https://rumble.com/v68jydg-indiana-public-private-partnerships.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
Cheryl and Ken discuss the proposed Indiana Senate Bill 202 stripping Lieutenant Governor Micah Beckwith’s constitutional authorities by rogue establishment career Republicans.
The discussion continues regarding the the elusive public-private partnerships of 501 (c) 4 (Building Corporations) established in Four Indiana Counties (Floyd, Gibson, Wells, Warrick) by an Indianapolis attorney firm. The “Directors” are identified in each county, along with the expanding real estate in each portfolio. The Indiana State Board of Accounts reveals a 17 page audit in Warrick County outlining a violation of State Law in appropriating $1million+ to a real estate acquisition for a County Jail.
There is further dialogue regarding “Adult Changing Tables” in Indiana highway rest stops. Senate Bill 30 is sponsored by Senator Becker and Buck.
Senate bill 171, sponsored by Indiana Republican Senator Mike Young would further strengthen the “Right to Life bill” of banning the abortion drug, Mifepristone as a birth control measure. The victim of incest or rape must complete an affidavit to “justify” using the drug therefore allowing for pursuit of the criminal causing the unintended pregnancy.
The final comments are the continued assurance of defunding the Indiana University’s program “Kinsey Institute” . The oversight is being monitored by Indiana State Comptroller Elise Nieshalla.
Links:
2024 Handbook for Indiana Redevelopment Commission Members and Their Attorneys: 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://btlaw.com/insights/publications/2024/2024-handbook-for-indiana-redevelopment-commission-members-and-their-attorneys
501 (c) 4 Classifications 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/faq
Indiana Business Services: 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://bsd.sos.in.gov/
Warrick County State Board of Accounts Audit: 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/41/01/E9E76740-BAD6-4985-9D8C-68EF06E7E168/FILE_8874.pdf
Indiana Legislature Telephone ☎️:
317-232-9400
Cheryl and Ken discuss the proposed Indiana Senate Bill 202 stripping Lieutenant Governor Micah Beckwith’s constitutional authorities by rogue establishment career Republicans.
The discussion continues regarding the the elusive public-private partnerships of 501 (c) 4 (Building Corporations) established in Four Indiana Counties (Floyd, Gibson, Wells, Warrick) by an Indianapolis attorney firm. The “Directors” are identified in each county, along with the expanding real estate in each portfolio. The Indiana State Board of Accounts reveals a 17 page audit in Warrick County outlining a violation of State Law in appropriating $1million+ to a real estate acquisition for a County Jail.
There is further dialogue regarding “Adult Changing Tables” in Indiana highway rest stops. Senate Bill 30 is sponsored by Senator Becker and Buck.
Senate bill 171, sponsored by Indiana Republican Senator Mike Young would further strengthen the “Right to Life bill” of banning the abortion drug, Mifepristone as a birth control measure. The victim of incest or rape must complete an affidavit to “justify” using the drug therefore allowing for pursuit of the criminal causing the unintended pregnancy.
The final comments are the continued assurance of defunding the Indiana University’s program “Kinsey Institute” . The oversight is being monitored by Indiana State Comptroller Elise Nieshalla.
Links:
2024 Handbook for Indiana Redevelopment Commission Members and Their Attorneys: 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://btlaw.com/insights/publications/2024/2024-handbook-for-indiana-redevelopment-commission-members-and-their-attorneys
501 (c) 4 Classifications 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://www.opensecrets.org/outside-spending/faq
Indiana Business Services: 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://bsd.sos.in.gov/
Warrick County State Board of Accounts Audit: 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/41/01/E9E76740-BAD6-4985-9D8C-68EF06E7E168/FILE_8874.pdf
Indiana Legislature Telephone ☎️:
317-232-9400
🔥2❤1
Indiana Gov. Braun Signs Executive Orders to Streamline State Government and Boost Efficiency
INDIANAPOLIS – Governor Mike Braun has signed nine executive orders pertaining to state government operations. These Executive Orders deliver on Gov. Braun's promise to make state government leaner and more efficient by streamlining state operations, boosting transparency, and promoting fiscal discipline while cutting red tape.
EO 2025-11 – Reorganize Executive Orders: Review and create a page of active Executive Orders to create transparency for Hoosiers.
EO 2025-12 – Budget Discipline: Direct OMB to develop policies and incentives to ensure agencies operate within their budgets.
EO 2025-13 – Key Performance Metrics aligned to outcomes that impact Hoosiers: Direct OMB to work with agencies to develop Key Performance Metrics for agencies and create a dashboard to monitor performance.
EO 2025-14 – Replacing DEI in Government with MEI: Merit, Excellence, and Innovation: Direct agencies to examine policies and procedures to ensure compliance with recent Supreme Court ruling, closes Chief Equity Inclusion and Opportunity Office.
EO 2025-15 – Removing Degree Requirements for State jobs: Direct SPD to examine all job postings and remove degree requirements to the extent possible and replace with skills or experience-based alternatives.
EO 2025-16 – Return to Work: Directs state employees back to the office by July 1, 2025, and for OMB to work with SPD to develop policies detailing exceptions to this.
EO 2025-17 – Reducing Regulation / Regulatory Sunset: Requires agencies to reduce regulatory burdens by 25% by January 1, 2029, requires comparison of regulations to other states on sunset review and default to least regulated option. Directs agencies to move regulations into code if regulations not touched in over 8 years.
EO 2025-18 – Professional Licensing Deregulation: Requires agencies to examine professional licensing requirements and reduce them to the extent possible.
EO 2025-19 – Implementation of StateRAMP: Directs Indiana to join the StateRAMP program which is a state-based cloud computing framework that establishes common requirements for vendors to meet across jurisdictions.
A full list of Executive Orders signed by Gov. Braun can be found here: https://www.in.gov/gov/newsroom/executive-orders/
INDIANAPOLIS – Governor Mike Braun has signed nine executive orders pertaining to state government operations. These Executive Orders deliver on Gov. Braun's promise to make state government leaner and more efficient by streamlining state operations, boosting transparency, and promoting fiscal discipline while cutting red tape.
EO 2025-11 – Reorganize Executive Orders: Review and create a page of active Executive Orders to create transparency for Hoosiers.
EO 2025-12 – Budget Discipline: Direct OMB to develop policies and incentives to ensure agencies operate within their budgets.
EO 2025-13 – Key Performance Metrics aligned to outcomes that impact Hoosiers: Direct OMB to work with agencies to develop Key Performance Metrics for agencies and create a dashboard to monitor performance.
EO 2025-14 – Replacing DEI in Government with MEI: Merit, Excellence, and Innovation: Direct agencies to examine policies and procedures to ensure compliance with recent Supreme Court ruling, closes Chief Equity Inclusion and Opportunity Office.
EO 2025-15 – Removing Degree Requirements for State jobs: Direct SPD to examine all job postings and remove degree requirements to the extent possible and replace with skills or experience-based alternatives.
EO 2025-16 – Return to Work: Directs state employees back to the office by July 1, 2025, and for OMB to work with SPD to develop policies detailing exceptions to this.
EO 2025-17 – Reducing Regulation / Regulatory Sunset: Requires agencies to reduce regulatory burdens by 25% by January 1, 2029, requires comparison of regulations to other states on sunset review and default to least regulated option. Directs agencies to move regulations into code if regulations not touched in over 8 years.
EO 2025-18 – Professional Licensing Deregulation: Requires agencies to examine professional licensing requirements and reduce them to the extent possible.
EO 2025-19 – Implementation of StateRAMP: Directs Indiana to join the StateRAMP program which is a state-based cloud computing framework that establishes common requirements for vendors to meet across jurisdictions.
A full list of Executive Orders signed by Gov. Braun can be found here: https://www.in.gov/gov/newsroom/executive-orders/
👍2🤔1
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bcreg20250117a.htm
The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced it has withdrawn from the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS).
While the Board has appreciated the engagement with the NGFS and its members, the work of the NGFS has increasingly broadened in scope, covering a wider range of issues that are outside of the Board's statutory mandate.
