For investment today
Send me your details.
immediately so we can continue with your registration

*Full name
*Phone number
*Email address

Write to me now if you are interested via the link below.
100% guaranteed
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DataRepublicanofficial

I’ve had an unplanned project and just finished it. I’ll be back tomorrow!

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1929038305812984096?t=i7VRd8RXNyfvm15Yma5OOA&s=19
🎤 Okay, the idea of drag being associated with disability gets me so upset that I'm going to say it outright.

For every one person anointed to speak for a certain demographic, there are countless - thousands, hundreds of thousands who are simply living their lives.

For example, I have never, ever met another person as "deaf" as I am. @deaflibertarian has spoken many times on how rare it is to have 100% deafness. As an analogy, think how helpful it would be for a visually impaired person to have even 1% sight compared to zero sight.

But that's me: the only 100% deaf person I have ever met in my entire life of meeting many Deaf people. Every single Deaf person who has been "allowed" to speak for me, is far less deaf than me at a technical level.

Why and how do spokespeople of an entire demographic get into that place in the first place?

Well, I am living proof that it has nothing to do with degree of struggle - because if I were, then I would not be persona non grata of the Deaf community.

I believe the answer of how people get chosen to speak for their demographic is simple:

Spokespeople are anointed ... BECAUSE THEY SERVE THE PURPOSE OF THE INSTITUTIONS WHICH GIVE THEM A PLATFORM IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Nothing less. Nothing more.

And it serves the institutions to muddy the distinction between disability and drag, because this is where they can sweep in to implement their own value system.

Spokespeople are chosen for usefulness.

Personal update:

I disappeared last week, there's no excuse. I wasn't taking a break, I was finishing a novel.

Specifically, a novel I've been writing on and off for a few years. Normally, that's just a side pursuit, the same way you might piano or paint. But like programming, writing is a structural discipline. You study Joseph Campbell, study Save the Cat, break your story into acts and beats, and revise until your narrative spine stands up.

Catalyst at 10%. Mentor is introduced at 20-22%. B-story (romance) begins around then. Etc. If this doesn't intrigue you right away - then I beg you, don't Grok it, because this will ruin every single modern movie and book you read from here on. Seriously.

Anyway, most books of my type fall into a plot structure known as the "Superhero" genre — absolute good vs. absolute evil, chosen ones and villains. Harry Potter vs. Voldemort. Luke vs. Vader. I can't write like that, because I don't see the world like that.

Instead, I wrote a story where the villain is a system which preserves itself through manufactured consent. That wasn't a conscious political statement at first, but ... since taken on this X journey, it's become much more obvious where the inspiration came from. We all see this unfold during the Biden years: institutional decay, censorship, peace enforced through suppression.

That final ending, 30,000 words, came fast and was a direct inspiration of that.

So: thank you for tolerating the silence. Odds are, you'll never read the book... infamously, fewer than 1 out of 100 make it out of the slush pile. But if this one does, know that it's an allegory for everything I post about here.

May I please selfishly volunteer myself? Along with @deaflibertarian

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1929377824437325954?t=Qd4U4ykdTMXzuY5gDW8wUQ&s=19
This is going to be disturbing, but take a few seconds to think about it.

The "New World Order" after the Cold War was always about conquest, not democracy.

It was always about dissolving national sovereignty in favor of a supranational global system run by unelected elites, multinational corporations, and enforced by NATO.

Now imagine, just for a second, that Ukraine joined NATO and Putin didn't respond with nukes.

Do you really think NATO expansion would stop there?

Of course not. Because the end goal was never Ukraine, it was always the entire world.

The real mission of "democracy" is global dominance: political, economic, and military.

And eventually, that mission collides with nuclear-armed nations like Russia or China who draw their own red lines.

World War III is baked into the design of the New World Order.

Today might have been the day it finally happened, or that day is still 10 years into the future. But it will happen unless the New World Order is stopped.

Working on release, but in the meantime, I thought I'd share an email I wrote to a non-follower who gave me an article about West's role in creating the Ukraine conflict:

The article is correct, but needs some elaboration.

You should look up the history of NATO. They only began military action *after* the Cold War was over. Their first military strike was in 1993/1994 with the Bosnia war. Since then, they've made many many more military actions.

This was not an accident. This was a result of a deliberate decision by elites (and outlined by Soros in an essay, although he wasn't the sole architect) to reorient the world towards the "New World Order" which is enforced by NATO. The Afghanistan and Iraq wars were a big part of that. It's a deliberate attempt to conquer the world and bring it under "democracy."

But it's not really "democracy" in the way you think - it's more of a blurring of boundaries to bring countries under a supranational world order that is ran by unaccountable bureaucracy and megacorporations.

Mass migration was a deliberate part of that strategy. When conquest of the Middle East (Iraq) didn't work to convert them into democracies, they decided to backdoor permit massive amounts of mass migration.

They said it was to counter dropping birth rates. That's a lie. Mass migration is happening in the name of global security. The idea is that if we accept enough refugees, they will start "exporting" democracy back to their home countries and we will accomplish through them what we could not do in Iraq / Afghanistan.

Ukraine is simply the latest military frontier in this endless NATO expansion.

This is not to say that Putin is a good guy. Far from it. He is an authoritarian and represents that "old" aspect of Communism. Order and culture - perhaps - but Putin/China/etc use tradition as a way to get people to conform and submit, whereas in the Western world, anarcho-tyranny is the preferred tool to create obedience.

