1933 was the year of implementing United States governmental enslavement of its citizens. That “Corporation” system is being dismantled along with the Federal Reserve.
Think I’m wrong? Research the Chevron determination by the US Supreme Court passed last week. The entire corrupt system is coming down.
Think I’m wrong? Research the Chevron determination by the US Supreme Court passed last week. The entire corrupt system is coming down.
🙏6💯4🔥1
TRENDING
Supreme Court Ruling Alters January 6 Charges: From Insurrection to Trespassing
The Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. U.S. has struck down one of the most common charges against January 6 defendants: “obstruction of an official proceeding.” This ruling has profound implications for the numerous cases that relied on this charge, rendering many of these convictions invalid.
For years, the narrative around January 6 has centered on the idea of an “insurrection.” Politicians and pundits alike have used this term to describe the events of that day, often framing it as an organized attempt to overthrow the government. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling signals a significant shift in how these actions are legally interpreted. The events of January 6 are now increasingly seen as a case of mass trespass and unlawful entry rather than an insurrection.
The Justice Department’s decision to use the obstruction charge, which stems from a law enacted post-Enron to criminalize the destruction of evidence, has now been called into question. The broad interpretation of this law allowed it to be applied to hundreds of January 6 cases. At least a quarter of the prosecutions included this charge. The ruling will result in resentencing for many, and pending cases will proceed without the obstruction claim.
Former President Donald Trump is also affected by this decision. Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Trump in Washington, D.C., includes obstruction charges. With the Supreme Court’s ruling, half of this indictment could be dropped, necessitating a potential superseding indictment. This development could derail Smith’s efforts to bring Trump to trial before the election, a goal that has been prioritized by both Smith and Judge Tanya Chutkan.
The ruling challenges the long-held belief that January 6 was an insurrection. Polls show that a majority of citizens view the events as a protest that escalated into a riot, not an attempt to overthrow the government. This perspective is reinforced by the Supreme Court’s decision, which suggests that the legal framework used to prosecute many of the January 6 defendants was flawed.
The narrative of January 6 as an insurrection has been a critical point for many in the media and politics. However, this ruling undermines that claim, shifting the focus to charges of trespass and unlawful entry. President Biden’s statements about democracy being on the ballot and the hyperbolic claims surrounding Trump’s potential re-election are increasingly being questioned. Recent polls indicate that a significant portion of the public views Biden, not Trump, as a greater threat to democracy.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. U.S. marks a turning point in the legal and political discourse surrounding January 6. As the obstruction charges are invalidated, the narrative shifts from insurrection to trespassing, challenging the Justice Department’s prosecution strategy and altering the public’s perception of the events. This ruling underscores the need for accurate legal interpretations and highlights the potential misuse of broad legal provisions in politically charged cases.
https://theleadingreport.com/supreme-court-overturns-jan-6-convictions/
Supreme Court Ruling Alters January 6 Charges: From Insurrection to Trespassing
The Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. U.S. has struck down one of the most common charges against January 6 defendants: “obstruction of an official proceeding.” This ruling has profound implications for the numerous cases that relied on this charge, rendering many of these convictions invalid.
For years, the narrative around January 6 has centered on the idea of an “insurrection.” Politicians and pundits alike have used this term to describe the events of that day, often framing it as an organized attempt to overthrow the government. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling signals a significant shift in how these actions are legally interpreted. The events of January 6 are now increasingly seen as a case of mass trespass and unlawful entry rather than an insurrection.
The Justice Department’s decision to use the obstruction charge, which stems from a law enacted post-Enron to criminalize the destruction of evidence, has now been called into question. The broad interpretation of this law allowed it to be applied to hundreds of January 6 cases. At least a quarter of the prosecutions included this charge. The ruling will result in resentencing for many, and pending cases will proceed without the obstruction claim.
Former President Donald Trump is also affected by this decision. Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Trump in Washington, D.C., includes obstruction charges. With the Supreme Court’s ruling, half of this indictment could be dropped, necessitating a potential superseding indictment. This development could derail Smith’s efforts to bring Trump to trial before the election, a goal that has been prioritized by both Smith and Judge Tanya Chutkan.
The ruling challenges the long-held belief that January 6 was an insurrection. Polls show that a majority of citizens view the events as a protest that escalated into a riot, not an attempt to overthrow the government. This perspective is reinforced by the Supreme Court’s decision, which suggests that the legal framework used to prosecute many of the January 6 defendants was flawed.
The narrative of January 6 as an insurrection has been a critical point for many in the media and politics. However, this ruling undermines that claim, shifting the focus to charges of trespass and unlawful entry. President Biden’s statements about democracy being on the ballot and the hyperbolic claims surrounding Trump’s potential re-election are increasingly being questioned. Recent polls indicate that a significant portion of the public views Biden, not Trump, as a greater threat to democracy.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. U.S. marks a turning point in the legal and political discourse surrounding January 6. As the obstruction charges are invalidated, the narrative shifts from insurrection to trespassing, challenging the Justice Department’s prosecution strategy and altering the public’s perception of the events. This ruling underscores the need for accurate legal interpretations and highlights the potential misuse of broad legal provisions in politically charged cases.
https://theleadingreport.com/supreme-court-overturns-jan-6-convictions/
👍6👏1
INDIANA
2008. Election Irregularities
Barack Obama qualified for the primary with 534 signatures. The prosecutor discovered 100 to 200 signatures were forged. Barack Obama was never qualified for the primary in Indiana.
