CO2-Gesetz Resultate, wieder einmal sind die älteren Menschen eher auf Ja https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/208 , "reiche Leute" nicht wirklich positiv darauf (ja 41-42%, aber Leute die ⅓ verdienen waren auch auf 39% ..., zudem waren 5k - 9k eher negativ darauf ...).
Beim Klima- und Innovationsgesetz war es nicht viel besser, wo tendenziell kaum Differenz gab, wo die "Reiche" sehr ähnlich wie die Anderen lagen, bzw. die Anzahl bestimmt dagegen grosser war. Zudem lag 7-9K wieder tiefer. Zwischen alle, nur die 3-5k waren "eher negativ".
Bzgl. der Massentierhaltungsinitiative hatte wir schon berichtet https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/153
Also dort gab es ein klar "Nein" bei den Reichen.
Als Zusammenfassung können wir sehen, dass generell (aber nicht immer) "arme Menschen" eher für das Klima / die Tiere bereit sind mehr Geld zu bezahlen, was jedoch reiche Leute nicht bereit sind zu tun, oder eher auf ähnlicher Weise, obwohl sie 3x mehr verdienen! Zudem können wir auch sehen, dass generell ältere Menschen am Anfang sich für diese Thematiken interessieren, jedoch dann bei der richtigen Abstimmung eher die Meinungen ein bisschen ändern.
Beim Klima- und Innovationsgesetz war es nicht viel besser, wo tendenziell kaum Differenz gab, wo die "Reiche" sehr ähnlich wie die Anderen lagen, bzw. die Anzahl bestimmt dagegen grosser war. Zudem lag 7-9K wieder tiefer. Zwischen alle, nur die 3-5k waren "eher negativ".
Bzgl. der Massentierhaltungsinitiative hatte wir schon berichtet https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/153
Also dort gab es ein klar "Nein" bei den Reichen.
Als Zusammenfassung können wir sehen, dass generell (aber nicht immer) "arme Menschen" eher für das Klima / die Tiere bereit sind mehr Geld zu bezahlen, was jedoch reiche Leute nicht bereit sind zu tun, oder eher auf ähnlicher Weise, obwohl sie 3x mehr verdienen! Zudem können wir auch sehen, dass generell ältere Menschen am Anfang sich für diese Thematiken interessieren, jedoch dann bei der richtigen Abstimmung eher die Meinungen ein bisschen ändern.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sorry, it's wrong.
Rich people first trash money for shit, pollute our planet with their jets, yachts, luxury cars, buy fashion products derived from animals, giving a shit to human rights, eat or buy (to keep as toys / accessories) illegal imported animals, do space tourism by polluting a lot, die by visiting Titanic, say "poor people are the cause of pollution", try to create motivation bullshit how to live with few money (without having idea what this means), criticize poor countries that their fertility rates are too low by saying other bullshit, don't declare their money and don't pay taxes https://perma.cc/AU4N-7XRQ https://perma.cc/8LYC-HS5B, act like if they are doing all the job (when in reality they delegate all work to their employees!* and don't even take their responsibility when needed), just leave a brand as CEO if they do shit (just few of many examples https://perma.cc/S526-XNNT, https://perma.cc/8WG4-XDZQ), prefer to fire people, instead of cutting their overpaid salary for doing almost nothing, etc. AFTER THAT they invest money and use the rest for buying things, even if they don't really need to invest money, because they already own millions of dollars, that once they die, their fake 25 years old wife or their kids can get by thinking "we are so happy he died, finally i got the money" but say in the public "this was a tragic event, we will miss him a lot ..."
Obviously there are few decent CEO or rich people too, one of this is Pavel Durov, other are Mack family, Roger Federer (more the mentality, less about pollution ...), etc.
*except if the real CEO is still doing the same job, like when he launched the brand ... but currently big brands change CEO like whores change their clients, and when they do shit, they even get bonus or other things ... which is just a shame
Rich people first trash money for shit, pollute our planet with their jets, yachts, luxury cars, buy fashion products derived from animals, giving a shit to human rights, eat or buy (to keep as toys / accessories) illegal imported animals, do space tourism by polluting a lot, die by visiting Titanic, say "poor people are the cause of pollution", try to create motivation bullshit how to live with few money (without having idea what this means), criticize poor countries that their fertility rates are too low by saying other bullshit, don't declare their money and don't pay taxes https://perma.cc/AU4N-7XRQ https://perma.cc/8LYC-HS5B, act like if they are doing all the job (when in reality they delegate all work to their employees!* and don't even take their responsibility when needed), just leave a brand as CEO if they do shit (just few of many examples https://perma.cc/S526-XNNT, https://perma.cc/8WG4-XDZQ), prefer to fire people, instead of cutting their overpaid salary for doing almost nothing, etc. AFTER THAT they invest money and use the rest for buying things, even if they don't really need to invest money, because they already own millions of dollars, that once they die, their fake 25 years old wife or their kids can get by thinking "we are so happy he died, finally i got the money" but say in the public "this was a tragic event, we will miss him a lot ..."
