More seriously - the fatal flaw of the 20th century (and by extension of the 21st century) is that they mistook Popper's fallibilism for institutions immune to bureaucratic closure -- when in fact fallibilism is exactly what enabled endless fora via incorrigable self-examination, and thus endless clubs, and thus endless NGOs/UN/institutions - and in the end, produced closure just as strict as the one that Popper/Soros claimed to oppose

Let me lay out something your NGOs never account for, yet more of your own citizens are beginning to understand.

Americans have stepped away from NGO-crafted "freedom" indices that always crown the same governments as enlightened. We see the pattern. We no longer treat these rankings as neutral data or as credible authority, because they are not. Their metrics shift to suit their narrative, and the narrative always protects their preferred states -- the compliant states of globalists.

The experts you cite are losing legitimacy because the public now sees through them. Their push for tighter control over speech is not a sign of strength. It is a sign of fear.

I pray your nations choose to claim the principles that protect open expression and personal agency in the United States. The world is freer when people, not institutions, decide what may be said and what may be believed.

And ... blocked.

Correct. I spent six months researching “democracy.”

The “democracy” people are foreign policy people who think entirely in terms of institutions and “stabilizing” the world order at a transnational level. Every lever they have revolves around maintaining a monopoly on legitimacy, which is why they’re panicking at the existence of X, cryptocurrencies, anything outside their control. Consent of governed has nothing to do with it; the only relationship they have to actual democracy is legacy — left over from the Cold War.

Here's the real "EU Made Simple" summary:

The EU insists it isn't running a censorship regime, according to an outfit funded by the EU itself, plus the USAID-flavored branches of several EU governments.

Talked with someone who has been infiltrating groypers - which is actually insightful, this is what he had to say. Also important to note that presence of foreign amplification doesn't mean he doesn't have a big genuine fanbase:

Short form explanation:

First, he is one of the most misquoted, taken out of context people I have ever seen in any media.

He is the polar extreme in the opposite direction from cancel culture, and he’s also an actual product of the censorship machine.

Without the censorship and deplatforming of him from literally everywhere, he may not have ended up so extreme.

He’s essentially been entirely alone building an audience on Rumble for years. Even before Rumble existed he was thrown off everything and still kept going. The result is some of the most polarized and siloed people on the internet.

Their ideas were never properly challenged, never given true pushback, because no one saw them or even acknowledged his existence.

Now, that he has turned into the mainstream he’s spent the past 10 years honing this message into something that is translatable to a mass media audience.

And I’ll tell you the problem, he’s extremely good. His points are actually true, the problem is his he arrives at them are rooted in the wrong direction. That is where you actually see the antisemitism.

Instead of saying: The USA after the Cold War needed to control the Middle East, and we figured out how to do that by working with certain countries and destroying others. Whether or not that was a good decision or not, that was still the decision of the American government and ultimately American citizens as it is our country, and we are responsible for our own government.

Nick’s read is: “The Israeli’s and Jews of the world have conspired to control the American government so that they can dominate the Middle East.” (Basically his ‘JQ’ question summed up.)

Now the deal is I refuse to believe after watching him do that for sometime that he is stupid enough to think that’s true.

He doesn’t care which side wins, so long as it leads to the ultimate goal, which is a rise of a Caesar type figure.

I would like to acknowledge that Nick Fuentes does tap into a real frustration. As @honestpollster said, the videos do not entirely watch themselves.

But make no mistake: the rise is not organic, and the agenda is not America First.

Thread End (for now).

🧵 THREAD: NCRI's Analysis: How Abuse of 𝕏's Platform boosted Nick Fuentes

A few days ago, @elonmusk got "ratioed" by Nick Fuentes.

The air quotes are intentional. There was nothing organic about the ratio.

This morning, Network Contagion Research Institute (@ncri_io) released a forensic breakdown of how Nick Fuentes' sudden rise over the past year was driven by synthetic amplification, foreign engagement clusters, and coordinated raid behavior.

I read the full report and asked NCRI some clarifying questions about their methodology. The findings are staggering.

As always, patience as I pull this thread together. 👇

https://x.com/i/status/1998194403748548641
Elbridge Colby has articulated the most sane foreign policy of the post-Cold War order by an order of magnitude.

Don't invest in scams. Invest in real businesses. Investing is the best way to build long-term wealth.

There are no millionaires who made a lot of money from working in scams. There's no certainty, only principles and systems. Follow what's recommended to you.

If you're here for investment, we only provide you with the best.

Don't go out to invest with scammers and then come back to ask me (how I can help you) or for help, because I'll no longer assist you.

Remember one thing: nothing good comes cheap - protect yourself.

If you want to invest here, please do so and reap your profits as soon as possible. We're not just the best 🙏, but we always deliver on our promise regarding Bitcoin trading investments.

For today's investments
Send me your details
right away so we can proceed with your registration.

*Full name
*Phone number
*Email address

Write to me now if you're interested via the link below.
100% guaranteed
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DataRepublicanofficial

The Federal Bar Association commits 19,000 members of the public legal profession including 2,000 judges to advance racial equity through UN SDGs.