Populism is traditionally a "grievance," a movement around one person, a protest.

The thing the NGO-Administrative Complex fears the most is if populism consolidates to construct parallel institutions.

We already have all the ingredients. Bitcoin, the Second Amendment, etc.

Oh, here comes the predictable "turn down the temperature" posts.

None of tthe comments you are posting are actual calls for violence.

They are all angry calls wanting accountability for the people who created the seditious videos.

And they are justified in their anger. Why shouldn't they be?

Meanwhile, you're ignoring the fact that leftists are celebrating on Bluesky yet again.

This isn't even considering your whole role in this color revolution to remake America "democracy."

This is him

The only thing more predictable than Democrats claiming victimhood over an Afghan illegal immigrant shooting a National Guard member is Democrats torching a city over a supposed microaggression.

Not my usual thing, but tonight feels heavy. I could use the distraction. Ask me anything here and I’ll reply as I’m able.

An important concept to understand is that they don’t consciously sit down and say “hey let’s start a color revolution.”

In fact, they hate talking about color revolutions because it removes moral agency from the people.

Instead, you have multiple NGOs rain down at every level of civic society doing their part in this sequence, all implicitly agreeing Trump is a threat to democracy.

Here's how the actual overthrow will look like. A protest happens at the White House or Congress or Mar-a-Lago. Law enforcement steps aside because elite defection. Protesters "nonviolently" make it known that if Trump doesn't resign, they'll execute him. Trump flees the country.

Yes, they were projecting when they said that Jan 6th was an insurrection. Because it really does look the same insurrection they've pulled off in many countries.

Loving all the replies QTing as Q-Anon stuff. This is literally how it happens in other countries.

Yes, the transition of power is more complex than Trump simply being threatened by protesters. (Trump wouldn't actually back down, JD Vance is the successor, etc).

But this is how overthrows are done. Hollowing out security until protesters are capable of threatening lives.

Meeting with my dad and his advice, “make more Hello posts”

An important concept to understand is that they don’t consciously sit down and say “hey let’s start a color revolution.”

In fact, they hate talking about color revolutions because it removes moral agency from the people.

Instead, you have multiple NGOs rain down at every level of civic society doing their part in this sequence, all implicitly agreeing Trump is a threat to democracy.

Just one year ago, you were enthusiastically supporting a war on Venezuela if Maduro won.

I guess your handler, Alex Soros, got to you. @EmmaRincon

Hello Mr. Parnas,

I’m a novice in international law, but I am an expert in the equally authoritative (aka, irrelevant) topic of databases, and your claim that Pete Hegseth committed crimes is empty. Tying his actions to “international law” is a transparent attempt to manufacture a crisis.

International law has no force here. Your authority, mine, and that of the scholars you cite sits on the same level: none. It is all gatekeeping dressed as expertise.

The video urging people to ignore “illegal orders” made your intent clear. You stretch the term until it covers anything that suits your goal of weakening the security apparatus and pushing Trump out of office. People see that. They see you.

That you all are walking free and making those posts trying to advance a color revolution is the ultimate proof that Trump is not an authoritarian... he is far too lenient.

Turned the last chapter draft in not a moment too soon. This book has been my everything the past few months. Going to take a few days off. Thank you @JoshuaLisec for putting up with me, and also @Nero and @JackPosobiec for your support.

Everyone thinks it's like we make obscure discoveries when in fact it's more like we make a few Google searches and ... "why has nobody ever reported on this"

Absolutely not diminishing Bad Kitty's work (she's the best), just contextualizing how rare analytical journalism is and how you, too, can fill in the gap if you're called for it.

Am I reading this article correctly?

CIA leaks messages of shooter communicating with CIA to prove to Rolling Stone that CIA wasn't working with the shooter when in fact the shooter was in active collaboration with the CIA as of just a few months ago?

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1995967997098557927?t=YM-0JUY4peMdD6XAKuR0Dg&s=19
I'd like just one rabbit hole that doesn't trace back to George Soros, please