Forwarded from Formula Data Analysis
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
So... I did something😬
I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!🤩
You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!🏎
Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!
Info in comment👇
I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!🤩
You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!🏎
Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!
Info in comment👇
❤10👍1
Formula Data Analysis
So... I did something😬 I'm teaming up with JMP to organise an F1-themed data analysis summer challenge!🤩 You'll analyse the data from an F1 race: laptimes, compounds, pit stops, speed traps, you name it!🏎 Same data for everyone: may the best among you win!…
The time to join the challenge is running out!
Here’s how to join:
1️⃣ Sign up
2️⃣ Download the free JMP trial + dataset
3️⃣ Submit your visualisation in JMP
4️⃣ Join the live webinar
Click here to join:
https://www.jmp.com/en/offers/summer-challenge/motorsport?utm_source=fdanalysis&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=701Ki000000EZJgIAO
Here’s how to join:
1️⃣ Sign up
2️⃣ Download the free JMP trial + dataset
3️⃣ Submit your visualisation in JMP
4️⃣ Join the live webinar
Click here to join:
https://www.jmp.com/en/offers/summer-challenge/motorsport?utm_source=fdanalysis&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=701Ki000000EZJgIAO
❤7
Formula Data Analysis
HUNGARIAN GP - START ANALYSIS Albon was quickest, right in front of his teammate. The Softs aided Williams' traction (SAI was quickest to 100km/h). The two Haas cars were quickest among those who started on Mediums. HAM was quickest on Hards. RUS had to…
Same data, showing the compound used through colour.
As expected, 🟥Softs had the highest potential, then 🟨Mediums, then ⬜️Hards.
As expected, 🟥Softs had the highest potential, then 🟨Mediums, then ⬜️Hards.
❤10👍2
Performance gains in the ground-effect era have been wild:
~3% less drag, ~12% more high-speed acceleration 😳
📍 Ferrari in Hungary quali:
2022 ➡️2025
✅-2.195s laptime‼️
✅+3km/h top speed
✅+4km/h minimum speed
✅+13km/h in Turn 11‼️
Each year, laptime improved and top speed was higher or equal, but downforce improved the most.
Ferrari cut drag while massively boosting downforce:
- Increasing the top speed from 312 to 315km/h means a ~3% reduction in drag {(312/315)^3 - 1}.
- Increasing the minimum speed in T11 from 228 to 241km/h is a ~12% increase in lateral acceleration {(241/228)^2}, or ~0.5g more!
Made via @JMP_software
~3% less drag, ~12% more high-speed acceleration 😳
📍 Ferrari in Hungary quali:
2022 ➡️2025
✅-2.195s laptime‼️
✅+3km/h top speed
✅+4km/h minimum speed
✅+13km/h in Turn 11‼️
Each year, laptime improved and top speed was higher or equal, but downforce improved the most.
Ferrari cut drag while massively boosting downforce:
- Increasing the top speed from 312 to 315km/h means a ~3% reduction in drag {(312/315)^3 - 1}.
- Increasing the minimum speed in T11 from 228 to 241km/h is a ~12% increase in lateral acceleration {(241/228)^2}, or ~0.5g more!
Made via @JMP_software
❤16👍3🔥3
The most powerful naturally-aspirated #F1 engine ever was... Japanese, likely 🇯🇵
Peak power reached in 2005 (end of 3000cc, 'V10' era)!
Renault ~900hp
Cosworth 915hp
Mercedes ~930hp
Ferrari 920-940hp
Honda >965hp (Last power step in Suzuka)
Toyota >1000hp, detuned to ~960hp for reliability
The straight-line acceleration of these cars was insane, much higher than the current ones' (and did so 20 years ago)!
Compared to current cars:
- Similar peak power;
- Higher end-of-straight power (No ERS, always full power);
- 200kg lighter (600kg, including driver!);
- 20cm narrower track, reducing drag.
Crazy!
Peak power reached in 2005 (end of 3000cc, 'V10' era)!