This is HUGE! The private organization, known as the Federal Reserve, is imploding. Hallelujah!!! Big things are coming to our Republic.
The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced it has withdrawn from the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS).
While the Board has appreciated the engagement with the NGFS and its members, the work of the NGFS has increasingly broadened in scope, covering a wider range of issues that are outside of the Board's statutory mandate.
This is HUGE! The private organization, known as the Federal Reserve, is imploding. Hallelujah!!! Big things are coming to our Republic.
🔥4👍1
https://www.pbs.org/video/journey-to-america-with-newt-and-callista-gingrich-9oyt64/
For generations, immigrants from around the world have come to America with the hope of realizing the American dream. Their stories are united by the shared belief in the founding principles of our nation. "Journey to America: with Newt and Callista Gingrich" features inspiring immigrant stories from those who have come to the United States and excelled.
Indiana Representative Victoria Spartz is featured in @newtgingrich documentary highlighting legal immigrants to our great Republic in the pursuit of the American Dream with independence of mind, spontaneity, and love for freedoms protected by our Constitution.
For generations, immigrants from around the world have come to America with the hope of realizing the American dream. Their stories are united by the shared belief in the founding principles of our nation. "Journey to America: with Newt and Callista Gingrich" features inspiring immigrant stories from those who have come to the United States and excelled.
Indiana Representative Victoria Spartz is featured in @newtgingrich documentary highlighting legal immigrants to our great Republic in the pursuit of the American Dream with independence of mind, spontaneity, and love for freedoms protected by our Constitution.
👎3👍2
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15QeAvZE2eiWMTpqapHrwliR0Pzey2ojIQYsKC7zyqHU/edit?usp=sharing
Republicans who have not received funding directly from AIPAC in the previous election cycle:
Nick Begich AK-AL
Eli Crane AZ-02
Abraham Hamadeh AZ-08
Paul Gosar AZ-09
Jeff Hurd CO-03
Lauren Boebert CO-04
Gabe Evans CO-08
Andrew Clyde GA-09
Mike Collins GA-10
Marjorie Taylor Greene GA-14
Mary Miller IL-15
Thomas Massie KY-04
Troy Carter LA-02
Tom Barrett MI-07
Warren Davidson OH-08
Rob Bresnahan PA-08
Chip Roy TX-21
John McGuire VA-05
Michael Baumgartner WA-05
BUT: Look at Indiana! The 119th Congress for 2025 names the House Representatives, on both sides of the aisle, taking lobbying money from a foreign entity lobbyists.
Mark Messmer is working for the lobbyist over his American Constituents. He has received $412,435. FACT. Messmer is a liar, he stated publicly that he has received zero donations from AIPAC.
Here’s the video. https://rumble.com/v5d6jnh-mark-messmer-addresses-the-2nd-amendment-group-in-evansville-indiana-august.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
Republicans who have not received funding directly from AIPAC in the previous election cycle:
Nick Begich AK-AL
Eli Crane AZ-02
Abraham Hamadeh AZ-08
Paul Gosar AZ-09
Jeff Hurd CO-03
Lauren Boebert CO-04
Gabe Evans CO-08
Andrew Clyde GA-09
Mike Collins GA-10
Marjorie Taylor Greene GA-14
Mary Miller IL-15
Thomas Massie KY-04
Troy Carter LA-02
Tom Barrett MI-07
Warren Davidson OH-08
Rob Bresnahan PA-08
Chip Roy TX-21
John McGuire VA-05
Michael Baumgartner WA-05
BUT: Look at Indiana! The 119th Congress for 2025 names the House Representatives, on both sides of the aisle, taking lobbying money from a foreign entity lobbyists.
Mark Messmer is working for the lobbyist over his American Constituents. He has received $412,435. FACT. Messmer is a liar, he stated publicly that he has received zero donations from AIPAC.
Here’s the video. https://rumble.com/v5d6jnh-mark-messmer-addresses-the-2nd-amendment-group-in-evansville-indiana-august.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
👍4
INDIANA - UNITED NATIONS 🇺🇳
WARNING ⚠️
BRISTOL, Ind. (WNDU) - A $1 billion data center proposed for the town of Bristol could be an economic game changer.
But residents living near the 250 acres of farmland where the data center would be constructed aren’t all onboard.
Among some of the concerns are loss of property value for homeowners, destroyed farmland, water supply issues and noise pollution.
WNDU 16 News Now spoke with residents of the area, some of which have lived in their homes for over 20 years. Others are descendants of people who helped create the city.
Neighbors said losing the agricultural area near County Road 23 and County Road 14 in Washington Township would be detrimental.
“We thought this was going to be our retirement home, and we’ve put all, not all our 401k but all our savings and stuff into remodeling this house, it was a fixer upper,” said Lester Otto, who has lived in the area near the proposed data center for 20 years. “This was our final home, and the way it looks we’re going to have to move because of what’s going on around us.”
Otto said he initially moved to this area because of the quietness and amount of farmland that surrounded it — something he said has started to drift over the years.
“St. Joseph County has got a data center over there that’s probably four times the size of what they are planning to do here,” Otto said. “This is 247 acres, and they only need 20 acres. What are they going to do with the rest of that acreage?”
But that’s not the only concern neighbors have.
“Low frequency sound levels, there’s been a lot of data, a lot of research done that shows the harm that it does to the children and the animals,” said Michael Miller.
They say straining of power grids, and loss of property value are among some of their concerns. But they say the biggest one is the identity of the buyer.
WNDU 16 News Now spoke with the town manager, Mike Yoder, who said they have been working with residents to address their concerns.
“I know that’s an issue, but it’s a strange issue to me,” Yoder said. “When they go to get a building permit, we’ll know who the user is. I expect to be approached about tax executives of some sort, we know the user at that point. So, we know it’ll be a data center, it’s no different than saying it can only be used for recreational vehicle factory.”
If the proposal is passed, it would double the town’s assessed value by around $500 million.
Yoder said the proposed data center would bring multiple benefits to taxpayers and could lower tax rates across the board.
But not everyone is convinced.
“Going to ruin the environment around here,” Miller said.
The Bristol Town Council will meet Thursday night at 7 p.m. to decide whether to rezone the land from agricultural to manufacturing.
It’s the Indiana Economic Development Corporation Aka Marxist, Globalization agenda. It’s being promoted all over the State of Indiana. Governor Braun must defund the IEDC immediately.
WARNING ⚠️
BRISTOL, Ind. (WNDU) - A $1 billion data center proposed for the town of Bristol could be an economic game changer.
But residents living near the 250 acres of farmland where the data center would be constructed aren’t all onboard.
Among some of the concerns are loss of property value for homeowners, destroyed farmland, water supply issues and noise pollution.
WNDU 16 News Now spoke with residents of the area, some of which have lived in their homes for over 20 years. Others are descendants of people who helped create the city.
Neighbors said losing the agricultural area near County Road 23 and County Road 14 in Washington Township would be detrimental.
“We thought this was going to be our retirement home, and we’ve put all, not all our 401k but all our savings and stuff into remodeling this house, it was a fixer upper,” said Lester Otto, who has lived in the area near the proposed data center for 20 years. “This was our final home, and the way it looks we’re going to have to move because of what’s going on around us.”
Otto said he initially moved to this area because of the quietness and amount of farmland that surrounded it — something he said has started to drift over the years.
“St. Joseph County has got a data center over there that’s probably four times the size of what they are planning to do here,” Otto said. “This is 247 acres, and they only need 20 acres. What are they going to do with the rest of that acreage?”
But that’s not the only concern neighbors have.
“Low frequency sound levels, there’s been a lot of data, a lot of research done that shows the harm that it does to the children and the animals,” said Michael Miller.
They say straining of power grids, and loss of property value are among some of their concerns. But they say the biggest one is the identity of the buyer.
WNDU 16 News Now spoke with the town manager, Mike Yoder, who said they have been working with residents to address their concerns.