The common thread in all this is that - without God at the center of our hearts, our appetite for controlling and conquering is boundless. We have never evolved from the primitive times wherein tribes lived in a constant cycle of warfare and conquest. We just fooled ourselves into thinking we're enlightened in throwing around money and bombs, instead of throwing rocks and sticks.

And the worst part is that everyone is convinced they're right.

Putin/China represent authoritarian nationalism without God.
The Western world represents hedonistic globalism without God.
Both sides are without God. Magog and Gog.

As to answer your question about NATO: NATO's purpose has been corrupted. It evolved from a strictly defensive allegiance to a war machine.

The United States is uniquely blessed in that it is in a singular position geographically as well as economically. We need to set the example: peace through strength. My vote is to pull out of NATO, set an example and rebuild our defenses from within - to protect, not to conquer.

Probably a good day to promote the distillery...

Working on a data drop / tool drop today.

I discussed today's events with the @Not_the_Bee - it happened live during the recording. Podcast will be released tomorrow.

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1930733381400330664?t=_c9F13uG-IlXSosDXISxVg&s=19
Thank you! Yes, Mr. DataRepublican takes his craft seriously. He is a scientist at heart who engineers recipes from scratch. I think it got a Platinum award last week, will have to check with him.

Timeline cleanse: Bourbon. Do you have a pet picture?

19 states have signed onto the @COSProject which calls for a Convention of States.

I'm trying to figure out how to scrape the Federal Register now.

🚨📊 NEW SPREADSHEET DROP: Where Was Biden when he signed all his EOs? 📊🚨

I've compiled a comprehensive spreadsheet tracking Biden's physical location on 1,000+ exact dates of Executive Order and Pardon from his presidency — for the purpose of investigating autopen use. ✍️🕵️‍♂️

🔎 AI-assisted cross-referencing of:

🔹Official White House press pool logs
🔹FAA flight paths / schedule archives
🔹Newspaper articles

⚠️ Reminder: Every Executive Order includes a precise publication timestamp. So even if the White House says “President Biden was in D.C.” — like on 2022-12-23 — if the orders post at 12:00 PM sharp, and Biden was confirmed absent all day, then that’s a red flag. 🔔

✅ All data points are verifiable.
✅ Time zone-normalized.
✅ Double-checked against primary source logs where available.

🧵 Thread with findings below as I compile it.
📎 Spreadsheet download link below 👇

Hello Representative Kinzinger,

It’s been an emotional couple of days, so I will give it to you straight.

@catturd2 is a real, actual human being. He and I don’t agree on everything. Neither do I or @matt_vanswol .

But we get along. Do you know why?

The fact that two influencers could reconcile is so foreign to you that you, one of the most powerful men in the world, felt compelled to comment on that, speaks everything about your ideology.

And it’s : your party, your side allows absolutely no dissent. You find it alien enough to quote-xeet.

You are a disgusting human being. But we all already knew that.

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1931155155040280583?t=pXumqhfCfSxvCePoSwZbUw&s=19
IMO, a hypothetical Convention of States should do exactly 2 things and only 2 things:

1. Repeal the 17th
2. Term limits

That's it. No arguing. No fluff. No idealism. Just these 2 things will kill the Swamp and we should align on them. @COSProject

Hello Ms. Biles,

You are one of the most talented athletes in the world. It is well documented that you came to dominate in gymnastics on far fewer hours as a child than it takes most elite athletes to achieve.

So, let me ask you this: Have you ever done an iota of research on gender differences in athletics?

I'm one of the marginalized you claim to protect. I am myself deaf, I have a leg that's an inch shorter than the other, and no sense of balance. I was on the track team, but I came last in every single competition.

Scientific evidence shows that there is no overlap in the bell curve between female athletes and male non-athletes... in favor of the male (see attached table). If a couch potato male is automatically above a female swimmer athlete in strength... imagine how much worse that disparity is once that man starts training.

You claim to be inclusive, of marginalized people. But the reality is: what you are doing here is the EXACT opposite of including people like myself.

What you are doing is the equivalent of forcing MENSA members into special education classes and claiming that because people object, that it isn't "uplifting" or "inclusive."

That is the truth. @Riley_Gaines_ is trying to fight to keep the playing field for women. And you are harming your own gender in preventing her from doing that. That is common sense. If nothing, observe this controversy does not exist on the male-to-female transgender side for a reason.

Humans are a sexually dimorphic species, and men are far more physically dominant than women. That is what the plain scientific facts say. And you do not realize it, because you do not have a humility for just how gifted you are.

You should be ashamed of the post you just made here. You do not speak for inclusivity or marginalized people. You speak for privileged men.

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1931189225149366466?t=bN-JH6Hqc7s3CTGQMhY_4A&s=19
TL;DR: the 17th fundamentally changed how Americans relate to their government.

Before it, the United States operated more like a confederation of semi-sovereign states, similar to what the EU was intended to be. After it, the balance shifted.

For the first time, the federal government was directly influenced by popular national will, bypassing the states' formal control over the Senate.

It was by far the most significant step toward centralizing power in DC... changing us from a union of states into a more unified, singular nation-state.

We are all broken.

Thank you for putting up with me. See you tomorrow.

By and far the most difficult part of what I do is not making the connections. That is somewhat easy with AI these days. Rather, it is presenting the important information in a digestable form.

This video represents an "uncensored" relationship map for Vladmir Putin. What I show on the website is a curated version of both charities and people relationships.