Election Fraud is real.
VIDEO CLIP 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1808607136865529860/pu/pl/aXFcJ232hSOLdsZ4.m3u8?tag=12
2008. Election Irregularities
Barack Obama qualified for the primary with 534 signatures. The prosecutor discovered 100 to 200 signatures were forged. Barack Obama was never qualified for the primary in Indiana.
Election Fraud is real.
VIDEO CLIP 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1808607136865529860/pu/pl/aXFcJ232hSOLdsZ4.m3u8?tag=12
👍8🤬4
BRICS To Accept Local Currencies for Fish Exports, Sideline US Dollar
BRICS is looking to dominate the food and crops sector and reduce the US dollar’s hegemony for trade settlements. Russia recently proposed a plan to allow countries to settle trade in local currencies for grain exports. The plan termed ‘grain exchange’ allows import and export companies to buy grain directly from farm producers and firms. The exchange could be initiated in local currencies sidelining the US dollar. However, BRICS has now gone a step further and plans to use the same mechanism for fish exports, where local currencies will be the primary mode of payment and not the US dollar.
BRICS member China is the second biggest exporter of fish in the world exporting $10.40 billion worth of seafood. Its counterpart, India also exports nearly 17% of its fish and seafood products around the globe. The total worth of India’s fish exports stands close to $4.6 billion a year. Russia is looking to monetize its BRICS counterpart’s global fish exports to diminish the US dollar’s dominance.
https://watcher.guru/news/10-sco-countries-ready-to-ditch-us-dollar-for-trade
https://watcher.guru/news/brics-start-of-de-dollarization-52-trade-in-china-settled-in-yuan
BRICS is looking to dominate the food and crops sector and reduce the US dollar’s hegemony for trade settlements. Russia recently proposed a plan to allow countries to settle trade in local currencies for grain exports. The plan termed ‘grain exchange’ allows import and export companies to buy grain directly from farm producers and firms. The exchange could be initiated in local currencies sidelining the US dollar. However, BRICS has now gone a step further and plans to use the same mechanism for fish exports, where local currencies will be the primary mode of payment and not the US dollar.
BRICS member China is the second biggest exporter of fish in the world exporting $10.40 billion worth of seafood. Its counterpart, India also exports nearly 17% of its fish and seafood products around the globe. The total worth of India’s fish exports stands close to $4.6 billion a year. Russia is looking to monetize its BRICS counterpart’s global fish exports to diminish the US dollar’s dominance.
https://watcher.guru/news/10-sco-countries-ready-to-ditch-us-dollar-for-trade
https://watcher.guru/news/brics-start-of-de-dollarization-52-trade-in-china-settled-in-yuan
HERE IS A PICTURE OF KAMALA IYER HARRIS’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE ⚠️
Her mom was born in India
Her dad was born in Jamaica
They met through mutual activism at the socialist University of California Berkeley…
SHE IS AN ANCHOR BABY WITH TWO HARDCORE EXTREME-LEFT POLITICAL ACTIVIST PARENTS 🚨
SHE WILL DESTROY THE COUNTRY BEYOND REPAIR IF THE ELITES ARE SUCCESSFULLY ABLE TO INSTALL HER IN OFFICE‼️
Anchor Baby —-> Anchor “President”
🚨 BEWARE 🚨
Her mom was born in India
Her dad was born in Jamaica
They met through mutual activism at the socialist University of California Berkeley…
SHE IS AN ANCHOR BABY WITH TWO HARDCORE EXTREME-LEFT POLITICAL ACTIVIST PARENTS 🚨
SHE WILL DESTROY THE COUNTRY BEYOND REPAIR IF THE ELITES ARE SUCCESSFULLY ABLE TO INSTALL HER IN OFFICE‼️
Anchor Baby —-> Anchor “President”
🚨 BEWARE 🚨
🔥3👍1
Trump 2024 RNC National Platform: The 20 Objectives
1. This point aims to dramatically reduce unauthorized border crossings through increased security measures, potentially including physical barriers and enhanced surveillance.
2. This proposes a massive logistical operation to identify, detain, and deport individuals residing in the U.S. without legal authorization, which would be unprecedented in scale.
3. This goal involves implementing economic policies to slow price increases and boost purchasing power, potentially through monetary policy, trade regulations, or domestic production incentives.
4. This aims to expand U.S. oil, gas, and potentially renewable energy production to surpass other global energy producers, likely through deregulation and increased drilling/mining permits.
5. This policy would incentivize companies to relocate manufacturing operations back to the U.S., potentially through tax benefits or penalties on offshoring.
6. This tax policy would reduce income tax rates for workers and eliminate taxes on tip income, which could benefit service industry workers but may impact government revenue.
7. This emphasizes strict interpretation and protection of constitutional rights, particularly focusing on First and Second Amendment freedoms.
8. This combines foreign policy aimed at conflict prevention with development of advanced missile defense technology to protect the entire U.S. from potential attacks.
9. This suggests reducing federal agency powers, particularly in areas where government actions are seen as infringing on individual liberties.
10. This proposes aggressive law enforcement actions against international criminal organizations, drug trafficking, and gang-related violence, with a focus on crimes associated with undocumented immigrants.