Renault ~900hp
Cosworth 915hp
Mercedes ~930hp
Ferrari 920-940hp
Honda >965hp (Last power step in Suzuka)
Toyota >1000hp, detuned to ~960hp for reliability
The straight-line acceleration of these cars was insane, much higher than the current ones' (and did so 20 years ago)!
Compared to current cars:
- Similar peak power;
- Higher end-of-straight power (No ERS, always full power);
- 200kg lighter (600kg, including driver!);
- 20cm narrower track, reducing drag.
Crazy!
❤19👍3
Formula Data Analysis
The most powerful naturally-aspirated #F1 engine ever was... Japanese, likely 🇯🇵 Peak power reached in 2005 (end of 3000cc, 'V10' era)! Renault ~900hp Cosworth 915hp Mercedes ~930hp Ferrari 920-940hp Honda >965hp (Last power step in Suzuka) Toyota >1000hp…
The pictures are inverted: Toyota produced ~1000hp but had to be detuned.
❤7👍2🤝1
In 2014 in Barcelona, Caterham’s F1 car was SLOWER than their GP2 car! 🤯
- 1.30.3 for the F1 car.
- 1.29.8 for the GP2 car(0.5s faster)!
#F1 cars became terribly slow in ‘14, and Caterham’s car was terrible all-around!
I explain this strange result in this thread👇
- 1.30.3 for the F1 car.
- 1.29.8 for the GP2 car(0.5s faster)!
#F1 cars became terribly slow in ‘14, and Caterham’s car was terrible all-around!
I explain this strange result in this thread👇
🤯10❤3😨3
Formula Data Analysis
In 2014 in Barcelona, Caterham’s F1 car was SLOWER than their GP2 car! 🤯 - 1.30.3 for the F1 car. - 1.29.8 for the GP2 car(0.5s faster)! #F1 cars became terribly slow in ‘14, and Caterham’s car was terrible all-around! I explain this strange result in this…
F1 cars became terribly slow in 2014.
This was due to:
- New PU➡️Significantly increased mass (+49kg over 2013);
- Lower peak and mean power than the already weak V8s (Considering Caterham’s Renault PU: around 750hp+80hp of KERS for V8, around 600+160hp for V6s);
- Narrower front wing.
This was due to:
- New PU➡️Significantly increased mass (+49kg over 2013);
- Lower peak and mean power than the already weak V8s (Considering Caterham’s Renault PU: around 750hp+80hp of KERS for V8, around 600+160hp for V6s);
- Narrower front wing.
❤8👍1
Formula Data Analysis
F1 cars became terribly slow in 2014. This was due to: - New PU➡️Significantly increased mass (+49kg over 2013); - Lower peak and mean power than the already weak V8s (Considering Caterham’s Renault PU: around 750hp+80hp of KERS for V8, around 600+160hp for…
Caterham, in particular, suffered from the low power of the Renault PU and the very low aerodynamic efficiency (look at how wide, ‘boxy’ and simple their sidepods are. Moreover, the air intakes were HUGE).
They were 4s off the pole!
They were 4s off the pole!
❤7😨3👍1
Formula Data Analysis
Caterham, in particular, suffered from the low power of the Renault PU and the very low aerodynamic efficiency (look at how wide, ‘boxy’ and simple their sidepods are. Moreover, the air intakes were HUGE). They were 4s off the pole!
The GP2s, on the contrary, kept the same performance as the previous years' thanks to stable rules:
- They were, for the first time, lighter than F1 (-3kg, 688kg vs 691kg);
- The engine produced 612hp, around the same as the Combustion Engine of F1 cars (~600hp);
- Same track width.
- They were, for the first time, lighter than F1 (-3kg, 688kg vs 691kg);
- The engine produced 612hp, around the same as the Combustion Engine of F1 cars (~600hp);
- Same track width.
