Muscovites rejoicing at the #victory over Nazi Germany #Red_Square, 1945 (photo by Alexander Krasavin)
@Communism
Join the @Communists
@Communism
Join the @Communists
❤9👍2
"I.V. #Stalin in his youth", #painting by Vladimir Isaakovich Prager, 1947
@Communism
Join the @Communists
@Communism
Join the @Communists
❤9
#Lenin standing with other #Bolsheviks a few days after the seizure of power.
Dialectics is the teaching which shows how Opposites can be and how they happen to be (how they become) identical,—under what conditions they are identical, becoming transformed into one another,—why the human mind should grasp these opposites not as dead, rigid, but as living, conditional, mobile, becoming transformed into one another.
Lenin, Conspectus of Hegel’s Logic (1914)
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Dialectics is the teaching which shows how Opposites can be and how they happen to be (how they become) identical,—under what conditions they are identical, becoming transformed into one another,—why the human mind should grasp these opposites not as dead, rigid, but as living, conditional, mobile, becoming transformed into one another.
Lenin, Conspectus of Hegel’s Logic (1914)
@Communism
Join the @Communists
🔥8👍2
Media
On this day, 9 June 1987, Yonsei University student, Lee Han-yeol, was hit in the head by a police teargas canister during a demonstration against the US-backed dictatorship in Seoul, South Korea.He was badly injured, and put in a coma by the attack, especially as it showed police were violating their requirement to fire teargas canisters upwards into the air at an angle of at least 45° – instead firing them directly at protesters' heads.The incident spurred public anger about the dictatorship and gave added impetus to the pro-democratic movement. “Bring back Lee Han-yeol!” became a popular slogan shouted in street protests. He eventually died on July 5, soon after president Chun Doo-hwan announced he was caving in and agreeing to introduce direct presidential elections, and other democratic reforms.After Lee’s death was announced, 2000 students fought with riot police near Yonsei University. And 1.1 million people attended his funeral in a mass procession. At the funeral, Lee’s mother, Bae Eun-sim, promised to keep fighting on behalf of her son, declaring:“Let it all go now. Your mother will take care of everything. Han-yeol! Let’s go now to Gwangju!”Gwangju is a South Korean city which was Lee’s home town, and which was at the heart of the movement against the dictatorship, where there was a mass uprising in 1980.Bae remained active in social movements until her death in 2022, at the age of 82.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
On this day, 9 June 1987, Yonsei University student, Lee Han-yeol, was hit in the head by a police teargas canister during a demonstration against the US-backed dictatorship in Seoul, South Korea.He was badly injured, and put in a coma by the attack, especially as it showed police were violating their requirement to fire teargas canisters upwards into the air at an angle of at least 45° – instead firing them directly at protesters' heads.The incident spurred public anger about the dictatorship and gave added impetus to the pro-democratic movement. “Bring back Lee Han-yeol!” became a popular slogan shouted in street protests. He eventually died on July 5, soon after president Chun Doo-hwan announced he was caving in and agreeing to introduce direct presidential elections, and other democratic reforms.After Lee’s death was announced, 2000 students fought with riot police near Yonsei University. And 1.1 million people attended his funeral in a mass procession. At the funeral, Lee’s mother, Bae Eun-sim, promised to keep fighting on behalf of her son, declaring:“Let it all go now. Your mother will take care of everything. Han-yeol! Let’s go now to Gwangju!”Gwangju is a South Korean city which was Lee’s home town, and which was at the heart of the movement against the dictatorship, where there was a mass uprising in 1980.Bae remained active in social movements until her death in 2022, at the age of 82.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
It is man’s social being that determines his thinking. Once the correct ideas characteristic of the advanced class are grasped by the masses, these ideas turn into a material force which changes society and changes the world.
Mao Zedong Where Do Correct ideas Come from?, (May 1963)
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Mao Zedong Where Do Correct ideas Come from?, (May 1963)
@Communism
Join the @Communists
👍2
An interesting and powerful portrait of Lenin's personality from the Soviet journal Kommunist in 1984.