Obviously there are few decent CEO or rich people too, one of this is Pavel Durov, other are Mack family, Roger Federer (more the mentality, less about pollution ...), etc.
*except if the real CEO is still doing the same job, like when he launched the brand ... but currently big brands change CEO like whores change their clients, and when they do shit, they even get bonus or other things ... which is just a shame
Rocket launches more polluting than all other sources https://perma.cc/WBK8-T2NF
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Meet the $15M Milestone Award Winners
and now let we comment this video / project by Elon Musk, but first let we share more details:
XPRIZE Carbon Removal is aimed at tackling the biggest threat facing humanity - fighting climate change and rebalancing Earth’s carbon cycle. Funded by Elon Musk and the Musk Foundation, this $100M competition is the largest incentive prize in history, an extraordinary milestone.
Team registration opened with the announcement of the full competition guidelines on Earth Day, April 22nd 2021. The competition will last for 4 years through Earth Day 2025.
To win the prize teams must demonstrate CO2 removal at the 1000 tonne per year scale, model costs at the million ton per year (megatonne) scale, and present a plan to sustainably reach gigatonne per year scale in future. In the first phase of the competition, teams must demonstrate the key component of their carbon removal solution, at a minimum.
The $100M prize purse will be distributed as follows:
After 1 year of competition the judges will review all submissions received by that time and award up to 15 Milestone Prizes of $1 million each.
After 4 years, judges will select the winners:
Bullet point
$50 million paid to the single Grand Prize Winner
Bullet point
$30 million to be distributed among up to 3 runners up
XPRIZE will also award up to US$5M to student teams in the Fall of 2021.
and now let we comment this video / project by Elon Musk, but first let we share more details:
XPRIZE Carbon Removal is aimed at tackling the biggest threat facing humanity - fighting climate change and rebalancing Earth’s carbon cycle. Funded by Elon Musk and the Musk Foundation, this $100M competition is the largest incentive prize in history, an extraordinary milestone.
Team registration opened with the announcement of the full competition guidelines on Earth Day, April 22nd 2021. The competition will last for 4 years through Earth Day 2025.
To win the prize teams must demonstrate CO2 removal at the 1000 tonne per year scale, model costs at the million ton per year (megatonne) scale, and present a plan to sustainably reach gigatonne per year scale in future. In the first phase of the competition, teams must demonstrate the key component of their carbon removal solution, at a minimum.
The $100M prize purse will be distributed as follows:
After 1 year of competition the judges will review all submissions received by that time and award up to 15 Milestone Prizes of $1 million each.
After 4 years, judges will select the winners:
Bullet point
$50 million paid to the single Grand Prize Winner
Bullet point
$30 million to be distributed among up to 3 runners up
XPRIZE will also award up to US$5M to student teams in the Fall of 2021.
