Military Defence Switzerland - Nederland - Suomi Telegram| Difesa Italia - Defensa España | Armées France - Militär Deutschland – Telegram
Military Defence Switzerland - Nederland - Suomi Telegram| Difesa Italia - Defensa España | Armées France - Militär Deutschland
418 subscribers
1.16K photos
354 videos
665 links
Download Telegram
We saw this one now ...

Well, in some parts what has been said is not fully wrong.

Like having a PhD doesn't show if things are true or wrong, same for the amount of followers, likes, views, if a person is a celebrity or not, a researcher or not, if such things has been said by rich or poor people, if politicians, lawyers, police officers, etc said that .... Every person in the world can say the true, fake infos or a mix of that ... and everyone can act with a double face! having just personal interests behind their actions.

Exactly the same happens for people in prison or not, people doing crimes or not ...

Yes, killing people is NOT acceptable at all, even "if you have right and all people near you maybe close eyes or other"...

Doesn't matter who did such crime. NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO KILL OTHER PEOPLE FOR THEIR IDEAS OR SOMETHING OTHER. This still doesn't mean that what he is fighting for is wrong or correct.

Now to be clear, we mean that in general ...

Just think about Prison Break story .... it's the best example, where the government was just a mafia. You maybe think "well, this is just a Tv Show"... mmmh nope! such shit happens even in the reality, where maybe people working for the government are more mafious and criminal than other.

So what we want to say is "without knowing the reasons and the full story behind that, you cannot say a person is idiot or not ..."

Many people haven't read anything and don't verify anything, maybe they just read some newspaper noscript articles or whatever.

No matter what, there are even many topics inside such story and we can already say you, that we noticed not scientific way to cite things in some part of the book, means that what he is saying cannot be considered as facts ... we will write more soon. Plus remember that is not enough to know what he or the mother / father are saying, since all three can tell bullshit ...

AfD is pretty similar to Breivik. Even their speaks are pretty identical to what Breivik is saying. Both are right wings ...
This still doesn't mean that what AfD is saying is bullshit too, because it's thanks AfD that we got more infos about specific topics, asking the government for more concrete stats related to specific topics, that otherwise are missing ... because only politicians can ask that ...

So maybe they are against immigration at all, discriminate people with their no sense "no Islam, yes Muslim" (that cannot be applied at all and not only because someone is Islamic, means he is a terrorist or criminal), like they do with the nature too, but this still doesn't mean all what as been said is bullshit. Every single thing need to be verified considering multiple point of views, even thinking like a terrorists.

This is the main problem ... People always have their "no criminal / terrorist mentality" without being able to understand why such things happen.

True professional think like criminals, if they want to investigate about crimes ... and understand the reason behind such actions ...

So is important to have such people like AfD too, since even if they are saying shit, they show where problems could be ... what other people instead just ignore at all ...

Breivik did the same too. Again, we don't relate that about what happened after July (no empathy, killing people, etc.) and we don't consider the Islam topic now, since he wrote tons of pages that we haven't read until now ... We are talking about things we read until now ... like things related to the family, the plan behind, abuses he got, etc.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MuslimTerrorists/149

Even correlating stats with things, without knowing the full context, is shit ...

The problem is in such case who said that ... AfD is well know to say bullshit without using facts, so saying that already show that they do it, because they have the same ideas like Breivik, even if maybe they read anything about Breivik, or just in part. Plus reading without verifying what has been said make no sense too ...

In conclusion, we agree in part with this (no matter related to which criminal), but not really in such case, because this has been said by AfD ... again AfD is promoting a lot of shit as facts ...

Remember that even professional and researchers share bullshit! and we already found similar bullshit in the past showing that to the public ...

Most important is always having a neutral evaluation, considering all aspects behind such things.

One thing is sure, what has been written is important for all people working for security department etc. Ignoring such infos will not improve our world ... even related to crimes that get done by similar people ..