Everyone who was in close contact with Lenin, even for only a short while. remembered him as a man of exceptional spiritual beauty. This is shown by the many thousands of recollections by his contemporaries. Academician M J . Averbach, one of the specialists who treated Lenin, recalled, in his declining years, the difficulty he had had as a schoolboy in writing an essay on the abstract theme of ’'Who we consider a really good person". He said that if he had been given such an essay to write later in life, it would have presented no difficulty whatsoever for him, for he would simply have described the life of Lenin and outlined his intellectual and moral qualities.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Everyone who was in close contact with Lenin, even for only a short while. remembered him as a man of exceptional spiritual beauty. This is shown by the many thousands of recollections by his contemporaries. Academician M J . Averbach, one of the specialists who treated Lenin, recalled, in his declining years, the difficulty he had had as a schoolboy in writing an essay on the abstract theme of ’'Who we consider a really good person". He said that if he had been given such an essay to write later in life, it would have presented no difficulty whatsoever for him, for he would simply have described the life of Lenin and outlined his intellectual and moral qualities.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Communism
An interesting and powerful portrait of Lenin's personality from the Soviet journal Kommunist in 1984. Everyone who was in close contact with Lenin, even for only a short while. remembered him as a man of exceptional spiritual beauty. This is shown by the…
#Lenin’s contemporaries characterized him down to a T: genius and wisdom combined with unpretentiousness and modesty. Those who did not know the #leader of the revolution personally, this man who showed our great country which path to take, who made the whole world listen to him, pictured him as a kind of mythological hero. On meeting Lenin face to face they were at first perplexed and amazed, for the Lenin they had imagined was nothing like the real man, friendly and highly accessible, whose appearance, habits and manners did not smack of the superhuman. Other casual observers went to the opposite extreme, maintaining that there was absolutely nothing which distinguished Lenin from the average Russian. In point of fact, Lenin was perfectly aware of his historical calling and of his great responsibility.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Communism
#Lenin’s contemporaries characterized him down to a T: genius and wisdom combined with unpretentiousness and modesty. Those who did not know the #leader of the revolution personally, this man who showed our great country which path to take, who made the whole…
He was very much the product of the working class of Russia which helped him fully reveal his genius while the October Revolution raised him to great heights. Nadezhda Krupskaya (Nadezhda Krupskaya (1869-1939), a leading figure in the Communist party ’and the Soviet state, the wife and comrade-in-arms or V. I. Lenin) - believed that Lenin would not have been the man he was had he lived in an age other than that of the proletarian revolutions and socialist construction.
There is nothing mystical in saying that it was the working class that formed the moral make-up of Lenin, to whom airs and graces and affectation were alien. The proletarian movement which he embodied excludes ostentation and feigned theatricality.
Lenin embodied revolutionary humanism in all its profundity and the nobleness of the Party’s aims. Lenin was the highest synthesis of political morality and personal ethics. His character is best understood in the context of the political struggle, i.e., in the main channel of his activities in which he revealed himself most fully. No one ever heard Lenin spout forth eloquent words about his love for the people, but everyone knew of it and felt it. He sincerely sympathized with the underprivileged and suffering masses. This was not passive compassion but the active sympathy of a proletarian revolutionary who saw the masses as the masters of their own destiny and who stirred them up to join in the struggle Moreover, he did not regard them as a faceless crowd, he saw them as individuals. His contemporaries testify how great was the circle of people for whom he did very much, mostly through others, while remaining on the sidelines himself. He showed his concern for people so tactfully that they only got to know by chance after many years just how much they were personally indebted to him.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
There is nothing mystical in saying that it was the working class that formed the moral make-up of Lenin, to whom airs and graces and affectation were alien. The proletarian movement which he embodied excludes ostentation and feigned theatricality.
Lenin embodied revolutionary humanism in all its profundity and the nobleness of the Party’s aims. Lenin was the highest synthesis of political morality and personal ethics. His character is best understood in the context of the political struggle, i.e., in the main channel of his activities in which he revealed himself most fully. No one ever heard Lenin spout forth eloquent words about his love for the people, but everyone knew of it and felt it. He sincerely sympathized with the underprivileged and suffering masses. This was not passive compassion but the active sympathy of a proletarian revolutionary who saw the masses as the masters of their own destiny and who stirred them up to join in the struggle Moreover, he did not regard them as a faceless crowd, he saw them as individuals. His contemporaries testify how great was the circle of people for whom he did very much, mostly through others, while remaining on the sidelines himself. He showed his concern for people so tactfully that they only got to know by chance after many years just how much they were personally indebted to him.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Communism
He was very much the product of the working class of Russia which helped him fully reveal his genius while the October Revolution raised him to great heights. Nadezhda Krupskaya (Nadezhda Krupskaya (1869-1939), a leading figure in the Communist party ’and…
A NEW TYPE OF LEADER
Lenin was a new type of leader, being closely linked with those involved in the common cause. There was always an atmosphere of ease and party equality around him. He showed an interest in everyone. found something of worth in everybody, addressed people as his equals, without the slightest hint of superiority or trace of condescension or affectation. Those who came to see Lenin were extremely nervous at the thought of meeting him but felt at ease as soon as they crossed the threshold of his room their embarrassment and constraint vanished in the twinkling of an eye, the speech. which they had taken great pains to prepare beforehand turned out to be unnecessary in the presence of this unpretentious man. All who met Lenin expressed their admiration of his art of listening to others; they were amazed at the fact that Lenin, the leader of a vast country which was faced with such formidable tasks, listened to his interlocutor calmly and patiently as if he had no other concerns whatever, showing no signs of the impatience one might expect of an extremely busy person. either in his words or tone of voice.