11. This urban development plan focuses on improving safety, cleanliness, and aesthetics in cities, with particular emphasis on the nation's capital.
12. This involves increasing military funding, modernizing equipment and technology, and enhancing overall military capabilities to maintain global military superiority.
13. This economic policy aims to maintain the dominant position of the U.S. dollar in international trade and finance.
14. This promises to maintain current Social Security and Medicare benefits without raising the retirement age, which may require finding alternative funding solutions.
15. This opposes government mandates promoting electric vehicle adoption and seeks to reduce regulations seen as burdensome to businesses or individuals.
16. This educational policy would withhold federal funding from schools teaching certain concepts related to race and gender, which proponents view as inappropriate or divisive.
17. This controversial policy aims to restrict participation in women's sports to individuals assigned female at birth.
18. This proposes removing individuals or groups associated with certain ideologies from college campuses, raising potential free speech concerns.
19. This suggests implementing same-day voter registration, requiring identification to vote, using paper ballots, and ensuring only citizens can vote, which supporters argue would enhance election integrity.
20. This broad goal aims to reduce political divisions and achieve significant national progress, though specific methods are not detailed.
1. This point aims to dramatically reduce unauthorized border crossings through increased security measures, potentially including physical barriers and enhanced surveillance.
2. This proposes a massive logistical operation to identify, detain, and deport individuals residing in the U.S. without legal authorization, which would be unprecedented in scale.
3. This goal involves implementing economic policies to slow price increases and boost purchasing power, potentially through monetary policy, trade regulations, or domestic production incentives.
4. This aims to expand U.S. oil, gas, and potentially renewable energy production to surpass other global energy producers, likely through deregulation and increased drilling/mining permits.
5. This policy would incentivize companies to relocate manufacturing operations back to the U.S., potentially through tax benefits or penalties on offshoring.
6. This tax policy would reduce income tax rates for workers and eliminate taxes on tip income, which could benefit service industry workers but may impact government revenue.
7. This emphasizes strict interpretation and protection of constitutional rights, particularly focusing on First and Second Amendment freedoms.
8. This combines foreign policy aimed at conflict prevention with development of advanced missile defense technology to protect the entire U.S. from potential attacks.
9. This suggests reducing federal agency powers, particularly in areas where government actions are seen as infringing on individual liberties.
10. This proposes aggressive law enforcement actions against international criminal organizations, drug trafficking, and gang-related violence, with a focus on crimes associated with undocumented immigrants.
11. This urban development plan focuses on improving safety, cleanliness, and aesthetics in cities, with particular emphasis on the nation's capital.
12. This involves increasing military funding, modernizing equipment and technology, and enhancing overall military capabilities to maintain global military superiority.
13. This economic policy aims to maintain the dominant position of the U.S. dollar in international trade and finance.
14. This promises to maintain current Social Security and Medicare benefits without raising the retirement age, which may require finding alternative funding solutions.
15. This opposes government mandates promoting electric vehicle adoption and seeks to reduce regulations seen as burdensome to businesses or individuals.
16. This educational policy would withhold federal funding from schools teaching certain concepts related to race and gender, which proponents view as inappropriate or divisive.
17. This controversial policy aims to restrict participation in women's sports to individuals assigned female at birth.
18. This proposes removing individuals or groups associated with certain ideologies from college campuses, raising potential free speech concerns.
19. This suggests implementing same-day voter registration, requiring identification to vote, using paper ballots, and ensuring only citizens can vote, which supporters argue would enhance election integrity.
20. This broad goal aims to reduce political divisions and achieve significant national progress, though specific methods are not detailed.
❤2
Forwarded from ColbertReport 🇺🇸 INDIANA (Ken Colbert)
H.R. 3542 (117th): Human-Animal Chimera Prohibition Act of 2021
INDIANA Senator Braun sponsors Senate bill 1800 to ban cross breeding of animals and humans.
In a laboratory, the first human-pig chimera was created in 2017, while the first human-monkey chimera was announced in April 2021. These aren’t like the chimeras of ancient myth — no “human head with a lion body” creatures. Instead, they take forms such as the mouse with 4 percent human cells, which in 2020 became the highest percentage of human cells ever successfully inserted into an animal.
In response to these developments, the nonprofit International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) issued new guidelines on the subject in May 2021, essentially giving the greenlight. Although the guidelines are non-binding, they are highly influential in the scientific community and heavily followed.
The guidelines did include some limitations. For example, any experiment “should proceed for the minimum time necessary to achieve the scientific aim” and experiments should “limit chimerism to a particular organ system or region” of the animal.
Some find this an exciting innovative new frontier in science, noting the potential advances in public health — for example, a pig could potentially grow a human heart. Others believe this emerging science is ethically and morally dangerous or wrong.
What the legislation does
The Human-Animal Chimera Prohibition Act would criminalize four things:
1 Creating, or even attempting to create, a human-animal chimera.
2 Transferring a human embryo into a nonhuman.
3 Vice versa, transferring a nonhuman embryo into a human.
4 Even receiving a human-animal chimera, even if you did not create it yourself.
Remember Fauci was involved in “Gain of Function”. Our Government has already been experimenting.
VIDEO 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix59Cx9rWVI&feature=youtu.be
ARTICLE 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hr3542/summary
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/s1800
INDIANA Senator Braun sponsors Senate bill 1800 to ban cross breeding of animals and humans.