First at all, better doing something than nothing, but still doesn't mean that Elon Musk is really focused on climate change because
1) he own 246000 mio and wasted 4000 mio with Twitter! this means 0.04% of all money he owns or 2.5% of the money he wasted with Twitter, so it just ridiculous low https://perma.cc/Y2CF-HLUQ
2) Biden announced a $600 million investment to combat climate change | June 19, 2023 —> 6x more than Elon Musk, even if Biden did a great shit with the Willow Project
3) "Unlike most pure electric passenger cars, Tesla Model 3 not only has a GHG emissions higher than the average GHG emissions of same class ICEV in the raw material acquisition stage and production stage, but also has a GHG emissions value higher than the average GHG emissions of same class ICEV in the usage stage." from Carbon Footprint Study of Tesla Model 3
See next post
1) he own 246000 mio and wasted 4000 mio with Twitter! this means 0.04% of all money he owns or 2.5% of the money he wasted with Twitter, so it just ridiculous low https://perma.cc/Y2CF-HLUQ
2) Biden announced a $600 million investment to combat climate change | June 19, 2023 —> 6x more than Elon Musk, even if Biden did a great shit with the Willow Project
3) "Unlike most pure electric passenger cars, Tesla Model 3 not only has a GHG emissions higher than the average GHG emissions of same class ICEV in the raw material acquisition stage and production stage, but also has a GHG emissions value higher than the average GHG emissions of same class ICEV in the usage stage." from Carbon Footprint Study of Tesla Model 3
See next post
4) Conclusions from "Analysis of Electric Vehicles Efficiency and their Influence on Environmental Pollution"
5) "In the production of Tesla cars, more pollution is produced than when producing ICE cars, but considering the entire life cycle of the product, Tesla ́s overall GHG pollution is lower than any ICE car ... Another fact to consider is the source of energy used during the manufacturing process ... How can tesla be more sustainable? The use of Li-ion batteries must stop. Many universities and organisations are working to find a better solution, for example salt-based batteries. If Tesla cannot substitute the use of Li-ion batteries, it should invest in research in the topic, make the batteries recyclable and long lasting and find sustainable sources of lithium" from "How sustainable is Tesla? - University of South-Eastern Norway"
See next post
5) "In the production of Tesla cars, more pollution is produced than when producing ICE cars, but considering the entire life cycle of the product, Tesla ́s overall GHG pollution is lower than any ICE car ... Another fact to consider is the source of energy used during the manufacturing process ... How can tesla be more sustainable? The use of Li-ion batteries must stop. Many universities and organisations are working to find a better solution, for example salt-based batteries. If Tesla cannot substitute the use of Li-ion batteries, it should invest in research in the topic, make the batteries recyclable and long lasting and find sustainable sources of lithium" from "How sustainable is Tesla? - University of South-Eastern Norway"
See next post
6) Pictures from "The Renewable Hydrogen–Methane (RHYME) Transportation Fuel: A Practical First Step in the Realization of the Hydrogen Economy"
7) Now we already said that Tesla is not the first electric car, that now almost everyone produce electric cars and that "Tesla is founded by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning" not Elon Musk https://perma.cc/NSA3-PN62 . If we put all such infos together, Tesla cannot be considered as "a climate change" oriented interest by Elon Musk, especially because Tesla at the end is still not the perfect climate neutral car and many alternative are available
8) Elon Musk obsession for the Space Tourism business ... check all previous posts
9) Elon Musk pollution with jets etc., like previously wrote https://perma.cc/9CXK-L9QP or https://perma.cc/C7UQ-UUCW or check https://news.1rj.ru/str/+DVhwNTlOodY4OGFh
10) Elon Musk tweets false climate claim https://perma.cc/NVY9-886W
11) ...
So in conclusion he gives the idea that he is doing something for the planet, but at the end HE IS NOT DOING THAT! Even if he gives 100 mio (which is low compared to the money he owns), the real people that make a change are other people, not Elon Musk. Elon Musk just gave money. All countries, EU, etc. should do that too, if they still don't do that.
Plus Elon Musk is checking a solution to remove CO2 (using other people ideas), but first he should stop to produce CO2.
7) Now we already said that Tesla is not the first electric car, that now almost everyone produce electric cars and that "Tesla is founded by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning" not Elon Musk https://perma.cc/NSA3-PN62 . If we put all such infos together, Tesla cannot be considered as "a climate change" oriented interest by Elon Musk, especially because Tesla at the end is still not the perfect climate neutral car and many alternative are available
8) Elon Musk obsession for the Space Tourism business ... check all previous posts
9) Elon Musk pollution with jets etc., like previously wrote https://perma.cc/9CXK-L9QP or https://perma.cc/C7UQ-UUCW or check https://news.1rj.ru/str/+DVhwNTlOodY4OGFh
10) Elon Musk tweets false climate claim https://perma.cc/NVY9-886W
11) ...
So in conclusion he gives the idea that he is doing something for the planet, but at the end HE IS NOT DOING THAT! Even if he gives 100 mio (which is low compared to the money he owns), the real people that make a change are other people, not Elon Musk. Elon Musk just gave money. All countries, EU, etc. should do that too, if they still don't do that.
Plus Elon Musk is checking a solution to remove CO2 (using other people ideas), but first he should stop to produce CO2.
For those that want more about the point 7, here a comparison between cars (from "Vertically Integrated Supply Chain of Batteries, Electric Vehicles, and Charging Infrastructure: A Review of Three Milestone Projects from Theory of Constraints Perspective") or more about electric cars (from "How technology, recycling, and policy can mitigate supply risks to the long-term transition to zero-emission vehicles")