Just one thing more. Breivik said he invested 8+ years studying things related to politics / economy ... if this is true or bullshit is another point ... and how this has been done too

Breivik is not the classic "suicide terrorist" too, doing such things just because someone other said to do that ... reason why the whole story requires hours to analyse that properly ...
Meanwhile shitty laws are not available just in Norway ... but even in Switzerland (and other places).

A dude could get no crime, if he is not able to understand what he is doing ...

NO SENSE AT ALL

Like if a "brain wash" fix such issues ...

A criminal should get the same exact sentence, no matter if he know or not what he is doing ... what is changing is the type of therapy.

Without considering the fact that psychologists are the first one saying bullshit. Many of them are not able to understand what is going on and then they are saying the opposite of what is really going on ...

It's a bit like doctors / nurses / etc. saying "yes, i understand your situation", when the reality is NOPE, you cannot understand, until you are in the same situation. You can maybe imagine how this could be, but it's still different.

Other similar shitty things are "yes, i can understand" said by call - services, "How are you?" (when in reality the goal is not to find out how you really are ... it's just a default question everyone is doing ...), etc.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"We need to work to fix the reason of migration and solve conflicts" Angela Merkel

This means even missing human rights.

One thing has been showed with the Palestine war. All such things our politicians are doing is just a great failure! United Nations is a failure, since even if they say things with brain, they still haven't solved anything ...

Countries that give a shit by thinking "well, migrants need to go to Germany, let we do anything and close eyes, by allowing that ... at the end they will not remain in our country ..."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDFakten/478

Since we are Swiss, we are saying that in neutral way, at the end we are not Germany ... We have not so many migrants like other countries too ..

This is about talking about a serious topic that should be fixed once at all, near other problems available. A topic that Anders Behring Breivik is talking about, but with a discrimination way, etc. So a topic that is not actual at all, but present since years. This has nothing to do with "keep our tradition" like years ago too. We love to see black or latin people in our countries, so we should have no issue to see even Muslims in our countries ...

Remember that criminality in America Latina is huge high, means that if you think like Breivik, you should refuse all latinos too ... which obviously make no sense.

Same otherwise can be said about Italians, that are like "rats". You see Italians everywhere! do we need to refuse Italians, just because they migrate everywhere? ...
We have no problem with that. People love eating Pizza and Pasta everywhere ...

Yes, Poland is doing things to stop such things
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDFakten/519

but there is still too much "give a shit" from all countries, like said previously
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TerrorismTelegram/495

If migrants leave country A to reach country Z, already countries A, B, C should stop that! not that A-Y are giving a shit and then is a problem of Z!

No matter if Z is Spain, Italy, France, Germany or other countries!

Related post
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/413
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Behind the idea of the people "now" and "me" is more important than "we" and "the future" Part 1

Few days ago Giorgia Meloni posted a video saying "there is no just "me", there is even the "we" dimension"

This is exactly the point.

Now obviously it always depends from what we are talking about.

Merkel is saying that in other ways too.

People always complain about "now" and "me dimension" like the 3 days Merkel is saying, but they always forget the "we dimension" and "consequences for the future" ...

Exactly like with climate change, were "well, going to holiday is much important than other things", "i prefer to keep my current lifestyle, giving a shit to what will happen in future", "using cars for every shit" (like Italy is doing), etc. are more important.
Norway said that too
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/810

A new report has been published recently in Italy saying exactly that

Nel primo semestre 2023 il 51,9% degli spostamenti è risultato più breve dei 15 minuti e il 20,2% si è collocato nella fascia 15-30 minuti; si tratta di percentuali in linea con gli anni precedenti, con la consueta eccezione del 2020 che ha registrato un’impennata soprattutto dei tragitti di brevissima durata (salita al 60% del totale).