In a laboratory, the first human-pig chimera was created in 2017, while the first human-monkey chimera was announced in April 2021. These aren’t like the chimeras of ancient myth — no “human head with a lion body” creatures. Instead, they take forms such as the mouse with 4 percent human cells, which in 2020 became the highest percentage of human cells ever successfully inserted into an animal.
In response to these developments, the nonprofit International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) issued new guidelines on the subject in May 2021, essentially giving the greenlight. Although the guidelines are non-binding, they are highly influential in the scientific community and heavily followed.
The guidelines did include some limitations. For example, any experiment “should proceed for the minimum time necessary to achieve the scientific aim” and experiments should “limit chimerism to a particular organ system or region” of the animal.
Some find this an exciting innovative new frontier in science, noting the potential advances in public health — for example, a pig could potentially grow a human heart. Others believe this emerging science is ethically and morally dangerous or wrong.
What the legislation does
The Human-Animal Chimera Prohibition Act would criminalize four things:
1 Creating, or even attempting to create, a human-animal chimera.
2 Transferring a human embryo into a nonhuman.
3 Vice versa, transferring a nonhuman embryo into a human.
4 Even receiving a human-animal chimera, even if you did not create it yourself.
Remember Fauci was involved in “Gain of Function”. Our Government has already been experimenting.
VIDEO 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix59Cx9rWVI&feature=youtu.be
ARTICLE 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hr3542/summary
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/s1800
Forwarded from ColbertReport 🇺🇸 INDIANA (Ken Colbert)
INDIANA:
So a pig is still a pig. Evansville VANDERBURGH School Corporation ( EVSC) has rebranded (SEL) Social Emotional Learning and CRT (Critical Race Theory) into their own verbiage of (GAIN) Growth in Academics through Innovation and Neuroeducation.
It’s right on the EVSC website. It’s using Agenda 21 to circumvent community education and promoting a substandard global agenda of common core. It is about the money. EVSC receives contracts from many sources to implement these ideologies. These educational ideologies do not align with Hoosier Values.
Panorama Education is just one of the contracts up for renewal. The EVSC Board is voting at Monday’s meeting to continue the relationship with US Attorney General Merrick Garland’s son in law regarding the Panorama contract. He owns the company and has contracts with most US School Districts.
The EVSC Board should postpone any endorsement until further research is conducted.
So a pig is still a pig. Evansville VANDERBURGH School Corporation ( EVSC) has rebranded (SEL) Social Emotional Learning and CRT (Critical Race Theory) into their own verbiage of (GAIN) Growth in Academics through Innovation and Neuroeducation.
It’s right on the EVSC website. It’s using Agenda 21 to circumvent community education and promoting a substandard global agenda of common core. It is about the money. EVSC receives contracts from many sources to implement these ideologies. These educational ideologies do not align with Hoosier Values.
Panorama Education is just one of the contracts up for renewal. The EVSC Board is voting at Monday’s meeting to continue the relationship with US Attorney General Merrick Garland’s son in law regarding the Panorama contract. He owns the company and has contracts with most US School Districts.
The EVSC Board should postpone any endorsement until further research is conducted.
Forwarded from ColbertReport 🇺🇸 INDIANA (Ken Colbert)
Seems the Evansville VANDERBURGH School Corporation’s program GAIN was trademarked in 2016; it’s been planned for several years and NEVER a dissenting Board Member when a vote is requested. https://trademarks.justia.com/870/36/gain-growth-academics-innovation-87036387.html
Forwarded from ColbertReport 🇺🇸 INDIANA (Ken Colbert)
INDIANA - VANDERBURGH County Republican Party Chairman Duckworth Voted A Republican In Bad Standing for Conceding House District 77 To Democrat Ryan Hatfield https://medium.com/@youngrepublicansvc/vcrp-chairman-duckworth-voted-a-republican-in-bad-standing-for-conceding-house-district-77-to-b1b1f564440d
❤5
We the People’s role is to declare what we want from our public servants in their representation of us.
Our job is not to blindly follow any politician. Our job is to hold them accountable.
Concern yourself with what God says, and be advocates for His kingdom “on earth as it is in Heaven.”
The RNC National Convention is filled with vipers, and occasionally (every 4 years) decent and honest people get caught up in their schemes. From my experience the delegates are the GOP insiders and busy bodies, unless patriots have discretely run slates to work their way in.
The delegates consistently weaken the platform, alienate the grassroots, and undermine the truth tellers.
Where the establishment makes allowances for normal God fearing Americans to see how the sausage is made, are the alternate delegates. They have no real power. Still, they get to enjoy the after-parties and star gaze at soulless politicians merely because they’ve appeared on Fox News.
The alternates then have a choice to become part of the establishment, or be so disgusted by what they see at these conventions, they disengage from the GOP all together. I’ve seen this cycle for decades.
But make no mistake, the majority of people gathering in Milwaukee are the entrenched establishment, that is only paying lip service to Trump because they have no answer (yet) on how to remove him.
They only respond to power, and Trump still wields more than anyone on planet earth.
Quite the conundrum for them.
@davidclements
Our job is not to blindly follow any politician. Our job is to hold them accountable.
Concern yourself with what God says, and be advocates for His kingdom “on earth as it is in Heaven.”
