Citizen Journalist has made an impact on 𝕏 uncovering Somali daycare fraud. Racking up 116M views in just under 3 days 👀🔥
https://x.com/i/status/2004642794862961123
@DarkIILight
https://x.com/i/status/2004642794862961123
@DarkIILight
Dark II Light 💜
Rupert Lowe speaking out also 👀🔥 https://x.com/i/status/2005292771624824974 @DarkIILight
Rupert Lowe continues speaking out 🧐🔥
I have no moral difficulty in stripping British citizenship from vile individuals like Alaa Abd el-Fattah - it's an argument I've been making for many months.
Say for example, the wife of a Pakistani man knew that her husband was raping a vulnerable young white girl? Was aware of his regular torture, inflicting unimaginable pain? And that wife did nothing? Said nothing?
Then, yes. Strip the dual citizenship and deport her back to Pakistan, along with her husband.
Families can be deported together.
If that means entire communities go, that means entire communities go. What's the issue with that? And I suspect it would mean entire communities go.
I received such enormous abuse for saying so.
Particularly from Farage - he called it 'unacceptable', he even instructed me to remove reference to these deportations in a speech when I was still in Reform. I refused. I am VERY glad I did.
This is a debate we need to have. We need to have the courage to do so. Even if it results in a few unpleasant insults. I do not care. And nor should you.
Weak politicians led us into this mess. They will not lead us out. I promise you that.
Being a 'British' citizen does not make you British. It just doesn't. It takes so much more than that.
I'd go one step further, and if it's clear an individual has given up their primary nationality in order to avoid justice through being solely 'British'? Then that must be reversed, and it can be reversed.
The country needs to have a really honest, and a really uncomfortable, conversation about citizenship and what it means in a modern Britain transformed by mass immigration, often from cultures and countries that hate us and our way of life - particularly with how easy it is now to obtain a British citizenship. The soaring numbers are eye-watering. It is terrifying.
Because, as we're seeing more and more, a piece of paper definitely does NOT make you British.
Even if it technically does? A piece of paper can, and it many cases should, be torn up.
We have welcomed in, permanently, men from alien cultures who hate us, want to do us harm and have no intention of adopting any values we might call British.
There are many just like this Egyptian, who have been granted British citizenship. They are not British, regardless of what a passport might say.
They should not be allowed to stay in Britain.
My position is clear, and it’s one the British people agree with.
https://x.com/i/status/2005314848989556792
@DarkIILight
I have no moral difficulty in stripping British citizenship from vile individuals like Alaa Abd el-Fattah - it's an argument I've been making for many months.
Say for example, the wife of a Pakistani man knew that her husband was raping a vulnerable young white girl? Was aware of his regular torture, inflicting unimaginable pain? And that wife did nothing? Said nothing?
Then, yes. Strip the dual citizenship and deport her back to Pakistan, along with her husband.
Families can be deported together.
If that means entire communities go, that means entire communities go. What's the issue with that? And I suspect it would mean entire communities go.
I received such enormous abuse for saying so.
Particularly from Farage - he called it 'unacceptable', he even instructed me to remove reference to these deportations in a speech when I was still in Reform. I refused. I am VERY glad I did.
This is a debate we need to have. We need to have the courage to do so. Even if it results in a few unpleasant insults. I do not care. And nor should you.
Weak politicians led us into this mess. They will not lead us out. I promise you that.
Being a 'British' citizen does not make you British. It just doesn't. It takes so much more than that.
I'd go one step further, and if it's clear an individual has given up their primary nationality in order to avoid justice through being solely 'British'? Then that must be reversed, and it can be reversed.
The country needs to have a really honest, and a really uncomfortable, conversation about citizenship and what it means in a modern Britain transformed by mass immigration, often from cultures and countries that hate us and our way of life - particularly with how easy it is now to obtain a British citizenship. The soaring numbers are eye-watering. It is terrifying.
Because, as we're seeing more and more, a piece of paper definitely does NOT make you British.
