Well, well, this is interesting intel from @JamesHartline . Alexander Soros single-handedly credited Adam Schiff with preserving American democracy. And if you read between the lines... maybe even delivering the 2020 election to Biden.
But what is Adam Schiff actually known for? Leaking classified information.
If Alex Soros is right, then Schiff wasn't being careless. Schiff was running interference for unknown masters. Who are they? I don't know yet. But I hope to find out.
No wonder Joe Biden's autopen pardoned him.
But what is Adam Schiff actually known for? Leaking classified information.
If Alex Soros is right, then Schiff wasn't being careless. Schiff was running interference for unknown masters. Who are they? I don't know yet. But I hope to find out.
No wonder Joe Biden's autopen pardoned him.
🔥9👎4👍2
I don’t know if this makes sense, and maybe I’m being naive, but here’s maybe a perspective framing. Every single recent President has done airstrikes. Obama bombed a hospital and had to apologize for it. None of those escalated into WW3.
The only one that came close was the 2017 MOAB which also caused a good number of my fellow MAGA friends to panic.
How much of the framing we’re experiencing is due to the media amplifying it as a policy failure? How much of our anxiety is due to us paying attention to every step President Trump makes and praying it is not going to be another Bush?
I’d argue that between distorted media framing, and going through four years of President Trump already, and Trump surrounding himself with foreign policy realists, gives some cause for optimism that we aren’t entering a new war.
The only one that came close was the 2017 MOAB which also caused a good number of my fellow MAGA friends to panic.
How much of the framing we’re experiencing is due to the media amplifying it as a policy failure? How much of our anxiety is due to us paying attention to every step President Trump makes and praying it is not going to be another Bush?
I’d argue that between distorted media framing, and going through four years of President Trump already, and Trump surrounding himself with foreign policy realists, gives some cause for optimism that we aren’t entering a new war.
👍8🔥1🙏1
Take note, GOP.
Discard the conventional wisdom of defending your seat through pork spending for your district.
Just run hard with mass deportations.
Moderation is the losing stance.
Discard the conventional wisdom of defending your seat through pork spending for your district.
Just run hard with mass deportations.
Moderation is the losing stance.
🔥8👍4
Hello Senator Graham,
We get it. You love war. You jump at any chance to bang the drums for another "democracy-building" war.
So let's talk about something you probably hoped stayed buried. One of Hunter Biden's leaked emails reveals Liz Schrayer, the CEO of USGLC and former AIPAC National Director, personally asked him to host a fundraiser for your re-election. And the reason why: because you were such a reliable champion against cuts to USAID.
Apparently, not cutting USAID transcends party lines such that Biden's son was asked to host your fundraiser.
Fast forward to 2025. Now, you claim to back President Trump in cutting USAID. Interesting pivot for someone who was publicly honored, multiple times, for defending USAID.
So which is it?
Were you blindly cheering on USAID spending without understanding how it works?
Or were you fully aware that USAID funnels money to corrupt NGOs and elites under the pretense of "democracy promotion?"
I'm betting it's the latter, because your record is so consisten
We get it. You love war. You jump at any chance to bang the drums for another "democracy-building" war.
So let's talk about something you probably hoped stayed buried. One of Hunter Biden's leaked emails reveals Liz Schrayer, the CEO of USGLC and former AIPAC National Director, personally asked him to host a fundraiser for your re-election. And the reason why: because you were such a reliable champion against cuts to USAID.
Apparently, not cutting USAID transcends party lines such that Biden's son was asked to host your fundraiser.
Fast forward to 2025. Now, you claim to back President Trump in cutting USAID. Interesting pivot for someone who was publicly honored, multiple times, for defending USAID.
So which is it?
Were you blindly cheering on USAID spending without understanding how it works?
Or were you fully aware that USAID funnels money to corrupt NGOs and elites under the pretense of "democracy promotion?"
I'm betting it's the latter, because your record is so consisten
🔥9👍3❤1
🚨 𝙏𝙃𝙄𝙎 𝘽𝙄𝙇𝙇 𝙄𝙎 𝙈𝙐𝘾𝙃 𝘽𝙄𝙂𝙂𝙀𝙍 𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙉 𝙄𝙏 𝙇𝙊𝙊𝙆𝙎.
If you look at the actual text of the bill: any foreign country or NGO that's ever funneled money, aid, or resources to the Taliban, even indirectly , could lose ALL U.S. funding.
This means the bill potentially strips any and all foreign aid going to China, Qatar, Iran, Russia, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia.
