Hill-arious!

Hillary Clinton took another loss as Hulu has passed on a show about her that had been in development at the network for nearly two years.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/hillary-defeated-again-hulu-passes-on-rodham-after-nearly-2-years-in-development

They’re lying to us about everything

Twitter sent a company-wide email to respond to the latest Project Veritas undercover video.

As long as there are idiots willing to go on Tinder dates and spill their guts to undercover Project Veritas reporters in the hopes to get laid... these sorts of memos will do absolutely nothing to stop it.... hehehe

Klaus Schwab in 1974 at the first Davos symposium, known at the time as the European Management Forum.

Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/worldeconomicforum/5935845659/in/photolist-a3wL7x

Oh, the irony.

Who’s gonna tell FangFang’s boy the gunman was Chinese? 🥴

The NGO Project – CTCL in Iowa

Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain


https://electiondataanalyzer.substack.com/p/ngo-project-part-xix-ctcl-in-iowa?s=w

Next up for the NGO Project: NC. Then I am going to do an complete Swing States CTCL impact analysis. After that, the slate is open to those states who have a need in fixing 2020. I may continue, I may move on depending on several factors.

So far in the 18 states I have examined to date which include 1,309 counties, 47% are dirty with CTCL grants....think about that. After 1,309 county wide analysis I can say with great certainty, CTCL grants went to D leaning counties on average without question. I plan on publishing a map of all of the dirty CTCL counties when this is through. Citizens need to know that their government is not being funded by tax dollars as it should be. Stop the pay offs.

Folks I would recommend that you familiarize yourself with how to obtain fiscal year data audit reports for your counties and cities. I will be posting a list of CTCL grantees. FOIA the financials. Trace the money. Find out how it was spent. Look for the line items. Learn what an EIN number is and how to look it up. Ask questions. They need to know we know.

I have looked at 1,392 counties in 22 states as part of The NGO Project research. https://electiondataanalyzer.substack.com/

Part of that analysis is capturing total votes in the 2020 Presidential Election per county for all parties.

I found this interesting.

In 2020, 1,051 counties totaled less than 50,000 votes all parties for President. That is 80% of all counties examined.

846 counites had less that 25,000 votes all parties for President. That is 64%.

Does this justify the use of expensive and corrupt machines in 80% of these counties? How long would it take to for citizens to hand count 50,000 votes in an entire COUNTY?

Only 386 had more than 100,000 votes. This is 30%.

Only 64 had more than 500,000 votes. This 5%.

Everybody has to use machines because 5% of the counties in these states have 500,000+ votes to count?

Required Reading.....https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/

The NGO Project – CTCL in NC

Esse quam videri - To be rather than to seem


https://electiondataanalyzer.substack.com/p/the-ngo-project-part-xx-ctcl-in-north?s=w

Here are a sample of 32 counties with less than 1000 presidential votes from 2020. How many of these counties need machines to count votes? None. May I make a suggestion? Look at your own state and find similar counties with small number of votes. Find out if they are using machines. If so, ask them why? How much are they spending on machines? If not, find out how they hand count. Thanks.

State Name Total
TX Cochran 1000
TX Sherman 992
TX Dickens 988
GA Taliaferro 928
CO Kiowa 903
NM De Baca 901
TX Throckmorton 894
TX Irion 889
CO Jackson 872
UT Piute 871
TX Culberson 864
CO Mineral 756
TX Stonewall 736
TX Briscoe 725
TX Cottle 662
TX Glasscock 653
TX Motley 652
TX Sterling 639
CO Hinsdale 632
UT Daggett 619
CO San Juan 562
TX Foard 551
TX Roberts 550
TX McMullen 516
NM Harding 505
NV Esmeralda 487
TX Kent 462
TX Terrell 458
TX Borden 416
TX Kenedy 194
TX King 159
TX Loving 66