Even if it technically does? A piece of paper can, and it many cases should, be torn up.
We have welcomed in, permanently, men from alien cultures who hate us, want to do us harm and have no intention of adopting any values we might call British.
There are many just like this Egyptian, who have been granted British citizenship. They are not British, regardless of what a passport might say.
They should not be allowed to stay in Britain.
My position is clear, and it’s one the British people agree with.
https://x.com/i/status/2005314848989556792
@DarkIILight
X (formerly Twitter)
Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) on X
I have no moral difficulty in stripping British citizenship from vile individuals like Alaa Abd el-Fattah - it's an argument I've been making for many months.
Say for example, the wife of a Pakistani man knew that her husband was raping a vulnerable young…
Say for example, the wife of a Pakistani man knew that her husband was raping a vulnerable young…
Trump trying to negotiate a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine 🕊️🔥
https://x.com/i/status/2005321466921791576
@DarkIILight
https://x.com/i/status/2005321466921791576
@DarkIILight
Yes, this is going to be a heavy one, the one that made Police officers throw up and worse 🙏🔥
https://x.com/i/status/2005549115745427812
@DarkIILight
https://x.com/i/status/2005549115745427812
@DarkIILight
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Former PM Liz Truss brings up the Deep State and support of Trump.
👀🔥
https://x.com/i/status/2004903913468690748
Credit: Jo
@DarkIILight
👀🔥
https://x.com/i/status/2004903913468690748
Credit: Jo
@DarkIILight
❤2
Dark II Light 💜
Trump trying to negotiate a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine 🕊️🔥 https://x.com/i/status/2005321466921791576 @DarkIILight
Putins residence was allegedly hit with a drone strike 👀🔥
🚨🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦 TRUMP IN THE CALL WITH PUTIN: DRONE STRIKE ON PUTIN’S RESIDENCE WILL CHANGE U.S. APPROACH TO ZELENSKY
Trump and Putin held a new conversation in which the Russian leader directly raised Kyiv’s alleged drone attack on his state residence in the Novgorod region.
The timing, Moscow stressed, was especially explosive: the incident reportedly occurred virtually immediately after U.S.–Ukraine talks at Mar-a-Lago, when diplomacy was supposed to be stabilizing, not escalating.
Trump reacted with visible shock and outrage, telling Putin he could not even imagine “such crazy actions.” In that context, Trump reportedly emphasized that the United States had not supplied Kyiv with Tomahawk missiles, underscoring a clear line Washington says it has not crossed even as it supports Ukraine militarily.
Putin, for his part, warned that attacks on the Russian presidential residence would not go unanswered. He told Trump that Moscow would review its position across several previously discussed understandings in light of what he described as Kyiv’s shift toward “state terrorism,” signaling that assumptions underpinning the talks are now in flux.
The Kremlin also claimed Trump made clear that the drone strike would influence how Washington approaches its relationship with Zelensky going forward. Kyiv, Trump reportedly said, had been advised not to seek a temporary respite or tactical pause, but to focus on reaching a comprehensive and binding settlement rather than maneuvering around obligations.
Moscow further argued that some of the outcomes achieved in Trump’s talks with Zelensky leave room for Ukraine to evade commitments. Putin was briefed on those discussions by Trump and his advisers, and used the opportunity to reiterate Russia’s concern that ambiguity in proposals is being used as leverage rather than as a path to resolution.
Despite the sharp tone, both leaders agreed to maintain a direct and “friendly” dialogue. Putin emphasized that Russia still intends to work closely and pragmatically with the United States to find a path toward peace, even as Moscow signals that its negotiating posture is hardening.
This episode matters because it lands at a moment when diplomacy had begun to look structured and sequenced. An alleged strike on a head-of-state residence, especially one using long-range drones, introduces a level of escalation that reshapes trust, timelines, and tolerance on all sides.
Geopolitically, it raises the stakes for Washington’s role as broker. If Trump recalibrates his approach to Kyiv while keeping channels open with Moscow, the balance of pressure shifts dramatically.
