with Trump possibly seen as using a crisis for political leverage, and Newsom navigating the balance between state sovereignty and the necessity of federal assistance.
For more detailed information, the source can be referenced at .
https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/01/trump-la-fires-newsom/
President Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom were seen embracing in Los Angeles amidst the aftermath of devastating wildfires, showcasing a moment of unity on the surface. However, this apparent camaraderie has been overshadowed by Trump's condition for federal disaster aid. Trump has publicly stated that he wants California to implement Voter ID laws before the state can receive full federal assistance for recovery efforts from the wildfires.
This demand has sparked controversy, as tying federal aid to changes in state voting laws could be seen as an attempt to leverage disaster relief for political gain. Critics argue that disaster aid should be apolitical, focusing solely on helping citizens recover from natural disasters. The move by Trump echoes his long-standing push for stricter voter identification laws, which he claims are necessary to combat voter fraud, though evidence supporting widespread voter fraud is scarce.
From the perspective of Newsom and other state officials, this condition could be viewed as an inappropriate use of federal power, potentially delaying much-needed support for fire victims. California already has voter identification requirements for registration but not necessarily for voting itself, which has been a point of contention in the broader national debate on voting rights.
The situation also highlights the tension between federal and state governance, especially when political ideologies differ. Newsom has responded by focusing on the immediate needs of Californians affected by the fires, while also hinting at potential legal challenges or alternative funding strategies if federal aid is withheld or conditioned inappropriately.
The political implications of tying disaster aid to voting policy reforms could set a precedent for future federal-state interactions, potentially affecting how disaster relief is negotiated and distributed across the U.S. This case could also influence public perception of both leaders, with Trump possibly seen as using a crisis for political leverage, and Newsom navigating the balance between state sovereignty and the necessity of federal assistance.
For more detailed information, the source can be referenced at .
https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/01/trump-la-fires-newsom/
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Summary of the Discussion Between Trump and LA Mayor on Wildfire Recovery and Insurance Issues
During a conversation focused on the recovery efforts following the California wildfires, former President Donald Trump and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass discussed the timeline for rebuilding and the challenges posed by insurance availability and federal aid. Here are the key points from their dialogue:
Rebuilding Timeline: Trump expressed concern over the reported 18-month delay in starting the rebuilding process, emphasizing the need for immediate action. Mayor Bass assured that such long delays would not be the case, highlighting the necessity of first addressing hazardous waste removal to expedite the process.
Federal Support and Permits: Trump committed to ensuring there would be no bureaucratic delays, particularly with federal permits, which he described as typically the hardest part. He mentioned that the Department of Commerce had already approved water-related issues, which usually takes a long time.
Insurance Crisis: The conversation touched on California's insurance crisis, with Trump noting that many insurance companies had left the state, making it nearly impossible for residents to obtain insurance. He attributed this partly to state policies, suggesting that these had made insurance companies reluctant to operate in California. The lack of insurance has left homeowners in a precarious position, with federal aid amounting to only $43,000 in some cases, far less than what might be needed for rebuilding.
Community Resilience: Trump praised the resilience of the affected communities, noting that despite the devastation, residents expressed a strong desire to rebuild in the same area, showing a deep connection to their community. He compared the situation to similar disasters he had witnessed, like flooding in North Carolina, emphasizing the spirit of the people and the efficiency of local fire departments.
Future Commitments: Trump promised continued support, mentioning that he had already spoken with the Governor about working together to address the situation. He also highlighted the importance of California to the nation, suggesting a future celebration once recovery efforts are underway and promising to "open the coffers" for aid.
Olympics Mention: In a lighter moment, Trump mentioned having secured a deal with the Olympics, indicating his involvement in various state matters, though this was somewhat tangential to the main discussion.
This dialogue reflects the urgency of addressing the aftermath of natural disasters, the complexities of state-federal cooperation, and the broader issues of insurance availability in disaster-prone areas. It also underscores the personal commitment of political figures to support recovery efforts and the resilience of affected communities.
During a conversation focused on the recovery efforts following the California wildfires, former President Donald Trump and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass discussed the timeline for rebuilding and the challenges posed by insurance availability and federal aid. Here are the key points from their dialogue:
Rebuilding Timeline: Trump expressed concern over the reported 18-month delay in starting the rebuilding process, emphasizing the need for immediate action. Mayor Bass assured that such long delays would not be the case, highlighting the necessity of first addressing hazardous waste removal to expedite the process.
Federal Support and Permits: Trump committed to ensuring there would be no bureaucratic delays, particularly with federal permits, which he described as typically the hardest part. He mentioned that the Department of Commerce had already approved water-related issues, which usually takes a long time.
Insurance Crisis: The conversation touched on California's insurance crisis, with Trump noting that many insurance companies had left the state, making it nearly impossible for residents to obtain insurance. He attributed this partly to state policies, suggesting that these had made insurance companies reluctant to operate in California. The lack of insurance has left homeowners in a precarious position, with federal aid amounting to only $43,000 in some cases, far less than what might be needed for rebuilding.
Community Resilience: Trump praised the resilience of the affected communities, noting that despite the devastation, residents expressed a strong desire to rebuild in the same area, showing a deep connection to their community. He compared the situation to similar disasters he had witnessed, like flooding in North Carolina, emphasizing the spirit of the people and the efficiency of local fire departments.
Future Commitments: Trump promised continued support, mentioning that he had already spoken with the Governor about working together to address the situation. He also highlighted the importance of California to the nation, suggesting a future celebration once recovery efforts are underway and promising to "open the coffers" for aid.
Olympics Mention: In a lighter moment, Trump mentioned having secured a deal with the Olympics, indicating his involvement in various state matters, though this was somewhat tangential to the main discussion.
This dialogue reflects the urgency of addressing the aftermath of natural disasters, the complexities of state-federal cooperation, and the broader issues of insurance availability in disaster-prone areas. It also underscores the personal commitment of political figures to support recovery efforts and the resilience of affected communities.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
The Republicans who did not vote for Pete Hegseth's confirmation as Secretary of Defense were:
Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
Senator Susan Collins of Maine
Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
Senator Susan Collins of Maine
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Why did Gavin Newsom hire the sheriff to handcuff him? Because he wanted to stop talking with his hands so he could finally give a "hands-off" press conference!
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Why did Gavin Newsom get the sheriff to cuff him? So he wouldn't end up jerking off the conversation when talking to the press.
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Why did Trump dress down Karen Bass, the trans Mayor of California? He said, "You think you're packing heat? Honey, I've seen more cock in a henhouse, and your outfit still looks like a fucking disaster!"
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Why did Obama have his hand down Diddy's pants?
Because he was checking if Diddy's "change" was really "hope" or just a hard promise!
Because he was checking if Diddy's "change" was really "hope" or just a hard promise!
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Why does Adam Schiff's goose neck bob like a porn star on payday?
Because he's so busy taking deep state dick, he can't keep his head straight!
Because he's so busy taking deep state dick, he can't keep his head straight!
Forwarded from NewsWeUse🫵
Why didn't they vote for Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense?
Because they cream their pants watching their party take a big, fat L. They're political cum-dumpsters for defeat!
Because they cream their pants watching their party take a big, fat L. They're political cum-dumpsters for defeat!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM