They're already getting the next one ready, you know that? They'll probably launch it at the beginning of May to try to pull attention from the 2000 Mules rollout.

Some newly minted authority you never heard of ten minutes ago is going suddenly be raised VERY HIGH UP where you can see him or her [there are only TWO GENDERS, don't @ me!] and they will then start selling a fake narrative to you.

The good news is, we're getting BETTER AND BETTER at exposing these people FASTER AND FASTER.

Ardis helped out himself by doing an interview where he talked about Jesuit Trump and the Black Pope pulling his strings.

The next shill they launch might not be so helpful, but we'll be ready to vet them.

See, that's the problem.

It always comes down to vetting. Nobody seems to want to ask the right questions until the new sting operation against MAGA has already been launched.

Vetting is super duper important.

Once again, it comes down to AUTHORITY FIGURES.

"Well people I trust are hyping this guy. He must be ok then! Somebody must have checked him out, right?"

WRONG.

VERY VERY WRONG.

Many MAGA influencers just want to latch on to the HOT THING of the moment and get the clicks and the views and the $$$. Why waste time VETTING the new HOT THING? There's no money or excitement or glory in that!

But I don't give a shit about fame or glory or money. I'm a real journalist. Screw the popularity contest. I will do my job.

If the new HOT THING is bullshit, I'm going to TELL YOU SO.

And if you don't like it?

You have no idea just how much I don't care.

Eight👏one👏million👏votes👏most👏in👏history👏

@LizHarrington76

🔴 Secret Service Agents Claim White House Lied About Dog Attack Story

https://resistthemainstream.org/secret-service-agents-claim-white-house-lied-about-dog-attack-story/?utm_source=telegram

This is what happens when dictatorship occurs:

“Twitter's insiders essentially just decided to screw over their shareholders, crash their stock, and open the company up to massive lawsuits just to prevent Elon Musk from running Twitter in a way that won't rig elections or censor their political opponents.”

Given what we're seeing when it comes to this twitter debate, everyone paying attention knows what is underlying it all. Know that to those behind twitter, it never was about the money…Never. The real value is not the “asset” or even growth…the real value is in the tyrannical and authoritarian control of FREE SPEECH. Look at some of the figures behind twitter that most Americans are now just learning about (a Saudi Prince?). Remember, twitter censored the sitting president of the United States of America (Donald J. Trump). They did this while allowing despots and dictators to continue to air their hatred of America. I could careless about twitter, but I fully support what Elon Musk is attempting to do. He is showing the international community how a business deal of serious magnitude is done, but doing so in an incredibly transparent way. I wish him luck. If he succeeds, he does help humanity and America regain a grip on the edge of the cliff we are hanging from right now. Say some prayers, because we can all use some. 🙏🏼🇺🇸

That’s big.

BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court, in 4-3 ruling, approves GOP redistricting maps.

Letter (dated 3/23/2022) from Special Counsel John Durham to the attorneys for Michael Sussmann:

FBI and CIA personnel concluded that the purported Alfa Bank/YotaPhone data was "potentially incomplete, fabricated, and/or exaggerated."

"Fabricated" 👀

Let me break this down, what happened today so you can understand why a deluge of lawsuits are about to descend on Twitter from it's own shareholders:

If I had 3,000 shares of Twitter and Elon was offering to buy them at $54 and I'd bought them at $24, I was looking a $90,000 profit and the board, who is supposed to be representing MY INTERESTS as a shareholder just EPICALLY SCREWED ME by denying me even a chance to vote for the deal.

Hell YES i WOULD SUE THEM.

Money talks, bullshit walks.

Twitters shareholders are not a bunch of raging Libtards. These are INVESTORS. It's a different animal.

Elon would be able to see their shadow banning, the algorithms they use for fake trading pages, the amount of bots used to artifically inflate content, AND he would see all the backdoors that CIA.DARPA have to Twitter's data.

Elon Musk gaining ownership over Twitter is something the Deep State is DESPERATELY trying to prevent.

It's FAR MORE than about just the money.

One of the first things you learn when you dig into Ukraine:

What a BIG BUSINESS babies are in that country.

Really big business.

Now, they never really hid this, you understand, just like they never really hid there was a civil war going on in the country since 2014.

But you know how the the Western press operates: they don't focus any real attention on it. Out of sight, out of mind.

You'd get the odd story here and there, but no real national, focused attention on it.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11623646/ukraine-babies-coronavirus-lockdown/

https://www.newstribune.com/news/2022/mar/22/debra-saunders-ukraines-baby-farms/

Huffpost, of all places, called out the human trafficking back in 2016.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ukraine-orphanages-feeder_b_7344882

New filing by Sussmann today, 4/15/22

Memorandum in Opposition by MICHAEL A. SUSSMANN re 61 MOTION in Limine

Main Document: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.68.0.pdf

Attachment 1: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.68.1.pdf

Attachment 2: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.68.2.pdf

Attachment 3: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.68.3_1.pdf

Brief glance at the filing.

Sussmann's trying to have the judge TOSS ALL THE EVIDENCE before the trial starts.

This is a Hail Mary filing and not a well argued one.

Federal district court judge Christopher Cooper has ruled against Sussmann every time, I think.

If the fix was in, Cooper would've granted Sussmann's Motion To Dismiss the Special Counsel's indictment against him earlier this week.

Judge Cooper not only DENIED the motion, he pretty much agreed with EVERY POINT Durham made in his rebuttal to that motion.

They got the Baker phones from the OIG. It's where they found the text message where Sussmann came right out and said he wasn't coming on behalf of any client.

What else did they find on those phones that wasn't turned over when it should have been?

Comey, McCabe, Strzok...they are never going to willingly reveal that they knew Sussmann and Steele and Simpson were working for Hillary when they were approached by her private contractors during the 2016 election campaign with the Alfa Bank and Steele Dossier hoaxes.

Now, they can be FORCED to do it at some point, probably by Durham making use of the already publicly available declassified documentation about it.

Yes, just based on already publicly declassified documents, like Brennan's handwritten notes and the CIA referral sent to Comey & Strzok, a competent prosecutor could nail all three of them.

But they're never on their own going to admit "Yeah we knew all this stuff was fake and coming straight from the Clinton campaign. We knew by August of 2016 these Clinton operatives would be making their approaches to us. And we decided to play along, take the hoaxes from them and start investigations of Trump and his associates based on these hoaxes."

https://www.einpresswire.com/article/568700449/michigan-governor-candidate-donna-brandenburg-secures-place-on-ballot

We have secured our place on the ballot!!

@Brandenburg4Mi

Brandenburgforgovernor.com

#BrandenburgForGovernor
#Donna4Mi
#AmericaFirst
#MichiganFirst
#Michigan