“I know that’s an issue, but it’s a strange issue to me,” Yoder said. “When they go to get a building permit, we’ll know who the user is. I expect to be approached about tax executives of some sort, we know the user at that point. So, we know it’ll be a data center, it’s no different than saying it can only be used for recreational vehicle factory.”
If the proposal is passed, it would double the town’s assessed value by around $500 million.
Yoder said the proposed data center would bring multiple benefits to taxpayers and could lower tax rates across the board.
But not everyone is convinced.
“Going to ruin the environment around here,” Miller said.
The Bristol Town Council will meet Thursday night at 7 p.m. to decide whether to rezone the land from agricultural to manufacturing.
It’s the Indiana Economic Development Corporation Aka Marxist, Globalization agenda. It’s being promoted all over the State of Indiana. Governor Braun must defund the IEDC immediately.
👍11
I spoke at the @EvansvilleINGov city council meeting on 1/27/2025 regarding creating a Resolution to support ICE when and if the removal of illegal aliens begin in Evansville. They provided me 3 minutes to speak. CRICKETS! They are all-in on the TPS.
The city is aiding and abating the TPS (Temporary Protected Status) through local NGO’s. A city council member has their own Not-for-profit that is coordinating the distribution of goods every Wednesday. A Colbertreport will be profiling the details.
Additionally a letter from an outside Evansville attorney stated my request for access to public record’s is unavailable due to no such record. The gate keeper is stating a “Surety Bond” is unavailable. Hmm Indiana State law says otherwise. The State Public Access Counselor, Luke Britt, says otherwise. This is absurd to block access to known public record. The VANDERBURGH County public record was provided in 2 minutes, the city is creating blatant denial to a requested record. CRICKETS by the City Council.
It was a deer 🦌 in the headlight moment.
Next step is to file suit, if Luke Britt does not demand the public records from the @EvansvilleINGov.
Anyone else having issues with the arrogance of our elected officials to blatantly block access to public record? What are they hiding?
@AGToddRokita @SenatorBanks @Jim_Banks @MicahBeckwith @AdamsCoINGOP @indgop @Schmitz4Indiana @93wibc @INHouseGOP @INDems @MissyMosby
The city is aiding and abating the TPS (Temporary Protected Status) through local NGO’s. A city council member has their own Not-for-profit that is coordinating the distribution of goods every Wednesday. A Colbertreport will be profiling the details.
Additionally a letter from an outside Evansville attorney stated my request for access to public record’s is unavailable due to no such record. The gate keeper is stating a “Surety Bond” is unavailable. Hmm Indiana State law says otherwise. The State Public Access Counselor, Luke Britt, says otherwise. This is absurd to block access to known public record. The VANDERBURGH County public record was provided in 2 minutes, the city is creating blatant denial to a requested record. CRICKETS by the City Council.
It was a deer 🦌 in the headlight moment.
Next step is to file suit, if Luke Britt does not demand the public records from the @EvansvilleINGov.
Anyone else having issues with the arrogance of our elected officials to blatantly block access to public record? What are they hiding?
@AGToddRokita @SenatorBanks @Jim_Banks @MicahBeckwith @AdamsCoINGOP @indgop @Schmitz4Indiana @93wibc @INHouseGOP @INDems @MissyMosby
🔥11
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a new round of charges Friday against Attorney General Todd Rokita — this time surrounding his defiant response to a prior reprimand.
In a sworn affidavit, Rokita accepted responsibility for misconduct in exchange for a public reprimand last year. In its new complaint, the commission found that Rokita almost immediately released a statement contradicting his admission.
“This retraction of acceptance of responsibility demonstrates that the respondent was not candid with the court when he attested that he admitted he had violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rules,” Adrienne Meiring, executive director of the disciplinary commission, wrote in the complaint.
Rokita now faces new charges for making false statements to the Supreme Court in the conditional agreement and affidavit; engaging in dishonest behavior and misrepresenting to the Supreme Court that he accepted responsibility for his misconduct; and violating a third rule for issuing a press release that contradicted his agreement.
The Republican attorney general did not immediately reply to the Indiana Capital Chronicle’s request for comment.
The underlying case stemmed from Rokita’s televised comments about Indianapolis doctor Caitlin Bernard, who oversaw a medication abortion for a 10-year-old rape victim from Ohio in 2022.
Rokita was ultimately reprimanded late last year. Bernard, an OB-GYN, was also disciplined before the Medical Licensing Board for discussing the procedure publicly.
Two hours after the high court handed down the reprimand, Rokita issued a public press release in which he maintained that his statements about Bernard had been “truthful.” He said he agreed to the reprimand to bring the case to a conclusion in order to save taxpayers money.
Grievances filed soon after by an Indiana doctor and attorney — questioning whether Rokita was sincere and contrite when he entered into the conditional agreement — resulted in the disciplinary commission opening a second investigation.
After that initial investigation, the commission’s executive director weighs if there is probable lawyer misconduct. If the director believes there is, then the full disciplinary commission reviews the matter.
The full commission is a citizen board made up of seven lawyers and two non-lawyers. They are appointed by the Indiana Supreme Court.
If the commission believes that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct for which they should be disciplined, it files a complaint with the Clerk of the Supreme Court formally charging the lawyer with misconduct.
That is the point where a case becomes public. Preceding deliberations are not public record.
If the commission and the lawyer can agree to the facts of the case and an appropriate disciplinary sanction, a hearing can be avoided. The agreement is submitted to the Supreme Court for approval. If the Court accepts the agreement, the agreed sanction is imposed by the Supreme Court and the case is over. If not, there is a hearing.
A hearing officer is then appointed by the Supreme Court to hear the evidence. The commission acts as prosecutor in the case and must prove its charges with a higher burden of proof than in a civil case. The hearing officer’s responsibilities are like those of a trial court judge, except that the hearing officer cannot make a final decision in the case.
The hearing officer makes a report on the case to the Supreme Court, which makes a final decision.
Sanctions depend on the seriousness of the case. Possible sanctions include:
• a private or public reprimand;
• suspension from practice for a set period of time;
• suspension from practice with reinstatement only after the lawyer proves fitness; and
• permanent disbarment.
The vast majority of grievances filed with the commission are dismissed. For instance, 1,499 grievances were filed during the 2024 fiscal year, according to the Indiana Supreme Court’s annual report. After review, 1,184 of those were dismissed, “having no valid issue of misconduct.”
In a sworn affidavit, Rokita accepted responsibility for misconduct in exchange for a public reprimand last year. In its new complaint, the commission found that Rokita almost immediately released a statement contradicting his admission.
“This retraction of acceptance of responsibility demonstrates that the respondent was not candid with the court when he attested that he admitted he had violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rules,” Adrienne Meiring, executive director of the disciplinary commission, wrote in the complaint.
Rokita now faces new charges for making false statements to the Supreme Court in the conditional agreement and affidavit; engaging in dishonest behavior and misrepresenting to the Supreme Court that he accepted responsibility for his misconduct; and violating a third rule for issuing a press release that contradicted his agreement.
The Republican attorney general did not immediately reply to the Indiana Capital Chronicle’s request for comment.
The underlying case stemmed from Rokita’s televised comments about Indianapolis doctor Caitlin Bernard, who oversaw a medication abortion for a 10-year-old rape victim from Ohio in 2022.
Rokita was ultimately reprimanded late last year. Bernard, an OB-GYN, was also disciplined before the Medical Licensing Board for discussing the procedure publicly.
Two hours after the high court handed down the reprimand, Rokita issued a public press release in which he maintained that his statements about Bernard had been “truthful.” He said he agreed to the reprimand to bring the case to a conclusion in order to save taxpayers money.
Grievances filed soon after by an Indiana doctor and attorney — questioning whether Rokita was sincere and contrite when he entered into the conditional agreement — resulted in the disciplinary commission opening a second investigation.
After that initial investigation, the commission’s executive director weighs if there is probable lawyer misconduct. If the director believes there is, then the full disciplinary commission reviews the matter.
The full commission is a citizen board made up of seven lawyers and two non-lawyers. They are appointed by the Indiana Supreme Court.