❤9👍1
Formula Data Analysis
The GP2s, on the contrary, kept the same performance as the previous years' thanks to stable rules: - They were, for the first time, lighter than F1 (-3kg, 688kg vs 691kg); - The engine produced 612hp, around the same as the Combustion Engine of F1 cars (~600hp);…
The main advantages of F1 cars were:
- Better acceleration (thanks to better peak power due to the ERS system, which, however, was still inefficient in 2014 for most teams);
- DRS (that is worth several tenths in a fast, high-load track like Barcelona);
- Higher aero complexity.
- Better acceleration (thanks to better peak power due to the ERS system, which, however, was still inefficient in 2014 for most teams);
- DRS (that is worth several tenths in a fast, high-load track like Barcelona);
- Higher aero complexity.
❤7👍2
Formula Data Analysis
The main advantages of F1 cars were: - Better acceleration (thanks to better peak power due to the ERS system, which, however, was still inefficient in 2014 for most teams); - DRS (that is worth several tenths in a fast, high-load track like Barcelona); -…
Consequently, the GP2 pole was good enough to beat FOUR F1 cars!
And what is even more impressive is one team, such as Caterham, having a faster GP2 car than their F1 car. 🤯
Surely the GP2 team was grinning! 🤣
And what is even more impressive is one team, such as Caterham, having a faster GP2 car than their F1 car. 🤯
Surely the GP2 team was grinning! 🤣
🔥11👍2❤1
Formula Data Analysis
Consequently, the GP2 pole was good enough to beat FOUR F1 cars! And what is even more impressive is one team, such as Caterham, having a faster GP2 car than their F1 car. 🤯 Surely the GP2 team was grinning! 🤣
And don’t let all this tech talk distract you from the ‘14 Caterham F1 having an ‘interesting’ shape of the nose.
🤣
🤣
😁10👍3⚡1🤩1🤡1
Formula Data Analysis
And don’t let all this tech talk distract you from the ‘14 Caterham F1 having an ‘interesting’ shape of the nose. 🤣
That's it!
Retweet the thread if you enjoyed this historical curiosity! 🤩
Do you know any other interesting F1 facts? 👀
I'm a Motorsport Performance Engineer: follow my page @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! 🏎
Retweet the thread if you enjoyed this historical curiosity! 🤩
Do you know any other interesting F1 facts? 👀
I'm a Motorsport Performance Engineer: follow my page @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! 🏎
❤8👍1
DUTCH GP - WINGS 🛠
- Medium-high load track;
- Load levels have reduced slightly since ‘22 as the downforce produced by the floors has increased.
Among top teams:
🟠 McL has the deepest, yes narrowest spoon (centre part of the wing emphasised).
⚫️ McL has the most cambered lower plane.
Load levels are not radically diverse.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
- Medium-high load track;
- Load levels have reduced slightly since ‘22 as the downforce produced by the floors has increased.
Among top teams:
🟠 McL has the deepest, yes narrowest spoon (centre part of the wing emphasised).
⚫️ McL has the most cambered lower plane.
Load levels are not radically diverse.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
❤7🔥3
DUTCH GP 📊FP1
1) BEST SECTORS:
🟧 NOR quickest in Sectors 2 and 3.
Where he wasn't (S1), a McL (PIA) was still on top.
🟥 LEC said that Ferrari was 'miles off', and the fact that they weren't competitive in any sector (and that he lost over 7 tents in S2 alone!) makes this clear.😵💫
2) TOP SPEED:
🟩 Sauber firmly on top.
🟧 McLaren had medium-high values;
lower for 🟥 Ferrari.
Low top speeds, so far, for 🟨 Racing Bulls and ⬜️ Haas.
1) BEST SECTORS:
🟧 NOR quickest in Sectors 2 and 3.
Where he wasn't (S1), a McL (PIA) was still on top.
🟥 LEC said that Ferrari was 'miles off', and the fact that they weren't competitive in any sector (and that he lost over 7 tents in S2 alone!) makes this clear.😵💫
2) TOP SPEED:
🟩 Sauber firmly on top.
🟧 McLaren had medium-high values;
lower for 🟥 Ferrari.
Low top speeds, so far, for 🟨 Racing Bulls and ⬜️ Haas.
❤7