Child Preying Services: Everything you need to know when CPS comes knocking

This video examines Child Protective Services' authority, explaining how government agencies operate as "clubs" with limited jurisdiction. It argues that constitutional rights, particularly parental rights under the First Amendment, supersede state authority, and demonstrates how individuals can legally challenge CPS interventions.

1. Introduction to Government Structure: Explains how government entities operate as "clubs" or jurisdictional bubbles, with federal authority superseding state authority, which supersedes local authority.

2. Constitutional Protection of Parental Rights: References the 1984 Roberts v. United States case establishing parent-child relationships as fundamental constitutional rights protected under the First Amendment.

3. Legal Test Requirements: Explains that fundamental rights can only be restricted through "strict scrutiny" requiring a "compelling state interest test" that must be conducted in federal, not state court.

4. Example Encounters: Shows footage of individuals refusing CPS entry without proper warrants, maintaining boundaries through doorbell cameras and verbal assertion of rights.

5. Judicial Authority Analysis: Details how judges using "discretionary tests" rather than strict scrutiny to remove children constitutes an "abuse of discretion" leading to multiple legal violations.

6. Historical Context: Discusses how Title IV-D legislation in the 1970s created financial incentives for states to pursue child support and custody cases, potentially corrupting family court decisions.

7. Natural Law Framework: Introduces concept of natural law as superior to statutory law, with rights derived from God/natural order rather than government.

8. Jurisdictional Challenges: Provides strategies for asserting private capacity and challenging CPS jurisdiction through formal documentation and verbal statements.

9. Remedy Processes: Outlines administrative remedies like formal notices, affidavits, and potential legal actions including special appearances in court without consenting to jurisdiction.

10. Community Response: Mentions the Shield of Souls assembly as a support system for those dealing with CPS and family court issues, offering education and resources.

link:
https://rumble.com/v6xydwq-child-preying-services.html

Decoding GITMO Lawfully - Unveiling controversial chronicles, this analysis scrutinizes claims of historical infiltrations and legal manipulations within the U.S., alleging deep-rooted financial and government ties. It critiques military and governmental operations as deceptive constructs and champions public consciousness of sovereign rights, encouraging peaceful assembly and independent legal action. It posits that genuine justice emerges from citizen-driven grand juries rather than state-controlled entities.

https://rumble.com/v6zgjew-gitmo-is-not-what-you-think.html

🎬Film: Kings of the Damned - Part 3 (Diddy/Epp Doc)

Prison Camps Masquerading as National Security Assets and distractions with central casting. The idea of internment facilities isn't merely speculative. Military documents reveal procedures surprisingly aligned with current situations. Are we facing endless surveillance under the guise of a national security state? We should question powerful entities like the UN's role in domestic affairs. Are their humanitarian efforts covers for darker goals? These centers don't resemble benevolent emergency sites. Instead, they're marked by barbed wire, guard towers, and armed oversight. This evidence blurs the line between aid and control. Are recent events merely power shifts? It's crucial to scrutinize institutional actions for transparency. Is peace a veil concealing hidden motives? What other pressures lurk beneath our democracy's surface? Exploring these ominous connections is essential which is why we bring you part 3.

https://rumble.com/v7037lm-kings-of-the-damned-part-3.html