If you look at the actual text of the bill: any foreign country or NGO that's ever funneled money, aid, or resources to the Taliban, even indirectly , could lose ALL U.S. funding.
This means the bill potentially strips any and all foreign aid going to China, Qatar, Iran, Russia, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia.
👍5👏5🙏5🔥2
Blocking foreign money from flowing into universities is a national security issue regardless. Foreign governments don't fund education out of goodwill. They're doing it with the goal of creating activists who will push their agendas, not ours.
For example, Qatar Foundation International gives students scholarships to study Arabic at Bowdoin. That is the exact same program where Zohran Mamdani came from. cc: @RepLuna
For example, Qatar Foundation International gives students scholarships to study Arabic at Bowdoin. That is the exact same program where Zohran Mamdani came from. cc: @RepLuna
🙏6👍3
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1937531209233629335?t=aq-3ksRz6eLJMKxXTb5bnQ&s=19
Advice for @ZelenskyyUa: President Trump is furious. If you want to get out of today’s meeting with any shred of dignity, do exactly what he says.
Advice for @ZelenskyyUa: President Trump is furious. If you want to get out of today’s meeting with any shred of dignity, do exactly what he says.
X (formerly Twitter)
DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) on X
Advice for @ZelenskyyUa: President Trump is furious. If you want to get out of today’s meeting with any shred of dignity, do exactly what he says.
🔥7👎1
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1937606436546372032?t=yAjq9k1IMcj1zcC4xR0D9A&s=19
Democrats have no problem with the CCP spending money to riot on our soil.
The Democratic Party has a foreign subversive problem.
Democrats have no problem with the CCP spending money to riot on our soil.
The Democratic Party has a foreign subversive problem.
X (formerly Twitter)
DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) on X
Democrats have no problem with the CCP spending money to riot on our soil.
The Democratic Party has a foreign subversive problem.
The Democratic Party has a foreign subversive problem.
💯13👎1🔥1
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1937693508191838692?t=zIWsFWvxQKyJhnmpaFMM8g&s=19
Another core strategy for regime change is to finance and promote the most destabilizing political factions.
Another core strategy for regime change is to finance and promote the most destabilizing political factions.
X (formerly Twitter)
DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) on X
Another core strategy for regime change is to finance and promote the most destabilizing political factions.
🙏4👀4🔥3👎1
I received the following email from CODEPINK.
"We are writing to formally address and correct the false and defamatory statements made in your recent social media posts regarding CODEPINK. These claims—which falsely allege that our organization is funded by China, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), or any foreign government or entity—are entirely baseless and constitute libel."
So, I will share the facts without spin:
Per Wikipedia, CODEPINK is 25% funded by Neville Singham, who is living in Shanghai and got rich off spreading CCP propaganda, and is under investigation by Congress for FARA violations.
CODEPINK is running a campaign called "China is Not Our Enemy," which promotes pro-China messaging, including denial of the Uyghur genocide, an atrocity affirmed by the U.S. Department of State.
The founder of CODEPINK, Jodie Evans, is married to the aforementioned Neville Singham.
In fact, the Uyghur denialism goes so far that Jodie Evans said in a YouTube interview, that Uyghurs are terrorists traine
"We are writing to formally address and correct the false and defamatory statements made in your recent social media posts regarding CODEPINK. These claims—which falsely allege that our organization is funded by China, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), or any foreign government or entity—are entirely baseless and constitute libel."
So, I will share the facts without spin:
Per Wikipedia, CODEPINK is 25% funded by Neville Singham, who is living in Shanghai and got rich off spreading CCP propaganda, and is under investigation by Congress for FARA violations.
CODEPINK is running a campaign called "China is Not Our Enemy," which promotes pro-China messaging, including denial of the Uyghur genocide, an atrocity affirmed by the U.S. Department of State.
The founder of CODEPINK, Jodie Evans, is married to the aforementioned Neville Singham.
In fact, the Uyghur denialism goes so far that Jodie Evans said in a YouTube interview, that Uyghurs are terrorists traine
👍5
And in solidarity for Code Pink's desire to get only the facts out without any allegations of being CCP-linked, I have pinned this thread to my profile.
👍3
I'll probably stop here, but please check out the others' comments to the thread.
Again, CODEPINK, I am sorry for repeating an opinion. I have gone so far that I researched to correct my own transgressions and provided the facts as I found them to my followers. 🫡
Again, CODEPINK, I am sorry for repeating an opinion. I have gone so far that I researched to correct my own transgressions and provided the facts as I found them to my followers. 🫡
😁4🔥2