What was framed as endgame diplomacy now risks becoming a test of control: over allies, over escalation, and over whether negotiations can survive shocks without collapsing into retaliation.
Source: Tass, RIA
https://x.com/i/status/2005678739103912092
@DarkIILight
🚨🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦 TRUMP IN THE CALL WITH PUTIN: DRONE STRIKE ON PUTIN’S RESIDENCE WILL CHANGE U.S. APPROACH TO ZELENSKY
Trump and Putin held a new conversation in which the Russian leader directly raised Kyiv’s alleged drone attack on his state residence in the Novgorod region.
The timing, Moscow stressed, was especially explosive: the incident reportedly occurred virtually immediately after U.S.–Ukraine talks at Mar-a-Lago, when diplomacy was supposed to be stabilizing, not escalating.
Trump reacted with visible shock and outrage, telling Putin he could not even imagine “such crazy actions.” In that context, Trump reportedly emphasized that the United States had not supplied Kyiv with Tomahawk missiles, underscoring a clear line Washington says it has not crossed even as it supports Ukraine militarily.
Putin, for his part, warned that attacks on the Russian presidential residence would not go unanswered. He told Trump that Moscow would review its position across several previously discussed understandings in light of what he described as Kyiv’s shift toward “state terrorism,” signaling that assumptions underpinning the talks are now in flux.
The Kremlin also claimed Trump made clear that the drone strike would influence how Washington approaches its relationship with Zelensky going forward. Kyiv, Trump reportedly said, had been advised not to seek a temporary respite or tactical pause, but to focus on reaching a comprehensive and binding settlement rather than maneuvering around obligations.
Moscow further argued that some of the outcomes achieved in Trump’s talks with Zelensky leave room for Ukraine to evade commitments. Putin was briefed on those discussions by Trump and his advisers, and used the opportunity to reiterate Russia’s concern that ambiguity in proposals is being used as leverage rather than as a path to resolution.
Despite the sharp tone, both leaders agreed to maintain a direct and “friendly” dialogue. Putin emphasized that Russia still intends to work closely and pragmatically with the United States to find a path toward peace, even as Moscow signals that its negotiating posture is hardening.
This episode matters because it lands at a moment when diplomacy had begun to look structured and sequenced. An alleged strike on a head-of-state residence, especially one using long-range drones, introduces a level of escalation that reshapes trust, timelines, and tolerance on all sides.
Geopolitically, it raises the stakes for Washington’s role as broker. If Trump recalibrates his approach to Kyiv while keeping channels open with Moscow, the balance of pressure shifts dramatically.
What was framed as endgame diplomacy now risks becoming a test of control: over allies, over escalation, and over whether negotiations can survive shocks without collapsing into retaliation.
Source: Tass, RIA
https://x.com/i/status/2005678739103912092
@DarkIILight
X (formerly Twitter)
Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) on X
🚨🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦 TRUMP IN THE CALL WITH PUTIN: DRONE STRIKE ON PUTIN’S RESIDENCE WILL CHANGE U.S. APPROACH TO ZELENSKY
Trump and Putin held a new conversation in which the Russian leader directly raised Kyiv’s alleged drone attack on his state residence in the Novgorod…
Trump and Putin held a new conversation in which the Russian leader directly raised Kyiv’s alleged drone attack on his state residence in the Novgorod…
❤1
Many are saying Obama, he is suggesting higher than that 👀🔥
https://x.com/i/status/2005700937009225791
@DarkIILight
https://x.com/i/status/2005700937009225791
@DarkIILight
🔥3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I just wanted to take a moment to wish you all a Happy New Year.
Let's hope 2026 is going to be a better one than 2025.
Wishing everyone abundance, healing and light. Much love to you all as always.
🎆🙏✨
@DarkIILight
Let's hope 2026 is going to be a better one than 2025.
Wishing everyone abundance, healing and light. Much love to you all as always.
🎆🙏✨
@DarkIILight
❤7👍1🥰1🍾1