If the commission believes that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct for which they should be disciplined, it files a complaint with the Clerk of the Supreme Court formally charging the lawyer with misconduct.
That is the point where a case becomes public. Preceding deliberations are not public record.
If the commission and the lawyer can agree to the facts of the case and an appropriate disciplinary sanction, a hearing can be avoided. The agreement is submitted to the Supreme Court for approval. If the Court accepts the agreement, the agreed sanction is imposed by the Supreme Court and the case is over. If not, there is a hearing.
A hearing officer is then appointed by the Supreme Court to hear the evidence. The commission acts as prosecutor in the case and must prove its charges with a higher burden of proof than in a civil case. The hearing officer’s responsibilities are like those of a trial court judge, except that the hearing officer cannot make a final decision in the case.
The hearing officer makes a report on the case to the Supreme Court, which makes a final decision.
Sanctions depend on the seriousness of the case. Possible sanctions include:
• a private or public reprimand;
• suspension from practice for a set period of time;
• suspension from practice with reinstatement only after the lawyer proves fitness; and
• permanent disbarment.
The vast majority of grievances filed with the commission are dismissed. For instance, 1,499 grievances were filed during the 2024 fiscal year, according to the Indiana Supreme Court’s annual report. After review, 1,184 of those were dismissed, “having no valid issue of misconduct.”
🔥4👍1
Trump gets rid of Haitian immigration protection, affecting half a million people
The decision announced Thursday means they would lose their work permits and could be eligible to be removed from the country by August of this year.
The Trump administration is throwing out protections that shielded roughly half a million Haitians from deportation, meaning they would lose their work permits and could be eligible to be removed from the country by August.
The decision, announced Thursday, is part of a sweeping effort by the Trump administration to make good on campaign promises to carry out mass deportations and specifically to scale back the use of the Temporary Protected Status designation, which was widely expanded under the Biden administration to cover about 1 million immigrants.
The Department of Homeland Security said in a news release that it was vacating a Biden administration decision to renew Temporary Protected Status — which gives people legal authority to be in the country but doesn’t provide a long-term path to citizenship — for Haitians.
People with the protection are reliant on the government renewing their status when it expires. Critics, including Republicans and the Trump administration, have said that over time the renewal of the protection status becomes automatic, regardless of what is happening in the person’s home country.
“For decades the TPS system has been exploited and abused,”Homeland Security said in the statement announcing the change. “For example, Haiti has been designated for TPS since 2010. The data shows each extension of the country’s TPS designation allowed more Haitian nationals, even those who entered the U.S. illegally, to qualify for legal protected status.”
Homeland Security said an estimated 57,000 Haitians were eligible for TPS protections as of 2011, but by July of last year, that number had climbed to 520,694.
It's not immediately clear how quickly they could be deported once their protections expire. Some may apply for other types of protection, and there are logistical challenges to carrying out such large-scale deportations.
Haiti’s migration director, Jean Negot Bonheur Delva, said only 21 Haitians have been deported so far under the Trump administration, but he noted that the group had already been scheduled for deportation under Biden. There were a total of nine flights to Haiti in 2024, according to Witness at the Border, an advocacy group that tracks flight data.
Delva cited worries about the strain of sending people back to a country still reeling from violence and where more than 1 million people are homeless because of gang violence.
“It’s very sad that people who left Haiti to look for a better life elsewhere … will come back,” Delva said. “With the insecurity problem, the lack of resources, they will be miserable.”
More than 5,600 people were reported killed last year in Haiti, according to the U.N. And many of the displaced are living in overcrowded makeshift shelters including abandoned government buildings where rapes are becoming increasingly common.
Gangs control 85% of Haiti’s capital and have launched new attacks to seize control of even more territory. Recent massacres have claimed the lives of hundreds of civilians.
Delva said Haiti’s government recently created a commission to help those deported.
“They are children of Haiti. A mother must receive her children from wherever they are,” he said.
Congress created TPS in 1990 to prevent deportations to countries suffering from natural disasters or civil strife, giving people authorization to work in increments of up to 18 months at a time.
Toward the end of the Biden administration, 1 million immigrants from 17 countries were protected by TPS, including people from Venezuela, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Sudan, Ukraine and Lebanon.
The Trump administration has already moved to end the protections for Venezuelans.
Two nonprofit groups Thursday filed a lawsuit challenging that decision.
The decision announced Thursday means they would lose their work permits and could be eligible to be removed from the country by August of this year.
The Trump administration is throwing out protections that shielded roughly half a million Haitians from deportation, meaning they would lose their work permits and could be eligible to be removed from the country by August.
The decision, announced Thursday, is part of a sweeping effort by the Trump administration to make good on campaign promises to carry out mass deportations and specifically to scale back the use of the Temporary Protected Status designation, which was widely expanded under the Biden administration to cover about 1 million immigrants.
The Department of Homeland Security said in a news release that it was vacating a Biden administration decision to renew Temporary Protected Status — which gives people legal authority to be in the country but doesn’t provide a long-term path to citizenship — for Haitians.
People with the protection are reliant on the government renewing their status when it expires. Critics, including Republicans and the Trump administration, have said that over time the renewal of the protection status becomes automatic, regardless of what is happening in the person’s home country.
“For decades the TPS system has been exploited and abused,”Homeland Security said in the statement announcing the change. “For example, Haiti has been designated for TPS since 2010. The data shows each extension of the country’s TPS designation allowed more Haitian nationals, even those who entered the U.S. illegally, to qualify for legal protected status.”
Homeland Security said an estimated 57,000 Haitians were eligible for TPS protections as of 2011, but by July of last year, that number had climbed to 520,694.
It's not immediately clear how quickly they could be deported once their protections expire. Some may apply for other types of protection, and there are logistical challenges to carrying out such large-scale deportations.
Haiti’s migration director, Jean Negot Bonheur Delva, said only 21 Haitians have been deported so far under the Trump administration, but he noted that the group had already been scheduled for deportation under Biden. There were a total of nine flights to Haiti in 2024, according to Witness at the Border, an advocacy group that tracks flight data.
Delva cited worries about the strain of sending people back to a country still reeling from violence and where more than 1 million people are homeless because of gang violence.
“It’s very sad that people who left Haiti to look for a better life elsewhere … will come back,” Delva said. “With the insecurity problem, the lack of resources, they will be miserable.”
More than 5,600 people were reported killed last year in Haiti, according to the U.N. And many of the displaced are living in overcrowded makeshift shelters including abandoned government buildings where rapes are becoming increasingly common.
Gangs control 85% of Haiti’s capital and have launched new attacks to seize control of even more territory. Recent massacres have claimed the lives of hundreds of civilians.
Delva said Haiti’s government recently created a commission to help those deported.
“They are children of Haiti. A mother must receive her children from wherever they are,” he said.
Congress created TPS in 1990 to prevent deportations to countries suffering from natural disasters or civil strife, giving people authorization to work in increments of up to 18 months at a time.
Toward the end of the Biden administration, 1 million immigrants from 17 countries were protected by TPS, including people from Venezuela, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Sudan, Ukraine and Lebanon.
The Trump administration has already moved to end the protections for Venezuelans.
Two nonprofit groups Thursday filed a lawsuit challenging that decision.
👍6❤1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsRgVEB2nuk
Indiana Senator Lugar Center in Ukraine 🇺🇦 ☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻
Indiana officials were involved in the bio-labs in Ukraine.
2014 Hunter Biden joins Burisma, Lugar Biolab opens the same time. Ok Community Notes, fact check me.
Indiana Senator Lugar Center in Ukraine 🇺🇦 ☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻
Indiana officials were involved in the bio-labs in Ukraine.
2014 Hunter Biden joins Burisma, Lugar Biolab opens the same time. Ok Community Notes, fact check me.
YouTube
Richard Lugar Public Health Research Center in Tbilisi, Georgia
Provides an overview of the Richard Lugar Public Health Research Center, a central part of the National Center for Disease Control Public Health (NCDC) in the Republic of Georgia. This public health research center was constructed with funds from the U.S.…
❤2
Have you ever wondered WHY a plant so ABUNDANT in nutrients and known for its medicinal properties is dismissed as a WEED?