The RNC National Convention is filled with vipers, and occasionally (every 4 years) decent and honest people get caught up in their schemes. From my experience the delegates are the GOP insiders and busy bodies, unless patriots have discretely run slates to work their way in.
The delegates consistently weaken the platform, alienate the grassroots, and undermine the truth tellers.
Where the establishment makes allowances for normal God fearing Americans to see how the sausage is made, are the alternate delegates. They have no real power. Still, they get to enjoy the after-parties and star gaze at soulless politicians merely because they’ve appeared on Fox News.
The alternates then have a choice to become part of the establishment, or be so disgusted by what they see at these conventions, they disengage from the GOP all together. I’ve seen this cycle for decades.
But make no mistake, the majority of people gathering in Milwaukee are the entrenched establishment, that is only paying lip service to Trump because they have no answer (yet) on how to remove him.
They only respond to power, and Trump still wields more than anyone on planet earth.
Quite the conundrum for them.
@davidclements
👍6
REVEALED: John Deere Sponsoring Sickening DEI Wokeness as They Fire American Workers and Move Factories to Mexico (VIDEO)
The woke left’s infestation of businesses extends to companies that one would think are either safe from politics or lean right. Then, they conspire with executives to double-cross salt-of-the-earth Americans for pure greed.
Conservative activist Robby Starbuck on Wednesday dropped a sobering video report on a company rural Americans (mainly Trump voters) rely on to do their jobs: John Deere. It turns out that selling tractors is far from the only item on the manufacturing company’s agenda.
Starbuck revealed that John Deere had undertaken a variety of sick actions promoting the radical left’s LGBTQ agenda, including pride events for toddlers and “Genderbread man” training.
The company has also promoted Marxist BLM activists like Ibram Kendi and Robin DeAngelo and is pushing unspecified DEI policies in Latin America and India. However, the Middle East and Africa appear to be exempt.
The company is so woke that the far-left Human Rights Campaign, a critical player in the DEI movement, awarded it a 95/100 score.
Here is the complete list of woke policies John Deere has undertaken according to Starbuck:
• Funding a pride event for kids as young as 3.
• “Genderbread man” training.
• They ask employees to list their “preferred pronouns” on all communications.
• Bill Gates is listed as their largest shareholder.
• John Deere celebrated their accounting and finance team taking United Way’s 21-day “United For Equity” program
• John Deere promoted Ibram Kendi, the woke children’s book “Anti-Racist Baby”, “Awake to Woke to Work”, a podcast on the concept of “Whiteness”, woke activist Robin DiAngelo, bigotry against Christians who supposedly have “Christian Privilege” and more.
• The woke policies have spread across the global John Deere brand with many of their DEI policies also being forced on their Latin America and India branches.
• LGBTQ & race-based identity groups at corporate headquarters.
Starbuck said these revelations on John Deere were “only the beginning,” and more would be revealed in the coming weeks and months.
To add insult to injury, John Deere announced massive layoffs of American workers in the Midwest last week and is moving factories to Mexico. As Fox Business reported, they are blaming operational costs in the United States and a lack of tractor sales.
From Fox Business:
The company is slashing around 280 workers from a plant in East Moline, Illinois, while another 230 employees are being let go at a factory in Davenport, Iowa. About 100 production employees at the company’s Dubuque, Iowa, plant will also be impacted. All layoffs are said to be effective from Aug. 30, the company tells FOX Business.
About 500 employees have been let go at its Waterloo plant in Iowa, per WQAD.
With this toxic combination of pushing disgusting woke nonsense while firing hard-working Americans, one could argue that John Deere deserves the Bud Light treatment. We may soon see how rural America responds.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/revealed-john-deere-sponsoring-sickening-dei-wokeness-as/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=revealed-john-deere-sponsoring-sickening-dei-wokeness-as
The woke left’s infestation of businesses extends to companies that one would think are either safe from politics or lean right. Then, they conspire with executives to double-cross salt-of-the-earth Americans for pure greed.
Conservative activist Robby Starbuck on Wednesday dropped a sobering video report on a company rural Americans (mainly Trump voters) rely on to do their jobs: John Deere. It turns out that selling tractors is far from the only item on the manufacturing company’s agenda.
Starbuck revealed that John Deere had undertaken a variety of sick actions promoting the radical left’s LGBTQ agenda, including pride events for toddlers and “Genderbread man” training.
The company has also promoted Marxist BLM activists like Ibram Kendi and Robin DeAngelo and is pushing unspecified DEI policies in Latin America and India. However, the Middle East and Africa appear to be exempt.
The company is so woke that the far-left Human Rights Campaign, a critical player in the DEI movement, awarded it a 95/100 score.
Here is the complete list of woke policies John Deere has undertaken according to Starbuck:
• Funding a pride event for kids as young as 3.
• “Genderbread man” training.
• They ask employees to list their “preferred pronouns” on all communications.
• Bill Gates is listed as their largest shareholder.
• John Deere celebrated their accounting and finance team taking United Way’s 21-day “United For Equity” program
• John Deere promoted Ibram Kendi, the woke children’s book “Anti-Racist Baby”, “Awake to Woke to Work”, a podcast on the concept of “Whiteness”, woke activist Robin DiAngelo, bigotry against Christians who supposedly have “Christian Privilege” and more.
• The woke policies have spread across the global John Deere brand with many of their DEI policies also being forced on their Latin America and India branches.