With all his unpretentiousness and accessibility, Lenin never stooped to familiarity. Although he addressed those around him in a comradely and informal manner all were well aware that no matter how straightforward a man he might be, he had to be told nothing but the truth, presented with facts that had been verified, that he would not tolerate empty phrases.
For Lenin, conversation was one of the main means of understanding life and people. His ability for listening to others derived from his organically inherent habit of observing the standards of collective work. He only took a decision once he was convinced that it was not just his personal opinion. but that of all his comrades as well. Those around him did not even suspect how many of their collective concerns or how much of their experience occupied their leader’s mind and influenced his decisions.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Lenin was a new type of leader, being closely linked with those involved in the common cause. There was always an atmosphere of ease and party equality around him. He showed an interest in everyone. found something of worth in everybody, addressed people as his equals, without the slightest hint of superiority or trace of condescension or affectation. Those who came to see Lenin were extremely nervous at the thought of meeting him but felt at ease as soon as they crossed the threshold of his room their embarrassment and constraint vanished in the twinkling of an eye, the speech. which they had taken great pains to prepare beforehand turned out to be unnecessary in the presence of this unpretentious man. All who met Lenin expressed their admiration of his art of listening to others; they were amazed at the fact that Lenin, the leader of a vast country which was faced with such formidable tasks, listened to his interlocutor calmly and patiently as if he had no other concerns whatever, showing no signs of the impatience one might expect of an extremely busy person. either in his words or tone of voice.
With all his unpretentiousness and accessibility, Lenin never stooped to familiarity. Although he addressed those around him in a comradely and informal manner all were well aware that no matter how straightforward a man he might be, he had to be told nothing but the truth, presented with facts that had been verified, that he would not tolerate empty phrases.
For Lenin, conversation was one of the main means of understanding life and people. His ability for listening to others derived from his organically inherent habit of observing the standards of collective work. He only took a decision once he was convinced that it was not just his personal opinion. but that of all his comrades as well. Those around him did not even suspect how many of their collective concerns or how much of their experience occupied their leader’s mind and influenced his decisions.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
❤7
Communism
A NEW TYPE OF LEADER Lenin was a new type of leader, being closely linked with those involved in the common cause. There was always an atmosphere of ease and party equality around him. He showed an interest in everyone. found something of worth in everybody…
THE SECRET OF HIS CHARM
Lenin was a teacher in the full sense of the word for those who were in close contact with him, and this very contact played an educative role. When Lenin was present there was a special, electric atmosphere which he created without any visible effort on his part, without any moralizing. His presence forced one to exert one's self spiritually, one's mind grew more alert, one was filled with the desire to know, think, read, study and, most important, to work and work. Flattery, servility and intrigue were inconceivable in Lenin’s presence. Everything bore the imprint of great unity, efficiency and unselfishness. The personal example set by Lenin and his moral influence kept those around him from growing complacent and arrogant, from everything that might diminish their honour and dignity as party members. Lenin's timely warnings kept the #Communists on the political lookout and imbued them with critical self-awareness.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Lenin was a teacher in the full sense of the word for those who were in close contact with him, and this very contact played an educative role. When Lenin was present there was a special, electric atmosphere which he created without any visible effort on his part, without any moralizing. His presence forced one to exert one's self spiritually, one's mind grew more alert, one was filled with the desire to know, think, read, study and, most important, to work and work. Flattery, servility and intrigue were inconceivable in Lenin’s presence. Everything bore the imprint of great unity, efficiency and unselfishness. The personal example set by Lenin and his moral influence kept those around him from growing complacent and arrogant, from everything that might diminish their honour and dignity as party members. Lenin's timely warnings kept the #Communists on the political lookout and imbued them with critical self-awareness.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
❤7👍1
Communism
THE SECRET OF HIS CHARM Lenin was a teacher in the full sense of the word for those who were in close contact with him, and this very contact played an educative role. When Lenin was present there was a special, electric atmosphere which he created without…
These meetings and talks with Lenin were a lesson in the party approach to many issues. He was able to assess every fact which came to his attention in a new way, from party positions, give it the broadest political interpretation. He taught others not to be dogmatic, to seriously consider everything that was happening around them, to foresee the consequences of measures taken ’'One does not need to be a theoretician for this. It is enough to be a party member."
