Death Sentence FAQ : Pros & cons of the death penalty - Avantages et inconvénients de la peine mort - Amnesty Bullshit Leaked – Telegram
It's a one way ticket, once banned the death penalty cannot be reimplemented.

WELL DON'T BAN THAT! with fake science propaganda!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyPropaganda
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyFacts

Because otherwise is the same 💩 like now with 🇪🇺! where to enable that is huge complex
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EuropeFacts/55
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EuropeFacts/56

Universal rights?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/1643
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/170
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/183
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IgnorancePeople/7
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/93
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnistiaPropaganda/54
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WeAreTheFutureTelegram

Cruel inhumane?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathPenaltyCruel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/152
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EmpathyTelegram/20
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/101
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/18
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/114
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/170
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/183
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathExecutions/5

Why we don't start to fight for real important things, means GUANTANAMO!!!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightAbuse/73
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/1527
Sorry, you are talking about nature ... and there is even not a nature in the index of your book 🤦‍♂️ ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathPenaltyCruel/55
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalCrueltyFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BauernprotestRealitat

and with this example, you show even the fact, that death penalty should not be used everytime and everywhere.

You can have a death penalty WITHOUT using it, just when needed!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/321

THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET

Not that you come here "ops, it was better to have that" ... Do you need assisted suicide now, if you don't wish to die?? NOPE Do you need abortion now, if you are not pregnant?? NOPE Do you need ....? NOPE!

This doesn't mean that you don't need such things in future too! Remember

a) removing death penalty is synonym of HAVING AN HARD LIFE TO REIMPLEMENT THAT!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EuropeFacts/55
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EuropeFacts/56
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EuropeFacts/36
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EuropeFacts/69

b) or no way to reimplement that
https://news.1rj.ru/str/JohnBessler/132

c) don't forget Norway!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence/18
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence/23

Synes du det hadde vært riktig om Norge innførte dødsstraff i forbindelse med denne saken, lurte aktor Inga Bejer Engh.

Det hadde vært det riktige på mange måter. Skal man vurdere en sak som dette, er det bare to utganger. Jeg ser på 21 års fengsel som en patetisk straff, svarte Breivik.

Do you think it would have been right if Norway introduced the death penalty in connection with this case, wondered prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh.

It would have been the right thing in many ways. If one considers a case like this, there are only two ways out. I see 21 years in prison as a pathetic punishment, Breivik replied.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikBullshit/81

only 50 prisoners?

Well, we already said that they get applied at too lower rate ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/1706
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/24
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CrimeExamples/110
Behind the death penalty Part 2

Sånn sett er det synd Indrebø ble sparket. Han virker å være en person med fornuftige holdninger, sier Breivik med henvisning til meddommeren som ble fjernet for å ha kommet med en kommentar 23. juli i fjor om at dødsstraff ville vært det eneste rettferdige https://perma.cc/6793-ATPZ

In that sense, it's a shame Indrebø was fired. He seems to be a person with reasonable attitudes, says Breivik, referring to the co-judge who was removed for having made a comment on 23 July last year that the death penalty would be the only fair thing.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence/18
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence/23

Jeg tenkte at det var en selvmordsaksjon, jeg trodde ikke jeg skulle overleve 22. juli.

I thought it was a suicide attempt, I didn't think I would survive the 22nd of July.

Breivik sa han regnet med at det var «fem prosent sannsynlighet» for at han skulle overleve angrepet i Regjeringskvartalet.

Breivik said he reckoned there was a "five percent probability" that he would survive the attack in the Government Quarter.

Det er tross alt Norges best bevoktede bygninger. Men så overlevde jeg ikke bare det, jeg overlevde Utøya også.

After all, they are Norway's best-guarded buildings. But then I not only survived that, I also survived Utøya.
🤣 .... SURE!!
Scroll from
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikErrors/11

Like etter at han ble pågrepet på Utøya 22. juli, kom han med en rekke krav til politiet. Blant dem var at det skulle innføres dødsstraff og såkalt waterboarding, vanntortur, i Norge.

Shortly after he was arrested on Utøya on 22 July, he made a number of demands to the police. Among them was that the death penalty and so-called waterboarding, water torture, should be introduced in Norway.

Disse tankene har han om sin egen henrettelse:
Det betyr at Gud kaller meg hjem. Jeg har ikke noe liv her i fengsel, så en dødsstraff vil ikke forkludre noen planer som er lagt. Det er ikke noe her som jeg ønsker å holde fast i, sier han.