Meet the DANDELION... one of the first flowers of spring to greet early-emerging INSECTS. From root to blossom, it’s loaded with a host of HEALTH-SUPPORTING compounds. So, does the humble DANDELION deserve a proud place in our gardens?
Foraging & Feasting: A Field Guide and Wild Food Cookbook by Dina Falconi; illustrated by Wendy Hollender
https://www.botanicalartspress.com/shop/foraging-feasting-a-field-guide-and-wild-food-cookbook
Meet the DANDELION... one of the first flowers of spring to greet early-emerging INSECTS. From root to blossom, it’s loaded with a host of HEALTH-SUPPORTING compounds. So, does the humble DANDELION deserve a proud place in our gardens?
Foraging & Feasting: A Field Guide and Wild Food Cookbook by Dina Falconi; illustrated by Wendy Hollender
https://www.botanicalartspress.com/shop/foraging-feasting-a-field-guide-and-wild-food-cookbook
👍10
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-house-hopeful-co-authored-bills-provide-in-state-tuition-driving-cards-illegal-immigrants
INDIANA
GOP House hopeful co-authored bills to provide in-state tuition, driving 'cards' to illegal immigrants
State Sen. Mark Messmer is running to represent Indiana's 8th Congressional District
A Republican state legislator running for Congress in Indiana is stressing the need to tackle illegal immigration, but has supported legislation that would have provided driving "cards" and in-state tuition rates for those in the U.S. illegally.
"I am devoted to tackling pressing issues like illegal immigration, safeguarding our liberties, protecting the unborn, balancing the federal budget, stopping the woke agenda, and growing jobs in Southwest Indiana," state Sen. Mark Messmer, who is running to represent Indiana's 8th Congressional District, wrote on his campaign website.
However, Messmer co-sponsored SB200 in 2022, which would have provided for illegal immigrants in the state to "apply for a driving card learner's permit and driving card to obtain driving privileges."
INDIANA
GOP House hopeful co-authored bills to provide in-state tuition, driving 'cards' to illegal immigrants
State Sen. Mark Messmer is running to represent Indiana's 8th Congressional District
A Republican state legislator running for Congress in Indiana is stressing the need to tackle illegal immigration, but has supported legislation that would have provided driving "cards" and in-state tuition rates for those in the U.S. illegally.
"I am devoted to tackling pressing issues like illegal immigration, safeguarding our liberties, protecting the unborn, balancing the federal budget, stopping the woke agenda, and growing jobs in Southwest Indiana," state Sen. Mark Messmer, who is running to represent Indiana's 8th Congressional District, wrote on his campaign website.
However, Messmer co-sponsored SB200 in 2022, which would have provided for illegal immigrants in the state to "apply for a driving card learner's permit and driving card to obtain driving privileges."
👎12
https://www.evansvillegov.org/egov/apps/document/center.egov?view=item&id=10034
Building Blocks - $35,000
Building Blocks, in partnership with the Haitian Center of Evansville, will use Forward Together funding to improve Kindergarten readiness for local Haitian Creole families. The initiative will increase access to high-quality early learning programs and provide over 1,000 bilingual Haitian Creole/English books to foster literacy. By 2025, at least 50 families will enroll their children, ensuring they are prepared socially, emotionally, and academically for school. This effort will also empower Haitian caregivers to support their children’s development, helping them succeed academically and thrive as contributing citizens.
buildingblocks.net
Aiding and abetting the TPS ( Temporary Protected Status).
@EVSC1 is facilitating the TPS.
@unitedwayswi is facilitating the TPS.
@EvansvilleINGov is facilitating the TPS
@VandSheriff is facilitating the TPS
The local NGOs are coordinating the financial donations. The Board of “Forward Together” are all woman over not-for-profits, determining the distribution of Taxpayers money. 💰
Where are you @AGToddRokita ?
@AGToddRokita @SenatorBanks @SenToddYoung @MicahBeckwith @LGMicahBeckwith @GovBraun @Indy_reporter_ @indgop @Schmitz4Indiana @AdamsCoINGOP @INHouseGOP @KColbertReport @lcgm1951 @owencounty_gop
Building Blocks - $35,000
Building Blocks, in partnership with the Haitian Center of Evansville, will use Forward Together funding to improve Kindergarten readiness for local Haitian Creole families. The initiative will increase access to high-quality early learning programs and provide over 1,000 bilingual Haitian Creole/English books to foster literacy. By 2025, at least 50 families will enroll their children, ensuring they are prepared socially, emotionally, and academically for school. This effort will also empower Haitian caregivers to support their children’s development, helping them succeed academically and thrive as contributing citizens.
buildingblocks.net
Aiding and abetting the TPS ( Temporary Protected Status).
@EVSC1 is facilitating the TPS.
@unitedwayswi is facilitating the TPS.
@EvansvilleINGov is facilitating the TPS
@VandSheriff is facilitating the TPS
The local NGOs are coordinating the financial donations. The Board of “Forward Together” are all woman over not-for-profits, determining the distribution of Taxpayers money. 💰
Where are you @AGToddRokita ?
@AGToddRokita @SenatorBanks @SenToddYoung @MicahBeckwith @LGMicahBeckwith @GovBraun @Indy_reporter_ @indgop @Schmitz4Indiana @AdamsCoINGOP @INHouseGOP @KColbertReport @lcgm1951 @owencounty_gop
🔥6❤2👍1😡1
2018 INDIANA
History matters.
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A former Mike Pence aide who was fired from one government job and left another after being formally disciplined wants Indiana voters to send him to Congress, where he would take over for the boss who sacked him, according to a review of public records by The Associated Press.
State records show Diego Morales, a candidate in the GOP primary for the 4th Congressional District, was fired in 2009 by former Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita, who is giving up his reliably Republican House seat to run for Senate.
The disciplinary actions against Morales are part of a resume that also includes embellishments, a spotty work history and murky business dealings.
His campaign didn’t respond to several questions from the AP but did insist Morales served as a “senior advisor” to Pence when he was Indiana’s governor. Some of Pence’s aides have defended Morales’ use of the noscript and endorsed his candidacy. However, the campaign acknowledges his work — including such tasks as event planning and venue preparation — didn’t rise to the level of many others who worked under the eventual vice president.
Diego Morales’ service to Indiana and his country are unimpeachable,” campaign manager Michael Sorenson said in an emailed statement, noting the 39-year-old Morales is also a veteran.
Morales often touts his role on Pence’s staff as he campaigns for the nomination against Steve Braun and state Rep. Jim Baird.
A spokeswoman for the vice president did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for Rokita declined to comment on the work habits of his former employee.
Rokita’s office formally disciplined Morales after eight months due to “incomplete” work, “inefficient execution” and a “lack of focus,” according to records obtained under Indiana’s public records act. He refused to agree to a work improvement plan and had filed notice that he intended to quit when he was fired, according to a termination letter.
Two years later, Morales left a different state job after refusing to sign on to a work improvement plan under former Secretary of State Charlie White, who was himself removed from office in 2012 following a voter fraud conviction.
Morales worked just over a month in White’s office when he was disciplined for “poor execution,” failing to complete his work and leaving the office to attend a “personal function,” records show.
His letter of resignation states that he was seeking “new experiences” that would better serve his “future ambitions.”
He later landed a gig with Pence in 2013 and was among a large group of staffers awarded a Sagamore of the Wabash, one of the state’s highest honors, when Pence was leaving office for Washington.
Morales now enjoys support from a number of GOP powerbrokers and Pence allies, including former chief of staff Jim Atterholt, who encouraged him to use the noscript “senior advisor,” Morales’ campaign has acknowledged.
“I considered (Morales) to be a senior adviser to both myself and to Governor Pence,” Atterholt wrote in an emailed statement. “Diego represented the Governor at countless events around the state and was critical to being our eyes and ears on how we could be of help to any and all Hoosiers.”