Infine al Sud e nelle Isole spicca lo share altissimo dell’auto (71,3%, oltre 10 punti superiore a quello del Nord-Ovest), in forte crescita dal 2021, che si accompagna alla penetrazione residuale della bicicletta (2,0% di spostamenti soddisfatti) e alla estrema debolezza del trasporto pubblico (4,6%, la percentuale nettamente più bassa tra le circoscrizioni nonostante l’incremento di oltre un punto rispetto al 2021).

L’uso dell’auto è infatti dominante per tutte le fasce di lavoratori, con una quota di spostamenti soddisfatti attorno alla soglia del 70% nel caso degli smart workers e attorno al 75% nel caso dei lavoratori in presenza.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Behind the idea of the people "now" and "me" Part 2

Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/415

In English? They simply are saying that Italian just use the car for every shit! especially in Sud ...

This is exactly the same what we said in previous posts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationTelegram/40
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BenShapiroBullshit/12
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BenShapiroBullshit/13
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1194
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1195
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/649
etc.

The same for people complaining about Last Generation, forgetting that most of such dude are still in the category "i prefer to take auto for every shit i need to do, instead of bus, train, etc."

What Merkel said even in a good way "it's not my competence ...". This is why there are engineers, scientists and many other professionals.

Because no one is expert in all topics. Like we are for sure not expert for laws and other things! We never studied law ... but we still invest a lot of time to search or verifying things. This still doesn't mean we are more experts than people doing just such things. But again, experts with 🙈 are useless too!

Is not the job of activists or politicians to say how things can be fixed, especially if this is related to the implementation of specific technologies ... It's the job of multiple experts that collaborate to find a solution ... This is what Ben Shapiro still doesn't understand ...

It's even time to stop seeing 3 days or similar of "lifestyle limitations" like the end of the world, when the consequences are maybe much worse ...

Most people see just the good things (yes, some talk about bad things too) when they speak about their past, by forgetting all bad moments and the fact that such positive things maybe were just 0.0000001% of the time. Like showing pictures with smiles, when maybe a people smiled just in such moment ...

We need to go to the future and check "how we will see our current action from a future prospective" ... exactly like Merkel is saying.

Sad that many people don't understand that
Our new multi channel is now available

Defence Facts on Telegram : Fact behind crimes / criminality / prisoners / terror attacks / sexual abuse / justice laws https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenseFacts

https://news.1rj.ru/str/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Islam Dress in Europe P1

Previously we said that we don't agree at all against the discrimination France is doing
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/568

As you know we are Swiss and we ALWAYS check things from multiple perspective, bad or good, with a neutral view.

Well, from one side we can partially understand why they are doing that
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/154
even if we don't agree with that

a) we need to remember the high criminality in France ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/810
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/791

b) even related to terrorism
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TerrorismTelegram/179

c) is not a case that France is offering better laws too
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/9
and is sharing much more prevention content

c) UAE’s Ministry of Interior published فيديو يظهر تحركات مرتكب / مرتكبة جريمة شبح الريم
showing a similar crime

d) we can even understand the fear by people, if they see such people, since already Sextortion
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/399
is huge problematic (=you don't see the real person behind), but people could avoid that using the brain

With a Burqa you don't know at all who is behind that, if they have weapons or whatever, so between all type of dresses, this is the worst (from a point of security ...)
BUT people can have weapons etc. even just wearing a jacket ... so this doesn't directly mean Burqa worst than Jacket or whatever.

Like with 🤡, we need to remember, that Burqa can hidden criminals better ... so at the end the police has no idea who the criminal is ...

