Which digital currencies have you invested in this year?

Have you made progress since you started?

What do you think will happen to Bitcoin before the end of the year?

What if I could point you in the right direction to get the most out of cryptocurrencies?

📩
(1) How does it work?
(2) How can I earn money from home?
(3) How can I get started?
(4) How can I earn more money?
No salary?
(5) I like it but I'm new here

If you want to invest, send me a direct message now!
Don't forget to send me your details. 🔰
*Full name
*Phone number
* Wallet address
* Email
* Nationality (optional)

This is a great opportunity to trade and earn money with me.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/DataRepublicanofficial

Hunter's peak crack addiction was while he was still serving on USGLC:

While everyone’s laughing at Hunter Biden again today, remember he is not a nobody.

Hunter Biden held a seat on the board of one of the most powerful NGO networks in the world: the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (USGLC). This is a group that directs U.S. foreign aid strategy and partners with top corporations, nonprofits, and military sector. Its CEO, Liz Schrayer (formerly AIPAC political director) still advises USAID, and just last year took credit for pushing through $90 billion in foreign aid during a gridlocked Congress.

Now ask yourself: What exactly qualified Hunter Biden... an addict, with no foreign policy expertise to sit on the board of directors alongside billionaires and NGO elites?

The answer is simple: If someone like Hunter could be trusted with a seat at that table, then the entire table is rotten. The foreign aid and "democracy" ecosystem is about access and protecting the racket.

Think about it. Liz Schrayer and USGLC took credit for getting the 95 billion dollar foreign aid passed through Congress last year.

Then Schrayer herself sits on the board which has advisory authority over where USAID dollars go.

How can that possibly be legal? I don't know.

Explain why you were silent on Epstein during all 4 years of the Biden administration, please.

Open Society Foundation (OSF) gave grants to Al-Haq, a group designated as terrorist by Israel. Israel passed this intelligence onto the CIA, but the CIA claimed insufficient evidence for designating these groups as terrorists.

Today, we also learned that OSF also gave the International Republican Institute (IRI) and National Democratic Institute (NDI) grants. The IRI and NDI are subsidiaries of the National Endowment for Democracy, which is a quasi-governmental NGO which works closely with the CIA.

Did Soros money influence the CIA's refusal to designate Al-Haq as a terrorist organization?

"It is possible that if events continue to unfold as they have done over the past few decades, that the idea of a universal and directional history leading up to liberal democracy may become more plausible to people, and that the relativist impasse of modern thought will in a sense solve itself." - Francis Fukuyama, one of the policy architects for Reagan.

To grasp my point, think of history the way a programmer thinks about technology. Setbacks (bugs) happen, but progress is assumed inevitable because liberal democracy is seen as objectively superior. You can't derail it any more than a coding error can delay AGI.

But just as putting in real effort can help accelerate AGI, trying harder in history (whether via war, soft power, or otherwise) might speed up the arrival of global peace and prosperity.

This is a strange poll, thanks for humoring.

If you could press a button, and it killed 10,000 people now violently, but resulted in the abolition of war forever, potentially saving an infinite number of lives, would you press it?

I remember very clearly, GWB talking about how the Iraq War would succeed because the love for democracy was ingrained in all humanity. My husband does too.

The difference is, we both changed opinions based on factual data points.