At events and in campaign materials, Morales portrays himself as a “business owner,” an “adjunct professor” and high-level government worker.
But according to state records and interviews, Morales bounced around government jobs, sometimes lasting little more than a few months. His business, Aiming Higher Services, was administratively dissolved last November. And he was an adjunct instructor — not a professor — at Ivy Tech Community College, though the school system did briefly employ him as a “career resource assistant” for one month in 2010, records show.
https://www.jconline.com/story/news/local/indiana/2018/03/15/ex-pence-indiana-aide-running-congress-defends-resume/430019002/
History matters.
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A former Mike Pence aide who was fired from one government job and left another after being formally disciplined wants Indiana voters to send him to Congress, where he would take over for the boss who sacked him, according to a review of public records by The Associated Press.
State records show Diego Morales, a candidate in the GOP primary for the 4th Congressional District, was fired in 2009 by former Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita, who is giving up his reliably Republican House seat to run for Senate.
The disciplinary actions against Morales are part of a resume that also includes embellishments, a spotty work history and murky business dealings.
His campaign didn’t respond to several questions from the AP but did insist Morales served as a “senior advisor” to Pence when he was Indiana’s governor. Some of Pence’s aides have defended Morales’ use of the noscript and endorsed his candidacy. However, the campaign acknowledges his work — including such tasks as event planning and venue preparation — didn’t rise to the level of many others who worked under the eventual vice president.
Diego Morales’ service to Indiana and his country are unimpeachable,” campaign manager Michael Sorenson said in an emailed statement, noting the 39-year-old Morales is also a veteran.
Morales often touts his role on Pence’s staff as he campaigns for the nomination against Steve Braun and state Rep. Jim Baird.
A spokeswoman for the vice president did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for Rokita declined to comment on the work habits of his former employee.
Rokita’s office formally disciplined Morales after eight months due to “incomplete” work, “inefficient execution” and a “lack of focus,” according to records obtained under Indiana’s public records act. He refused to agree to a work improvement plan and had filed notice that he intended to quit when he was fired, according to a termination letter.
Two years later, Morales left a different state job after refusing to sign on to a work improvement plan under former Secretary of State Charlie White, who was himself removed from office in 2012 following a voter fraud conviction.
Morales worked just over a month in White’s office when he was disciplined for “poor execution,” failing to complete his work and leaving the office to attend a “personal function,” records show.
His letter of resignation states that he was seeking “new experiences” that would better serve his “future ambitions.”
He later landed a gig with Pence in 2013 and was among a large group of staffers awarded a Sagamore of the Wabash, one of the state’s highest honors, when Pence was leaving office for Washington.
Morales now enjoys support from a number of GOP powerbrokers and Pence allies, including former chief of staff Jim Atterholt, who encouraged him to use the noscript “senior advisor,” Morales’ campaign has acknowledged.
“I considered (Morales) to be a senior adviser to both myself and to Governor Pence,” Atterholt wrote in an emailed statement. “Diego represented the Governor at countless events around the state and was critical to being our eyes and ears on how we could be of help to any and all Hoosiers.”
At events and in campaign materials, Morales portrays himself as a “business owner,” an “adjunct professor” and high-level government worker.
But according to state records and interviews, Morales bounced around government jobs, sometimes lasting little more than a few months. His business, Aiming Higher Services, was administratively dissolved last November. And he was an adjunct instructor — not a professor — at Ivy Tech Community College, though the school system did briefly employ him as a “career resource assistant” for one month in 2010, records show.
https://www.jconline.com/story/news/local/indiana/2018/03/15/ex-pence-indiana-aide-running-congress-defends-resume/430019002/
🥴4❤3🤯1
The Republican chairwoman of the Indiana Senate Judiciary Committee won’t say why she is stonewalling state efforts to complement President Donald Trump’s efforts to address illegal immigration after four years of open borders.
The Republican-led Indiana House passed HB 1531 that would, in part, stop illegal aliens from undercutting hard-working Hoosiers by creating penalties for employers who knowingly hire or employ illegal aliens. The legislation states an employer is not in violation of the law if he “engaged in reasonable diligence to confirm the work eligibility…”
If found engaging in illegal employment, the employer has 15 days to terminate the alien and provide proof to the state attorney general in the form of a signed affidavit. Otherwise, the consequence is the “suspension of all of the employer’s operating authorizations at the location or locations where the violation or violations occurred for a period of one hundred eighty days.”
The legislation would also make clear that all Indiana law enforcement must honor a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer request and hold a suspect in custody for 48 hours. It would also permit the state to gather data to determine how illegal immigration affects citizens and public resources, and to consider withholding state funds from localities that refuse to enforce immigration laws.
But Sen. Liz Brown has yet to bring the legislation the vast majority of her party supports for a committee vote, effectively freezing it. If the legislation passes a committee vote, it will move to the Senate floor and likely be passed into law given its support among the state Republican caucus. But if Brown does not allow a vote, it will die with the end of the legislative session in one month.
Brown did not respond to an inquiry from The Federalist about whether she plans to allow her colleagues to vote on the bill.
There are, however, two additional ways the legislation could make it out of committee. In one, Senate President Pro-Tem Rodric Bray could reassign the legislation to another committee. Bray did not return a request for comment. The other way is via rules stating “the author of such bill or any member of the Senate shall have the right to call the attention of the Senate to such fact.” Two-thirds of state senators can then vote to bring the bill to the floor for a vote.
R.J. Hauman, president of the National Immigration Center for Enforcement and a visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Federalist it’s “unfathomable that states would ignore the overwhelming immigration enforcement mandate we won on in November, yet the Indiana Senate still won’t even set HB 1531 for a hearing.”
“Small, piecemeal measures like the handful of other immigration bills moving in Indiana are not enough and are no substitute for the meaningful reforms in HB 1531. As Congress works through reconciliation, states must step up,” he said.
Despite this roadblock, the majority of Indiana Republicans support the bill, state officials told The Federalist. The two top vote-getters in Indiana in 2024’s elections were Trump and Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, both strong supporters of immigration enforcement. State Rep. J.D. Prescott, who introduced the legislation, said its main goal is “to protect American workers.”
“The main portion of this bill is to protect American workers. We’re going to make sure companies are following the law. It’s already illegal to hire illegal immigrants based off of federal law, so we just want to make sure that our state law has an enforcement provision for that,” Prescott said in a statement to The Federalist. “Right now I know that the current administration is doing a good job of trying to make sure we have the southern border closed, but previous administrations have failed to do the job, so we want to make sure we have resources here within our state to enforce federal policy from a state standpoint. This is a tried-and-true method that has been taken up in other states as well.”
Rokita called the legislation “critically important.
The Republican-led Indiana House passed HB 1531 that would, in part, stop illegal aliens from undercutting hard-working Hoosiers by creating penalties for employers who knowingly hire or employ illegal aliens. The legislation states an employer is not in violation of the law if he “engaged in reasonable diligence to confirm the work eligibility…”
If found engaging in illegal employment, the employer has 15 days to terminate the alien and provide proof to the state attorney general in the form of a signed affidavit. Otherwise, the consequence is the “suspension of all of the employer’s operating authorizations at the location or locations where the violation or violations occurred for a period of one hundred eighty days.”
The legislation would also make clear that all Indiana law enforcement must honor a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer request and hold a suspect in custody for 48 hours. It would also permit the state to gather data to determine how illegal immigration affects citizens and public resources, and to consider withholding state funds from localities that refuse to enforce immigration laws.
But Sen. Liz Brown has yet to bring the legislation the vast majority of her party supports for a committee vote, effectively freezing it. If the legislation passes a committee vote, it will move to the Senate floor and likely be passed into law given its support among the state Republican caucus. But if Brown does not allow a vote, it will die with the end of the legislative session in one month.
Brown did not respond to an inquiry from The Federalist about whether she plans to allow her colleagues to vote on the bill.