Plus there are different types of veils
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/571

France’s hijab ban for its athletes at 2024 Olympics draws international condemnation https://perma.cc/UC9J-T94S

UN rights agency slams France's decision to bar its 2024 Olympic athletes from wearing headscarf https://perma.cc/2MJP-3Z4Q

French education minister announces ban on Islamic abayas in schools https://perma.cc/YFT2-CZ83

TIMELINE: FRANCE’S TARGETING OF MUSLIM WOMEN’S DRESS
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/573
https://perma.cc/NWJ9-HERE
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Scumond da cuvrir la fatscha - Islam Dress in Europe Part 2

Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/422

Nul ne peut, dans l'espace public, porter une tenue destinée à dissimuler son visage https://perma.cc/3Q3T-GFUW

Interdiction du voile : retour sur 20 ans de législation https://perma.cc/T8T8-L49F

Le gouvernement français interdit l'abaya à l'école au nom de la laïcité https://perma.cc/XZL9-2ETA

e) we just noticed now, that even Switzerland banned that. We had no idea ...

Checking if this was true from
French ban on face covering https://perma.cc/T4M9-NNVJ

Burka wearers in Switzerland to be fined up to CHF1,000 https://perma.cc/AF8J-FURD

On March 7, 2021, Swiss voters approved by a vote of 51.21%–48.79% a popular initiative that prohibits covering one’s face in public, with some enumerated exceptions. Voter turnout was 51.40% https://perma.cc/4WBD-8X6M

On March 7, voters approved a constitutional amendment that bans full facial coverings, including the burqa and niqab, in public spaces. The ban did not include facial coverings worn for health, security, or climatic reasons, or at religious sites. At year’s end, The Federal Council was drafting a new article in the criminal code that would implement the constitutional amendment https://perma.cc/TJ8A-6NYD

Swiss ‘burka ban’ accepted by slim majority https://perma.cc/WE3U-38NP
We missed this at all ...

🇩🇪 https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/574
🇫🇷 https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/575
🇮🇹 https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/576

UN calls Swiss burka ban ‘restriction of fundamental freedoms’ https://perma.cc/LHM7-RENU

The top European Union court has ruled that member states can prohibit their employees from wearing signs of religious belief https://perma.cc/AT6Z-2N6P
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Islam Dress in Europe Part 3

Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/422

So in conclusion:
like we said previously related to prisoners / criminals / migrants / trans women
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/565
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/566

we need to remember that there are human rights for both part, those wearing that, but even the other (means those that could get raped by rapers once released for example ...)

So we don't need to just see one side ... because as always it's complex ...

Such laws, and we don't say that because just few minutes ago we discovered that Switzerland banned it, have the goal in part to keep our population safe, BUT this doesn't solve criminality, because not all such people are criminals ...

Like said, this could help police with the identification, but there are still other ways to show a fake faces in public ...

Carnival and similar things are other example where people could exactly do the same ...

But already make up is enough ...

One thing is sure.

It's not a discrimination if police want to control such people more than other.
At the end no one know what they are hiding.

So police has the right to control all people with the goal to keep us safe!

As always, the answer is "depends"

We still don't agree with that, but we understand that too ...

Plus it depends "what get banned?" "Do they ban all type of Islam wears?" Banning Hijab is different than banning Burka ...

We say this even if we believe that religion is just 💩. At the end yes, religion is full of bullshit ... BUT at the same time everyone can follow what he wants ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/333
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MuslimTerrorists/126
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/753
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/754

So there is a difference between saying religion contains bullshit (which is a fact) and discriminating people based on thing that has nothing to do with science / facts (Islam dress is one of this). At the end wearing Hijab or not does make 0 difference for our security ...
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why France is trying to ban Hijab too.

Well, because this can be used in similar way like a Burka ...

But remember ... it's enough to wear a jacket + a face mask + a scarf or a covid mask + a beannie or hood to be exactly the same like a Muslim ...

So in Alan Walker and other dj TikToker style

Without considering that you could use bodysuites, make up, glasses, and many other things to cover your body / face by getting the exact same results.

This is why we don't agree with that, especially related to Hijab ...

Last point, if we want to check that from another point of view: like COVID mask make people looking more hot and attractive (this has been confirmed with scientific studies too! and obviously it depends from person to person ...) the same exact thing happens with Islam dress ...

