Charles Stanley
A creepy FTM pastor ➡️ a biological female deceiver
An oval skull
A vertical forehead
Small, flat facial features
Short arms
A short humerus bone
Flat cheeks
No brow bone
No square jaw
A female energy
A creepy FTM pastor ➡️ a biological female deceiver
An oval skull
A vertical forehead
Small, flat facial features
Short arms
A short humerus bone
Flat cheeks
No brow bone
No square jaw
A female energy
Pastor Michael Todd
Short arms
A short humerus bone
Large hips
A female Q angle
A female vibe
Female facial features
Short arms
A short humerus bone
Large hips
A female Q angle
A female vibe
Female facial features
Katy Perry, male skeletal markers and her mother pastor Keith Hudson, female skeletal markers.
Compare the abominations.
Compare the abominations.
Greg Locke
Short arms
A short humerus
Hips
An oval skull
Close together, small flat facial features
The female vibe
This female fraud is a pastor of the Global Vision Bible Church.
Global Vision 🤣
Short arms
A short humerus
Hips
An oval skull
Close together, small flat facial features
The female vibe
This female fraud is a pastor of the Global Vision Bible Church.
Global Vision 🤣
Forwarded from Em
To measure the damage these entities are inflicting on mankind, consider the question:
If you, a genuine man, were to discover that another "man" who was your boss (or pastor, or team leader, teacher, coach, mentor in the business world, etc. (and you looked up to 'him" like a "father-figure, someone who you thought modelled success, etc.)) was actually a female entity, would you be devastated? Would it affect you in any way? Would it cause you emotional distress? Would you act differently upon said discovery?
Now considering the answer to this question do you think we can BEGIN to establish the harm that is being caused? Do you think we could begin to establish that there is a good faith basis for disclosure, such that: if these entities "desire" to continue interactions with mankind and to continue to have influence upon mankind, they must provide disclosure and if they do not agree to such disclosure then they necessarily agree that their position as to mankind is adverse and not a friendship and not trustworthy (not to be relied upon as true)?
Their practices then are rightly discerned to be deceptive practices as they agree that they intend for mankind to perceive them as other than they actually are.
As such, is there a basis to present to them (individually, case by case basis...) a request for disclosure?
If you, a genuine man, were to discover that another "man" who was your boss (or pastor, or team leader, teacher, coach, mentor in the business world, etc. (and you looked up to 'him" like a "father-figure, someone who you thought modelled success, etc.)) was actually a female entity, would you be devastated? Would it affect you in any way? Would it cause you emotional distress? Would you act differently upon said discovery?
Now considering the answer to this question do you think we can BEGIN to establish the harm that is being caused? Do you think we could begin to establish that there is a good faith basis for disclosure, such that: if these entities "desire" to continue interactions with mankind and to continue to have influence upon mankind, they must provide disclosure and if they do not agree to such disclosure then they necessarily agree that their position as to mankind is adverse and not a friendship and not trustworthy (not to be relied upon as true)?
Their practices then are rightly discerned to be deceptive practices as they agree that they intend for mankind to perceive them as other than they actually are.
As such, is there a basis to present to them (individually, case by case basis...) a request for disclosure?