There are, however, two additional ways the legislation could make it out of committee. In one, Senate President Pro-Tem Rodric Bray could reassign the legislation to another committee. Bray did not return a request for comment. The other way is via rules stating “the author of such bill or any member of the Senate shall have the right to call the attention of the Senate to such fact.” Two-thirds of state senators can then vote to bring the bill to the floor for a vote.
R.J. Hauman, president of the National Immigration Center for Enforcement and a visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Federalist it’s “unfathomable that states would ignore the overwhelming immigration enforcement mandate we won on in November, yet the Indiana Senate still won’t even set HB 1531 for a hearing.”
“Small, piecemeal measures like the handful of other immigration bills moving in Indiana are not enough and are no substitute for the meaningful reforms in HB 1531. As Congress works through reconciliation, states must step up,” he said.
Despite this roadblock, the majority of Indiana Republicans support the bill, state officials told The Federalist. The two top vote-getters in Indiana in 2024’s elections were Trump and Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, both strong supporters of immigration enforcement. State Rep. J.D. Prescott, who introduced the legislation, said its main goal is “to protect American workers.”
“The main portion of this bill is to protect American workers. We’re going to make sure companies are following the law. It’s already illegal to hire illegal immigrants based off of federal law, so we just want to make sure that our state law has an enforcement provision for that,” Prescott said in a statement to The Federalist. “Right now I know that the current administration is doing a good job of trying to make sure we have the southern border closed, but previous administrations have failed to do the job, so we want to make sure we have resources here within our state to enforce federal policy from a state standpoint. This is a tried-and-true method that has been taken up in other states as well.”
Rokita called the legislation “critically important.
The Federalist
Red States Move To Help Trump Enforce Immigration Laws
Several states are beginning to aid President Donald Trump's efforts to secure the southern border and decrease illegal crossings.
👍3
” Illegal immigration is a top concern of Hoosier voters.
“It would directly address the concerns about illegal immigration that legislators and I hear from constituents all the time. This issue isn’t going away, and both my office and the General Assembly have an obligation to Hoosiers to act decisively to help keep illegal aliens out of our communities,” Rokita said in a statement to The Federalist. “HB 1531 would be a big step toward fulfilling that obligation.”
Two months into Trump’s presidency, law enforcement actions targeting illegal migrants are nowhere near levels needed to address the record-breaking numbers the Biden administration invited, overwhelming public services, housing, and some towns. Biden illegally admitted at least an estimated 10 million foreign citizens to compete with American workers. At the current rate, just 528,000 will be returned to their countries by the end of Trump’s final term.
The vast majority of illegal migrants paid cartels to help them enter the United States either in cash or in debt. This means their employment subsidizes international terrorism and promotes a vast network of indentured servitude that also undercuts wages for American workers.
Indiana U.S. Sen. Jim Banks told The Federalist that “Hoosiers expect us all to work together at the state, local and federal levels to support ICE and deport illegal criminals from our streets. This bill helps do that in a big way.”
The bill is also supported by the Indiana Republican Party’s national representatives Sen. Todd Young, and U.S. Reps. Marlin Stutzman, Mark Messmer, Jim Baird, and Erin Houchin. U.S. Rep. Rudy Yakym said H.B. 1531 “is the commonsense legislation needed to tackle the urgent challenges of illegal immigration head-on.”
“For too long, Indiana’s communities have shouldered the fallout of the failed Biden-Harris border policies,” Yakym said. “This bill is critical to strengthening our laws, protecting our communities, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars. I urge the Indiana General Assembly to get this done.”
“It would directly address the concerns about illegal immigration that legislators and I hear from constituents all the time. This issue isn’t going away, and both my office and the General Assembly have an obligation to Hoosiers to act decisively to help keep illegal aliens out of our communities,” Rokita said in a statement to The Federalist. “HB 1531 would be a big step toward fulfilling that obligation.”
Two months into Trump’s presidency, law enforcement actions targeting illegal migrants are nowhere near levels needed to address the record-breaking numbers the Biden administration invited, overwhelming public services, housing, and some towns. Biden illegally admitted at least an estimated 10 million foreign citizens to compete with American workers. At the current rate, just 528,000 will be returned to their countries by the end of Trump’s final term.
The vast majority of illegal migrants paid cartels to help them enter the United States either in cash or in debt. This means their employment subsidizes international terrorism and promotes a vast network of indentured servitude that also undercuts wages for American workers.
Indiana U.S. Sen. Jim Banks told The Federalist that “Hoosiers expect us all to work together at the state, local and federal levels to support ICE and deport illegal criminals from our streets. This bill helps do that in a big way.”
The bill is also supported by the Indiana Republican Party’s national representatives Sen. Todd Young, and U.S. Reps. Marlin Stutzman, Mark Messmer, Jim Baird, and Erin Houchin. U.S. Rep. Rudy Yakym said H.B. 1531 “is the commonsense legislation needed to tackle the urgent challenges of illegal immigration head-on.”
“For too long, Indiana’s communities have shouldered the fallout of the failed Biden-Harris border policies,” Yakym said. “This bill is critical to strengthening our laws, protecting our communities, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars. I urge the Indiana General Assembly to get this done.”
The Federalist
Red States Move To Help Trump Enforce Immigration Laws
Several states are beginning to aid President Donald Trump's efforts to secure the southern border and decrease illegal crossings.
❤3
Sheriff put DARE funds in his personal account for more than a decade — Tens of thousands of dollars unaccounted for
SOUTH BEND, Ind. — REAL News Michiana has learned that Sheriff William Redman put tens of thousands of dollars in DARE funds into his private bank account(s) for more than a decade. From 1997 until 2012, Redman put all of the funds for the program into his private account(s) with no oversight and no records showing how the money was spent. According to figures obtained by RNM through a public records request, it appears nearly $100,000 could have simply disappeared.
REAL News Michiana’s Clifton French uncovered the data while working for ABC57 in 2018, while Redman was running for his first term as Sheriff of the St. Joseph County Police Department. However, the ABC57 News Director at the time, Kelley Dickens, shelved the story for unknown reasons. Redman ended up winning the primary election by less than 20 votes that year.
RNM obtained those records again by requesting the emails and documents sent to Clifton French in 2018.
Redman started with the DARE program for the St. Joseph County Police Department in 1997. He kept all of the funds in his private accounts until February of 2012. According to a spokesperson for the Sheriff’s Department, Chief Robert Boits discovered Redman was using his personal account for the money in 2012 and demanded Redman start a county account.
How the discovery of the management of the money occured is hotly contested by several sources within the Sheriff’s Department. Some say the discovery was made through a standard audit. Others tell RNM that Boits made the discovery by hearing it from other deputies or staff, reprimanded Redman and forced him to create the county account to avoid bad publicity. Chief Boits cannot be questioned because he passed away in 2013.
According to DARE bank statements starting in February of 2012, the first deposits into the account were a $2,000 grant reimbursement plus 6 different donation deposits for approximately $2,600. By 2018, there was nearly $48,000 in the account. That means the program had an average surplus of approximately $8,000. Over a 13 year period, if extrapolated out with the same average surplus, Redman would have approximately $104,000 in DARE funds in his private bank account(s). All of it is unaccounted for. There is no account for how much money was taken in or how much money was spent and what that money was spent on.
Clifton French was told in 2018 there are no records from the time Redman was holding the money in his own account(s). RNM is still calling on Sheriff Redman to share his account information to show how and where the DARE money was spent as most banks retain records for longer than the 7-year retention period required by law.
Become a subscribing member to see all of the supporting evidence below. All of the documents, including bank statements and statements from the SJPD regarding the funds from 2018 are included in those documents for subscribers to see for themselves.
It’s very troublesome to me.” Kevin McGowan, Republican candidate for the St. Joseph County Sheriff, said. “If this is true, it’s a big disappointment to St. Joseph County as well as the Sheriff’s Department. Transparency and accountability are important when in comes to public safety and its leaders. I hope that promises of transparency from the current administration can play out and we will learn what exactly happened so anything that is amiss can be dealt with accordingly.”