Since they cover part of the body, people are more attractive than what maybe they really are ... exactly like it happens with people wearing hoddies, other clothing, etc. because people have a different idea (imagination) of what the person look in reality ...

Once they remove such clothes, maybe they remain disappointed. Obviously the opposite can happen too, where you are disappointed looking to their clothes and once removed, you see the opposite.

Well, now obviously this is not a reason to ban or not such dresses, but still a point that many people always forget.

Conclusion: if people wear Hijab, they are not more terrorists than what Alan Walker and co. are wearing! Remember that and NEVER forget that ...

But there are many other dj with masks: Sickickmusic, Marshmello, Angerfist ... and YouTubers ...

Go to part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/422
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What decent soldiers look like? Like this one!

We prefer to have 3 of such dudes, than 100000 who just have fear to control their boss / celebs / politicians / CEOs or whatever ... or simply keep their 🙈🙉🙊 closed ...

No matter which position a person has, he can be a danger ... so EVERYONE should be controlled!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TerrorismTelegram/564

The reality, THIS STILL DOESN'T HAPPEN AT ALL IN 2023, were people just say "yes, he is my friend", "i know him", "it's fine ...", etc.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/400

This is one of many reasons why crimes are happening. Because in reality YOU DON'T KNOW ANYONE. You don't really know even your best friend ... you only think to know him ...

Obviously this has not the goal to create mass panic, but more that people need to stop trust other people like chickens ...

No matter if there is Elon Musk, Jens Stoltenberg, António Guterres, other politicians, CEOs, influencers, celebrities or whatever!

ALL PEOPLE NEED TO GET CONTROLLED!

Exactly like it happened in this scene or
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SwitzerlandFacts/56

We need to improve safety NOW! no exception is allowed!!!

This should be implement has law in every single country! not that everyone can do the shit he wants ... If there is a security control, ALL need to be controlled!
No matter if we support Telegram against the bullshit journalists write related to Terrorism on Telegram, because at the end we STAND FOR FACTS!, we request that:

- PAVEL DUROV SHOULD REALLY START TO BAN GERMAN TERRORISTS! and other bullshit related things

It's time that Pavel Durov gives less shit to such things, like he did previously with our multiple requests to remove all Italian spam (that is still available), rape channels, etc.

It's fine to have freedom of speech, but there is still a limit.

- Our governments start to sentence bullshit as a serious crime! no matter who is sharing such bullshit.

- Our governments start to sentence properly all people closing their eyes in front of crimes ... no matter if this is against human, animal or planet rights!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/39
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/41
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The real question is "Is Transformers for 🇵🇸, 🇮🇱 or 🇮🇱🇵🇸 or he gives a 💩?" 😆
Meanwhile just think the Breivik theory "all Islam people need to convert their religion or we will bring back them to their homes" ...

Probably he has not considered the fact, that this is impossible to do at all, even if such no sense theory would be true ...

If you try to do such thing, you probably escalate a world war, if already now there is just a chaos for a small country. Palestine, having a population size pretty similar to Norway ..., but still involving most countries in the world ...

And this is just about Palestine, then there are all other Islamic people ...

So Breivik, your theory cannot be implemented at all ...

Without talking about the crazy no sense idea of the German terrorist ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TerrorismTelegram/560
Well, we need to update our previous statement.

Both Germany and Italy are a shame for Europe.

Germany especially for using Telegram as terrorist, Italy for mass applauding terror attacks, like we found now ... and the police allowed such thing without doing anything too!

Thanks god not all people are so ...

No matter what, such countries were already listed as terroristic mind countries, near 🇫🇷, 40 years ago ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/432
Europe is under attack! from multiple point of views to be honest:
- Unpayable financial government debts
- Terrorism
- Climate change, where most people still give a shit
- People ignorance
- Laws and human rights that NEED TO CHANGE NOW!

but obviously in this project, is more about terrorism, since for the other things we had already released or are releasing projects.