• LGBTQ & race-based identity groups at corporate headquarters.
Starbuck said these revelations on John Deere were “only the beginning,” and more would be revealed in the coming weeks and months.
To add insult to injury, John Deere announced massive layoffs of American workers in the Midwest last week and is moving factories to Mexico. As Fox Business reported, they are blaming operational costs in the United States and a lack of tractor sales.
From Fox Business:
The company is slashing around 280 workers from a plant in East Moline, Illinois, while another 230 employees are being let go at a factory in Davenport, Iowa. About 100 production employees at the company’s Dubuque, Iowa, plant will also be impacted. All layoffs are said to be effective from Aug. 30, the company tells FOX Business.
About 500 employees have been let go at its Waterloo plant in Iowa, per WQAD.
With this toxic combination of pushing disgusting woke nonsense while firing hard-working Americans, one could argue that John Deere deserves the Bud Light treatment. We may soon see how rural America responds.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/revealed-john-deere-sponsoring-sickening-dei-wokeness-as/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=revealed-john-deere-sponsoring-sickening-dei-wokeness-as
😡7
INDIANA
Indiana Economic Development Corporation
State government buildings get new signs at steep cost
Three new signs declaring key state slogans are now up on several Indiana state government center buildings in downtown Indianapolis.
The total cost was about $820,000. Not all was taxpayer money.
Back in 2016, the Indiana Economic Development Corp. added three signs with former Gov. Mike Pence’s “A State That Works” catchphrase to two buildings: the west side of the IEDC’s office at 1 North Capital and the north and south sides of the Indiana Government Center North building. The signs included a gear with the state’s shape inside it.
They cost about $300,000 at the time — or nearly $393,000 in today’s dollars, according to the U.S. Inflation Calculator.
Those three signs have been removed and new signs have been created and replaced by Indiana-based Signworks.
The first two have the new IEDC slogan: Indiana For the Bold. The letters are nine feet tall and span more than 120 feet across.
The signage, which is internally illuminated to fit the new brand, will better reflect the state and its focus on the future and creating a better tomorrow for Hoosiers,” IEDC Spokeswoman Erin Sweitzer said. “These signs are also a unique opportunity to share our brand and the state’s many competitive advantages to not only Indianapolis businesses, residents and students, but also to the more than 30 million people who visit our capital city each year.”
“The signs are in prime downtown locations that are frequently shown in photo and video coverage of the city by media outlets and content creators, creating countless opportunities to share Indiana’s bold brand with potential businesses, innovators and talent around the world,” she added.
The total cost to remove the three existing “A State That Works” signs and install the two new “Indiana For the Bold” signs – was roughly $580,000. The money came from the IEDC’s existing Business Promotion and Innovation funding, which is used to promote business investment and encourage entrepreneurship and innovation.
The third signage location, on the north side of the Indiana Government Center North building, was replaced with branding from the Indiana Destination Development Corporation (IDDC). It features the “IN Indiana” slogan.
Elaine Bedel, secretary and CEO of the IDDC, said the cost of that sign was $240,848. It was funded by the Indiana Destination Development Foundation and not state taxpayer dollars. The expenditure was unanimously approved by foundation board members on February 20, 2024
https://indianacapitalchronicle.com/briefs/state-government-buildings-get-new-signs-at-steep-cost/
Indiana Economic Development Corporation
State government buildings get new signs at steep cost
Three new signs declaring key state slogans are now up on several Indiana state government center buildings in downtown Indianapolis.
The total cost was about $820,000. Not all was taxpayer money.
Back in 2016, the Indiana Economic Development Corp. added three signs with former Gov. Mike Pence’s “A State That Works” catchphrase to two buildings: the west side of the IEDC’s office at 1 North Capital and the north and south sides of the Indiana Government Center North building. The signs included a gear with the state’s shape inside it.
They cost about $300,000 at the time — or nearly $393,000 in today’s dollars, according to the U.S. Inflation Calculator.
Those three signs have been removed and new signs have been created and replaced by Indiana-based Signworks.
The first two have the new IEDC slogan: Indiana For the Bold. The letters are nine feet tall and span more than 120 feet across.
The signage, which is internally illuminated to fit the new brand, will better reflect the state and its focus on the future and creating a better tomorrow for Hoosiers,” IEDC Spokeswoman Erin Sweitzer said. “These signs are also a unique opportunity to share our brand and the state’s many competitive advantages to not only Indianapolis businesses, residents and students, but also to the more than 30 million people who visit our capital city each year.”
“The signs are in prime downtown locations that are frequently shown in photo and video coverage of the city by media outlets and content creators, creating countless opportunities to share Indiana’s bold brand with potential businesses, innovators and talent around the world,” she added.
The total cost to remove the three existing “A State That Works” signs and install the two new “Indiana For the Bold” signs – was roughly $580,000. The money came from the IEDC’s existing Business Promotion and Innovation funding, which is used to promote business investment and encourage entrepreneurship and innovation.
The third signage location, on the north side of the Indiana Government Center North building, was replaced with branding from the Indiana Destination Development Corporation (IDDC). It features the “IN Indiana” slogan.
