This proves that Hillary Clinton’s private spy network comprised of federal cyber contractors were indeed abusing and exploiting their access to federal communications collection databases and that they were mining those databases for non public data targeting Trump and his close associates.

These criminal cyber contractors were stealing federal data [some of it very likely classified] off the databases and giving it to other Clinton political operatives such as Michael Sussmann.

And now Durham has just unveiled definitive evidence these criminal cyber contractors were illegally stealing data from out of the EOP during the transition period after Trump won the 2016 election and giving that stolen data to the Clinton campaign’s dirty tricks operatives.

Dear Elon,

I was censored from Twitter on the exact same day as President Trump (hmmm, I wonder why?). I likely said (to many times) the presidential election of 2020 was an election filled with fraud (yes it was) and I probably used the phrase God Bless America once too often (yes I did). For the soulless people at twitter, that may have confused them…I’m NOT sorry about that.

Well this tweet below from @Techno_Fog (a great patriot and seriously smart legal scholar) is all part and parcel of the reason they try to hide from the truth. They figure if they ban speech from people they fear, we will all dry up and go away. Maybe you can’t do anything about twitter (it really doesn’t matter). There is an army of digital soldiers (information warriors) that exist and despite the challenges of the undeniable assault on free speech, these warriors of truth have been on the march across all other forms of social media and cannot be stopped. We own the information space of free speech. This is our high ground and we will not cede it to a bunch of arrogant flakes who think they own the world.

I want you to succeed because your success is part of the victory we all need for humanity. Freedom is a human trait. Faith is an even deeper human trait and emotion. I have both.

These thugs involved in the treason against all Americans, not just Trump and myself must be held to account. That accounting should come on earth but if it doesn’t come in this life, it will come as they all enter the gates of hell.

What we’ve learned because we’ve fought for the truth to come out is that this is beyond corruption. Who’s kidding who. This group planned and staged a coup of America and think they got away with it. Not so fast.

So Elon, good luck with whatever your plans are for twitter (twitter no longer matters as much as it use to—but with the right leadership at the helm…).

We respect what you’re doing, your battle is a noble one and we applaud what you have achieved so far in this struggle for freedom.

Thank you and God Bless America 🙏🏼🇺🇸

Respectfully,

A digital soldier
PS., Happy Easter 🙏🏼
__________________

“Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) Tweeted:
We've previously reported that they targeted the Executive Office of the President AFTER Trump was elected.

CIA notes of the Sussmann meeting confirm this.

They extracted and manipulated data from the Executive Office of the President during the transition.”

https://t.co/LocHAiMgG1 https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1515181428610416654?s=20&t=eToa6igI0Ys4_DnHwYPKwA

Yes, This would be Treason!”

This is what “watching the water” truly means. At least to a surfer.

Grift Send Go Godlewski is at it again. Here he is, offering to buy water filtration systems for his followers that can't afford it...all because of Stew Peters' unverified and inaccurate claim that there's snake venom in the water. Are you catching on yet?

Phil Godlewski buys followers. Notice the pattern? Are you following that clown for free? 🤡

This is a decorated military hero publicly celebrating the victories of a billionaire immigrant autist, congratulating him as a digital soldier for free speech.

I dare you to find a similar historical example for any Empire, any free Republic, any revolutionary movement.

Neither seek power. Neither lust for Glory. One craves hearth and Irish condiments the other is a rocket whisperer.

I will never be ruled by either, never pay him a duty or a tax. And yet we bend our backs under the same yoke.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/RealGenFlynn/2442

HT Dina @hoboglobal 😊
She always brings the heat.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/SpyGateDownEnclave/36675

How many of us know Jared is the son of Charlie Kushner?

Charlie’s Real Estate attorney is Alan Hammer, a senior partner at Brach Eichler in Roseland NJ. I’ve only met him once, but I know him very well by association with his partners.

Billions of dollars in investment property purchase and acquisition is managed by Alan‘s team for many of the most brutal Jewish real estate development entrepreneurs in New York and New Jersey.

A lot of Trump work comes out of that office by the way. It’s a no fuck around kind of place.

Charlie (and probably Jared for that matter) are observant Jews that take their culture very seriously. They are not careless they are not shy they do not live in your world.

Slipshod SniffyJoe and the KrackheadKid do not live in their world either. If you had $1 billion to invest in real estate this is where you would put it. But they wouldn’t take your money.

They would, however, take money from Mohammad bin Salman. The House of Saud is all business, nothing personal.

Please, Pocahontas.
You ass-clown.
You Stolen-Wampum Deep State faux Oklahoma shyster.
You Harvard Progressive lifetime Massachusetts Senate Dingle hopper.

Please investigate billion dollar investments with Jared Kushner so we can attach Investigations into Chinese Russian Iranian Ukrainian Kazakhstani and Crackheadistani investments into Uncle Sniffies House of Shame.

We are waiting, I can’t even breathe I’m so excited.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/SpyGateDown/6939

Note to whoever is running marketing for these people —- this makes me hate you. Signed, Everyone.

Holy moly. I just swallowed my own red pill again.

Note the date of my prediction sent over to my unit chaplain from my deployment task force.

Then my response from the day after.

Knew it from the start, just like I told you.

Durham has filed his rebuttal to Michael Sussmann's defense team's Motion To Exclude the government's expert witness, FBI Cyber Unit Chief David Martin from testifying at the upcoming trial, scheduled to begin on May 16.