Lenin could be masterful when he had to be, would quash the least violation of party discipline, any boasting. He could not stand loafers and careerists. He could be demanding of others and therefore made endless demands on himself.
It is rightly held that there is nothing more difficult than to show the good side of one's nature when arguing with or criticizing others. Lenin relentlessly waged the ideological war, was a formidable polemist, and exploited every slip made by his political opponents. The very complexity of the matters in hand often gave rise to burning polemics, and Lenin would deliberately emphasize a problem in order to reveal its essence. to clearly see who held what position. However, no matter how harsh Lenin was with his opponents, he never allowed trifles to intrude upon the main struggle of opinions, never uttered one word that might be taken as a personal attack. He shattered his opponents’ arguments mercilessly, but in such a way that even a very sensitive person would not feel humiliated.
Lenin had a great quality - the ability to put aside his personal feelings, his sympathy or antipathy, everything extraneous and superficial when he engaged in political discussions or took political actions. This was political honesty in the true, profound sense of the word. Lenin's relations with people, his closeness to them, were determined by his concern for the revolutionary cause. His personal attachments did not affect his political position.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Lenin could be masterful when he had to be, would quash the least violation of party discipline, any boasting. He could not stand loafers and careerists. He could be demanding of others and therefore made endless demands on himself.
It is rightly held that there is nothing more difficult than to show the good side of one's nature when arguing with or criticizing others. Lenin relentlessly waged the ideological war, was a formidable polemist, and exploited every slip made by his political opponents. The very complexity of the matters in hand often gave rise to burning polemics, and Lenin would deliberately emphasize a problem in order to reveal its essence. to clearly see who held what position. However, no matter how harsh Lenin was with his opponents, he never allowed trifles to intrude upon the main struggle of opinions, never uttered one word that might be taken as a personal attack. He shattered his opponents’ arguments mercilessly, but in such a way that even a very sensitive person would not feel humiliated.
Lenin had a great quality - the ability to put aside his personal feelings, his sympathy or antipathy, everything extraneous and superficial when he engaged in political discussions or took political actions. This was political honesty in the true, profound sense of the word. Lenin's relations with people, his closeness to them, were determined by his concern for the revolutionary cause. His personal attachments did not affect his political position.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
❤8
Communism
These meetings and talks with Lenin were a lesson in the party approach to many issues. He was able to assess every fact which came to his attention in a new way, from party positions, give it the broadest political interpretation. He taught others not to…
The secret of Lenin’s charm and his great authority lay in the fact that he was always himself, were it on the rostrum or at home, in public or in the family circle. His public and priv ate life were an integral whole, solidly merged into one. This is why recalling Lenin, his contemporaries could venture to speak of his private life, to which schisms, internal contradictions and compromise were alien. He had a passionate love for life in all its complexity and diversity, could not drink his fill of it and was able to snatch happiness from life, his main joy being struggle and desire for victory.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
@Communism
Join the @Communists
❤11👍1
Did you know that the first gay marriage in the Philippines took place in the guerrilla territories of the New People’s Army, the armed wing of the Communist Party of the Philippines? In 2005, the revolutionary LGBTQI+ marriage broke legal barriers to gay marriage.
“The only way the LGBTQ community can find liberation from gender oppression is to topple down class oppression,” according to a gay party member, who also added, “We should forge unity with other classes and sectors against a common enemy. Gay or not, we are all victims of imperialism, feudalism, and bureaucrat capitalism.”