Elaine Bedel, secretary and CEO of the IDDC, said the cost of that sign was $240,848. It was funded by the Indiana Destination Development Foundation and not state taxpayer dollars. The expenditure was unanimously approved by foundation board members on February 20, 2024
https://indianacapitalchronicle.com/briefs/state-government-buildings-get-new-signs-at-steep-cost/
💩1
MODERNA
Moderna to receive $176 million of your tax dollars to develop bird flu vaccine
And yes — it will be an mRNA vaccine with some warning it will be developed using gain-of-function research.
Even as the fallout from the COVID-19 vaccine continues, Moderna has been awarded $176 million by the federal government to develop another mRNA vaccine for today’s viral scare, bird flu.
Last week, federal officials announced that the pharmaceutical giant would be awarded money by way of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The purpose of the funds, as LifeSite reported, is to “accelerate” the development of the vaccine.
“Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a military contractor, has already helped develop a bird flu mRNA shot that has been cleared by the FDA, prompted by a bird flu outbreak in U.S. dairy cows. The vaccine development will include a late-stage trial next year if early testing looks promising,” they report, citing the Associated Press.
They note that one of the chief concerns many had surrounding the COVID-19 “vaccine” was its use of mRNA technology which has an “abysmal” track record, as LifeSite describes it.
So, considering the bird flu vaccine will use mRNA technology and gain-of-function research, here’s a major plot twist:
One of the most published cardiologists in history, Peter McCulloch, recently suggested that this could be to blame for bird flu jumping from animals to humans in the first place, calling for a shutdown on gain-of-function labs, and warned that culling animals and creating vaccines would only help the virus to develop into “more resistant strains.”
The powers that be appear to be trying to use the bird flu as another pandemic, and their colors shouldn’t be showing more clearly.
https://substack.com/@elizabethjohnston
Moderna to receive $176 million of your tax dollars to develop bird flu vaccine
And yes — it will be an mRNA vaccine with some warning it will be developed using gain-of-function research.
Even as the fallout from the COVID-19 vaccine continues, Moderna has been awarded $176 million by the federal government to develop another mRNA vaccine for today’s viral scare, bird flu.
Last week, federal officials announced that the pharmaceutical giant would be awarded money by way of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The purpose of the funds, as LifeSite reported, is to “accelerate” the development of the vaccine.
“Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a military contractor, has already helped develop a bird flu mRNA shot that has been cleared by the FDA, prompted by a bird flu outbreak in U.S. dairy cows. The vaccine development will include a late-stage trial next year if early testing looks promising,” they report, citing the Associated Press.
They note that one of the chief concerns many had surrounding the COVID-19 “vaccine” was its use of mRNA technology which has an “abysmal” track record, as LifeSite describes it.
So, considering the bird flu vaccine will use mRNA technology and gain-of-function research, here’s a major plot twist:
One of the most published cardiologists in history, Peter McCulloch, recently suggested that this could be to blame for bird flu jumping from animals to humans in the first place, calling for a shutdown on gain-of-function labs, and warned that culling animals and creating vaccines would only help the virus to develop into “more resistant strains.”
The powers that be appear to be trying to use the bird flu as another pandemic, and their colors shouldn’t be showing more clearly.
https://substack.com/@elizabethjohnston
👍3❤1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I am grateful I also listened to this honest Doctor back in 2020.
He predicted the 'sudden' death of the CNN journalist interviewing him in this video.
He predicted the 'sudden' death of the CNN journalist interviewing him in this video.
INDIANA
Indiana AG Todd Rokita sues East Chicago over ‘sanctuary city’ policies
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita is suing the City of East Chicago for what he claims are violations of the state’s ban on “sanctuary cities.”
The complaint, filed in Lake County Superior Court, alleges that an East Chicago ordinance — adopted in 2017 — violates Indiana law by “restrict[ing] taking certain actions regarding information of citizenship or immigration status and limit[ing] or restrict[ing] the enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than the full extent permitted by federal law.”
The lawsuit quotes the city’s code, which specifically bars law enforcement from:
• requesting information about — or otherwise investigating or assisting in — the investigation of a person’s citizenship or immigration status
• detaining a person based upon an immigration detainer, administrative warrant, or “[a]ny other basis that is based solely on the belief that the person is not present legally in the United States, or that the person has committed a civil immigration violation”
• working with federal agencies “to support or assist in any capacity with immigration enforcement operations,” or cooperating with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) unless presented with a criminal warrant
“This week, my office filed a lawsuit against East Chicago because its leaders continue to operate their city as a sanctuary city, giving safe harbor to illegal aliens, against federal and state law,” Rokita said in a statement Tuesday. “We have a new statute that supports the rule of law thanks to the leadership of the General Assembly and I intend to enforce it because illegal immigration is unfair to the good people of this state and those who worked hard to enter our country legally. As we continue to evaluate other local governments, this may not be the last lawsuit we file on this issue. Stay tuned.”
A 2011 Indiana law bans local governments from restricting cooperation with federal officials over citizenship or immigration information.
The Indiana Supreme Court blocked a group of citizens from suing over a Gary ordinance in 2022, saying they didn’t have legal standing. The state’s highest court dismissed the lawsuit which claimed Gary’s policy of prioritizing local public safety needs and protecting the rights of immigrants unlawfully violated Indiana’s sanctuary cities law.
But state lawmakers followed up earlier this year by authorizing the attorney general to enforce the law. Senate Enrolled Act 181, which took effect July 1, permits the attorney general to file a lawsuit against any Indiana college, university or unit of local government that is not enforcing state laws banning sanctuary cities.