The filing can be read here:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.69.0_2.pdf

This part right here is really why the defense team is trying to prevent FBI Cyber Unit Chief David Martin from testifying at Sussmann's trial.

Sussmann - if he's really intent on going to trial and professing his innocence - wants to be able to testify on the stand - and have others testify for him - that he really honestly and truly believed the Alfa Bank allegations were real. It was not a hoax, he wants to claim. He was not making stuff up for the Clinton campaign as part of dirty trick operation to vilify Donald Trump as a distraction from Hillary Clinton's own email server scandal, you see.

He and the people on the cyber team he was working with via Rodney Joffe at Neustar believed there really was a hidden communications line between Alfa Bank and Trump Tower.

But the SCO has now told him if he gets up there and says that, or any other defense witness claims that, Durham will have Martin to rebut that definitely with evidence.

The first objection that Sussmann's defense team makes to having FBI Cyber Unit Chief David Martin testify as an expert witness is that they claim the Special Counsel's Office waited to long to notify them that they were going to call an expert witness, tell them who that expert witness was, and what this expert would testify to.

Here is where Durham begins answering that claim.

Durham points out that the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 [FRCP 16] does not contain any specific timing requirement in it.

March 30 was almost exactly 6 weeks from the time of the trial date [May 16] that Judge Christopher Cooper had previously set.

A month and a half is plenty of time, and Durham cites case law on this where the D.C. Circuit [which is where this case is being held] has ruled 6 weeks prior to trial is sufficient notice.

The only times the court has found notice of expert testimony by the government to be untimely was when notice was given only on the eve of the trial's start date.

If Durham had waited until around May 6th to inform the defense he'd be calling an expert witness, just 10 days before the trial starts, then the defense would have real grounds for objecting.

In United States v. Martinez [657 F.3d 811, 817 - 9th Cir. 2011] the court found the government waiting until just five days before trial to notify the defense of an expert witness was not timely.

In United States v. Johnson [228 F.3d 920, 922, 926 - 8th Cir. 2000] the prosecutors waited until just six days before trial to notify the defense they were calling in an expert witness, and the court ruled this notification was untimely.

Then Durham counters yet again by showing several of the cases cited by Sussmann's defense team actually help make Durham's case for him.

Both cases cited by Sussmann's team - US v. Day and US vs. Wilson, involve defense teams that waited far too long to notify the court of their intention to call expert witnesses.

In US v. Day the court excluded the expert witness the defense wanted to call to testify because the defense only gave the court an extremely vague two page report less than 14 days before the trial date.

In US v. Wilson, the court excluded the defense's expert witness because the defense waited until less than one week before trial to notify the court it intended to call that witness.

In contrast, Durham gave the defense a full six weeks notice of his intention to bring Martin in as his expert witness. And he didn't give them a vague 2 page report about what Martin will testify to, either.

Part of the Sussmann team's objections is that they didn't get sufficient notice that Martin would be called as a rebuttal expert witness.

Durham argues the Special Counsel's Office [SCO] has actually gone above it's Rule 16 requirements.

Durham points out the Rule 16 obligations only cover the government's case-in-chief.

That is, the case they give in the opening statement of the trial, and then the presentation of their case against the defendant, at which point the government rests and the defense begins to make it's own case.

So the government's case-in-chief extends only from the opening statement to the point the government rests.

However, after the defense has made it's own case to the jury, the government gets to make it's rebuttal case to the defense's presentation.

Durham can't yet tell Sussmann's team exactly what Martin would testify to as an expert rebuttal witness because the defense hasn't made it's case yet.

It's been established case law with precedent since 1974 that "Rebuttal witnesses are a recognized exception to all witness disclosure requirements." - US vs. Windham [5th Cir. 1974]

Neither side knows what kind of expert testimony will be needed or what particular expert witnesses they will call until they've heard the other side's case in the courtroom.

Thus, neither side is required to disclose to the other side exactly who their expert rebuttal witnesses will be before the trial starts.

So Durham is in fact, correct. He has gone far above his obligations under Rule 16 by informing the defense he'll call Martin as his rebuttal witness if Sussmann or anyone else attempts to claim on the stand the Alfa Bank allegations about Trump/Russia collusion have real merit.

What Sussmann and the defense want to be able to do is spin their own tale about DNS data and what the Alfa Bank white papers and thumb drives show.

This is another reason they don't want Martin testifying.

They only want the jury hearing Sussmann and Joffe's version of what they were doing and what the DNS data shows.

Well they had to try. Sussmann's defense team actually claims to the court that they are objecting to FBI Cyber Unit Chief David Martin testifying as an expert witness because they say the Durham SCO did not disclose to them how Martin is "qualified to testify specifically about DNS or TOR."

🤷‍♂️😬

You are reading that correctly. Sussmann's team had the balls to say "You didn't show us why the guy who is the Chief of the FBI's Cyber Unit is qualified to testify as an expert witness on what DNS or TOR are to a jury."

Durham says: tell you what. I'll drop a big report on Agent Martin's qualifications in your lap before the trial gets here. But you know you're reaching here, guys."

Musk is going to COMPLETELY BYPASS THE BOARD and make A TENDER OFFER DIRECTLY TO THE SHAREHOLDERS.

Musk spent months getting this ready.

He knew the board would turn him down. He's not frantically trying to come up with a Plan B, he had his Plan B ready even before he launched his Plan A.

This is getting REALLY GOOD.