24/7 Yenposting
Photo
IDK man when I'm vomiting I'm thinking about how quickly I can get this over with. My mind is only quiet when I'm alseep, and even then I'm still dreaming
I'm convinced that we need to just start stringing people up
https://youtu.be/3qWEKOfPnjg
https://youtu.be/3qWEKOfPnjg
YouTube
Company Mocks Disabled Customer After Bricking Their Thermostat
https://www.youtube.com/@Rhine_Labs
https://consumerrights.wiki
https://consumerrights.wiki
Retarded Ramblings (Punished Edition)
Video
They literally don't make them like this anymore and it's tragic beyond words
Forwarded from vx-underground
Lots of nerds arguing over FFmpeg and Google stuff still.
Basically security nerds have argued that FFmpeg has a responsibility to fix any bugs in their project regardless if they call themselves a "volunteer project" or a '"vendor".
Security nerds argue that because of the size and popularity of FFmpeg, which FFmpeg proudly reps, then they should fix the issue and trying to minimize themselves as "volunteer project" is redundant
FFmpeg has responded, in summary, "stop jerking yourselves off, just submit a patch".
Security nerds retorted that it's not their job to submit a patch and FFmpeg, as the vendor or volunteer project, whatever you want to call it, is responsible for the patch.
FFmpeg and it's supporters have criticized security nerds as people who want to find CVEs to look cool and badass, rather than actually improving the security posture of a project.
We're on day 3, or day 4, of a bunch of nerds arguing about patches and stuff. It's a beautiful thing. I enjoy reading it. I think everyone makes a valid point.
I also enjoy people calling each other nasty names and insults over something they're not involved in (they don't work at Google or help FFmpeg, they're just picking their team)
Overall I give this drama a solid 7/10.
Basically security nerds have argued that FFmpeg has a responsibility to fix any bugs in their project regardless if they call themselves a "volunteer project" or a '"vendor".
Security nerds argue that because of the size and popularity of FFmpeg, which FFmpeg proudly reps, then they should fix the issue and trying to minimize themselves as "volunteer project" is redundant
FFmpeg has responded, in summary, "stop jerking yourselves off, just submit a patch".
Security nerds retorted that it's not their job to submit a patch and FFmpeg, as the vendor or volunteer project, whatever you want to call it, is responsible for the patch.
FFmpeg and it's supporters have criticized security nerds as people who want to find CVEs to look cool and badass, rather than actually improving the security posture of a project.
We're on day 3, or day 4, of a bunch of nerds arguing about patches and stuff. It's a beautiful thing. I enjoy reading it. I think everyone makes a valid point.
I also enjoy people calling each other nasty names and insults over something they're not involved in (they don't work at Google or help FFmpeg, they're just picking their team)
Overall I give this drama a solid 7/10.
vx-underground
Lots of nerds arguing over FFmpeg and Google stuff still. Basically security nerds have argued that FFmpeg has a responsibility to fix any bugs in their project regardless if they call themselves a "volunteer project" or a '"vendor". Security nerds argue…
All security nerds refusing to submit patches need to kys immediately. It's their job to do both
Also calling a public fatwa for the guy who decided that accessing final members in const enums in dart is actually magically not constant (it fucking is)
ALSO ALSO to the guy on stackoverflow saying "dart doesn't need a preprocessor" you are getting an eternity on the sandpaper treadmill
This looks cool but I need to closely read the spec before I can trust it. The inclusion of crypto is worrying
https://ravendevteam.org/betanet
https://ravendevteam.org/betanet
ravendevteam.org
Raven Development Team
Privacy and security should be on by default.