After swirling for a while, it finally popped in why the Swedish period cereal from earlier is so troubling.

This goes beyond attempts at being gross or forcing things on others out of the upside down idea it needs discussed.

Many years ago, I was taught that the time of a woman’s period was something to be both revered and mourned; revered for the possibility of a new life being brought forth and then also mourning the loss of that potential life.

Having said that, in taking something that’s part of the cycle of creation and turning into something to be eaten, under the guise of furthering discussion? It might be the most heinous thing they’ve done yet.

To be clear, they’ve taken the feminine aspect of the human creation process and reduced it to a cannibalistic joke. Because jokes about drinking blood and eating organs are totes funny as topics of discussion during a family breakfast.

Then there’s the unspoken inversion of Holy Sacrament; meanwhile, there’s nothing sacred about what’s being pushed with period cereal.

It has an unseen subversive aspect which reminds of the global muzzling ritual. And I’ve a bad feeling about what they hope to accomplish with this item, having turned it into a novelty product that many will purchase just for giggles when there’s nothing funny about garden-variety cannibalism, much less the global luciferian ritualistic type.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/SoothingWhitePillsChannel/3156

Full credit to Mo Brooks for refusing to be corralled by the petulant Sandra Smith. He wouldn’t let her put intellectual shackles on him the way Fox has put shackles on her. For a brief moment, truth broke through the clouds of obstruction and obfuscation at Fox #2000Mules

Here's why CNN and The Washington Post are admitting vulnerabilities in the Dominion machines!

Just heard for the 1st time today how expensive puberty blockers are.

Am I the only one who thinks that, after seeing all of the coof propaganda, that the Big Pharma industry is just slimy enough to be behind the exponential rise in kids suddenly thinking it was cool to take these irreversible poisons?

Peter Thiel on climate:

"I'm more worried about the mind virus that's called progressivism, and is leading to an apocalyptic mental health breakdown throughout our whole society."

@KanekoaTheGreat

Does Mitt Romney have a secret Truth Social account, like he did with Twitter?

Couldnt have said it better. #FuckJoeBiden

Remember what i was telling you about fake republicans who are really Leftwing subversives?

https://skeshel.substack.com/p/tye-night-i-watched-the-election?s=w#details

The prequel to “How Fox News set ‘The Big Lie’ in Motion,” highlighting the instant recognizability of the theft.

My fourth audio recording of a previously written piece.

Thank you for listening!

Want to know a little bit more about where overlord Klaus Schwab came from?

Will Zoll takes us through his background & (allegedly Nazi) family lineage in the latest PrussiaGate edition:

https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/the-reichswef-part-v?s=r

In the landmark case of CASTLE ROCK v. GONZALES, A young mother of three sued the town of Castle Rock Colorado, after officers failed to respond to her repeated reports over several hours that her estranged husband had taken their three children in violation of her restraining order against him. She was continuously told to wait by officers and see if they returned instead. She even went down to the local police station and provided a copy of her restraining order, begging them to help. The officer who took the report instead went to dinner.
Ultimately, the estranged husband murdered all three children, and later walked into the police station, opened fire, and was killed.
- - - - -
In the case legal case following, the woman sought remedy claiming violation of her 14th amendment rights based on the failure of the officers to uphold their commitment.
The Supreme Court, however, ruled against her and found that even when language explicitly guarantees an action, the police are not obligated to respond or assist a citizen, and that their help is discretionary, not mandatory.
-----
This means, according to the Supreme Court, US citizens are not actually guaranteed any help by their law enforcement officials, nor can they appropriately legally remedy a situation in which officers do not respond.