In the 1990s, the party accepted the idea that all LGBTQI+ relationships should be considered equal to heterosexual ones. A 2019 Social Weather Stations survey shows that 60% of Filipinos believe the LGBTQI+ community is discriminated against.
“The only way the LGBTQ community can find liberation from gender oppression is to topple down class oppression,” according to a gay party member, who also added, “We should forge unity with other classes and sectors against a common enemy. Gay or not, we are all victims of imperialism, feudalism, and bureaucrat capitalism.”
In the 1990s, the party accepted the idea that all LGBTQI+ relationships should be considered equal to heterosexual ones. A 2019 Social Weather Stations survey shows that 60% of Filipinos believe the LGBTQI+ community is discriminated against.
👍11❤4👎3🔥1
Media
On this day, 11 June 1943, Karl Gorath, a 20-year-old gay German nurse, was deported to the Auschwitz concentration camp. He was first arrested for homosexuality after being denounced by a jealous lover in 1939, and given a prison sentence. After his release he was sent to the Neuengamme concentration camp, where he was made to wear a pink triangle denoting LGBT+ prisoners. Working in the camp's health department, with some comrades he attempted to smuggle food to Russian prisoners, who were being starved to death. Their plan was discovered by the Nazis, who then sentenced Gorath to transportation to Auschwitz as a criminal and political prisoner, to be denoted with a red triangle.Despite contracting dysentery, he managed to survive the war and was released in 1945. But within a few months he was arrested again by West German authorities, who had kept the homophobic Nazi laws intact. His case was overseen by the same judge, who greeted him with the words "You are already here again!" and gave him the maximum sentence of five years. His lawyer requested that his time served in the concentration camps be counted as part of this, but his request was denied.After his release, because of his convictions he was unable to get a job for a decade. And when the time came to draw his pension, his years interned in concentration camps were deducted from his allowance, as were his unemployment payments.He died in 2003, having never received compensation for his treatment, unlike some other Holocaust survivors.He told his story in a 2000 documentary, "Paragraph 175", named after the relevant section of the penal code.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
On this day, 11 June 1943, Karl Gorath, a 20-year-old gay German nurse, was deported to the Auschwitz concentration camp. He was first arrested for homosexuality after being denounced by a jealous lover in 1939, and given a prison sentence. After his release he was sent to the Neuengamme concentration camp, where he was made to wear a pink triangle denoting LGBT+ prisoners. Working in the camp's health department, with some comrades he attempted to smuggle food to Russian prisoners, who were being starved to death. Their plan was discovered by the Nazis, who then sentenced Gorath to transportation to Auschwitz as a criminal and political prisoner, to be denoted with a red triangle.Despite contracting dysentery, he managed to survive the war and was released in 1945. But within a few months he was arrested again by West German authorities, who had kept the homophobic Nazi laws intact. His case was overseen by the same judge, who greeted him with the words "You are already here again!" and gave him the maximum sentence of five years. His lawyer requested that his time served in the concentration camps be counted as part of this, but his request was denied.After his release, because of his convictions he was unable to get a job for a decade. And when the time came to draw his pension, his years interned in concentration camps were deducted from his allowance, as were his unemployment payments.He died in 2003, having never received compensation for his treatment, unlike some other Holocaust survivors.He told his story in a 2000 documentary, "Paragraph 175", named after the relevant section of the penal code.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
👍3❤1
Media
On this day, 11 June 1919, racist rioting broke out in Cardiff, Wales, when white, mostly ex-servicemen attacked local residents of Afro-Caribbean, Somali, Malay, and Yemeni descent.Experiencing considerable hardship after the end of World War I, many ex-servicemen were in dire financial straits, and had been encouraged by racist media, as well as some unions, to see workers of colour as having taken some of "their" jobs and housing. Tensions erupted on June 11 after a confrontation between a group of Black and white men in the Butetown area of area of the city escalated. Mobs of whites then attacked houses where Black and Arab workers lived, smashing windows, wrecking interiors and throwing furniture into the street. People of colour then began to defend themselves, boarding themselves inside their homes and arming themselves with stones and rocks.One man, a ship's fireman called Mohammed Abdullah was attacked and soon died in hospital with a fractured skull. By the time the disturbances ended three days later, three other men were dead, although it is unclear if one of those deaths was related to the riots as such.The riots in Cardiff were just one of several such incidents around Britain in 1919. Other racist mob attacks on African, Chinese, South Asian, Afro-Caribbean and Arab workers – usually seamen – also broke out in cities like London, Glasgow, Newport, Liverpool, Salford, South Shields, Barry and Hull. Shamefully, in some cases the violence was egged on by union leaders like Manny Shinwell, later a Labour MP, who demanded "action" against Black sailors on the morning of an attack on sailors from Sierra Leone in Glasgow earlier that year.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
