It has been brought to my attention that some of you may have received a message which appears to be from this channel. Possibly talking about banks or other financial establishments. This is a scammer/bot. Please delete and block. This channel cannot send you private messages. If you receive a private message from someone at this channel, it would be from their personal account, and would not match the photo the channel is using. If you need to reach anyone here, you can do so by joining the chat and posting there to get our attention.
Thanks. Happy Sunday!
Thanks. Happy Sunday!
👍12
If you were previously booted from the chat, chances are it's because you didn't pass Rose's bot check! All you have to do is re-join the chat and scroll all the way down. Once you see the welcome message to you from Rose, look underneath it for the button to prove you are not a bot. Rose didn't ban you forever, just booted you for the time being because you didn't prove life. 🇺🇸
To join the chat, use this link, then click under Rose's welcome message.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElectionEducationChat
To join the chat, use this link, then click under Rose's welcome message.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElectionEducationChat
👍5👎1
For mail in ballots, does your state do anything to "confirm" the person submitting the ballot is the correct registered voter? Which method is used? Multiple answers ok, if applicable in your state.
Anonymous Poll
48%
Signature verification (match sig with one on file)
2%
Witnesses required (witnesses are confirmed)
3%
Witness(es) required (not confirmed)
12%
ID required (send a copy?)
8%
Voter signs a declaration, but signature not compared to anything on file
2%
Other method (please share in comments)
17%
Not sure
4%
No mail in ballots allowed
20%
There is absolutely no verification, it's a free for all with mail in ballots
1%
Not voting as a form of protest
❤3
A Smurf is someone who breaks down large amounts of $ into several smaller transactions to evade regulations. In other words, smurfing is a money laundering method.
Evidence of smurfing is all over the data published by the FEC. Our elections are bought and paid for with dark money by the Marxist/communist loving criminals.
It's funneled through many many donors in small amounts to make it appear that certain candidates have lots of support and lots of donations.
Act Blue is in the middle of the whole operation! (There are several others, but they have NOTHING on Act Blue.)
This MUST be stopped!
Evidence of smurfing is all over the data published by the FEC. Our elections are bought and paid for with dark money by the Marxist/communist loving criminals.
It's funneled through many many donors in small amounts to make it appear that certain candidates have lots of support and lots of donations.
Act Blue is in the middle of the whole operation! (There are several others, but they have NOTHING on Act Blue.)
This MUST be stopped!
❤13🔥5
This is dedicated to a couple patriots who are actively fighting for a higher standard within our elections. Chris came to me with a concern, and shared Shawn's video. Using the information provided and my own understanding of the process, we present to you the issue of insufficient authentication for mail in ballots.
"It is critical to understand genuine authentication, and there is a real need to reveal why elections require genuine authentication." @Chris_Arsenault
Shawn Smith with Cause of America:
https://rumble.com/v29tphu-elections-101-authentication-2-step-vs.-2-factor.html
"It is critical to understand genuine authentication, and there is a real need to reveal why elections require genuine authentication." @Chris_Arsenault
Shawn Smith with Cause of America:
https://rumble.com/v29tphu-elections-101-authentication-2-step-vs.-2-factor.html
🔥14👍3
Does your elections office know you by name yet? If not, you are doing something wrong! Get down there, be present, ask questions, and let them know you are paying attention!
👏13
Forwarded from Peter Bernegger
The strange world of Federal Elections Commission (FEC) data: the data downloaded from their website versus an API tied into their database can show two different results for the same query; while their website is shown on your monitor, their data can change while you’re watching it (we have screenshots); a contribution which already occurred can be dated in the future; they double count some things; they incorrectly count some things; they count transactions fees as a separate contribution; they have a State named “ZZ”.
When was the last time the FEC audited its own database? And, audited any reports coming to them from PAC’s, committees, or campaigns?
~ Peter Bernegger
When was the last time the FEC audited its own database? And, audited any reports coming to them from PAC’s, committees, or campaigns?
~ Peter Bernegger
🔥8👍1