According to the complaint, Rokita sent a letter to members of the East Chicago Common Council on May 14, asking whether the ordinance in question was still in effect. His office also demanded its repeal if it was still in effect and warned of legal consequences if the “unlawful ordinance” is not repealed.
The Common Council has not responded to the letter or repealed the ordinance, Rokita said in the lawsuit.
In 2017, a number of cities across the U.S. passed “welcoming city” ordinances in opposition to then-President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. Such ordinances direct government officials not to provide information about a person’s immigration status to federal immigration authorities.
In May, Rokita also threatened legal action against the cities of Gary, West Lafayette and Monroe County, telling them to repeal similar policies “violating Indiana law.”
No lawsuits have been filed by Rokita’s office against those other cities, however.
https://indianacapitalchronicle.com/briefs/indiana-ag-todd-rokita-sues-east-chicago-over-sanctuary-city-policies/
Indiana AG Todd Rokita sues East Chicago over ‘sanctuary city’ policies
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita is suing the City of East Chicago for what he claims are violations of the state’s ban on “sanctuary cities.”
The complaint, filed in Lake County Superior Court, alleges that an East Chicago ordinance — adopted in 2017 — violates Indiana law by “restrict[ing] taking certain actions regarding information of citizenship or immigration status and limit[ing] or restrict[ing] the enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than the full extent permitted by federal law.”
The lawsuit quotes the city’s code, which specifically bars law enforcement from:
• requesting information about — or otherwise investigating or assisting in — the investigation of a person’s citizenship or immigration status
• detaining a person based upon an immigration detainer, administrative warrant, or “[a]ny other basis that is based solely on the belief that the person is not present legally in the United States, or that the person has committed a civil immigration violation”
• working with federal agencies “to support or assist in any capacity with immigration enforcement operations,” or cooperating with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) unless presented with a criminal warrant
“This week, my office filed a lawsuit against East Chicago because its leaders continue to operate their city as a sanctuary city, giving safe harbor to illegal aliens, against federal and state law,” Rokita said in a statement Tuesday. “We have a new statute that supports the rule of law thanks to the leadership of the General Assembly and I intend to enforce it because illegal immigration is unfair to the good people of this state and those who worked hard to enter our country legally. As we continue to evaluate other local governments, this may not be the last lawsuit we file on this issue. Stay tuned.”
A 2011 Indiana law bans local governments from restricting cooperation with federal officials over citizenship or immigration information.
The Indiana Supreme Court blocked a group of citizens from suing over a Gary ordinance in 2022, saying they didn’t have legal standing. The state’s highest court dismissed the lawsuit which claimed Gary’s policy of prioritizing local public safety needs and protecting the rights of immigrants unlawfully violated Indiana’s sanctuary cities law.
But state lawmakers followed up earlier this year by authorizing the attorney general to enforce the law. Senate Enrolled Act 181, which took effect July 1, permits the attorney general to file a lawsuit against any Indiana college, university or unit of local government that is not enforcing state laws banning sanctuary cities.
According to the complaint, Rokita sent a letter to members of the East Chicago Common Council on May 14, asking whether the ordinance in question was still in effect. His office also demanded its repeal if it was still in effect and warned of legal consequences if the “unlawful ordinance” is not repealed.
The Common Council has not responded to the letter or repealed the ordinance, Rokita said in the lawsuit.
In 2017, a number of cities across the U.S. passed “welcoming city” ordinances in opposition to then-President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. Such ordinances direct government officials not to provide information about a person’s immigration status to federal immigration authorities.
In May, Rokita also threatened legal action against the cities of Gary, West Lafayette and Monroe County, telling them to repeal similar policies “violating Indiana law.”
No lawsuits have been filed by Rokita’s office against those other cities, however.
https://indianacapitalchronicle.com/briefs/indiana-ag-todd-rokita-sues-east-chicago-over-sanctuary-city-policies/
❤4
INDIANA
July 10, 2024
In episode 200: “Republicans in bad standing”, Cheryl Battiger Smith and Ken Colbert discuss the 2024 Indiana Republican Convention, the Republican Lieutenant Governor nominee, Micah Beckwith; the censure of three certified precinct committeeman; the removal of certified delegates; and future discussion of a variety of topics related to politics in Southwest Indiana.
Leave a comment below regarding future subject matters to be investigated and discussed. Nothing is off limits.
VIDEO. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://rumble.com/v56fv56-republicans-in-bad-standing-discuss-the-2024-indiana-republican-convention..html
This week in Evansville Podcast with host Johnny Kinkaid. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KEtArt6il5Y
@KColbertreport
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ColbertReport
July 10, 2024
In episode 200: “Republicans in bad standing”, Cheryl Battiger Smith and Ken Colbert discuss the 2024 Indiana Republican Convention, the Republican Lieutenant Governor nominee, Micah Beckwith; the censure of three certified precinct committeeman; the removal of certified delegates; and future discussion of a variety of topics related to politics in Southwest Indiana.
Leave a comment below regarding future subject matters to be investigated and discussed. Nothing is off limits.
VIDEO. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://rumble.com/v56fv56-republicans-in-bad-standing-discuss-the-2024-indiana-republican-convention..html
This week in Evansville Podcast with host Johnny Kinkaid. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KEtArt6il5Y
@KColbertreport
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ColbertReport
👍6