Formula Data Analysis – Telegram
Formula Data Analysis
3.38K subscribers
1.42K photos
10 videos
3 files
915 links
All the analyses of the world’s most famous page on Formula 1 telemetry: join NOW to understand F1 better!🏎📈
Download Telegram
JAPANESE GP - FP2: DATA ANALYSIS

🟠 McL quickest thanks to unmatched downforce: 1-2 in Sector 2, NOR quickest in Sector 3 (who had the most margin, too)!

1) AERO CHARACTERISTICS
🟠 McL: highest downforce
🟣 Alpine: lowest drag
🔴 Ferrari/ 🟢 Mercedes: medium load

2) BEST SECTORS
LEC quickest in S1 (gaining on the main straight).
NOR quickest in the rest of the lap.
ANT was as slow in S1/2 as he was quick in S3!

3) IDEAL LAPS
Not only was NOR the quickest, he also had the most margin in the pocket! (Next: LEC and GAS)

The ideal lap (1:27.726) is already over 4 tenths quicker than last year's pole!

The pole is McLaren's to lose; check out the first comment for extra.
10👍2
Japanese GP - Qualifying | Corner Analysis

VER gained 0.112s in the last chicane, getting pole by just 0.012s! 🔥

- 🟠NOR lifted and braked early; 🔴LEC less so; 🔵VER did for last.
- VER had to brake the most (largest longitudinal accel.) Yet, he still made the corner (largest lateral accel.).
- Yet, his exit was no worse than LEC's.
🔥10👏2
Japanese GP - Qualifying | Aero Characteristics

The race could be wet, at least in part! 🌧

In that case, teams running a more loaded aero setup (McL, Haas) should gain over those that focused more on reducing drag (Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull): the drag penalty will be lower, and downforce will be even more important.
🔥122👍1
JAPANESE GP - RACE PACE

🟠 NOR and 🔵 VER were quickest, and had identical pace!

PIA was just 0.03 s/lap slower on average but was quicker than them at the end (yet slower than ANT, who had a fresher tyre)!

🟢 ANT 0.02s/lap quicker than 🔴 LEC.

1-2) McL/RBR (NOR/VER)
3) Mercedes (ANT) +0.26 s/lap
4) Ferrari (LEC) +0.28 s/lap
5) Racing Bulls (HAD +0.59 s/lap
6) Williams (ALB) +0.62 s/lap
7) Aston (ALO) +0.91 s/lap
8) Haas (BEA) +0.93 s/lap
9) Alpine (GAS) +0.94 s/lap
10) Sauber (DOO) +1.38 s/lap
10👍4
Japanese GP - Tyre Degradation

One of F1's main problems: the Hard tyre was FASTER than the Medium — and lasted longer too! 💡

The Medium just can't handle the stress, so drivers can't push as much, making it slower. 🚨

Just one viable strategy ➡️Boring races

What's YOUR opinion? 🤔
14🤓3👍1
BAHRAIN PREVIEW

3 DRS zones, 2 of which follow a slow corner: overtakes will be plenty (unlike in Suzuka)!

Like Suzuka, however, the race will be a 1-stopper due to the hardest compounds (C1-C3).

🟠 McL’s high drag will be handy in Sector 2;
🔵 RBR’s low drag in Sectors 1 and 3.

🔴 Ferrari is finally bringing a new floor, which would solve (part of) their issues: in 2018 and 2019 they finally regained performance once in Bahrain.

📸: @pirellisport
13👍5🔥5
BAHRAIN GP - REAR WINGS

Bahrain requires less loaded wings than Suzuka - Despite that, McL and Ferrari are using the same ones seen in Japan.

Mercedes' top speed was the highest in quali; despite that, they've further reduced the wing load.

RBR, instead, has increased it!💡

Many unexpected choices: expect some teams to change spec for qualifying.

📸 @AlbertFabrega
8👍2🥰1
BAHRAIN GP - PRACTICE 1
TOP SPEEDS vs 2024 QUALIFYING

Mercedes is running a very unloaded rear wing this year, a choice maybe influenced by having the worst top speed last year!

They are 8km/h faster already (partly due to wind), yet there are still 4 faster teams!

McL's downforce is excellent: having high drag is a good tradeoff .👌
👍71
JAPANESE GP - RACE
THE EFFECT OF DIRTY AIR - VISUALISED! 💡

🟠 NOR following 🔵 VER closely through the mighty 130R corner on Lap 3

The slipstream reduced the aero forces:
1) Before the corner: less drag➡️NOR gaining;
2) Into the corner: less downforce➡️NOR had to lift 20%, losing 6km/h; his lateral acceleration was 0.6g lower than VER's!

Notice that VER remained full-throttle, yet still lost speed, due to:
1) Energy dissipation caused by cornering forces🛞;
2) Decreased ERS deployment🪫(Not smart to deploy energy right before a braking point)!

Made via @JMP_software
11
BAHRAIN GP - PRACTICE 2 DATA ANALYSIS

FP2 data shows that 🟠 McL's key to performance was... unmatched downforce!💡

1) HEAD TO HEAD:
🟠PIA lost 0.25s to 🟢RUS in the first 2 straight due to much higher drag (7km/h top speed deficit).
His downforce advantage was insane, though: check out how much less he could lift in T5/6/7! He also reached much greater braking g's.

To put things into perspective:
The best non-McL driver (RUS, P3 in FP2) lost over 0.7s in sector 2 to PIA!

2) TOP SPEEDS:
Two McL cars at the bottom. ⚪️BEA reached 332km/h (+14km/h vs NOR)!
It seems that it was due to a higher engine mode (gaining on all straights vs his longer runs).

3) AERO PERFORMANCE:
Most teams are close together, around the center of the graph (average characteristics).
McL is a total outlier.
10🥰1
BAHRAIN GP - QUALIFYING

Hear this:
No driver had a lower top speed than 🟠PIA, yet he still got the pole! 🤯
His very loaded setup gave him unmatched downforce, losing on the straights but gaining everywhere else!

🟢Merc, 🔴Ferrari, 🟣Alpine, and 🔵RBR behaved similarly.

[Each team's best lap considered]
👍91