SOUTH BEND, Ind. — REAL News Michiana has learned that Sheriff William Redman put tens of thousands of dollars in DARE funds into his private bank account(s) for more than a decade. From 1997 until 2012, Redman put all of the funds for the program into his private account(s) with no oversight and no records showing how the money was spent. According to figures obtained by RNM through a public records request, it appears nearly $100,000 could have simply disappeared.
REAL News Michiana’s Clifton French uncovered the data while working for ABC57 in 2018, while Redman was running for his first term as Sheriff of the St. Joseph County Police Department. However, the ABC57 News Director at the time, Kelley Dickens, shelved the story for unknown reasons. Redman ended up winning the primary election by less than 20 votes that year.
RNM obtained those records again by requesting the emails and documents sent to Clifton French in 2018.
Redman started with the DARE program for the St. Joseph County Police Department in 1997. He kept all of the funds in his private accounts until February of 2012. According to a spokesperson for the Sheriff’s Department, Chief Robert Boits discovered Redman was using his personal account for the money in 2012 and demanded Redman start a county account.
How the discovery of the management of the money occured is hotly contested by several sources within the Sheriff’s Department. Some say the discovery was made through a standard audit. Others tell RNM that Boits made the discovery by hearing it from other deputies or staff, reprimanded Redman and forced him to create the county account to avoid bad publicity. Chief Boits cannot be questioned because he passed away in 2013.
According to DARE bank statements starting in February of 2012, the first deposits into the account were a $2,000 grant reimbursement plus 6 different donation deposits for approximately $2,600. By 2018, there was nearly $48,000 in the account. That means the program had an average surplus of approximately $8,000. Over a 13 year period, if extrapolated out with the same average surplus, Redman would have approximately $104,000 in DARE funds in his private bank account(s). All of it is unaccounted for. There is no account for how much money was taken in or how much money was spent and what that money was spent on.
Clifton French was told in 2018 there are no records from the time Redman was holding the money in his own account(s). RNM is still calling on Sheriff Redman to share his account information to show how and where the DARE money was spent as most banks retain records for longer than the 7-year retention period required by law.
Become a subscribing member to see all of the supporting evidence below. All of the documents, including bank statements and statements from the SJPD regarding the funds from 2018 are included in those documents for subscribers to see for themselves.
It’s very troublesome to me.” Kevin McGowan, Republican candidate for the St. Joseph County Sheriff, said. “If this is true, it’s a big disappointment to St. Joseph County as well as the Sheriff’s Department. Transparency and accountability are important when in comes to public safety and its leaders. I hope that promises of transparency from the current administration can play out and we will learn what exactly happened so anything that is amiss can be dealt with accordingly.”
🤯2❤1
A new property tax plan from Indiana House Republicans prevailed over qualms from Democrats on Monday, advancing to the House floor for further considerations after the 15-8 committee vote.
Senate Bill 1 would now let counties increase their local income taxes and — for the first time — allow cities to implement their own local income taxes. Under a massive amendment adopted Monday, counties would be able to levy an income tax up to 2.9%, up from the current 2.5% cap, while cities could go up to 1.2%.
The legislation would also phase out, by 2030, the business personal property tax on anything purchased this year or later.
Senate Bill 1 would now let counties increase their local income taxes and — for the first time — allow cities to implement their own local income taxes. Under a massive amendment adopted Monday, counties would be able to levy an income tax up to 2.9%, up from the current 2.5% cap, while cities could go up to 1.2%.
The legislation would also phase out, by 2030, the business personal property tax on anything purchased this year or later.
👎5👍3❤1
Chief Justice John Roberts addressed ongoing speculation about his possible retirement during a public appearance in Buffalo, New York, this week.
The comments come four months into President Donald Trump’s second term, amid growing interest in whether Roberts would allow Trump to appoint another justice to the Supreme Court.
Roberts, appointed in 2005 by President George W. Bush, has served as Chief Justice for nearly two decades. His tenure has included pivotal decisions such as the legalization of gay marriage in 2015 and the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022.
Speaking to a crowd of lawyers and legal observers, Roberts dismissed the idea that his departure was imminent. “I’m going out feet first,” he said, adding a touch of humor to his response, as reported by Trending Politics.
Roberts recounted a conversation he had with two individuals he trusts, in which he asked them to tell him when it might be time to retire. He said both responded, “‘It’s time to go.’ So I said, ‘Alright, never mind.’”
Though he joked about staying indefinitely, Roberts acknowledged that declining health could eventually factor into a decision to step down. He said if he became a burden to the court, that would signal the time to leave.
His comments were delivered during a celebration marking the 125th anniversary of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. However, his remarks on retirement quickly overshadowed the anniversary event.
Roberts addressed the broader topic of aging justices. When asked if those in their late 80s should still be deciding complex constitutional matters, he noted that such situations have occurred only “a handful of times.”
He said that while some justices may have stayed longer than advisable, such instances have typically resolved themselves without major disruption. Roberts did not mention specific names in this context.
At 70, Roberts is younger than Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Sonia Sotomayor. He stated that he still feels “pretty healthy” on most days, indicating no immediate reason to consider retirement.
The Chief Justice also mentioned that he visited his childhood home in Buffalo before attending the event, underscoring a personal connection to the location.
In response to a question about the rise in presidential impeachments, Roberts stated that impeachment should not be used to express disagreement with judicial decisions.
Calls for term limits for Supreme Court justices have increased in recent years. Despite this, Roberts and others on the bench have largely dismissed such proposals.
Justice Samuel Alito, who is part of the court’s conservative bloc, has also rejected the idea of stepping down during Trump’s term. Sources close to him insist that he does not view his role through a political lens.
A source quoted by the Wall Street Journaldenied rumors that Alito, age 74, is preparing to retire to allow Trump to appoint a younger conservative replacement.
Roberts’ public remarks reaffirmed his intention to remain on the court and emphasized a nonpartisan approach to judicial service.
The comments come four months into President Donald Trump’s second term, amid growing interest in whether Roberts would allow Trump to appoint another justice to the Supreme Court.
Roberts, appointed in 2005 by President George W. Bush, has served as Chief Justice for nearly two decades. His tenure has included pivotal decisions such as the legalization of gay marriage in 2015 and the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022.
Speaking to a crowd of lawyers and legal observers, Roberts dismissed the idea that his departure was imminent. “I’m going out feet first,” he said, adding a touch of humor to his response, as reported by Trending Politics.
Roberts recounted a conversation he had with two individuals he trusts, in which he asked them to tell him when it might be time to retire. He said both responded, “‘It’s time to go.’ So I said, ‘Alright, never mind.’”
Though he joked about staying indefinitely, Roberts acknowledged that declining health could eventually factor into a decision to step down. He said if he became a burden to the court, that would signal the time to leave.
His comments were delivered during a celebration marking the 125th anniversary of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. However, his remarks on retirement quickly overshadowed the anniversary event.
Roberts addressed the broader topic of aging justices. When asked if those in their late 80s should still be deciding complex constitutional matters, he noted that such situations have occurred only “a handful of times.”
He said that while some justices may have stayed longer than advisable, such instances have typically resolved themselves without major disruption. Roberts did not mention specific names in this context.
At 70, Roberts is younger than Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Sonia Sotomayor. He stated that he still feels “pretty healthy” on most days, indicating no immediate reason to consider retirement.
The Chief Justice also mentioned that he visited his childhood home in Buffalo before attending the event, underscoring a personal connection to the location.
In response to a question about the rise in presidential impeachments, Roberts stated that impeachment should not be used to express disagreement with judicial decisions.
Calls for term limits for Supreme Court justices have increased in recent years. Despite this, Roberts and others on the bench have largely dismissed such proposals.
Justice Samuel Alito, who is part of the court’s conservative bloc, has also rejected the idea of stepping down during Trump’s term. Sources close to him insist that he does not view his role through a political lens.
A source quoted by the Wall Street Journaldenied rumors that Alito, age 74, is preparing to retire to allow Trump to appoint a younger conservative replacement.
Roberts’ public remarks reaffirmed his intention to remain on the court and emphasized a nonpartisan approach to judicial service.
❤4