The highest CO2 emissions from tourism was calculated to be from aviation, with 71% of total CO2 travel emissions. This is followed by waterborne navigation (ferries and cruises; 21%) and road transport (private cars; 8%).

Aviation is the largest contributing sub-sector, mainly owing to the large number of travellers and the long distances travelled. The highest emissions factors per passenger kilometre were found for cruise ships and ferries transporting cars in addition to passengers.

Total CO2 emissions are dominated by Norwegians travelling for HOLIDAYS!!!!! (= NOT BUSINESS!), which contributes 47% of total emissions. The largest share of Norwegian travel emissions is from international aviation (2 286 kt CO2 ) to warm destinations such as Spain, Greece, Thailand and Turkey.

International tourists who visit Norway make for 3 273 kt CO2, of which 2 220 kt is from aviation and 949 kt from waterborne navigation.

The tourist market with highest emissions is Germany with 441 kt CO2 of which 15%, 48% and 37% come from aviation, cruises and ferries, respectively. Passengers from USA cause the second highest emissions, mainly from aviation (349 kt CO2) and cruise ships (56 kt CO2).

Of the total tourist emissions, holiday travel contributes 78%.

In 2020, restrictions were put on travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a reduction in mobility. As a consequence, CO2 emissions experienced a massive reduction of 60%, which was sustained from late March to at least the end the year.

Aviation and cruise ship emissions had the largest emission decreases, whereas road transport emissions in July 2020 were at the same level or even higher than in pre- COVID years.

Cruise ships have the highest emission factor, but the emission factor from ferries is of similar magnitude when one also takes into account the transport of cars.

Emissions range from 93 to 615 kg of CO2 per passenger-day, or from 199 to 1314 g CO2 per passenger-km, depending on the size, the age and the ship’s capacity configuration

How you inform yourself about the topic you tweet 🤦‍♂️

When @BenShapiroBullshit meets @ElonMuskBullshit ...

I try to say things are interesting and fun ...

Facts don't need to be funny or interesting ...

There must be some reason why so many people are following me

Yes, like people follow a pornostar for the pussy, a celebrity or TikTok star for the tits and the body, most people follow you just because you have money

but remember MONEY != FACTS!

Have opinion on ...

Yes, this is the point OPINIONS != FACTS!

Sometimes they are wrong, sometimes they are right ...

🤦‍♂️ ... seriously?! and how you know they are wrong or right, if you don't search anything about such things?! you just say what you think!

Make a mistake, don't worry about it ...

Well if you kill your space flight tourists with a mistake DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT, it was just a mistake, or better a double mistake, near the mistake that space flight is just POLLUTION! and a way for Elon to get more money
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskBullshit/198

NEVER AGAIN ...

What the hell has Elon Musk to do with Israel and Palestine ...?

AGAIN ELON MUSK HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT! HE JUST OWN TONS OF MONEY! BASTA!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskBullshit/172

Especially for the top four emitters, it is hard to distinguish between a business or private flight, due to numerous associated aircraft. For those who own only one or two private jets (e.g., Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk), their movements are somewhat more certain.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/175
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/159
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/173
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/144
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/223
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/54

For example, Figure 10 shows around 50 tips carried out by Elon Musk in March 2020 alone, which count for approximately 600 tons of CO2. Notably, this represents more than 120 average global inhabitant CO2 emissions in 2020.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/56

The energy needs for cell production and cell assembly dominate the climate impacts of battery production for both Nissan and Tesla.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MissionPlaneta/57
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MissionPlaneta/58

The production related climate impact would be reduced significantly (by 62%) if battery cells were produced using Swedish electricity compared to European electricity, as CO2 emissions from energy use dominate cell production climate impact.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/1170

The climate impacts are by no means extreme: 53 and 499 g CO2eq. kWh−1 for low voltage used for propulsion and 45 and 484 g CO2eq. kWh−1 for high voltage used for production, respectively, while some markets have climate impacts well over 1000 g CO2eq. kWh−1 [29] and green certified electricity has a possibility of less than 10 g CO2eq. kWh−1