On this day, 11 June 1919, racist rioting broke out in Cardiff, Wales, when white, mostly ex-servicemen attacked local residents of Afro-Caribbean, Somali, Malay, and Yemeni descent.Experiencing considerable hardship after the end of World War I, many ex-servicemen were in dire financial straits, and had been encouraged by racist media, as well as some unions, to see workers of colour as having taken some of "their" jobs and housing. Tensions erupted on June 11 after a confrontation between a group of Black and white men in the Butetown area of area of the city escalated. Mobs of whites then attacked houses where Black and Arab workers lived, smashing windows, wrecking interiors and throwing furniture into the street. People of colour then began to defend themselves, boarding themselves inside their homes and arming themselves with stones and rocks.One man, a ship's fireman called Mohammed Abdullah was attacked and soon died in hospital with a fractured skull. By the time the disturbances ended three days later, three other men were dead, although it is unclear if one of those deaths was related to the riots as such.The riots in Cardiff were just one of several such incidents around Britain in 1919. Other racist mob attacks on African, Chinese, South Asian, Afro-Caribbean and Arab workers – usually seamen – also broke out in cities like London, Glasgow, Newport, Liverpool, Salford, South Shields, Barry and Hull. Shamefully, in some cases the violence was egged on by union leaders like Manny Shinwell, later a Labour MP, who demanded "action" against Black sailors on the morning of an attack on sailors from Sierra Leone in Glasgow earlier that year.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
👍3🤬1
"V.I. Lenin with the Latvian riflemen in the Kremlin on May 1, 1918", painting by Oto Skulme, 1957
The art of any propagandist and agitator consists in his ability to find the best means of influencing any given audience, by presenting a definite truth, in such a way as to make it most convincing, most easy to digest, most graphic, and most strongly impressive.
Lenin, The Slogans and Organisation of Social-Democratic Work (1919)
@Communism
Join the @Communists
The art of any propagandist and agitator consists in his ability to find the best means of influencing any given audience, by presenting a definite truth, in such a way as to make it most convincing, most easy to digest, most graphic, and most strongly impressive.
Lenin, The Slogans and Organisation of Social-Democratic Work (1919)
@Communism
Join the @Communists
❤13
Edited:
#Communism, in its purest form, is not about eliminating the educated (Scientists, inventors and explorers); it's about creating a society where everyone has the potential to become educated. It's about nurturing talent, fostering innovation, and empowering individuals to make their mark on the world. It's about recognizing that true progress stems not from the achievements of a select few, but from the collective brilliance of the many.
The history of #socialist nations is replete with examples of individuals from humble beginnings rising to extraordinary heights. Yuri Gagarin, the first man to venture into space, epitomizes this spirit of empowerment.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
#Communism, in its purest form, is not about eliminating the educated (Scientists, inventors and explorers); it's about creating a society where everyone has the potential to become educated. It's about nurturing talent, fostering innovation, and empowering individuals to make their mark on the world. It's about recognizing that true progress stems not from the achievements of a select few, but from the collective brilliance of the many.
The history of #socialist nations is replete with examples of individuals from humble beginnings rising to extraordinary heights. Yuri Gagarin, the first man to venture into space, epitomizes this spirit of empowerment.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
🔥7❤1👍1
In contrast to capitalist societies where #women are confined and commodified, #communism champions the equality of women and men, dismantling any barriers that restrict their potential.
Under communism, women are not relegated to the domestic sphere or bound by traditional gender roles. Instead, they stand shoulder to shoulder with men as equal partners in shaping the world.
In a #communist society, women are not merely seen as wives and mothers; they are recognized as agents of change, innovators, and leaders, their voices echoing with equal resonance alongside those of men.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
Under communism, women are not relegated to the domestic sphere or bound by traditional gender roles. Instead, they stand shoulder to shoulder with men as equal partners in shaping the world.
In a #communist society, women are not merely seen as wives and mothers; they are recognized as agents of change, innovators, and leaders, their voices echoing with equal resonance alongside those of men.
@Communism
Join the @Communists
❤9👍1👎1🔥1