Such is the predictable trend of managerialism — where the state pretends to shrink while increasing its coercive capabilities through automation, AI, and mass surveillance.

What makes this Blairite push particularly insidious is that it mimics classical economic arguments for efficiency and reducing public-sector bloat, but the endgame is not decentralization or market solutions - it is full-spectrum control (facilitated through digital means).

New technologies often appear optional when first introduced, but eventually society restructures itself in such a way that these technologies become necessary just to survive. Take the internet for example, it would be almost impossible to get by without using the internet. Even if one completely eliminates internet usage in his personal life, most jobs still require internet usage. There is simply no way of getting around the internet. The same would apply for transhumanism. Likely even moreso, since the changes brought by transhumanism are even greater than those which were brought by the internet. Even if in the highly unlikely scenario that transhumanism was optional, due to it increasing the efficiency of the human by such a large magnitude, individuals who embraced transhumanism will be propagandized as superior, with those remaining in their natural forms socially ostracized. We see this today as those without the newest belongings, especially those that are technological, as less than others.

⸸ Ted Kaczynski

Stanford scientists built a brain-computer interface that reads inner speech aloud, unlocked only by imagining a secret passphrase.— Article

BREAKING: NASA Administrator Sean Duffy says he has requested “the alien briefing.”

➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews